Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 When it comes to cancer: While Dr. Young agrees with Simoncini's Sodium Bicarbonate treatment, they disagree totally on the nature of cancer. Young says that it is a wasting of tissue and Simoncini says that it is pleomorphic Candida . Simoncini's conclusion closely aligns with that of Royal Rife. Simoncini says that what we are seeing is the body's reaction to a invasive condition, not a wasting of tissue. In order to effectively cure the problem. the condition must be clearly understood. Young does not explain Why the body wastes, therefore his theory makes less sense... >Dr. Young also states, " bacteria, yeast/fungi, and mold are not the cause of a cancerous condition but are the result and the evidence of cells and tissues biologically transforming from a healthy state and to a unhealthy state. " Dr. Young astutely observed that, " over-acidification of the body leads to the development of chronic yeast and fungal outfections and ultimately a cancerous condition of the cells and tissues. " < >Fundamentally, cancer is a relatively simple over-acidic condition of the blood and then tissues that leads to an oxygen deficiency dis-ease. The use of sodium bicarbonate increases hydroxyl ions or oxygen that buffers dietary and/or metabolic acids preventing the rotting or fermentation of cells and tissues and thus prevents and/or reverses a cancerous condition.< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.