US Judge Rules Against Compulsory Vaccinations

[Guest guest]

US Judge Rules Against Compulsory Vaccinations

_http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-335421?ref=feeds%2Flatest_

(http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-335421?ref=feeds/latest)

 

 

30 years after compulsory vaccination became US Law:

 

 

US Court issues an injunction to stop it and to hold the the government

and drug companies responsible for reactions.

 

 

A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in

the United States District Court of New Jersey.

 

 

This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in

that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal

government as defendant.

 

 

When the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will stop the federal

government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu vaccine against

their will. It will also prevent a state or local government from forcibly

vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person who is not vaccinated from being

denied any services or constitutional rights.

 

 

Vawter’s filings included a Complaint, and several pages of evidentiary

Exhibits. Vawter’s legal papers have been written not only for filing in

federal court, but additionally so they can be looked at by activists around

the world for ideas on filing lawsuits in their own countries to help stop

forced vaccinations.

 

Vawter believes that as the truth of the dangers of flu vaccines continues

to become known, banning the forced use of them will eventually succeed on

a worldwide basis. He cautions people to avoid fear and keep themselves

focused on the task of blocking forced vaccination. Preliminary Injunction

will immediately halt mandatory vaccinations in the U.S.

 

 

The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read the

papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction that it

appears the federal government has engaged in some amount of negligence with

regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu vaccines

scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence submitted does warrant a

more thorough investigation into the safety of the flu vaccines.

 

 

The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from forcing any

person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person’

s free will and free choice. The government will not allow any state or

local government, or any party, to force any person to be required to take any

influenza vaccination against that person’s free will and free choice.

 

 

U.S. government sued for gross negligence and violation of the

Constitution

 

 

In his Cause of Action, Vawter charged that the federal government has

engaged in gross negligence by funding and promoting flu vaccines that are

proven to be dangerous and manufactured with little oversight. The vaccines

scheduled for use in late 2009 and 2010 contain heavy metals including

thimerosal mercury, which have been proven to cause autism in children with

lowered immune systems, and other dangerous and toxic ingredients.

 

 

The federal government has stated it will force these flu vaccines onto

the American public against their will, under a document signed by Health and

Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

 

 

He further charged that the vaccine makers stand to earn billions of

dollars selling vaccines, and are already spending tens of millions advertising

a “Phase 6 Pandemic†that the evidence shows does not really exist.

 

 

The federal government has not required the World Health Organization

(WHO) to show evidence of such a pandemic. There has been no collection of

facts, sworn testimony, witnesses being questioned, hearings being held, or lie

detector tests being given when preposterous statements have been made.

The WHO declared a massive “Phase 6 Influenza Pandemicâ€, even though only a

few hundred people worldwide had so far died of this swine flu virus, and

when far more people die each year of regular flu.

 

 

Vawter noted there is a preponderance of evidence to show that the federal

government so poorly trained its employees that they eagerly agreed with

the unsubstantiated claims of the WHO in the face of evidence to the

contrary.

 

 

Forced vaccination would violate the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution

by allowing the government to enter homes and force people to be

vaccinated, or to forcibly remove people to another location for vaccination.

 

 

It would also violate Fifth Amendment Constitutional rights by depriving

people of liberty without due process of law.

 

 

Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in gross negligence

by failing to properly investigate factual evidence submitted by esteemed

medical professions over many years which proves flu vaccines have caused

serious damage to people.

 

 

The CDC has stated that thimerosal mercury is being used in the new flu

vaccines being prepared.

 

 

The government has failed to investigate profiteering.. Billions of

dollars in vaccine sales can cause organizations to falsify threats so as to

cause unwarranted public hysteria leading to forced vaccinations.

 

 

The government is guilty of gross negligence because its employees failed

to properly investigate the release of a case of live swine flu virus. One

of the main companies the government deals with, Baxter Vaccines, was

apparently involved in the transporting of live bird flu virus that was released

on a public train earlier this year.

 

 

A lab technician with the Swiss National Center for Influenza in Geneva

had traveled to Zurich to collect eight ampoules, five of which were filled

with the H1N1 swine flu virus. However, failure of the dry ice in their

container allowed pressure to build up, and the ampoules exploded as the train

was pulling into a station.

 

 

The highly reputable UK newspaper “the Telegraph†reported on July 2nd

that flu vaccines tested on homeless people caused twenty-one of them to die.

 

 

Vawter charged there is a preponderance of evidence to show that

government will not provide people being vaccinated with a list of the vaccine

ingredients and possible negative side effects before they are vaccinated. Most

of the public will not know this flu vaccine contains thimerosal mercury.

 

 

Vawter submitted an Order to force the government to publish vaccine

ingredients and side effects, and to give this information to everyone who

takes

a flu vaccine, and do so at least 3 days prior to their vaccination. A

denial of this order would violate Plaintiff’s rights to demand the government

obey the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by requiring it to engage

in freedom of speech. The First Amendment not only allows a citizen to

have freedom of speech himself, but it allows a citizen to demand his

government engage in freedom of speech when it is promoting the use of such as

these vaccinations to the public.

 

 

The government proclamation stating a person cannot sue for any damages he

receives from the flu vaccine, completely bypasses the congress and the

court system in violation of the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution which

grants the right to sue to recover for damages.

 

 

Vawter submitted an Order to deem unconstitutional any proclamation, rule

or similar law that forbids people from suing for damages resulting from

the vaccines of 2009 and 2010.

 

 

 

Robert O. Young, Ph.D., D.Sc.

Founder of ‘THE NEW BIOLOGY’

Creator of the ‘SCIENCE OF ALKALINE LIVING’ for Health.