Guest guest Posted February 8, 2007 Report Share Posted February 8, 2007 Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:02:34 0800, " " <zrosenbe wrote: >>… the only issue raised by demonology is whether one feels that evils that effect consciousness arise from external malevolent forces, or from within oneself. Even what we call 'demons' can be malevolent influences from media, brainwashing, toxic people, or family dynamics, as much as disembodied entities 'floating in the ether'. Z'ev, " Demonology " is properly just what you say, a focus on the disembodied, etheric, or " numinous " , as Paul Unschuld puts it. This too, I believe, has been a continuous theme in the literature that the phenomena of possession, or somehow peculiar behavior (shen-disturbance) can be ascribed to ghostly entities, or also to rationale, albeit often metaphorical events, situations or relationships. I was just reading Donald Harper (MaWangDui) this evening, on how the existence of these spooky things (in people's beliefs) has been accepted by Chinese throughout the tradition. (Unschuld has made this point also.) But they (the authors we notice) tend a draw a line as to its permissible practical influence. Harper cites instances, in Han times, where people were taken to task (fired, banished, killed) when they tried to invoke ghostly matters in a way that impacted imperial authority or the social order (including, for instance, medical treatment). But he cites also instances where magical rituals were acceptably prescribed (maybe in a sort of where-all-else-failed scenario). What fascinates me is the possible relevance of their discussions of theory and application regardless of what they may have thought the cause was. I.e. whether their interpretations, understood metaphorically, can provide us with insight into things we are confronted with, such as habits, addictions, obsessions, negative experiences, etc. Jeffery's discussion on " possession " was framed like this; and similar ideas came up in his more recent workshop on PTSD (similar to what Stefan Chmelik also brought up earlier today). >> I still wonder if the 'demons treatment' is an accurate translation and/or transmission of Chinese concepts. Good point. I will ask Jeffery, next month, more specifically what terms people like Ge Hong, Chao YangFeng, or Sun SiMiao (or even contemporary Daoist practitioners) used. He did cite the term " jie zhu " (release and expel) for exorcism, noting that both terms were virtues or actions of the lungs. That was in a detailed discussion of Sun SiMiao's ghost points and their use, with differential diagnosis, in actual treatments. -- Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.30/674 - Release 2/7/2007 3:33 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.