Guest guest Posted October 28, 2006 Report Share Posted October 28, 2006 > Posted by: " Dr. Avery Jenkins " docaltmed mirapei2004 > Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:01 pm (PDT) > > Like it or not, the MD and DC degrees are significantly more extensive > than those required for acupuncture, in fact, over twice as long. > Between > 4500 and 5000 hours are required for MD or DC, which are terminal > degrees > comparable to the PhD, compared to the 1900 hours necessary for the > master's level acupuncture degrees. I strongly disagree with this statement. I don't know of any master's degree program in the US that is only 1900 hours. The accreditation commission requires significantly more than that to accredit a school. Most programs are approximately 3000 hours (or more), taking 3 to 4 years of rigorous full time graduate study to complete. Internships are strictly supervised. Comprehensive national board exams are long, expensive and difficult. Most students carry huge student loan debt upon completion. I don't know of any other master's level degree that takes this much time, money or effort to complete. To belittle the effort that most of us on this list have put toward our professional degree is, needless to say, somewhat insulting. 300 hours of acupuncture training is not enough to make anyone proficient in Asian medicine, just as 300 hours of chiropractic training, or western medical training will not make us proficient to 'do chiropractic' or to 'do western medicine'. I know a number of DCs who have gone through the entire TCM masters program and they would whole-heartedly agree. -judy -- Judy Lemieux, M.S., L.Ac. In Denver & Centennial, Colorado (303) 964-1996 http://www.QingTingAcupuncture.com Acupuncture Association of Colorado President http://www.acucol.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2006 Report Share Posted October 28, 2006 I would like to add my opinion which I feel is pretty much unbiased regarding this issue since I have been trained in both professions. I graduated from Los Angeles College of Chiropractic in 1990. A few years after this I started my education at SAMRA University of Oriental Medicine in Los Angeles and graduated in 2000. I always hear the same issue with chiro's regarding the hours that were required to graduate. For some reason they feel the increased hours of chiro education makes them qualified to do acupuncture. Having degrees in both professions, I can tell you this is nonsense, the educational process between both professions are like comparing oranges and apples. To be honest, chiropractic college was more difficult due to all the western medicine courses, although the majority of the education that was learned would soon be forgotten and was not education that you would necessarily use in practice, except the major information that was necessary to make a proper diagnosis, etc. I found my education at SAMRA was a much more difficult and different experience, lots of memorization and different strategies for treating patients which in itself is complicated if one wants to do a good job. As most of you know that everything that you learn in acupuncture/TCM school you can use in practice which seperates the 2 professions and after graduating most of us realize how much more there is to learn to be 100 percent competent due to the different areas of specialities. I have spoken with several MD's and DC's regarding their education thru the UCLA program or John Amaro's program and its pretty sad, yes they do get defensive especially when I ask them basic questions such as which points are contraindicated in pregnancy and they cannot tell you the majority of the points, or which points are more relevant for a frontal headache, temporal headache, occipital headache, etc. and they tell you LI-4 is the main point or they are not sure what to say. This in itself will determine the effectiveness of the treatment and clincal outcome. This is what seperates the professionals doing acupuncture and the clinical results that one achieve. As most of you are aware and from what I have seen, the clinical results vary greatly. This is like dismissing spinal manipulation/adjustment from being non-effective when being done by an acupuncturist, physical therapist, or MD because the clinical results were not that effective. I also know have several DC's that are mixers who feel that acupuncture is not in their scope of practice because of the demanding education and clinical training it takes to achive this. The chiro's are the first to yell and scream when another profession is trying to incorporate spinal manipulation without the adequate training. Both professions need to respect the other's training and education and not feel that because one has more hours in education this qualifies them to do the acupuncture. Just ask any other chiro what his opinion is who has also gone thru both educational programs, I can tell you their opinion will be pretty much as I have expressed. Brian N. Hardy Doctor of Chiropractic Licensed Acupuncturist Certified Clinical Nutritionist Master of Science in Oriental Medicine Diplomate of the American Clinical Board of Nutrition Chinese Medicine , acudoc11 wrote: > > > Action speaks louder than empty rhetoric. > > It is now illegal in Florida for a DC or an MD to call themselves > acupuncturist (medical acupuncturist) or anything similar. The DCs are prohibited from > calling themselves Certified Acupuncturists. Even those who banter around the > week-end-warrior 100 hr board certifications are now being cautioned by the > Department of Health. > > A DC who has a certification is only allowed to say that they USE > acupuncture and they had better make sure they inform the public in their > advertisements that they have NO license in acupuncture unless of course they completed > the full course of study and maintain a dual licensure. In lieu of the dual > licensure (if they mention acupuncture in their ads) the DC must state that they > are ONLY a Chiropractor. > > The community here in Florida is tired of this kind of mis- advertising and > defrauding of the public. The state has finally gotten serious about it. > Violate it and the DC or the MD will be hauled before their respective boards under > the Dept of Health for disciplinary action coupled with stiff fines and > substantial investigative fees. > > What DCs administer with the 100 hrs should be appropriately called > Chiro-Puncture whatever that might be. And what the MDs do without any training > should be called Medi-Puncture....but definitely neither are acupuncture. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.