Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 At 04:45 AM 5/13/08, you wrote: >Seizing control of water, >Posted by: " VoiceAnalysis " VoiceAnalysis soundstonedchick >Mon May 12, 2008 7:34 am (PDT) > > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >Siezing Water:The Water Restoration Act of 2007 > >The Water Restoration Act of 2007, along with others, gives the federal >government complete control over every waterway, river, stream, lake, >aquifer, creek, slew, swamp, underground spring and even the rain that >runs off your roof. Why? Well to better protect you from polluters and >to ensure water safety, and of course “national securityâ€. > >Here’s the real deal. Oil which has been deemed the worlds most >valuable commodity (remember that word) is quickly being replaced by >water. Water is the new “goldâ€. Under the Public Trust doctrine, the >government is prohibited from converting something such as water (a >human right…we can’t live without it) to a commodity. It mu a public >trust, meaning that it is so important to our survival that it >should never be subjected to markets, trading or private interests. In >other words, it should never be reclassified as a commodity. But this >Act lays the groundwork for removing from the Public Trust this basic >human right which is a necessity, and will facilitate it being >reclassified a “needed commodityâ€. Enter the multi-national >corporations. > >What is under way is the effort to classify water as a commodity and >not a right. All of this actually started with NAFTA and then CAFTA. >Both agreements, which are not enforceable as they are both >unconstitutional have been parts of a puzzle that until recently seemed >not to make any sense at all. Both are focused on giving multinational >corporations the right to lay claim to food production whether it is >agriculture or animal ranching, to force out family farms, to patent >their new “frankenseeds†and put the resulting GMO food on our grocery >shelves without labeling the foods as altered. > >The corporations can now sue the government (and have) if it acts in >any way to prevent it from making profits it believes it is entitled >to. This ability to sue for impaired profit making can be the result of >environmental regulations, of Federal laws which may prevent the >corporations from hiring illegal workers, or issues of eminent domain >in which an individuals’ land stands in the way of corporate >profiteering and the courts have not acted to protect the interests of >the corporation. The corporation then claims “trade illegal†provisions >of NAFTA and CAFTA and our federal laws and regulations are put aside, >along with property rights. > >All that was left to capture from the public was the water supply. >CAFTA goes a long way in establishing the privatization of water >supplies, including in-land navigated waters and the right to use and >access the water supplies. > >If the federal government is not able to gain total control of all >water from whatever source, it is highly unlikely that water can be >taken from the status of Public Trust and moved to one of a commodity, >which is exactly what the Water Restoration Act of 2007 will enable. > >If CAFTA protections and provisions for corporations and the provisions >within CAFTA that put the rights of investors above those of the >individual, or human rights, cannot come into play, it will be nearly >impossible to expose our water supply to global markets. CAFTA’s >primary aim is to protect and promote investors regardless of the cost >to individuals or communities. > >Water is not only a basic human right, but also a natural resource. >Inland states like Minnesota have Public Trust Laws (in addition to >federal doctrine) which maintain the use of waterways for drinking and >for recreation purposes. Every lake here has public water access due to >the Public Trust which everyone contributes to in one way or another. >No one can claim land at the bottom of a lake……its commonly one can claim >private ownership of lake fish stocks, or other natural >resources resulting from the lake’s existence. This applies to rivers >also, including the Mississippi which runs through the state. > >The Water Restoration Act of 2007 would federalize all inland and >coastal waters from any source. This act is needed to set the stage for >the privatization guaranteed to corporations under CAFTA and would >effectively convert the entire water supply from any source into a >commodity. > >As it is, any corporate agriculture business operating in any area is >allowed to bypass water treatment plants, sewage treatment and the >associated costs and to tap directly into underground aquifers even at >the cost of depleting the water supply to the surrounding communities. >GMO seeds, especially “traitor†seeds require as much as three times >the normal amount of water to activate and to grow, but any efforts to >limit use or regulate disposal even by monetary assessment have been >unsuccessful. The corporate rights now exceed that of the individual or >community. CAFTA clearly states repeatedly that “investor protections†>must be a priority. > >Using the NAFTA provisions, along with even more detrimental CAFTA >provisions, the World Bank along with the United Nations are active in >the effort to convert the worlds’ water supply into a commodity to be >controlled by private investors via global trade and investment >agreements. If these efforts are successful, water will no longer be a >community or individual right and resource necessary to maintain life, >but a globally traded commodity subject to markets and your ability to >pay. > >The World Trade organization in collusion with provisions of NAFTA, >have been instrumental in converting water into a tradable commodity >and as such subject to international trade policies which favor no one >but the giant corporations. In each instance of corporations attempting >to overturn domestic environmental laws or regulations, the laws have >been rendered null using the “trade illegal†provisions of both NAFTA >and CAFTA which declare that the right of the corporation cannot be >superseded or infringed upon by laws or regulations that hinder the >amount of profit they estimate can be attained. > >The World Bank already has established a system whereby credit or loans >will not be issued to Third World countries and even less stressed >countries, unless they agree to allow foreign investors access to >privatize the water supply. In Bolivia this resulted in mass >demonstrations that finally forced out a subsidiary of Bechtel that had >privatized the water supply, increased costs three-fold minimally, >dispensed with upkeep and left ¼ of the rural homes without access to >water. > >England has privatized their water system and costs rose 45% overnight, >all but skeleton crews remained of the maintenance sector and the >quality of water has dropped significantly. > >In one Canadian town several people became ill and one died from an >ecoli contamination in the water supply. This occurred after the supply >had been privatized, and the owner of the water supply knew of the >contamination. The public was never notified until after people became >ill. > >In March of 2000 at the Hague, a meeting occurred where water >executives stated that as long as water was coming out of the tap the >public had no right to any information as to how it got there….. Or quality. > >Here in the States, private investors have in some places succeeded in >taking over community water supplies, in other places the communities >have fought back against the sale of publicly held supplies realizing >that this most important element of human survival should never be >under the control of private corporations whose one and only duty is to >make a profit for investors. > >As water has historically been deemed a human right and necessity, so >much so that the Public Trust Doctrine was put on paper, how could >anyone in good conscience believe water is, or promote water as, a >tradable commodity? How can there be so many callous and greedy >individuals running around out there who would willingly see another >human thirst to death just so they can make a buck? Apparently there >are many. > >The Water Restoration Act 2007 relies heavily on promotion based on >protecting the water supply from pollution, from terrorists, and of >course “national securityâ€. The truth is it has nothing to do with any >of these things. The WRA will allow unfettered pollution with no >recourse for communities or individuals and “trade illegal†treatment >of local and state laws. Before the entire water supply can be sold off >to private interests the federal government must gain control of the >entire water system. This is what the WRA will do. > >This Act would be more aptly titled “The Water Confiscation Act†as >this is exactly what is intended. All it is set to do is to strike down >the Public Trust Doctrine and facilitate the conversion of water from a >basic human right into a commodity. The only threat to “national >security†here is from the government and the massive corporations who >are behind it. > >I guess we shouldn’t be surprised by any of this. After all, the >Security & Prosperity Partnership refers to people as “human capitalâ€. >I wonder how long it will be before they refer to us as a “needed >commodity†and trade and sell us on the global market. > >Control the food, control the water and you control the people. I >believe it was Henry Kissinger who first made this observation when >speaking about the importance of depopulation through the use of >eugenics. Obviously good old Henry realized that overtaking the food >and water supplies would go a long way in deciding who had a right to >life. ****** Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky http://www.thehavens.com/ thehavens 606-376-3363 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.