Guest guest Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009  You are right , the bacterial contamination L-tryptotophan was just an excuse the FDA needed to oppress our choice of natural supplements.You can still get it from a doctor with a prescription.  Instead of increasing quailty control in checking for contamination ,theFDA chosed to ban it with out a prescription.   There were more deaths from contaminated hamburg at Jack in the Box ;so why wasn't hamburg ban except with a prescription. --- On Wed, 5/13/09, bestsurprise2002 <bestsurprise2002 wrote: bestsurprise2002 <bestsurprise2002 << >> Toxic L-tryptophan: Shedding Light on a Mysterious Epidemic MCS-Canada Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 10:24 PM There are 8 chapters altogether, plus a section on Acknowledgments and another on Comments by Scientists and Others. On the left hand side of the webpages are links to all the chapters/sections. There are aslo several links in each chapter - I have not put in the urls so please go to the websites. I have wondered for years what happened to L-tryptophan. It seems it would be very helpful to many of those with pain, sleep difficulties, Fibromyalgia, and many other conditions. Well, I guess now I know........ ..except why is it still not available? or was this just an excuse for the FDA and Health Canada as they collaborate with Codex....... is this what the future holds for Canada and the USA? best wishes, Shan (http://www.papercut .biz/emailStripp er.htm) Toxic L-tryptophan: Shedding Light on a Mysterious Epidemic _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ index.cfm) by William E.Crist Preface by Jeffrey Smith _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ PrefacebyJeffrey Smith/index. cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ PrefacebyJeffrey Smith/index. cfm) In chapter 4 of my book Seeds of Deception, I present the story of a deadly epidemic in 1989 that was linked to an L-tryptophan food supplement produced by genetically engineered bacterium. Much of the material was based on the research of William Crist, whose work is reproduced here. Introduction: Was Genetic Engineering the Cause of Contaminated L-tryptophan and the EMS Epidemic? _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 1Introduction/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 1Introduction/ index.cfm) Knowing my long-standing interest in food purity issues, a friend in California suggested in 1996 that I look into the cause of the tragic eosinophilia- myalgia syndrome (EMS) epidemic that had struck seven years earlier. The outbreak was traced to consumption of L-tryptophan food supplements produced by a Japanese company using genetically engineered (GE) bacteria. Exactly what role biotechnology played in the contamination of the supplement was hotly debated. After thousands of hours of self-sponsored research, I believe I can shed some light on that issue. Background Information: The EMS Epidemic, Initial Research Studies and News of Biotech Link _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 2BackgroundInfor mation/index. cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 2BackgroundInfor mation/index. cfm) During the summer and autumn of 1989, an outbreak of a tragic and mysterious disease swept across the U.S. First scores, then hundreds of people fell seriously ill with a rare blood and muscle disorder. Doctors and hospital staffs were baffled by the unusual cluster of symptoms and were largely ineffective in treating the victims. The Pre-epidemic Cases: A Key to the EMS Puzzle? _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 3Pre-epidemicCas es-KeytoEMSPuzzl e/index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 3Pre-epidemicCas es-KeytoEMS Puzzle/index. cfm) **The existence of cases prior to those that constituted the great bulk of the epidemic is one of the most peculiar and interesting aspects of the EMS outbreak.** — Edwin M. Kilbourne,1 epidemiologist, Center for Disease Control For more than a decade now, researchers have been puzzled by cases of EMS that occurred for several years prior to the epidemic. Where Did the Contaminants Come From? _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 4WhereDidtheCont aminant sComeFrom/index. cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 4WhereDidtheCont aminantsComeFrom /index.cfm) **Although the [20kg/batch] powdered carbon may have contributed to the removal of the etiological [causal] agent, it does not explain how the agent was introduced into the product.** —Edward Belongia, M.D., et al., The New England Journal of Medicine 1 It*s been more than a decade since Belongia and his colleagues raised this salient point about what created the contaminants that caused EMS. Surprisingly, few researchers have addressed it. Problems with Identifying and Testing for Trace Contaminants _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 5ProblemswithIde ntificationTesti ng/in dex.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 5ProblemswithIde ntificationTesti ng/index. cfm) **I must emphasize that the presence of the contaminants in the [showa Denko] L-tryptophan is astonishingly small and so you require very sophisticated instrumentation and a lot of hard work to even come close to determining the structures.* * — Stephen Naylor, Mayo Clinic1 Government Agencies Disagree on Cause of EMS _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 6GovtAgenciesDis agreeonEMSCause/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 6GovtAgenciesDis agreeonEMSCause/ i ndex.cfm) The FDA*s finding that control L-tryptophan itself was a contributing factor to the syndrome is surprising, because it is inconsistent with the epidemiological evidence linking production lots of implicated L-TRP to cases of EMS. Earlier studies by leading researchers, including those at the Center for Disease Control (CDC), clearly suggested that L-tryptophan itself was not responsible for EMS and that the disease was caused by contaminant( s) in a single manufacturer’s L-TRP.1-3 Unanswered Letters to Government Officials _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 7UnansweredLette rstoGovtOf ficials/index. cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 7UnansweredLette rstoGovtOfficial s/index.cfm) This section includes three letters sent to government regulatory authorities and researchers concerning: (1) key information and/or data that appears to have been concealed from the public regarding L-tryptophan and the EMS epidemic, and (2) discrepancies in the interpretation of research data and in the procurement of samples of Showa Denko's (SDK) genetically engineered strains of bacteria. After several months, and now years, no one from either the National Centers for Disease Control or the Food and Drug Administration has answered several key, material questions. Conclusion: Who’s Responsible? _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 8ConclusionWhosR esponsib le/index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 8ConclusionWhosR esponsible/ index.cfm) What created the biologically potent trace contaminants in Showa Denko L-tryptophan that inflicted a seriously debilitating disease at such low dosages of a food supplement? Researchers still do not know. Some, like Gleich and Maryanski, have stated that genetic engineering can’t be ruled out as a causal factor, though they favor other scenarios, usually the manufacturer’s inadequate purification system. Acknowledgments _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ Acknowledgments/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ Acknowledgments/ index.cfm) Addendum: Comments by Scientists and Other Professionals _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ CommentsbyScient istsandOthers/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ CommentsbyScient istsandOthers/ index.cfm) (http://www.papercut .biz/emailStripp er.htm) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 L-tryptophan can be purchased on line from most supplement dealers. It was released about 2 years ago in the USA. 5-htp makes L-tryptophan in your system. Some people favor 5-htp, I like L-tryptophan it works better for me. I also take Vinpocetine and alpha-GPC, they help with sleep, pain, stress and depression - works for me. There was a bad form of L-tryptophan made in Japan that was contaminated with an additive and several people died when it was band. I never buy off brands of my supplements and I research extensively before I buy anything new - it's all there on the net. Bless, >^..^< Delene - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _____ You are right , the bacterial contamination L-tryptotophan was just an excuse the FDA needed to oppress our choice of natural supplements.You can still get it from a doctor with a prescription. Instead of increasing quailty control in checking for contamination ,theFDA chosed to ban it with out a prescription. There were more deaths from contaminated hamburg at Jack in the Box ;so why wasn't hamburg ban except with a prescription. --- On Wed, 5/13/09, bestsurprise2002@ <bestsurprise2002%40> <bestsurprise2002@ <bestsurprise2002%40> > wrote: bestsurprise2002@ <bestsurprise2002%40> <bestsurprise2002@ <bestsurprise2002%40> > << >> Toxic L-tryptophan: Shedding Light on a Mysterious Epidemic MCS-Canada@gro <MCS-Canada%40> ups.com Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 10:24 PM There are 8 chapters altogether, plus a section on Acknowledgments and another on Comments by Scientists and Others. On the left hand side of the webpages are links to all the chapters/sections. There are aslo several links in each chapter - I have not put in the urls so please go to the websites. I have wondered for years what happened to L-tryptophan. It seems it would be very helpful to many of those with pain, sleep difficulties, Fibromyalgia, and many other conditions. Well, I guess now I know........ ..except why is it still not available? or was this just an excuse for the FDA and Health Canada as they collaborate with Codex....... is this what the future holds for Canada and the USA? best wishes, Shan (http://www.papercut .biz/emailStripp er.htm) Toxic L-tryptophan: Shedding Light on a Mysterious Epidemic _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ index.cfm) by William E.Crist Preface by Jeffrey Smith _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ PrefacebyJeffrey Smith/index. cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ PrefacebyJeffrey Smith/index. cfm) In chapter 4 of my book Seeds of Deception, I present the story of a deadly epidemic in 1989 that was linked to an L-tryptophan food supplement produced by genetically engineered bacterium. Much of the material was based on the research of William Crist, whose work is reproduced here. Introduction: Was Genetic Engineering the Cause of Contaminated L-tryptophan and the EMS Epidemic? _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 1Introduction/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 1Introduction/ index.cfm) Knowing my long-standing interest in food purity issues, a friend in California suggested in 1996 that I look into the cause of the tragic eosinophilia- myalgia syndrome (EMS) epidemic that had struck seven years earlier. The outbreak was traced to consumption of L-tryptophan food supplements produced by a Japanese company using genetically engineered (GE) bacteria. Exactly what role biotechnology played in the contamination of the supplement was hotly debated. After thousands of hours of self-sponsored research, I believe I can shed some light on that issue. Background Information: The EMS Epidemic, Initial Research Studies and News of Biotech Link _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 2BackgroundInfor mation/index. cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 2BackgroundInfor mation/index. cfm) During the summer and autumn of 1989, an outbreak of a tragic and mysterious disease swept across the U.S. First scores, then hundreds of people fell seriously ill with a rare blood and muscle disorder. Doctors and hospital staffs were baffled by the unusual cluster of symptoms and were largely ineffective in treating the victims. The Pre-epidemic Cases: A Key to the EMS Puzzle? _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 3Pre-epidemicCas es-KeytoEMSPuzzl e/index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 3Pre-epidemicCas es-KeytoEMS Puzzle/index. cfm) **The existence of cases prior to those that constituted the great bulk of the epidemic is one of the most peculiar and interesting aspects of the EMS outbreak.** - Edwin M. Kilbourne,1 epidemiologist, Center for Disease Control For more than a decade now, researchers have been puzzled by cases of EMS that occurred for several years prior to the epidemic. Where Did the Contaminants Come From? _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 4WhereDidtheCont aminant sComeFrom/index. cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 4WhereDidtheCont aminantsComeFrom /index.cfm) **Although the [20kg/batch] powdered carbon may have contributed to the removal of the etiological [causal] agent, it does not explain how the agent was introduced into the product.** -Edward Belongia, M.D., et al., The New England Journal of Medicine 1 It*s been more than a decade since Belongia and his colleagues raised this salient point about what created the contaminants that caused EMS. Surprisingly, few researchers have addressed it. Problems with Identifying and Testing for Trace Contaminants _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 5ProblemswithIde ntificationTesti ng/in dex.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 5ProblemswithIde ntificationTesti ng/index. cfm) **I must emphasize that the presence of the contaminants in the [showa Denko] L-tryptophan is astonishingly small and so you require very sophisticated instrumentation and a lot of hard work to even come close to determining the structures.* * - Stephen Naylor, Mayo Clinic1 Government Agencies Disagree on Cause of EMS _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 6GovtAgenciesDis agreeonEMSCause/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 6GovtAgenciesDis agreeonEMSCause/ i ndex.cfm) The FDA*s finding that control L-tryptophan itself was a contributing factor to the syndrome is surprising, because it is inconsistent with the epidemiological evidence linking production lots of implicated L-TRP to cases of EMS. Earlier studies by leading researchers, including those at the Center for Disease Control (CDC), clearly suggested that L-tryptophan itself was not responsible for EMS and that the disease was caused by contaminant( s) in a single manufacturer's L-TRP.1-3 Unanswered Letters to Government Officials _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 7UnansweredLette rstoGovtOf ficials/index. cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 7UnansweredLette rstoGovtOfficial s/index.cfm) This section includes three letters sent to government regulatory authorities and researchers concerning: (1) key information and/or data that appears to have been concealed from the public regarding L-tryptophan and the EMS epidemic, and (2) discrepancies in the interpretation of research data and in the procurement of samples of Showa Denko's (SDK) genetically engineered strains of bacteria. After several months, and now years, no one from either the National Centers for Disease Control or the Food and Drug Administration has answered several key, material questions. Conclusion: Who's Responsible? _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 8ConclusionWhosR esponsib le/index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ 8ConclusionWhosR esponsible/ index.cfm) What created the biologically potent trace contaminants in Showa Denko L-tryptophan that inflicted a seriously debilitating disease at such low dosages of a food supplement? Researchers still do not know. Some, like Gleich and Maryanski, have stated that genetic engineering can't be ruled out as a causal factor, though they favor other scenarios, usually the manufacturer's inadequate purification system. Acknowledgments _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ Acknowledgments/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ Acknowledgments/ index.cfm) Addendum: Comments by Scientists and Other Professionals _http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ CommentsbyScient istsandOthers/ index.cfm_ (http://www.seedsofd eception. com/Public/ L-tryptophan/ CommentsbyScient istsandOthers/ index.cfm) (http://www.papercut .biz/emailStripp er.htm) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2009 Report Share Posted October 4, 2009 See snippets below from the article below on Life Extension Foundation. Go to URL for full story. I just came upon it today & had sent it to another list. BTW, I get my daily dose of Tryptophan from drinking two doses of whey protein isolate every day. Alobar ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The FDA Ban of L-Tryptophan: Politics, Profits and Prozac © Posted on LEF April 6 1998 By: Dean Wolfe Manders, Ph.D. This article first appeared in " Social Policy " , Vol. 26, No. 2 Winter 1995. Dr. Manders has lectured and done extensive research on the medical politics of L-Tryptophan. The article also appeared in " Blazing Tattles " June 1996. In the fall of 1989, the FDA recalled L-Tryptophan, an amino acid nutritional supplement, stating that it caused a rare and deadly flu-like condition (Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome / EMS). On March 22, 1990, the FDA banned the public sale dietary of L-Tryptophan completely. This ban continues today. On March 26, 1990, " Newsweek " featured a lead article praising the virtues of the anti-depressant drug Prozac. Its multi-color cover displayed a floating, gigantic green and white capsule of Prozac with the caption: " Prozac: A Breakthrough drug for Depression. " The fact that the FDA ban of L-Tryptophan and the Newsweek Prozac cover story occurred within four days of each other went unnoticed by both the media and the public. Yet, to those who understand the effective properties of L- Tryptophan and Prozac, the concurrence seems " unbelievably coincidental. " The link here is the brain neurotransmitter serotonin---a biochemical nerve signal conductor. The action of Prozac and L-Tryptophan are both involved with serotonin, but in totally different ways. Elevated levels of serotonin in the body often result in the relief of depression, as well as substantial reduction in pain sensitivity, anxiety and stress. Prozac, as well as other new anti-depressant drugs such as Paxil and Zoloft, attempt to enhance levels of serotonin by working on whatever amounts of it already exists in the body (these drugs are known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors). None of these drugs, however produce serotonin. In contrast, ingested L-Tryptophan acts to produce serotonin, even in individuals who generate little serotonin of their own. The most effective way to elevate serotonin would be to use a serotonin producer rather than a serotonin enhancer. The continuing FDA public ban of L-Tryptophan prevents popular access to this most effective serotonin producer. The millions of Americans who for decades safely have relied upon L-Tryptophan to relieve depression, anxiety and PMS, as well as to control pain and induce natural sleep, have been forced elsewhere for solutions. Routinely, such solutions are pharmaceutical in nature: people are forced to use either often highly addictive, expensive, and sometimes dangerous drugs like Xanax, Valium, Halcion, Dalmane, Codeine, Anafranil, Prozac, and others, or simply suffer. Present FDA public policy maintains that L-Tryptophan is an untested, unapproved and hazardous drug. The analytical work done a few years ago by the Centers for Disease Control and the Mayo Clinic, research which traced the fall of the serious flu-like condition to contaminants found in batches of L-Tryptophan made by the Japanese company Showa Denko, has not convinced the FDA to allow L-Tryptophan back on the market. This decision is based primarily on the research of FDA and NIMH scientists who state that L- Tryptophan itself, irrespective of contaminants, is a dangerous substance. Other university-based research scientists disagree with these findings. The public availability of L-Tryptophan is too important an issue only to be argued and shrouded within scientific debate that remains, ultimately, mystifying to the vast majority of Americans. There are many obvious facts worthy of public attention, and concern. For example, consider the following: On February 9, 1993, a United States government patent (#5185157) was issued to use L-Tryptophan to treat, and cure EMS, the very same deadly flu-like condition which prompted the FDA to take L-Tryptophan off the market in 1989. Notwithstanding its public ban and import alert on L-Tryptophan, the FDA today allows Ajinomoto U.S.A. the right to import from Japan human-use L- Tryptophan. Distributed from the Ajinomoto in Raleigh, North Carolina, the L- Tryptophan is then sold to, and through, a network of compounding pharmacies across the United States. Purchased by individuals only under a physician's order, L-Tryptophan emerges here as a new prescription drug in the serotonin marketplace; one hundred 500 mg. capsules cost about $75.00, approximately five times more than if they were sold as a dietary supplement. Since the FDA holds the political mandate and power of a public regulatory agency established ostensibly, to protect people from raw corporate interests in drug production and distribution, the actions of the FDA in concert with Ajinomoto U.S.A. are illuminating. By publicly banning L-Tryptophan from its dietary supplement status and price, while allowing L-Tryptophan to be sold as a high-priced prescription drug, the naked duplicity of the FDA L-Tryptophan policy is revealed. During and after the 1989 EMS outbreak, the FDA did not totally ban the use of L- Tryptophan in humans---then, as today, the FDA has granted the pharmaceutical industry the protected right to use L-Tryptophan in hospital settings. Manufactured by Abbott Laboratories, the amino acid injectable solutions Aminosyn and Aminosyn II contain as much as 200 mg. of L-Tryptophan. (Moreover, L-Tryptophan has never been removed from baby food produced and sold within the United States.) While the FDA has banned the public sale and use of safe, non-contaminated, dietary supplements L-Tryptophan for people, the United States Department of Agriculture still sanctions the legal sale and use of non-contaminated L-Tryptophan for animals. Today, as in the past, feed grade L-Tryptophan continues to be used as a nutritional and bulk feed additive by the commercial hog and chicken farming industry. Additionally, L- Tryptophan is now available for use by veterinarians in caring for horses and pets. Outside of the United States, in countries such as Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, England, and others, L-Tryptophan is widely used. Nowhere, have any serious or widespread health problems have occurred. At bottom, the FDA public ban of safe, non-contaminated L-Tryptophan is uneven, expensive, and biased in favor of the pharmaceutical industry. The FDA proscription effectively awards billions of dollars in profits to pharmaceutical companies and their suppliers in the same proportion as it adds billions of unnecessary dollars to the nation's already bloated health care expenditures. On June 15, 1993, the FDA Dietary Supplement Task Force published a report on the work it had been doing in the area of developing FDA policy around nutritional supplements. On page two, the report admits, " The Task Force considered various issues in its deliberations, including ... what steps are necessary to ensure that the existence of dietary supplements on the market does not act as a disincentive for drug development. " In this case, the FDA has succeeded in carrying out its stated policy goal. With competition from publicly available L-Tryptophan removed, the rapidly expanding market in prescription serotonin drugs---now among them L-Tryptophan itself---contains no major " disincentives " for the massive accumulation of pharmaceutical industry profits. It is now time for appropriate congressional committees to review openly and aggressively the entire matter of L-Tryptophan. This will provide a needed forum where political, corporate, and scientific issues of the FDA L- Tryptophan regulatory policy may be addressed. There exists ample precedent for such hearings: in the 1980's and early 1990's, for example, such investigations uncovered favoritism in the approval of generic drugs and the bribery of FDA officials. The story of L-Tryptophan illustrates a sad perverse picture of the politics and priorities of public health in America: A safe, dietary-supplement serotonin producer is publicly unavailable to people, while daily fed to animals by corporate agribusiness. A patent is approved to use L-Tryptophan to cure the very condition the FDA claims it caused. And, while publicly exclaiming that L-Tryptophan is a dangerous and untested drug, the FDA more quietly, allows human-use L-Tryptophan to be imported, and then marketed and sold by the pharmaceutical industry. To allow the FDA ban of L-Tryptophan to continue unreviewed and univestigated condemns millions of Americans to unnecessary financial expenditures and needless suffering. http://www.lef.org/fda/fdaban95.html +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:24 PM, <bestsurprise2002 wrote: > There are 8 chapters altogether, plus a section on Acknowledgments and > another on Comments by Scientists and Others. On the left hand side of the > webpages are links to all the chapters/sections. There are aslo several links > in each chapter - I have not put in the urls so please go to the websites. > > I have wondered for years what happened to L-tryptophan. It seems it would > be very helpful to many of those with pain, sleep difficulties, > Fibromyalgia, and many other conditions. Well, I guess now I know.........except why > is it still not available? or was this just an excuse for the FDA and > Health Canada as they collaborate with Codex.......is this what the future holds > for Canada and the USA? best wishes, Shan > (http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm) > > Toxic L-tryptophan: Shedding Light on a Mysterious Epidemic > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/index.cfm) > by William E.Crist > > Preface by Jeffrey Smith > > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/PrefacebyJeffreySmith/index\ ..cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/PrefacebyJeffreySmith/index\ ..cfm) In > chapter 4 of my book Seeds of Deception, I present the story of a deadly > epidemic in 1989 that was linked to an L-tryptophan food supplement produced by > genetically engineered bacterium. Much of the material was based on the > research of William Crist, whose work is reproduced here. > > Introduction: Was Genetic Engineering the Cause of Contaminated > L-tryptophan and the EMS Epidemic? > > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/1Introduction/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/1Introduction/index.cfm) Knowing my long-standing interest in food > purity issues, a friend in California suggested in 1996 that I look into the > cause of the tragic eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome (EMS) epidemic that had > struck seven years earlier. The outbreak was traced to consumption of > L-tryptophan food supplements produced by a Japanese company using genetically > engineered (GE) bacteria. Exactly what role biotechnology played in the > contamination of the supplement was hotly debated. After thousands of hours of > self-sponsored research, I believe I can shed some light on that issue. > > Background Information: The EMS Epidemic, Initial Research Studies and > News of Biotech Link > > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/2BackgroundInformation/inde\ x.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/2BackgroundInformation/inde\ x.cfm) > During the summer > and autumn of 1989, an outbreak of a tragic and mysterious disease swept > across the U.S. First scores, then hundreds of people fell seriously ill with > a rare blood and muscle disorder. Doctors and hospital staffs were baffled > by the unusual cluster of symptoms and were largely ineffective in > treating the victims. > > The Pre-epidemic Cases: A Key to the EMS Puzzle? > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/3Pre-epidemicCases-KeytoEMS\ Puzzle/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/3Pre-epidemicCases-KeytoEMS > Puzzle/index.cfm) > **The existence of cases > prior to those that constituted the great bulk of the epidemic is one of the > most peculiar and interesting aspects of the EMS outbreak.** > — Edwin M. Kilbourne,1 epidemiologist, Center for Disease > Control > For more than a decade now, researchers have been puzzled by cases of EMS > that occurred for several years prior to the epidemic. > > Where Did the Contaminants Come From? > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/4WhereDidtheContaminant > sComeFrom/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/4WhereDidtheContaminantsCom\ eFrom/index.cfm) > **Although the [20kg/batch] powdered carbon may have contributed to the > removal of the etiological [causal] agent, it does not explain how the agent > was introduced into the product.** > —Edward Belongia, M.D., et al., The New England Journal of Medicine 1 > It*s been more than a decade since Belongia and his colleagues raised this > salient point about what created the contaminants that caused EMS. > Surprisingly, few researchers have addressed it. > > Problems with Identifying and Testing for Trace Contaminants > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/5ProblemswithIdentification\ Testing/in > dex.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/5ProblemswithIdentification\ Testing/index.cfm) > **I must emphasize that the presence of the contaminants > in the [showa Denko] L-tryptophan is astonishingly small and so you require > very sophisticated instrumentation and a lot of hard work to even come > close to determining the structures.** — > Stephen Naylor, Mayo Clinic1 > > Government Agencies Disagree on Cause of EMS > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/6GovtAgenciesDisagreeonEMSC\ ause/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/6GovtAgenciesDisagreeonEMSC\ ause/i > ndex.cfm) The FDA*s > finding that control L-tryptophan itself was a contributing factor to the > syndrome is surprising, because it is inconsistent with the epidemiological > evidence linking production lots of implicated L-TRP to cases of EMS. Earlier > studies by leading researchers, including those at the Center for Disease > Control (CDC), clearly suggested that L-tryptophan itself was not responsible > for EMS and that the disease was caused by contaminant(s) in a single > manufacturer’s L-TRP.1-3 > > Unanswered Letters to Government Officials > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/7UnansweredLetterstoGovtOf > ficials/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/7UnansweredLetterstoGovtOff\ icials/index.cfm) > This section includes three letters sent to > government regulatory authorities and researchers concerning: > (1) key information and/or data that appears to have been concealed from > the public regarding L-tryptophan and the EMS epidemic, and > (2) discrepancies in the interpretation of research data and in the > procurement of samples of Showa Denko's (SDK) genetically engineered strains of > bacteria. After several months, and now years, no one from either the > National Centers for Disease Control or the Food and Drug Administration has > answered several key, material questions. > > Conclusion: Who’s Responsible? > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/8ConclusionWhosResponsib > le/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/8ConclusionWhosResponsible/\ index.cfm) > What created the biologically potent trace > contaminants in Showa Denko L-tryptophan that inflicted a seriously debilitating > disease at such low dosages of a food supplement? > Researchers still do not know. Some, like Gleich and Maryanski, have > stated that genetic engineering can’t be ruled out as a causal factor, though > they favor other scenarios, usually the manufacturer’s inadequate > purification system. > > Acknowledgments > > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/Acknowledgments/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/Acknowledgments/index.cfm) > Addendum: Comments by Scientists and Other Professionals > > _http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/CommentsbyScientistsandOthe\ rs/index.cfm_ > (http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/CommentsbyScientistsandOthe\ rs/index.cfm) > (http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2009 Report Share Posted October 4, 2009 The " contaminated " tryptophan came from GM bacteria used to make the tryptophan. See snippets below. URL at end. Alobar ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ GM Tryptophan- EMS-Killed 37 and Permanently Disabled 1500 People The tryptophan disaster in the end of the 1980’s and beginning of 1990’s killed 37 and permanently disabled 1,500 people in the United States in a disease called eosonophil myalgia syndrome (EMS). It was caused by one or more extremely poisonous substances present in a tryptophan food supplement, which was produced by genetically engineered bacteria at the Japanese firm Showa Denko. Showa Denko destroyed the evidence that could have been used to determine the scientific cause of the problem. They destroyed the genetically engineered bacterial stocks, along with any potentially surviving specks that investigators might have recovered from the walls or the equipment in their facilities. Was the poison created by the bacteria? * The biotech corporations stressed that eosonophil myalgia syndrome (EMS) appeared after Showa Denko had changed the production method, reducing the coal content in a carbon filter in December 1988. It was maintained that this probably had reduced the protection against chemical impurities appearing in the production process (without any explanation how they could appear). The filter story was widely disseminated to the press worldwide as the cause of the epidemic. But the attorney William Crist has demonstrated that this argument was totally untenable, because he found that hundreds of cases of eosonophil myalgia syndrome (EMS) occurred before reduced filtration was introduced. * Tryptophan has been produced by a large number of other producers using natural bacteria (not genetically engineered) without any similar complication in any case. They have been using the same manufacturing methods, which are standard for this kind of production. This makes it very unikely that impurities from the production system were the culprit. This is also what the technicians at Showa Denko argued themselves. In addition, there is no reasonable explanation how a highly toxic chemical could appear “out of the air” and this has never occurred before in this kind of production. Tens of thousands of similar manufacturing units have been producing millions of tons of medical substances (penicillin being the most famous), since more than fifty years without the appearance of any unwanted highly toxic chemical impurity in any case. This fact is in itself very strong evidence in favour of the alternative that it was the bacteria that caused the emergence of the poison and nothing else. Only someone (like a lawyer of the biotech industry) who is completely ignorant of this fact could even think of suggesting something else. Could GE have caused the appearance of the poison? * Unexpected appearance of poisons has been predicted by molecular biologists because of the way genetic engineering can disturb normal cellular functioning. * Unexpected appearance of poisons has occurred in reality as predicted in other cases. * The risk for unexpected complications is greater the larger number of genes that are inserted because it brings about a greater instability in the genetic control of metabolic processes. In this case, the bacterium had not undergone just one genetic modification but FOUR different foreign genes had been introduced. * The risk was especially great for disturbance of the natural metabolic processes in this case and consequent appearance of unexpected substances, because all the genes were directed at modifying the same cellular “production line” (for producing tryptophan). * The most suspect impurity, “EBT” was closely similar to tryptophan. It was the kind of substance that could appear due to genetic engineering. But when reports came in about EBT, soon a contradictory report appeared that indicated, absurdly enough, that even tryptophan, a natural non-toxic substance in the body, could produce EMS-like symptoms. This confusing finding was not surprising, rather it was predictable. As billion-dollar biotech interests were threatened, the corporations had every reason to do whatever possible to confuse the issue. If EBT would have been proven to be the cause of eosonophil myalgia syndrome (EMS), it would have been evident that Genetic Engineering was indeed the reason for the disaster. This would have made it psychologically impossible to launch GMO foods on the market without very expensive (billion dollar) testing which would have wrecked the entire GE food project. Facing this threat, it is very likely that the corporations “encouraged” the fabrication of research reports that confused the issue (this would not have been the first time science was misused in a fraudulent way). Moreover, later research has, as could be expected, not been able to confirm that tryptophan itself is harmful and the US food agency, FDA, now allows bacterially produced tryptophan to be used even in baby food. Conclusion For the above reasons it is highly likely that it was genetic engineering that caused a metabolic disturbance in the tryptophan-producing bacteria, resulting in the production of the deadly eosonophil myalgia syndrome (EMS) poison. More on this subject: # by William E. Crist: Toxic L-tryptophan: Shedding Light on a Mysterious Epidemic # by Professor Philip J. Regal, PhD, University of Minnesota: Deaths and Cripplings from Genetically Engineered L-tryptophan All GMO foods must be withdrawn from the market This is not the only case where an unexpected poison has appeared, and as the present safety testing methods are superficial and highly insufficient, it is only a matter of time before another unexpected substance occurs in a Genetically Modified food which in the worst case will harm millions of people before the connection is even discovered. No genetically modified food is even labeled in the United States, and most of the food on the supermarket shelves today are indeed genetically modified – over 70%. The consequence of this is that all GE foods must be withdrawn and subjected to careful and extensive safety testing. There is no independent research of any genetically modified food item prior to it reaching the supermarket shelves; prior to your family consuming them. If, for some ethically unacceptable reason, this is not immediately done, at least the Genetically Engineered foods must be immediately labeled in order to provide families a choice to avoid them. Presently the only way to do so in countries, including the United States, where they are not labeled, is to eat only certified organically grown food. http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/gm-tryptophan-ems-kill\ ed-37-and-permanently-disabled-1500-people/ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Delene <aftech wrote: > L-tryptophan can be purchased on line from most supplement dealers. It was > released about 2 years ago in the USA. 5-htp makes L-tryptophan in your > system. Some people favor 5-htp, I like L-tryptophan it works better for me. > I also take Vinpocetine and alpha-GPC, they help with sleep, pain, stress > and depression - works for me. > > > > There was a bad form of L-tryptophan made in Japan that was contaminated > with an additive and several people died when it was band. I never buy off > brands of my supplements and I research extensively before I buy anything > new - it's all there on the net. > > > > Bless, > > > >>^..^< Delene > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.