Electrical and Frequency Effects on Pathogens

[Guest guest]

Electrical and Frequency Effects on Pathogens

_http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioelectronics/IntroductiontoBioelectronics

/ElectricalandFrequencyEffectsonPathogens.htm_

(http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioelectronics/IntroductiontoBioelectronics/Ele\

ctricalandFrequencyEffect

sonPathogens.htm)

In the early 1900s, Royal Rife discovered that certain lower life forms

could be " devitalized " by subjecting them to certain frequencies produced by

an electrical apparatus. He used a combination of AC and DC power to do so.

He used a powerful dark field microscope, another device he perfected,

which allowed him to watch the effects of his frequency generator on live

viruses, bacteria, paramecium, and other potential pathogens. He watched as

they were devitalized in a number of ways, either losing their motility,

pleomorphing into a different (and hopefully nonpathogenic) form, or actually

bursting. Unfortunately, most of his work and the exact design of his

frequency generator were lost. This story is detailed in a book called _The

Cancer

Cure that Worked_

(http://www.amazon.com/dp/0919951309?tag=eregimens-20 & camp=14573 & creative=327641\

& linkCode=as1 & creativeASIN=0919951309 & adid=0AWX0B45ZAV

P9680YHW2 & ) by Barry Lynes.

In a small clinical study during Rife*s time, his frequency generator

reportedly had a 100% cure rate for the types of cancers that were investigated

- sarcomas and carcinomas. He also had a perfect cure rate for other

serious diseases of the time, like tuberculosis. The tale of how this work was

almost lost to mankind due to fledgling pharmaceutical companies and the AMA

is a story for the conspiracy theorists.

Rife*s dark field microscope was also an innovation far ahead of its time.

It allowed him to view even the tiniest viruses while they were still

alive by staining them with light, unlike today*s electron microscopes for

which the sample must be **fixed** which kills the pathogen being viewed. With

this microscope, he saw and reported instances of pleomorphism, which is

when an organism mutates, as when a bacterium mutates to a fungal-type

lifeform. This was also reported by Bechamps, another early microscopy pioneer,

but is still considered anathema to the conventional medical establishment,

even though alternative modern researchers working with dark field

microscopes have clear proof that it occurs and are willing to show anyone who

cares to look.

The exploration of this phenomenon and that of frequency and other

electrical effects on pathogens will likely one day be common. However, there

is

little profit, and hence motivation, for large corporations to research

electrical modalities to treat disease, especially with devices that one can

build oneself. This is not to mention the political and legal pressure that

comes from government agencies pressured by organizations that have the most

to lose from the development of such treatments, like pharmaceutical

companies, which may be a much larger factor. It will only come about when so

many people know about this treatment, use it, and are more successful using

it than with conventional modalities that it may become the preferred

method to treat some diseases due to cost, safety, and efficacy. Eventually,

doctors will have to lobby the AMA and FDA to allow them to use these devices

to better perform their services without fear of persecution and

prosecution. With the entrenched medical bureaucracy in the United States and

other

countries, however, this may take a century or more.

In the meantime, people will perform their own bit and piece research for

diseases that conventional medicine has little luck in treating

successfully. Luckily, due to the internet, this can occur at a much faster

rate as

people the world over share results. Plus, in many developing countries there

is not yet political pressure hampering this research, which could speed

results.

Another factor that may accelerate progress in this field is the vast

amount of commercial applications that exist for this technology which are

outside the government-protected field of internal medicine. There is a (rather

expensive) **pimple zapper** which uses a single sharp electrode in one

hand (and the box in the other) advertised which claims to locally kill

bacteria which can cause eruptions. A salmonella detector was once developed

for

egg processing lines which stimulates eggs with audio waves and listens

for salmonella resonance. Other potentially profitable applications are as a

safe pesticide in homes (and perhaps farms) and as a disinfectant.

Since the early 1990s, James Bare has been working to recreate Rife's

work, and has a book and video showing how to build a generator which

approximates Rife*s. His video shows pathogens succumbing to the effects of his

generator, usually bursting or hemorrhaging from the field effects from the

transmitter, which is 5 or more feet away.

Bare*s Rife device generates a 27 MHz AC waveform and combines it with a

DC waveform at varying frequencies, usually in the audio range. The waveform

excites a plasma tube from which the power is transmitted. The high

frequency penetrates the body efficiently, but the antipathogenic action is

thought to be mostly the harmonics caused by the DC portion.

The Rife-Bare device will not generate high enough frequencies to match

those discovered by Hulda Clark (in the DC portion) to kill pathogens

directly. It must use the harmonics of the frequency generator and as such

produces a DC waveform which produces enough harmonics to generate them.

This is an inexact science at this time, and due to fluctuations in

construction, equipment, tube variations, operating technique, results differ

from those building and using the devices, although most admit when they

follow Bare's instructions to the letter, they have the best results. Once the

device is constructed, cautious experimenters test it on cultures of

bacteria, molds, paramecium, etc, to more assure the device produces a useful

wave.

The people working with Rife/Bare generators report that it is easy to

tell when a frequency generator is causing harmful effects since pain will be

felt. They have done experiments on lab rodents and reported that they will

not tolerate harmful frequencies without trying to escape. Even so,

incautious experimentation with high voltage devices can cause damage or even

death, so it is critical that one thoroughly understands the ramifications of

dealing with these types of bioelectronics.

 

(http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioelectronics/RifeBare/Resonant%20Light%20PERL\

..htm) The Rife-Bare generator is one of the few types of frequency

treatments where the subjects do not come in contact with the device, and

some report it works as much as 100 feet or more away (killing fungus). Other

methods that people use to apply frequency to the body include coils, pads,

handholds, and other contact applicators. Coils of wire can be stimulated

with a frequency and produce a field which will penetrate the body, and

some use this method to treat Lyme disease. Pads or handholds can be used to

apply voltage directly to the body.

One person reported that he caused possibly permanent nerve and lymph node

damage to himself by applying voltage using a wire coil attached to a

function generator, amplified to 60 volts, and at tapeworm frequencies as

published by Clark. He says he had a tapeworm in a lymph node which " bubbled

up "

when subjected to the field, killing it but damaging his lymph node.

Human body cells have a resonant frequency at about 1000 KHz, and any

strong DC modulated signal over 330 KHz produces harmonics of significant

amplitude in this frequency range. AC signals do not produce these harmonics,

so

are probably safer to use, but also do not work nearly as well when used

in a frequency-unspecific manner.

Hulda Clark uses an AC frequency generator with handholds to kill

pathogens in the body. Using a device she developed called a syncrometer, she

determined the resonant frequencies of many potential pathogens in the body and

proceeded to kill them with an AC frequency generator. This list is

published in her book called The Cure for all Diseases. The only problem with

this

method is that the pathogen that is causing an illness must be accurately

identified before treatment, so that the correct frequency can be used. To

run through the entire list of pathogens and dial in the frequencies for

all of them for a minimum 3 minutes each requires many hours.

Clark then developed a **zapper.** It is a single frequency generator

which produces DC square waves at about 30 KHz. The lowest frequency given on

her list of pathogens is about 70 KHz and goes up beyond 1MHz. Yet, she

reports that the DC wave kills many different pathogens in the body. She once

speculated that this was from the positive offset DC voltage on the body,

but some thought it more likely that the bugs were still dying from frequency

effects from the harmonics produced by a zapper's square wave.

A zapper produces an imperfect 30 KHz square wave. A square wave is

composed of an infinite number of higher frequency AC waves. The AC wave's

frequencies and power distribution is analyzed using Fourier transforms. A

perfectly symmetrical square wave produces major odd harmonics, that is, AC

frequencies at 1,3,5,7,9... times its frequency, and the power available in

those harmonics decreases as the multiplication factor increases. A perfect 30

KHz zapper produces power at 30, 90, 150, 210, 270 ... Khz. It also

produces minor even harmonics.

However, no zapper built to Clark*s specs produces a perfect square wave.

It produces an unsymmetrical square wave. Most of the ones I have built

produce around 16/14 ratio, staying at 8 volts for 16 microseconds, then

dropping to 0 volts for 14 microseconds. These values are approximate. There is

also usually a spike on the positive-going pulse. These **imperfections**

however, add to a zapper*s effectiveness. It means that rather than just

producing harmonics on the odd multiples, it produces harmonics all over the

place. It is impossible to analyze theoretically (for me anyway) and tell

just what AC frequencies are being produced.

Add to this another uncertainty factor in that no two zappers are alike

when using cheap parts, like from Radio Shack, which have a wide tolerance. I

have seen zappers built with the same parts in the same board layout

produce different frequencies, one at 28KHz and one at 35KHz, e.g. This leads

to

a great deal of variability between zappers. For example, the frequency

effects of one zapper might be very good at treating salmonella and not touch

e. coli, while another one built with the same parts might be highly

effective against e. coli and not touch salmonella. There is too much

variability. I have one zapper which seems to work best for flu, but will not

work

against colds, and another that performs best for colds.

Robert Beck is another researcher in the bioelectronic field. His

**zapper** is a low frequency bipolar device originally designed to treat HIV.

At

this original writing of this article, it uses a 27V signal at 4Hz,

although, like Clark*s zapper, frequency is stated not to be important. Beck

reports that his device does not kill HIV directly, but merely keeps them from

reproducing, which effectively treats them. Even with the high voltage of

Beck*s zapper, it is probably unlikely that there is enough power at the

resonant frequency of HIV to kill it, given the very low frequency. Then again,

maybe there is, since viruses are so small, perhaps it only takes a

milliwatt or less at the correct frequency to destroy them. And, last I read,

Beck's device killed 100% of HIV in 100% of subjects (although this is a far

cry from curing AIDS). But perhaps there is something other than frequency

effects that devitalize HIV from Beck's machine.

There are also now being built frequency **guns** which produce a

non-adjustable set of frequencies and are aimed at a specific part on the body

and

are modulated by using colored cones on the output. In the few anecdotes I

have seen in their use, they appear to be somewhat successful in treating

cancerous tumors. One person reported that it did nothing to treat his

multiple sclerosis, however, but this is understandable given Clark*s

assertions

on the causes of MS.

I have corresponded with a person who has used frequency generators a

great deal in treating illness. He has used homemade ones, commercial function

generators, standard and modified zappers. I think he stumbled on to a

likely reason the zapper and other frequency devices work.

DNA/RNA are polar molecules and are thus susceptible to frequency effects.

Each DNA molecule has a resonant frequency. In general, the simpler the

life form the lower the resonant frequency of the being (according to Hulda

Clark.) Every cell in a living being has a DNA molecule (half in sperm and

ova) and since the DNA for each species are the same size, they have the

same frequency. When the cells are subjected to their resonant frequency at

sufficient power, they are destroyed.

A zapper with a non-symmetrical waveform provides a limited amount of

power in the resonant frequency of each molecule which contains DNA/RNA, which

is every living cell. When there are a large amount of the same type of

molecule, like in the human body, which is composed of quadrillions, the

amount of energy transmitted to each is so small that none are damaged

(although

they could be due to localized effects of more power being available

closest to the electrode site of a pad device, e.g.). However, this assumes

that

there is enough power in the frequency of those cells, and Clark states t

hat human body cells have a frequency of above 1MHz. So, if one stays in the

lower frequencies and limits power to a reasonable level, there is not

enough power in the harmonics at 1MHz and above to do damage to a human body.

If there are a small number of some other types of RNA/DNA, as from a

minor infection of bacteria, the amount of energy available in that resonant

frequency may be enough to destroy the DNA. However, if one has an excess

amount of, say, large parasites in the body, the amount of energy is not

enough to harm them. The power can be cranked up enough to destroy them, but

without knowing the exact frequency at which the pathogens will destruct, it

can be risky since the body could be damaged.

There is another effect from a zapper or other pad device that may as

important as the frequency effects, however. According to the same guy's

speculation, a zapper, or any square wave frequency device, produces hydrogen

peroxide in the blood due to its chemistry. Peroxide has antipathogenic

effects. But this is only produced in the blood. Still, it would be better to

produce it in this manner than ingest it, since consuming more than a few

drops can reportedly adversely affect beneficial gut bacteria and not be

transmitted to the blood stream intact. He says he can taste the peroxide in

his

mouth when zapping at high voltages. Perhaps this is the main benefit from

using a zapper and any frequency effects are minimal.

After making this post, someone who was involved in the colloidal silver

manufacturing business wrote that he suspected that many of the same

principles of making colloids also apply to using a zapper. Colloidal silver is

made with a zapper-type device and silver wire or plates. He explained that

oxygen as formed on one electrode, and hydrogen on the other, as well as the

H2O2 and H30, so these could have an effect.

In my experience, zappers are often effective for blood borne pathogens

but not inside the nasal cavities, intestines, or other places inside which

there is no blood contained. The same limitation probably applies to all pad

or contact devices. Whether it is from the production of chemicals or

actual frequency effects, they need the conductive blood to work systemically

(although there might still be some local effects that could be put to use.)

I think Clark's syncrometer is probably only effective in detecting

pathogens with blood exposure as well.

These same limitations apply to variable frequency generator pad devices,

but at least (if a bug can be identified) the exact AC frequency can be

used without having to rely on harmonics. They can also be used with Rife

frequencies for indeterminate pathogens.

Rife-Bare generators appear to be the most effective for treating the

entire body and not just the blood, but are most valuable for diseases that are

well researched and discussed. Even if a pathogen can be identified as

causing a malady, experimentation with a microscope is necessary to determine

the correct frequencies to use unless they have been previously determined.

The devices lack the ability to use the pathogen frequencies Clark

published so harmonics must be used, which makes it an even less exact science

because of variations in equipment. Small variations in construction and usage

methods can make them ineffectual and they should be well tested and the

operators well trained before using them for treatment.

Zappers are often recommended by alternative healers for use since they

appear to be perfectly safe. High powered variable frequency plasma tube

devices are likely better at treating illness, but some do not recommend their

use except by those who research and experiment cautiously because of the

possibility of damaging oneself or others. Also, the severity and type of

disease should be taken into account when deciding on an alternative

bioelectronics device for oneself.

These machines will certainly affect (if not be) the future of medicine in

the decades to come as more and more people realize their utility and

safety and especially as the devices and the frequencies which they use are

perfected.

Links

_DNA and RNA Derived Frequencies_

(http://www.rifetechnologies.com/dna-rna.html) is a short explanation of the

work Char Boehm is doing in

investigating resonant frequencies for pathogens.