Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

MOUNTAIN VIEW: That Smells Real Nice

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Poster's comment: I am thinking that I must have warped sense of humour

this morning - I found this very humourous............laughed all through it

& then read it again......but it is so horribly true and it couldn't have

been said any better....

 

MOUNTAIN VIEW: That Smells Real Nice

_http://www.swvatoday.com/comments/mountain_view_that_smells_real_nice/sports/50\

23/_

(http://www.swvatoday.com/comments/mountain_view_that_smells_real_nice/sports/50\

23/)

 

By LIZA FIELD

 

Sometimes I wonder what part of the human brain came up with those

dizzying, throat-stopping, rancid-odored drier-sheets and air-**fresheners.**

—The

insane part, I reckon; the part happy to be unhinged from reality. These

chemical potions—usually dubbed names like **Country Fresh!** and **Morning

Sunshine!** and **Mountain Breeze!**—have nothing to do with the

countryside, mountains or fresh air, and are in fact implicated in everything

from

nausea to respiratory disorders to skin problems to cancer.

 

Want to dry off with a **Nature’s Fresh-n-Soft** slathered **clean**

towel? Alright! First, hold the towel to your face and inhale deeply—Mmmm!—

like the happy folks in the commercials! If you feel slightly nauseated or

need to cough, don*t worry; that*s a natural reaction to this **Natural-Soft**

toxic soup of unnatural ingredients.

 

Since *natural* is by no means the point here, ignore your body*s innate

response and continue rubbing yourself down with this **fresh-dried**

slatherment of benzyl acetate, limonene, ethanol, chloroform, pentane and other

carcinogens and neurotoxins!

 

And if you feel at all hesitant in coating yourself (and then overpowering

anyone who comes near you that day) with the industrial-strength

*fragrance* that you can*t quite convince yourself smells divine, realize that

these

fragrances do serve a *real* purpose.

Because the toxins used in *softening* fabric do heat up in the drier and

smell like a genuine, gosh-awful, chemical-plant smokestack, strong

perfumes are needed to mask that reality. And in order to convince consumers to

tolerate these strong, pretend-nothing*s-wrong-here perfumes, a useful

marketing ploy has proven handy: promote the negative characteristic as, in

fact, desirable! Shouldn*t all laundry smell like—mmmm!—funeral-parlor

preservative? Ah, forever-fresh!

 

This disparity between the product*s reality and the image it promotes may

seem comical (or depressing) spelled out this way.

 

But that such a disparity regularly strikes us as unremarkable—in fact,

quite the usual—indicates something of how normalized we*ve become to the

blatantly-fake, and how easily we collude in the enterprise of calling one

thing by a completely contrary label and collectively agreeing that...... Yes,

like the emperor*s new clothes, it is wonderfully so…so…what-it-isn*t!

.......... Quite a few conditioners, deodorants and skin lotions (with names

like **safe-stuff,** **healing balm** and **pure-guard**) belong in the

same category, reeking of putrid chestnut blossoms and adding a variety of

chemical stiffeners or softeners, propylene glycols and aluminums and

formaldehydes known to impair human health.

 

Since the skin is a thin, widespread organ meant to expel toxins rather

than be slathered in them, our common use of toxin-laden cosmetics, lotions,

drier sheets, nail polishes and hair conditioners is one of the

immunity-compromising practices implicated in rising cancer rates.

 

Should the representation of a toxic chemical-bath as **Nature*s Down-Home

Pure-itude!** be outlawed, then, since it encourages the consumer to

inhale, wear and sleep in a cloud of carcinogens?

 

Deregulation-enthusiasts like Rush Limbaugh would say **No.** This is

America; everyone has the right to make a buck however he chooses, whether by

deception or truth. And since money is of more worth than unmarketable

values like truth, in the free-enterprise system that seems to comprise the

whole of our reality, we can*t go around making laws that impair our pursuit

of it. How could deception be regulated anyhow? Deception (and the eagerness

to be deceived) has been around at least as long as the earliest stories

of man. According to Genesis, Eve quickly reckoned the serpent was promoting

something good-for-her. Esau seemed happy to trade his birthright for a

mess of potage, and Moses easily duped the fed-up, tired-of-frogs Pharaoh into

letting the Israelites leave town for a small escapade.

 

Something in us apparently wants to be deceived. We want to believe we can

really buy fresh countryside in an aerosol can, or bring back a happy,

rural childhood by using drier sheets labeled **Country Mornings**.

 

Certainly the false prophets that Jeremiah and other Hebrew figures railed

against would have been out-of-business had the people not said **Preach

to us soft things. Speak to us of ease!** We want to be told there*s no

problem, and thus avoid the pain of change—an illusory goal in itself.

 

More than any other species, humankind seems to have a profound gift for

self-deception. While it may have evolved as a coping mechanism to deal with

intolerable conditions, we seem often to make liberal use of it in order

to avoid the pain of facing any disagreeable reality. But reality is

innately healthful, since avoidance of reality would require life, itself, to

become unreal. More on this really endless topic, next time.

 

 

Reader Reaction:

This commentary hit home with a bang. I live in a small town in the middle

of Montana, and I hate stepping outside expecting the fresh air this area

is known for, and instead getting a nose full of dryer sheet sludge.

 

Not only is it not good for anyone to breathe, but most of the time it’s

like a cup of coffee with 30 spoons of sugar — a hint of something maybe

recognizable but totally overrun with some kind of chemical cloud.

 

And it can beat up on anyone who suffers from asthma or RADS or a damaged

metabolic system. Thanks, and keep writing.

 

 

 

Posted by MontanaJohn from Montana on 04/18 at 07:09 PM

 

(http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...