Major Development for the Future of Dietary Supplements

[Guest guest]

 

 

We predicted late last year before, during and after the election that 2009

would begin a time of change and challenge for dietary supplements.  It looks

like the first shoe has dropped:  The U.S. Government Accountability Office

(GAO) presented a report to Congress last week, titled Dietary Supplements: FDA

Should Take Further Action to Improve Oversight and Consumer Understanding.

 

A link to the full 70+ page report appears at the end of this article.  Here

are a few highlights:

 

1.     The Players

 

The GAO is known as " the investigative arm of Congress. "   It's self-described

mission is to improve the performance and ensure the accountability of the

federal government.  Typically, its work is performed at the direction of

Congressional Committees.  Its work " leads to laws and acts that improve

government operations. "  

 

With regard to this particular report, the GAO's work was done at the request of

Congressional Representatives Henry Waxman, John Dingell and Bart Stupak, and

Senator Richard Durbin.  Rep. Stupak has been one of the FDA's most vocal

critics, as we reported some weeks ago.   As we have also reported in the

past, Reps. Waxman and Dingell, and Sen. Durbin have been skeptics - if not

outright critics - of DSHEA and the dietary supplement industry for years.

 

2.    The Issues

 

The GAO organized its comments according to four themes:

 

•    The FDA has insufficient information from the industry about dietary

supplements and manufacturing operations to be effective.

 

•    The FDA has applied insufficient resources to properly oversee dietary

supplements.

 

•    The FDA has insufficient authority to remove products from the market.

 

•    The FDA needs to do more to educate the public about dietary

supplements.

3.    GAO Comments of Concern

 

Within the GAO Report, we find these comments:

 

" According to several experts we spoke with, [the FDA's] regulatory approach [to

supplements under DSHEA] has fallen short in protecting U.S. consumers in the

past. "

 

Among other things about this statement, we would like to know who these

purported experts are, and the methods they used to arrive at their

conclusion.  We would also like clarification:  is it the FDA or the law

itself that has failed the public?

 

" [Even though reported adverse events average about 500 per year], the FDA

recently estimated that the actual number of total adverse events . . . related

to dietary supplements per year is over 50,000 . . . "

 

We would very much like to know how the FDA arrived at this estimate, including

how the FDA evaluates whether an adverse event was actually caused by

supplements as opposed to other potential causes. We also point out that the

average adverse events reported for pharmaceuticals each year for the past 5

years is over 300,000.

 

4.     GAO Recommendations

 

The GAO made four recommendations

 

•    Dietary supplement companies should be required to identify themselves

as a dietary supplement company as part of the existing registration

requirements, and they should be required to update this information annually;

they should be required to provide a list of the products they sell and a copy

of the labels, updated annually; and they should be required to report all

adverse events related to dietary supplements, not just major events.

 

•    The FDA should issue guidance to clarify when an ingredient is

considered a new dietary ingredient, the evidence needed to document the safety

of new dietary ingredients, and appropriate methods for establishing ingredient

identity.

 

•    The FDA should provide guidance to industry to clarify when products

should be marketed as either dietary supplements or conventional foods

formulated with added dietary ingredients.

 

•    The FDA should work better to educate consumers about the safety,

efficacy, and labeling of dietary supplements.

 

Note that the GAO made no specific recommendations about changing outright the

regulation of dietary supplements under DSHEA.  But you can bet this report

isn't the last shoe to land.

 

We'll have more in the coming days about the GAO report and the

recommendations.  In the meantime, you can read the report for yourself here.

 

Thanks for your support.

To view our privacy policy,

 

You are receiving this alert because you are d to the Citizens for

Health list to receive occasional updates of importance to the natural health

community.