Reply to criticism of my article, 45 Reasons Not to Vaccinate

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr _____,

 

Namaste. I am sorry I got your name wrong the first time.

 

The title of my article is now " 50 Reasons to Protect Infants from

Vaccines " , as I have added 5 more points. I can add much more but that

would test the patience of the readers. An article very similar to mine

by Dr Guy Lanctot, MD, appears here;

 

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/vaccinationsilentgenocide14nov05..shtml

 

 

Before I reply to your arguments I wish to emphasize a few points.

Science is about discovering the truth about the physical universe.

Truth which is measurable and verifiable. There is no bias in science.

It just states the fact for the society to interprete it and apply it.

Science is guided by ethics and morality. The findings are utilised to

serve humanity.

 

 

Technology is about putting scientific theory into practice. As far as I have

read, it is about harnessing science to serve mankind. There is a lot

more human interference with technology than with science. Often

scientific findings are compromised to make technology viable. This is

not bad in itself if the intentions are good and the aim laudable.

 

 

Todays technology is dominated by the industry. Private enterprise

is about earning profits. It is known that laws can be circumvented

even legally as laws are subject to various interpretations. Scientific

institutions today are funded by private enterprises. If a scientific

institution conducts a study sponsored by private enterpreneurs it gets

paid only if the findings are favourable to the sponsor. This is

particularly true of the medical industry.

 

 

It often happens that the data of the institution may be honestly

generated but intentionally misinterpreted to suit industry needs. We

know that the Lancet, a premier medical journal, has conceded that it

has no way to verify the research articles published in it. This is

also true of other journals. It is up to each individual scientist to

be ethical so that science prevails over industry profitability.

 

 

I will point out to the issue of mercury in vaccines. The vaccine

decontaminant Thiomersal is 49.56% ethylmercury by weight. Ethylmercury

is an industrial toxin whose use is fraught with great dangers. The

bottles of Thiomersal have the skull and dagger mark on them.

Thiomersal has been pushed out of many a medical product because of its

severe toxicity. Products using Thiomersal have been recalled from the

market. Mercury in its any form is known to be dangerous. A study by

the Americam Academy of Pediatricians has clearly stated that mercury

is particularly dangerous for the pregnant mother and the infant.

 

 

However study after study in the USA reveals that Thiomersal is

safe. The latest study hopes to " put at rest all doubts " . The doctors

who are sympathetic to my cause and medical scientists scoff at such

studies. I am personally aware of meetings in the Health Ministry that

have discussed this very sensitive issue. Even then mercury will not be

shifted out of vaccines. Even " mercury free " vaccines contain this

heavy metal.

 

http://www.hapihealth.com/index.php?option=com_content & task=view & id=19 & Itemid=27

 

This is because, as intimated to me officially by the Govt of

India, mercury is essential to " make vaccines safe " . Without this

decontaminant the  vaccines would cause " more harm " .

 

 

I wish to also define this " harm " . Vaccines consists of bacteria

and viruses that are cultured in animal tissues and serum. This is the

prime source of contamination. You talk about " pure vaccines " . There is

no such thing as a pure vaccine, the term is an oxymoron. There have

been attempts to replace Thiomersal by 2Phenoxyethelene, another very

dangerous neurotoxin. But the results, as informed to me, are " not

encouraging " . I have with me the PPT presentation that was used by a

very senion health ministry official that details all this. I cannot

share it with you.

 

 

So mercury continues to be pumped into infants. Along with that

goes live and genetically modified bacteria and viruses, contaminated

serum, heavy metals like mercury and aluminum, carcinogens like

formaldehyde and monosodium glutamate, antibiotics that ought not to be

injected without skin prick tests and God alone knows what else.

 

 

The other aspect of this " harm " is the effect on the financial

health of vaccine manufacturers and even the government. The

manufacturers would be inundated with court cases if by chance an

" official study " concedes that Thiomersal can cause harm. As it is, in

the US itself, around 8000 cases are pending against the industry. The

first case has been decided upon and has gone in favour of the

complainant setting back the US Govt by several hundred million

dollars, as assumed by activists as the amount of compensation has not

been revealed. In a case where the amount was revealed the compensation

was seventy eight million dollars. No wonder both the government and

the industry are jittery. The industry has appealed to the government

to shut down operations. The US Govt's response has been to grant

immunity to vaccine manufacturers, put up a special " vaccine court " and

put a surcharge of $60 per vaccine to set up a vaccine damage

compensation fund.

 

In India, the government is in no position to even have " mercury

free " vaccines. The process of removing mercury from the end product

(mercury is used in the process) will increase the cost of vaccine 4 to

5 times. The government cannot afford this.

 

 

The very fact that " scientific studies "  repeatedly stress that the

presence of mercury, aluminum, squalene and other toxic ingredients in

vaccines are  " safe " to be injected into infants makes me wary of such

studies in the official domain. 

 

 

Thus I prefer to state the facts to people without depending upon

distorted studies. The parents need to have all the information they

have before they decide to vaccinate. That vaccines are dangerous is

openly conceded and even declared in writing by the biotechnology department of

the Govt of India, Ministry of Science and Technology, who promise that

genetically engineered and plant based vaccines would relieve the

burden on children who are now injected with animal serum, heavy metals

and other toxins. What they don't say that the health effects of

genetically engineered vaccines will also never be revealed.

 

 

Regarding the points raised by you I have already sent a detailed

article which will answer many of your questions. I have also sent you

a link which clearly shows the disease graphs based upon US Govt data

and the fact that vaccines have been introduced at the fag end.

 

http://www.vaccinationdebate.com/web1..html

 

http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Did-Vaccines-Really-Halt-Killer-Diseases-

 

The government announcement in the Hindu has found mention in an

article in the Indian Journal of Pediatrics by Dr Jacob Puliyel who is

a very senior IMA member and the Co Chairman of the IMA immunisation

committee. I have mentioned the name

of the article in the article sent to you. The IAP, Orissa,

instructions appeared only on print and not on the net (like the TOI

article) and I will send it to you separately.

 

 

I must also mention that scarlet fever and the plague have come and gone without

vaccines " eradicating " them.

 

Your contention about empirical evidence should also be applied to

the fact that illnesses amongst children have shot through the roof

after vaccines have been introduced. Why should this evidence be

ignored? The nature of vaccine ingredients and the harm they cause can

be found here;

 

http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/ingredie.html

 

 

Regarding vaccine safety and testing, a CDC website states, " No

matter how extensive the testing, it is impossible to allow completely

for the infinite variation among individuals, their immune systems, and

their reactions to the introduction of new substances into their

bodies. Serious systemic reactions to vaccines can occur, although they

are very rare. " However such reactions are not rare as revealed by the

growing epidemic of diseases amongst children who are clearly showing

signs and symptoms of the ingredients they are being injected with.

 

 

Vaccines are never tested against a plain placebo. The usual

procedure is to either test it against a comparable vaccine or a

diluted version of the same vaccine. This newsreport will educate you;

http://www.healthguidance.org/entry/1079/1/How-Are-Vaccines-Tested.html

 

 

In India vaccines and drugs have been tested without even the

participant's knowledge. A case in North India revealed that an

experimental vaccine was tested on pregnant women. This was widely

reported by the press. Such trials are carried out in other countries

too;

 

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2008/07/03/Homeless_die_in_Poland_of_bird-flu_va\

ccine/UPI-39641215100179/

 

 

Vaccine tests leave a lot to be desired. An unbiased report, the

full version of which has been pulled out of the net, points out, as salient

points:

  " How vaccines are tested - typically a new vaccine is tested on

10,000 - 20,000 people before the FDA approves it, is this enough to

reliably detect rare complications?... Two safety lapses - in two

recent cases, vaccine-safety agencies were slow to act on emerging

problems... The antivaccine argument - arguments and suppositions of

antivaccine activists... Compensating the injured - the federal Vaccine

Injury Compensation Program was created in 1988, funded by a small tax

on every lot of vaccine, it is an insurance plan against

childhood-vaccine injuries... "

 

 

This study points out that vaccines are a matter of " trust " .

http://www.comminit.com/en/node/181126/292

 

Doctors are instructed not to report vaccine damage. This was

publicly admitted by the IMA when it blew the whistle on the OPV and

the cases of paralysis caused by it. The government had instructed

physicians not to report damage.

 

 

Personally I would request you to pose as a ordinary non medical

person and take a vaccine damaged child to a pediatrician. You will

yourself realise how the system works. I have taken many such children to

doctors and have received open threats. A doctor, Dr P... M....,

who is a office bearer of the Indian Academy of Pediatricians openly

challenged me that, " no doctor will " dare " certify that this child is

vaccine damaged. " That is the system for you. In case of the OPV the

IMA has pointed out that the vaccine surveillance system reports only

up to 5% of cases.

 

 

There are no official studies comparing vaccinated versus non

vaccinated children. Activists have all along been shouting for such

studies. The findings of independent studies can be found here;

http://www.whale.to/a/children1.html

http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/03/oh-just-2-mor-1.html

http://www.generationrescue.org/survey.html

 http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/unvaccinated.html

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/unvax.html

 

For presence of monkey viruses in vaccines I will cite an official

study so that you will be at ease. This article states that SV 40 is

not cancerous and yet details all the steps that are taken to keep

vaccines SV40 free (just as the US Govt repeatedly says that Thiomersal

is extremely safe and yet is trying to reduce it in American vaccines).

However in practical circumstances such tests are very difficult to

carry out. A vaccine whistleblower has pointed out that vaccine batches

are often monitored " visually " . Cases of contamination being found is

very regular in the vaccine industry. It has happened with the OPV in

India also. Vaccine testing is indeed a " matter of trust " .

 

http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/bwp/141202en.pdf

 

This official very scientific study borders between " no incidence "

and " probably " . Interestingly it tries to rationalise the presence of

the SV40 in Indians to " man-monkey " physical exposure. Have we ALL been

bitten by monkey's? Then there is also the case of " false tests " . " We

say it is not there so it SHOULD NOT be there " . Typical scientific

conclusions in today's profit oriented world.

 

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/simian-virs-40

 

This scientific study says the whole issue needs further probe

 http://www.nature.com/onc/journal/v23/n38/full/1207877a.html

 

There is a SV40 foundation that studies this simian virus

http://www.sv40foundation.org/

 

Regarding the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV), this PubMed

study reveals the need to study this virus to develop a vaccine for

AIDS. So while seeking to develop a highly profitable vaccine in the

market we recognise the dangers from SIV but we say that the SIV

delivered to humans via the small pox vaccine and the OPV does not have

any relation to AIDS. Typical scientific thinking again.

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15731236

 

I will strongly object to your view that vaccines strengthen

immunity. Vaccines have nothing to do with stregthening immunity. A

strong immunity would reject the invasion by way of vaccines. Hence

adjuvants are used to " put the immune system on hold " so that the body

is forced to accept the intruder. You will find allergies in all

vaccinated children. This very fact reveals that the vaccines severely

affect the immune system. How the vaccines affect the immune system is

described here by Dr Rebecca Carley, a medico legal expert on vaccines.

Her article was deleted from the WHO website, where it once appeared;

 

http://www.wnho.net/response_to_cdc_health_research_guide.htm

 

 

This article was actually here in the CDC website before it was pulled out;

http://www.rsvpbook.com/custom_pages/50942/popup_chapter.php

 

Regarding 30 vaccine " shots " that I have mentioned (not 30

vaccines), the IAP recommends 24 shots without the consultation of

parents and 5 vaccines (Hep A, Varicella, Pneumococcal, Meningitis,

Japanese Encephalitis) (6 shots I think or maybe more) after

consulting. Thus the figure of 30 shots is correct, the actual may be

more. All these vaccines are being routinely given to children by

private practitioners.

 

 

I will object that you accuse me of lying and misleading the

public. To the contrary I am trying to educate parents about the

dangers from vaccines, a fact that is being increasingly admitted by

even pediatricians. Their first reaction has been not to vaccinate

their own children and relatives. There are many pediatricians today

who are not vaccinating beyond the IPV as far as their own children and

relatives are concerned. I would appeal to them to extend this facility

to their patients also, infants who have no voice to protest, but they

do protest by persistently crying and trying to make it known that they

do not wish to be vaccinated.

 

 

And finally here is a link to pictures of vaccine damaged

children, at the end. These are only from the small pox vaccine. I must

mention that autistic children are severely damaged and do not show any

external damage. Thus most vaccine damage will be permanent and

internal. Diseases can indeed disfigure children but most of the damage

occurs because of trying to meddle with eruptive acute disease. I

remember my brother being severely affected by measles and recovering

normally under homeopathic treatment.

 

 

If I have left anything out kindly let me know.

 

I am marking a copy to some senior doctors of India, USA and Canada. They may

kindly correct me if I

have stated anything wrong here.

 

 

Regards,

Jagannath.

 

Vaccine Injury Photos From The CDC

These pictures are from the Centers For Disease Control in America, entitled

'Vaccine Reaction Images' and can be found at:

 

http://www.bt.cdc.gov/Agent/Smallpox/VaccineImages.asp

 

 

 

This little girl is suffering from Eczema Vaccinatum, which is a severe eczema

caused by vaccination.

 

 

This boy had progressive vaccinia, a

massive flesh eating infection caused by vaccination. He had been

immuno compromised prior to his shot and unfortunately he died as a

result of his injuries.

 

Source: [from Fenner F., Henderson DA, et al. Smallpox and its Eradication. WHO.

1988]

 

 

Vaccine site reaction after a period of time.

Eczema Vaccinatum Lesions (Smallpox) On A Smallpox Vaccinated Person - Photo

From American Academy Of Pediatrics

 

 

See:

 

http://aapredbook.aappublications.org/week/iotw030308.shtml

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

http://messenger./invite/