Guest guest Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 i heard from other holistic doctors that never take more than 2000 as the body cannot discard extra of it as it does vit c and you will have problems later as it builds ? --- On Fri, 12/5/08, Mark Fletcher < wrote: Mark Fletcher < << >> Re:Correcting a vitamin D deficiency Friday, December 5, 2008, 12:53 PM Marji, Some fascinating info there. I've decided to take 4000 to 5000 IU a day until I reach 60 ng/dl. Mark Alternative- Medicine- Forum@ s.com, marjij wrote: > > Yesterday I attended a major Vitamin D conference at UCSD in San Diego. All > the big guns were there... the doctors and researchers from around the > country who do the actual research and trials. Holistic doctors were there, MD's, > chiropracters, osteopaths, cardiologists, pediatricians, even > dermatologists, and many more. > > The information they gave was astounding. Much of it is on this website: > _www.vitamindhealth .org_ (http://www.vitamind health.org) . This is the > website of Dr. Michael Horlick, one of the major investigators who has written many > books on this subject, and who gave a terrific presentation of the findings > about the epidemic deficiency of vitamin D in this country. How sunscreen has > been terribly destructive to our health... it interferes with the absorption > of UVB rays which are what make vitamin D in the skin, it allows UVA to get > through to the skin, but blocks UVB which is just backward from what you > want. To date there have been no randomized trials by the FDA or sunscreen > manufacturers to show that sunscreen protects against melanoma. They simply can't > show that it does. > > The atmosphere also prevents UVB from getting through to make vitamin D even > if you are outside. The UVB band is very narrow compared to the UVA band, > so much more UVA gets through. If the sky is overcast, no UVB. If you are > behind glass, no UVB. If those mysterious lines in the sky... chemtrails we > call them, have been dumped and spread out to reduce global warming... they > filter out the UVB healthful rays. > > Amazingly, Australia and New Zealand have the highest rate of melanoma than > anywhere in the world. And they have the highest ozone layers... which is > again, backward from what we would think. The ozone layer is thick and filters > out the UVB. High lattitudes as well in the northern latitudes, Norway, > Finland, Canada, even American north states above 40 degrees latitude... above > San Francisco... have high rates of melanoma, from not getting ENOUGH sun. It > may feel hot on your skin, and you may even burn, but that's from the UVA > rays, not the UVB's which are more fragile and need to penetrate deeper into > the derma to make the vitamin D. And furthermore, get this, most melanoma does > not occur even on the parts of the body that are exposed to the sun. People > who have indoor jobs and rarely go outside get melanoma... on legs, trunk, > even armpits! > > Vitamin D supplements defeat diabetes, cancer, pancreatic, ovarian, breast, > prostate... high blood pressure, athrosclerosis, heart disease, inflammation, > C-Reactive Protein (a cardiovascular disease marker), vascular stiffness, > blood clots, muscle tissue, stomach disfunction, arthritis, everything in your > body needs Vitamin D. > > If the evolutionists are right, we started out in the sea. That is where > Vitamin D3 comes from, phytoplankton. It does not grow on land. When we > crawled out of the sea we got our Vitamin D from the sun. There are no plants > that contain Vitamin D3, except in the ocean. Milk has it added. Only in cod > fish oil, or oily fish such as tuna or salmon can you buy it in cans. Those > fish ate the plankton. Farmed salmon does not contain it... those fish eat > junkfood the fish farmers toss to it. Farmed fish doesn't contain much of > anything good anyway. But their pretty red color is appetizing, until you > realize it's from red dye tossed into the food too. > > I have read on line that vitamin D2 supplements are made from animals, but I > don't know which ones or how that might be. At the conference they did not > mention that, but they did say that you can use either Vitamin D2 or D3 to > increase your levels, both work equally as well in the body. So I don't know > why they are pushing D3, that was not explained either. > > Currently there is a drive on to get the public's attention to the need for > Vitamin D. > All tissues need vitamin D. All tissues need all nutrients. Serum levels > of Vitamin D for all ages should be between 40 and 60 and for breast cancer > patients, they recommend serum levels of 72 ng/ml. Breast cancer victims all > have insufficient levels of Vitamin D and though it will not cure the cancer, > by bringing the level up to optimum it will stop further metastasis. > > The scientists at this convention recommended taking 5000, (yes five > thousand) IU of D3 supplements for three months and get levels checked again. When > you have reached 60 ng/dl then drop back to 2000 daily forever... for adults, > and 1000 for children. Interesting too, mothers who's Vitamin D levels were > low gave birth to babies who either became sick within the first month, or > were subject to developing Type 1, diabetes. But by giving babies and small > children D supplements they prevented type 1 diabetes from occurring in those > nutrient rich kids. > > You can try the website _http://www.grassroo tshealth. org/_ > (http://www.grassroo tshealth. org/) which was the organization that sponsored the conference > in San Diego yesterday. It was put together by a local breast cancer survivor > who contacted the doctors and researchers there and who eagerly spread the > word to other professionals to attend. The grassroots organization is trying > to do just that... get a grassroots movement to have everybody tested and > treated for Vitamin D deficiency, which could lead to major reduction of disease > and illness in the entire population. It is a movement to understand and > join. I just ordered from _www.crp.org_ (http://www.crp. org) six bottles of > liquid, one ml gives 5000 IU vitamin D3 daily. Going to give them to my > family members for Christmas. > > Then I saw that Carlson's has an even better deal... liquid vitamin D3 where > ONE DROP contains 2000 IU ! One bottle lasts a whole year! Please look > into this... and remember, if you consult your MD he/she probably won't know a > thing about it. All this new discovery has taken place within the last ten > years and most docs have been out of med school longer and still think the > minimum daily requirement of 400 IU for prevention of rickets is enough to keep > all your cells healthy, including bones, blood and brain. Don't even bother > asking. Check it out for yourself. > > Life Extension labs does the test, and at the conference they mentioned that > it was one they recommended. I didn't write down any others in my notes. > Good luck all. > > Marji > > > ************ **Stay in touch with ALL of your friends: update your AIM, Bebo, > Facebook, and MySpace pages with just one click. The NEW AOL.com. > (http://www.aol. com/?optin= new- dp & icid=aolcom40van ity & ncid= emlcntaolcom0000 0012) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 Just how much vitamin D does a Caucasian mowing the lawn in shorts and a T shirt get in two hours on a summer day? If 2000 IU is dangerous, why do not lots of people suffer dire consequences from moderate sun exposure? Alobar On 12/7/08, Rita Reya <azcallin wrote: > > i heard from other holistic doctors that never take more than 2000 as the body cannot discard extra of it as it does vit c and you will have problems later as it builds ? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.