Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

HOW REAL IS HER LOVE?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://www.newswithviews.com:80/Rudov/marc108.htm

 

by Marc H. Rudov

October 19, 2008

NewsWithViews.com

 

 

Binary Property

 

I love you. Three powerful words. They change lives. Are they real? Unlikely.

Men and women blithely utter these three words as easily as politicians promise

tax cuts. Do they mean it? Odds are, no. The test below will tell you for sure.

 

Half of marriages end in divorce. What is a divorce, really? Besides being a

legal process and a destroyer of families, it's a biopsy on a marriage, a

diagnostic evaluation of a failed union. On the alter, bride and groom pledge

love as the primary component of their wedlock. As petitioner and respondent in

a dissolution, which the wife initiates 70% of the time, they bicker over the

loss of assets and children - not love. So, the biopsy reveals no evidence of

love. What happened to it? Did it just vanish?

 

Unlikely. People marry for a variety of ulterior motives - money, lifestyle,

loneliness, security, convenient sex, career, appearance, parental pressure,

legitimate children, and Green Cards - none of which is love. In fact, in the

entire history of marriage, love as a uniting force is a relatively new concept,

and a weak one at that.

 

My contention is that love in a failed marriage or relationship was not real and

never existed. To use a scientific analogy: If love is the chief component of

marriage, it cannot disappear into thin air, without a trace. Think of love as

having a binary property: either it exists or it doesn't. By the same token,

glass is the chief component of windows; it can't just evaporate one day,

defying all laws of physics and chemistry.

 

There are people who believe they're marrying for love - but only because they

don't understand its meaning. Almost any dictionary mentions " passionate

affection " in its definitions of love. But, most of us have experienced

passionate affection, numerous times, with our spouses and paramours. If we're

honest, though, we'll admit that those encounters weren't necessarily love. So,

a big problem is that, by and large, we don't know the meaning of love. It's a

nebulous concept. Yet, we recite it, believe others who pledge it to us, and

base wealth-depleting decisions on it. Total insanity.

 

Four Pillars of Love

 

What is love, then? How can one know whether he truly loves a woman or is

receiving true love from her? This is a critical question, because one never

should express or accept or base his life on anything he doesn't grasp.

 

Allow me to offer a reliable, easy-to-remember love test. Simply, the four

pillars of love are mutual and sustainable lust, obligation, veracity, and

equality. For the structure of love to stand, all four pillars must be present.

If one pillar is missing or deficient, the structure collapses, and there is no

love. If the pillars are not mutual (supported by both man and woman) and

sustainable (able to endure for years), there is no love.

 

 

 

Let's examine these four pillars of love:

 

Lust - Lust is a powerful sexual attraction between mates. Without lust, two

people are just companions. Lust is the result of mutual connection - physical,

emotional, mental, spiritual, philosophical, political - manifesting as respect,

admiration, and desire for intimacy. Lust cannot be sustained without the other

three pillars (see below). Without lust, people get bored and stray. Women often

are counseled by their mothers to disregard lust as unnecessary in a marriage

(just catch a good provider); that's why so many women cheat on and divorce

their husbands. Many men find lustful women intimidating or offensive; that's

why they marry boring wives and then cheat on them. It's a myth that lust is a

short-term phenomenon. When asked why he never strayed in his 50-year marriage

to Joanne Woodward, Paul Newman said: " Why should I go out for hamburger when I

have steak at home? " Note: a quick way to kill lust is to eat like a pig and

avoid the gym.

 

Obligation - Obligation is the mutual commitment to watch each other's back, to

defend each other, to speak well of each other in public and to the children, to

rally each other, to be there for each other in difficult times (except in the

case of self-destructive behavior like drug addiction), to consider each other

in all major decisions, to be responsive to each other, to follow through

consistently on promises to each other, to be faithful to each other, and to put

each other first above all else and everybody else. Obligation, in this case, is

meant not to be drudgery but voluntary and heartfelt. If you cannot imagine

living up to or receiving these obligations one year or five years hence, love

doesn't exist in your situation. And, if one of you attempts to harm or destroy

the other, at any time (including divorce court), love never existed between

you.

 

 

 

Veracity - Veracity means truth. Two people must communicate the truth to each

other - about their feelings, thoughts, likes & dislikes, intentions, agendas,

and actions - and they must do so willingly, frequently, and effortlessly. Alas,

most people do not live this way, and that's why most relationships fail. If two

people meet online, and their dating profiles contained lies (age, weight,

photos, etc.), they're already doomed. There's a myth that women convey their

feelings more easily, willingly, and truthfully than men. Not only is this a

myth, it's a downright lie. If two people don't have mutual and sustainable

veracity, starting with initial contact, they have no love.

 

Equality - Equality is the antithesis of entitlement. Equality means that

neither man nor woman is treated better or regarded more highly than the other,

period. With equality, neither partner has rights or privileges superior to

those of the other. A woman who expects that a man will wine & dine her,

" because that's the way it's done, " doesn't believe in quality. No love here.

Conversely, a man who expects a woman to pick up his dirty socks, " because

that's the way it's done, " doesn't believe in equality - if she consents,

neither does she. If a woman's attraction to a man is predicated on the carats,

casas, and cars he provides her, she doesn't believe in equality - if he

consents, neither does he. No love here.

 

The NoNonsense Bottom Line

 

Life is simple, but people work hard to make it difficult. Love is simple to

understand, as the test above proves. Either love is present in your

relationship, or it isn't. You might feel a lot of attraction for her, and she

for you, but that doesn't make it love. Only if you have mutual and sustainable

lust, obligation, veracity, and equality can you have love. If one of those

pillars is missing or deficient, you don't have love.

 

It's OK to be in a relationship without love, as long as both of you are clear

about it. If such is the case, never say, I love you, and never accept it from

her - because both of you would be living a lie.

 

How real is her love? How real is yours? If the test shows not real, you have

some big decisions to make.

 

© 2008 - Marc H. Rudov -

 

 

 

 

E-mail message checked by Internet Security (5.5.0.212)

Database version: 5.10930

http://www.pctools.com/uk/internet-security/

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for this Virgil.

blessings

Shan

 

, " virgil "

<virgil.7 wrote:

>

> http://www.newswithviews.com:80/Rudov/marc108.htm

>

> by Marc H. Rudov

> October 19, 2008

> NewsWithViews.com

>

>

> Binary Property

>

> I love you. Three powerful words. They change lives. Are they real?

Unlikely. Men and women blithely utter these three words as easily as

politicians promise tax cuts. Do they mean it? Odds are, no. The test

below will tell you for sure.

>

> Half of marriages end in divorce. What is a divorce, really?

Besides being a legal process and a destroyer of families, it's a

biopsy on a marriage, a diagnostic evaluation of a failed union. On

the alter, bride and groom pledge love as the primary component of

their wedlock. As petitioner and respondent in a dissolution, which

the wife initiates 70% of the time, they bicker over the loss of

assets and children - not love. So, the biopsy reveals no evidence of

love. What happened to it? Did it just vanish?

>

> Unlikely. People marry for a variety of ulterior motives - money,

lifestyle, loneliness, security, convenient sex, career, appearance,

parental pressure, legitimate children, and Green Cards - none of

which is love. In fact, in the entire history of marriage, love as a

uniting force is a relatively new concept, and a weak one at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...