Guest guest Posted September 26, 2008 Report Share Posted September 26, 2008 Hey there dear friends, colleagues and family, The University of Metaphysical Sciences of which I teach for maybe to be put out of biz by this new law California is passing concerning education unless we get Arnold Schwarzenegger to VETO it and send it back for a rewrite to take out the religious discrimination clause in it about how only " multidenominational " and " well recognized religions " are the only ones who are going to be allowed to teach in CA. Please check out the info below, would only take you 5 min to do this for me and it will help a lot. Thank you Bill http://timholmes.byregion.net Hello Supporters of online teaching, The University Of Metaphysical Sciences desperately needs your help. This will only take 5 minutes of your time. UMS might be put out of business in January 2009 by new religious discrimination laws that are passing in the state of California. This bill is sitting on Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's desk waiting to be signed into law, having passed both houses in California already. They didn't happen to notice a few little words slipped into this version of the bill. Our only hope of preventing this from this passing into law on January 1, 2009 is to encourage the Governor of California to VETO this bill and ask for a rewrite to take out the religious discrimination clause. Only if he hears from us will he be alerted to the fact that there is a flaw in the religious exempt school portion of this bill. If you've ever fantasized about writing to Arnold Schwarzenegger, now's your chance! (You're welcome to let him know you liked him in the movies, but please don't say that overused line he's famous for, " I'll be back. " He's probably tired of hearing that.) We must make our voices heard very quickly, for time is running out. Please email him immediately, it will only take 5 minutes of your time, and I have made it easy for you. You can simply copy and paste one of the emails below, either the long one or the short one, into the contact form at the Governor's website (the url to his site and directions are below) Please feel free to eliminate anything you don't agree with and you can put your concerns in your own words or add more to the letter (it would be best to add your personal contribution to the beginning of the letter so they see that first). Please do include a sentence or two about why keeping a religious discrimination clause out of the realms of the law in CA is important to you, and let him know how important UMS is to you and what your experience is with being a student or supporter of UMS. I'll let you in on a drama that has been happening for UMS since 2005. An Education Dept employee, Joyce Leslie, said to us in July 2005, " You're out of business in 30 days because I'm not renewing your approval to operate. In my opinion only Christian schools should be considered religious schools and all these buddist, zen, sufi and metaphysical schools have to go. " The next day I called a supervisor and said that if the Christian schools were still in business and we weren't in 30 days, we would be going all the way to the supreme court if we had to concerning the BPPE's (Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education) religious discrimination. They called back and said they were sending us our approval to operate immediately. However, the next year during our renewal process various employees participated in thwarting our renewal. They sent us an incomplete application, played around for 9 months asking for documents they already had and pretended to need again, asked us to jump through hoops that no other school was being asked to do, except for other schools like ours, the Sufi school specifically. We did anything and everything they asked within 24 hours of their request and then they took months to process it. Finally, 9 months later they issued a denial of approval to operate letter because they " just got tired of waiting " when they themselves created the lag of time that passed. Immediately, we took them to court. It is not looking good for the BPPE and they are going to lose. However, if these new laws are signed into place concerning the provision that only " well recognized religions " will be allowed to teach in California that are " multidenominational " meaning that only religions with more than one denomination will qualify, they will have a new way to put us out of business. We will have to waste a massive amount of UMS funds, on top of what we've already had to spend on their efforts to block our registration, trying to prove that metaphysics is a " well recognized religion " and I'm not exactly sure that we'd be able to prove that we are " multidenominational, " (Christian religion has many denominations, like Protestant, Lutheran, Baptist, Catholic, etc) That would be another task upon us if this law passes. Either that or we will have to prove that the law is unconstitutional in the first place, all of which are very expensive, negative and time consuming processes that UMS simply doesn't have the money for, and probably other small schools teaching lesser known religions are in the same boat. They wouldn't be able to fight the court case it would take to prove the law is unconstitutional. So our best bet is to get Arnold Schwarzenegger to VETO the bill right now, which in essence forces it back for a rewrite before it can pass into law. We immediately need all the emails we can get to go into the Governor's office. If you have some friends who will do this too, it would be great if you would email this and ask them to assist our efforts. It is the number of emails in his office that will encourage him to investigate the issues, VETO this bill and ask for a fair rewrite about the religious discrimination clause. There are a couple other factors as well that we're mentioning in the email below which he should look into: powers granted to the BPPE to turn off a school's phone without a decision by a real court of law, and the amount they are allowing schools to keep when a student asks for a refund. Here's the directions on how to do this, only takes 5 minutes of your time: 1. Go to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's contact form at http://gov.ca.gov/interact 2. type in your name, email and choose " Education Issues/Concerns " as your subject 3. When it takes you to the next window, click on " Con " in the " Con or Pro " section, which means you are against (con) or for (pro) a change 4. Copy and paste the long version or the short version of the email below, or say it in your own words. Sign the email with your full name at the bottom. Add anything you would like to say to this email in addition to what is copied and pasted. DON'T FORGET TO PUT YOUR NAME at the bottom, or it may not be valid. Note whether you are a UMS student or supporter. 5. Click on submit, and that's all there is to it! Not a lot of time is taken up, but it is very powerful assistance that you have given to the freedom of " lesser known religions " to have the right to teach in CA along with the bigger religions. Thank you so much! Christine Breese Here's the letter below that you can copy and paste in the Governor's contact form if you want the quick easy way. Feel free to use your own words or add to it as well, or take out anything you don't agree with. (Short version) Dear Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, 1. Please VETO the SB 823 Education bill until it has been rewritten. I am concerned about how it supports religious discrimination by employee discretion at the BPPE (formerly the BPPVE) Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education. The line in question is: (Education Code 94874): 4) (A) A nonprofit institution owned, controlled, and operated and maintained by a bona fide church, religious denomination, OR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION COMPOSED OF MULTIDENOMINATIONAL MEMBERS OF THE SAME WELL-RECOGNIZED RELIGION, lawfully operating as a nonprofit religious corporation pursuant to Part 4 (commencing with Section 9110) of Division 2 of Title 1 of the Corporations Code. Why does a religion have to be " multidenominational " in order to operate in CA? If a religion doesn't have several denominations, like Christianity does, is it going to be prevented from having a school in CA and teaching its concepts? Is that constitutional? What is a " well-recognized religion " and what is not? Who decides if it is a well recognized religion? The BPPE? Are they actually qualified to make those decisions? Please note that this has been specifically changed from its original wording on purpose. The previous wording is better suited for supporting constitutional rights to freedom of religion than this new phrase. This is a sneaky trick that is being done so that employees of the BPPE can " legally " exercise their personal religious preferences that they have been trying to exercise over the past few years, specifically with University Of Metaphysical Sciences (UMS) and several *other schools of lesser known religions that are not " well recognized " or " multidenominational*. " * *Currently, UMS is in litigation with them specifically concerning this issue, and that is why this phrase is being sneaked into the bill, so they can avoid lawsuits about religious discrimination that the BPPE has been practicing up until now. 2. No employee or board should be allowed to turn off a school's phone without an objective hearing by a REAL court of law. Also, no 1-800 numbers should be allowed to be turned off, since 1-800 numbers are not California's jurisdiction. California will be responsible for financial damages and losses to schools in other states if California turns off a 1-800 number that rings in another state at another school branch, even though the BPPE may not know where that number rings. 3. Schools need at least $150 to cover expenses of postage, credit card fees and staff time when a student requests a refund. $100 is not enough for a school to meet its administrative expenses for enrolling and then refunding a student. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, (longer version with more details) Dear Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, 1. Please VETO the SB 823 Education bill until it has been rewritten. I am concerned about how it supports religious discrimination by employee discretion at the BPPE (formerly the BPPVE) Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education. This part of the bill is flawed, unconstitutional, and interferes with religious freedom. You might not want to go down in history for signing a law in California that goes directly against the Constitution of the USA. The BPPE has a history for religious discrimination against University of Metaphysical Sciences (UMS) and UMS is currently in court with the BPPE concerning this issue right now. It is possible this line is being snuck into the SB 823 bill in order to get rid of schools like UMS and other schools teaching " lesser known religions " that would not be considered " multi-denominational. " Christianity is the only religion that has true " multidenominational " status. Any other religion would have a hard time proving that it is " multidenominational. " If any religion has a bonafide church registered with the IRS as a 501©3, no matter how " well-recognized " its religion is or if it is not " multidenominational, " it should be allowed to operate in California along with all the other better known religions. The line in question is: (Education Code 94874): 4) (A) A nonprofit institution owned, controlled, and operated and maintained by a bona fide church, religious denomination, OR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION COMPOSED OF MULTIDENOMINATIONAL MEMBERS OF THE SAME WELL-RECOGNIZED RELIGION, lawfully operating as a nonprofit religious corporation pursuant to Part 4 (commencing with Section 9110) of Division 2 of Title 1 of the Corporations Code. Please note that this has been specifically changed from its original wording on purpose. This is will allow employees of the BPPE to " legally " exercise their personal religious preferences that they have been trying to exercise over the past few years. Employees of the BPPE are not qualified to determine if a religion is a " well recognized religion. " Not even the IRS attempts such an unconstitutional feat, nor is it required that a religion has many denominations. 2. I am also concerned about the provision that allows the BPPE to turn off a school's phone number. This should only be decided by a court of law, not an employee at the BPPE or a board hearing comprised of members that BPPE employees might know well and play golf with. Only an objective outside agency should be allowed to determine the existence of a school. The Department of Consumer Affairs is not objective, since it fought court cases on behalf of the BPPVE after the BPPVE was disbanded. Only a court of law can be considered objective concerning a school's existence, and only a court of law can be depended on to adhere to real laws and not be persuaded unfairly by employees of the BPPE. 1-800 numbers are not California's jurisdiction, so they should be exempt from this power granted to the BPPE to be able to turn off a school's phone number. Protection needs to be provided in this part of the law. 1-800 numbers are not local in California. Otherwise California might find itself financially responsible for damages and losses to schools in other states that are outside of California's jurisdiction. If the BPPE orders a 1-800 phone number turned off that a school has been using, they will be interfering with that school's ability to conduct business in another state since the 1-800 number might be ringing at a branch outside of California. I encourage you to ask for a rewrite on this part of the bill that will protect the branches of schools in other states from having their phone turned off that are not in California's jurisdiction. This will also protect California from being sued for large sums of money due to financial losses and damages that schools in other states might suffer due to this power granted to the BPPE to turn off phones. This invites a large financial liability issue for the state of California. 3. Also, when a student requests a refund, $150 should be kept for administrative costs, not $100. $100 does not cover what it costs to accept and then refund a credit card, due to the cost of processing credit cards, or the postage used for mailing materials. $150 does cover that expense. I encourage you to ask for a rewrite on this part of the bill. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I respect your wisdom in this decision, and I hope that you defend our rights to learn about whatever religion we want to learn about in the state of California. You must create checks and balances on employees at the BPPE, which has a history of being inconsistent, arbitrary and undependable as to a reliable outcome according to the Bureau of State Audits report. If " well recognized religions " can teach in California, so should lesser known religions that don't have lot of denominations. Sincerely, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.