Guest guest Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Comparing Water Filter Technologies/ Alternatives _http://www.waterfiltercomparisons.com/Compare_Water_Filter_Technologies.cfm_ (http://www.waterfiltercomparisons.com/Compare_Water_Filter_Technologies.cfm) The performance of a particular water filtration product can easily be verified by reviewing the " Performance Data Sheet " , which lists all of the contaminants the system has been certified to remove and to what degree. The law in California and several other states requires that this information be included as part of the company's literature, as well as the ongoing replacement cartridge cost, and that a copy be enclosed with each water filtration device. By comparing each product's contaminant reduction capabilities, system cost and ongoing cost per gallon, it is easy to determine which product is best for you. It is also important to look at the advantages or disadvantages of other products or technologies even though they are not leading brands; such is the case with reverse osmosis and distillation systems. Although none of the leading brands employ either of these de-mineralizing techniques, as their popularity has declined in recent years, there is an ongoing debate over the healthfulness of de-mineralized water vs. filtered water with trace minerals. While there are studies that argue both sides of this debate, after 15 years of specialized study in water quality and health, we feel that the benefits of drinking naturally balanced water with its natural trace minerals, just makes more sense. From a non-scientific perspective, the fact that nowhere on this planet do we find naturally occurring de-mineralized water should tell us that we were not meant to have it. In nature, all fresh water contains traces of natural minerals like calcium, magnesium and potassium, which is what our body is designed to run on. All over the world and throughout time, wherever you find the most contaminant-free, mineral rich water, you find the healthiest, most vibrant civilizations. On a more scientific level, there are several very credible research reports and books that stress the more recent opinion that long term consumption of de-mineralized water can in fact be dangerous. Dr. Zolton Rona, author of " The Joy of Health " , states that " the longer one consumes distilled water, the more likely the development of mineral deficiencies and an acid state. " Dr. Paavo Airola, cancer expert and author of " How to Get Well " and " Cancer... Causes, Prevention and Healing " also reports that " long term consumption of distilled water eventually results in multiple mineral deficiencies. " Two very negative things happen when we consume water that has been stripped of its natural minerals. First, because de-mineralized water contains more hydrogen it is an acid, with a pH below seven. Any time we consume an acid substance, our body will pull minerals from our teeth and bones to produce bicarbonate in order to neutralize the acid. Second, it has been proven that when our body fluids become more acid than alkaline the production of free radicals increases, causing increased cancer risks. Many studies suggest that cancer cells can only grow in an acid environment. This theory seems to be supported by the fact that the areas where people live the longest most disease free lives are the areas that have the most alkaline water, water with the highest mineral content. Reverse Osmosis and Distillation were first developed over 40 years ago for the printing and photo processing industries, which require mineral free water. Because of the popularity and demand for home water treatment products, many companies have marketed these products as " state-of-the-art " drinking water systems, which they simply are not. Often these products are marketed by using a demonstration that measures the TDS (total dissolved solids), and implies that this measurement shows the systems effectiveness at removing contaminants. TDS meters measure the dissolved minerals in water, primarily calcium and magnesium, and have little or nothing to do with contaminant levels or water purity. The very healthiest water is produced by selective filtration, which has the ability to remove contaminants and not minerals. All of the leading brands shown in the water filter comparison chart on this site use selective filtration methods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 I liked the idea of partially freezing tap water that someone posted recently, I tried it and it reminded me of pure mountain spring water (not that I've ever tasted pure mountain spring water) ... I didn't continue with it as I wondered about the energy consumption of the freezer. Ray. Posted by: " Alobar " Alobar wm_alobar Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:20 am (PDT) The amount of minerals one gets from water is minuscule compared to the amount of mineral we need. So I am not fearful of reverse osmosis water. You state " nowhere on this planet do we find naturally occurring de-mineralized water " seems to want to forget that rainwater is distilled water which is void of minerals, and rainwater is most certainly naturally occurring. Alobar E-mail message checked by Internet Security (5.5.0.212) Database version: 5.10230 http://www.pctools.com/uk/internet-security/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2008 Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 Alobar Rainwater is not demineralized. It picks up minerals from the atmosphere before it falls to earth. There is no naturally occurring distilled water on the face of the planet. GB , Alobar <Alobar wrote: > > The amount of minerals one gets from water is minuscule compared to > the amount of mineral we need. So I am not fearful of reverse osmosis > water. > > You state " nowhere on this planet do we find naturally occurring > de-mineralized water " seems to want to forget that rainwater is > distilled water which is void of minerals, and rainwater is most > certainly naturally occurring. > > Alobar > > On 7/10/08, bestsurprise2002 <bestsurprise2002 wrote: > > > > Comparing Water Filter Technologies/ Alternatives > > _http://www.waterfiltercomparisons.com/ Compare_Water_Filter_Technologies.cfm_ > > (http://www.waterfiltercomparisons.com/ Compare_Water_Filter_Technologies.cfm) > > The performance of a particular water filtration product can easily be > > verified by reviewing the " Performance Data Sheet " , which lists all of the > > contaminants the system has been certified to remove and to what degree. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 , " Guru K " <greatyoga wrote: > > Alobar > > Rainwater is not demineralized. It picks up minerals from the > atmosphere before it falls to earth. There is no naturally > occurring distilled water on the face of the planet. This is true. As measured with a Hanna PWT, the conductivity of distilled water is right around 1uS (uS = microsiemen). Reverse osmosis water comes in at around 20uS. Our household water, when it is rain water collected off the roof and stored in an epoxy coated concrete cistern, measures around 25uS. After the rainwater lands on the ground and flows into our pond, the conductivity is around 125uS. The water in rain ceases to be distilled the second it condenses around a dust particle to form a rain drop in the first place. However, the mineral content of rain water is still very low, compared to water that has flowed below or on the ground. > , Alobar > <Alobar@> wrote: > > > > The amount of minerals one gets from water is minuscule compared to > > the amount of mineral we need. So I am not fearful of reverse > osmosis > > water. > > > > You state " nowhere on this planet do we find naturally occurring > > de-mineralized water " seems to want to forget that rainwater is > > distilled water which is void of minerals, and rainwater is most > > certainly naturally occurring. > > > > Alobar > > > > On 7/10/08, bestsurprise2002@ <bestsurprise2002@> wrote: > > > > > > Comparing Water Filter Technologies/ Alternatives > > > _http://www.waterfiltercomparisons.com/ > Compare_Water_Filter_Technologies.cfm_ > > > (http://www.waterfiltercomparisons.com/ > Compare_Water_Filter_Technologies.cfm) > > > The performance of a particular water filtration product can > easily be > > > verified by reviewing the " Performance Data Sheet " , which lists > all of the > > > contaminants the system has been certified to remove and to > what degree. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.