How the American Medical Association Got Rich

[Guest guest]

How the American Medical Association Got Rich

 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/05/03/how-the-american-m\

edical-association-got-rich.aspx

 

 

The American Medical Association (AMA) was dictatorially led for the first half

of the 20th century by Dr. George H. Simmons and his protégé Dr. Morris

Fishbein. Simmons and Fishbein both served as general manager of the

organization and as editor of its journal, the Journal of the American Medical

Association (JAMA).

 

Dana Ullman's book,  " The Homeopathic Revolution: Why Famous People and Cultural

Heroes Choose Homeopathy " describes how, in 1899, Simmons began his 25-year

reign as head of the AMA. At that time, it was a weak organization with little

money and little respect from the general public. Simmons came up with the idea

to transform the AMA into a big business by granting the AMA's " seal of

approval " to certain drug companies that placed large and frequent ads in JAMA.

 

Advertising revenue increased substantially, from $34,000 in 1899 to $150,000 in

1909. Critics of the AMA have called their seal-of-approval program nothing but

a form of extortion, since the AMA did no testing of any products.

 

In 1924, Simmons was forced out of the AMA due to the many scandals swirling

around him. One investigation revealed that:

 

* Simmons had no credible medical credentials

* He worked primarily as an abortion doctor for many years

* He had had sex charges brought by some of his patients as well as charges of

negligence in the deaths of othersWhen he left, he took home all his personal

files and burned them.

 

His replacement, Morris Fishbein, was a specialist in publicity and the media;

he was a medical doctor who never practiced medicine.

 

Shortly after he became head of the AMA, he wrote several books sharply critical

of medical practices that were not AMA approved. He called chiropractic a

" malignant tumor, " and he considered osteopathy and homeopathy " cults. " Fishbein

also extended Simmons's idea for the AMA seal of approval to foods, and by

including a significant amount of advertising from food and tobacco companies,

he was able to make the AMA and himself even richer.

 

By 1950, the AMA's advertising revenue exceeded $9 million, thanks in great part

to the tobacco companies.

Sources:

* AlterNet April 10, 2008

* The Homeopathic Revolution 

 

 

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

This should certainly make you think twice when you see something christened

with the AMA's " seal of approval. " From the very beginning, the people behind

the AMA were not about protecting your health; they were interested in gaining

power and getting rich.

 

And yet, it wasn't that long ago that the AMA was still in the minority. People

didn't trust this new conglomeration, because in the 19th century, most

Americans thrived on more natural approaches like homeopathic medicine. 

 

Then, in 1847, along comes the AMA. They wanted control and they wanted money,

so what did they do? They kept all homeopathic physicians out of their " club, "

and proceeded to call all related remedies " quackery. "

 

If you didn't want to pay to join the club (by advertising in JAMA), anything

you recommended would also be criticized.

 

Note that none of this was based on scientific evidence, or even anecdotal

evidence of what was really healthy. It was solely about money. If you could buy

your way in, your products and your name would be endorsed, end of story.

 

Yet, at this time, people were still questioning the allopathic model that the

AMA was touting. If you haven't yet read Medical Control, Medical Corruption by

Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., please do, as it goes into great detail about the

sordid events that followed.

 

AMA: A True Medical Monopoly

 

The AMA claimed that the public did not know what was good for it and that the

medical establishment must have total control. And they have since gained just

that.

 

 

" Thanks to this central committee of the medical cartel [the AMA], " Rockwell

writes, " the number of medical schools and medical students is drastically

restricted, state licensure further obstructs the supply of doctors, fees are

largely secret and controlled across the industry, alternative treatments and

practitioners are outlawed, pharmacists and nurses are hamstrung, and the

mystique of the profession rivals the priesthood, although priests have a

somewhat lower income.

 

Meanwhile, the customer pays through the nose, even if he does not go to an

otolaryngologist. "

 

To put it simply, they took control of the medical schools and made it so that

only those who graduated from one of them could practice medicine. Well, since

they controlled the schools, guess what was largely taught? How to use

prescription drugs.

 

" The Rockefeller family had invested heavily in allopathic drug companies and

wanted doctors to use their products, " Rockwell writes, and so they also gave

grants to the schools that the AMA endorsed.

 

This medical monopoly is largely responsible for the problems that exist in

conventional medicine today:

 

* Heavy ties to the drug industry

* Reliance on drugs, surgery and hospital stays

* No competition, leading to outrageous prices that most Americans cannot

afford

* Calling tried-and-true natural remedies and most all non-medical doctors

quacksIf this topic interests you, I would strongly suggest viewing the video

about the 1988 book Murder by Injection. It explains how the Rockefeller

Syndicate, U.S. government officials and the AMA formed an unholy triumvirate

that successfully gained control of America's health care industry in the early

part of the 20th century -- control that still continues to this day.

 

Related Articles:

 

 

  American Medical Association's Secret Pact with the Federal Government

 

 The AMA -- Murder by Injection

 

 AMA Criticized for Letting Drug Firms Pay for Ethics Campaign