Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Enzymes in the Fight Against Cancer.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Enzymes in the Fight Against Cancer.

By: Dr. William Wong, ND, PhD.

_http://www.totalityofbeing.com/FramelessPages/Articles/EnzymesFightCancer.htm

_

(http://www.totalityofbeing.com/FramelessPages/Articles/EnzymesFightCancer.htm)

 

Cancer, the very name alone scares most people. These days man has a vast

amount of information on what things cause the disease, how it progresses,

it's growth rates vs. age, which forms are faster spreading than others but

what

we don't posses is the answer as to how to stop it. I won't touch on what

I believe are the business reasons why the disease has such poor treatment

rates in the US as opposed to else where, this isn't the forum for it. Suffice

to say that other countries have a better handle on fighting the disease

than we do and lets look at one of the reasons why.

Neoplasm's (cancers) are smart and cagey buggers. They can hide and grow

for a good spell undetected, they don't need oxygen to live (at least 99.9% of

them don't), and while you can kill most all of it with special treatments

and surgery all it take's is for one cell to survive to have the condition grow

back again. Many cancers are hormonally driven, such as testicular cancer

in younger men or cancers of the reproductive organs in middle aged and older

women. This provides the perfect fuel as during those periods of life

certain hormones abound. A cancer is built to survive. CA (cancer) cells are

covered with fibrin (the same stuff scar tissue is made of). Then as the cells

glom together to form tumors these growths themselves are armored with fibrin.

This thick protective coating is designed to prevent the bodies' own

defenses (i.e. Natural Killer cells, White blood cells or Oxygen) from getting

inside the cell or tumor and destroy it. It is this same defense that keeps

chemotherapy out of the cells in all but industrial strength doses. (Doses that

are just as likely to kill the patient as the cancer). It is this same defense

that keeps out whatever natural agent's patients may be using to combat the

disease.

Would it not make sense to have something strip away the outer fibrous wall

of CA so that whatever agents we are using as medicine, whether natural or

otherwise, can actually get into the cell and do their job? Sure as heck does?

That idea has made sense in Europe and Asia for almost 30 years. There

docs have been throwing highly fibrinolytic enzymes (scar tissue eating

enzymes)

both in blends and as solo enzymes at cancers outer coating and getting

better results with turning the tide that the folks here in the States. So why

has something with a 30 year history of proven worth and clinical application

not reached the shores of America yet? Good question.

In truth, there have been attempts to introduce systemic enzymes into cancer

therapy here as far back as the 1970's. Dr. William Kelly DDS, had an enzyme

based anti cancer therapy he used on pancreatic cancer patients. For those

not familiar with that form of cancer the survival rate from it was 0. Dr.

Kelly had a record of remission with his patients of 80+%. (1). Not possible

thought the ivory towers of establishment medicine. Also two major hindrances

kept popping up for Dr. Kelly, first he was a dentist not an MD. Secondly

it was also not believed here in this country that enzymes could be absorbed

orally. That kept many a doc from even looking at Kelly's findings. (2,3).

SO they sent a young medical intern, Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez to investigate

Kelly's claims and debunk him. Far from proving him a fraud the young MD found

Kelly's treatments worked and his recovery rate was as he said. That did

not settle things. The story of Dr. Kelly's persecution, the mysterious death

of his wife and his being run out of the country is too long a tale to take

up here. Nuff said that his therapy worked.

Concurrent with those events, in Germany and Japan enzymes were being used

both singly and in groups by orthodox medical researchers to augment

established therapy. It was found that by introducing a strongly fibrinolytic

enzyme

like chymotrypsin or serrapeptase that anti cancer medications penetrated the

cancer cell easier. Therefore lower dosages of chemotherapy could be used

and high levels of toxicity in the patient could be avoided. Along with that

researchers found that the enzymes seemed to reduce the side effects of the

chemotherapy and, definitely reduced the debilitating muscle wasting that

chemo therapy produced in it's patients. (4,5,6)

In radiation therapy patients, these doctors found that taking systemic

enzymes after treatments reduced the fibrosis that grew in the treated organs.

Organs treated with radiation become very hard filled with scar tissue, which

restricts the organ and reduces its overall function. The enzymes were found

to prevent a good bit of that scaring from occurring and where it had

already happened, the enzymes reduced existing fibrosis. (7). The use of

orally

administered systemic enzymes to aid in the treatment of cancer was embraced by

these countries.

After decades of resistance, systemic enzyme therapy as an adjunct to

overall cancer treatment has finally gained a foothold in America. Wholistic

and

alternative cancer treatment centers are using enzymes to assist in the fight

against the disease. Individual oncologist's, realizing the clinical

advantage posed by these agents, are now introducing them into the toolbox of

things

one can do against the disease. No less than the likes of the great

Naturopathic physician Dr. Michael Murray recommends systemic enzyme use in his

work

" How to Prevent and Treat Cancer With Natural Medicine " .

Now here's the pitch: To quote from Dr. Murray: " Serratia peptidase exerts

more powerful effects than chymotrypsin and trypsin in all of these

applications " . Serratia peptidase is the same as serrapeptase. Remembering

that

enzymes in blends exert a far greater range and strength of actions than solo

enzymes, I believe that serrapeptase based enzyme blends are the best systemic

enzymes to apply in the fight against cancer. Nuff Said.

 

References:

1) Dr. William Kelly's' book " One Answer to Cancer " is available free as a

download on: http://www.drkelley.com/CANLIVER55.html

2) Moriya, N, Nakata M, Nakamura M, Takaoka M, Iwasa S, Kato K, Kakinuma A.

Intestinal absorption of serrapeptase (TSP) in rats. Biotechnol Appl Biochem.

1994; 20(Pt1):101-8.

3) Miyata, K. Intestinal absorption of Serratia Peptidase. J Appl Biochem.

1980;2:111-16.

4) Rosanova, A.: The present stand of enzyme therapy in the treatment of

malignant tumors. Arztl Praxis XVI 36, 1964, 1442-1444.

5) Konig, W.: Enzyme therapy in the treatment of viral diseases and

carcinoma. Erfahrungsheilk. 38, 1989, 455-459.

6) Desser, L., Ransberger, A.: Introduction of tumor necrosis factor in

human peripheral-blood mononuclear cells by proteolytic enzymes. Oncology 47,

1990, 475.

7) Beaufort, E.: Reduction in the adverse effects of radiation therapy with

hydrolytic enzymes. Therapeutikon 10, 1990, 577-580.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...