Re:TEST BEFORE YOU INGEST

[Guest guest]

Question about the Kinesiology theory: I had an alternative practitioner do

this with me to test several supplements he thought I needed. He tested one

against the other, put the best one aside and put the negative one back on

the shelf. He did this several times, finally ending with a group of

" passing " supplements.

 

Then he did something I didn't understand. He re-tested the supplements

that had " passed " the test... thereby narrowing the selection down to an

optimum

few. But the only way this could happen was if some that were being

re-tested failed the test when re-tested. For this to happen, my body must

have

rejected what it had accepted before.

 

I don't understand the logic here... if it was good for my body the first

time why would it not be good when tested a second time? I became very

suspicious of this procedure after this. Can anybody explain this theory?

 

Marji

 

 

 

 

 

**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family

favorites at AOL Food.

(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Marji

 

Maybe he asked what the best supplement is between the two variables.

 

GB

>

> I don't understand the logic here... if it was good for my body the

first

> time why would it not be good when tested a second time? I became

very

> suspicious of this procedure after this. Can anybody explain this

theory?

>

> Marji

[Guest guest]

I don't understand the logic here... if it was good for my body the first

time why would it not be good when tested a second time? I became very

suspicious of this procedure after this. Can anybody explain this theory?

 

Hi Marji,

 

I use muscle testing all the time, mostly for myself, using a finger test

method. It depends on the question you ask as to the outcome. So if the

practitioner first went through the list and asked, for example, whether

something was good for your body, the second time he/she may have asked what

would be the BEST for your body. One can see that for the first question

you might get several things which may be good, but not best. Also, it's a

good way of double checking asking a different sort of question. The

questioner is only as good as his/her question, and it's all in how you

phrase it - questions should never be ambiguous as there is only ever a

yes-no response. Maybe is too hard to determine! I'm not sure if the

tester you had asked questions out loud or in their mind. If they are

asking out loud, it's not so good as your own intent can influence the

outcome more easily.

 

I like muscle testing as a tool, but when using it for myself, I am very

aware that my own intent can influence the outcome. Consequently, I find it

best when it's a question about a total unknown for me: eg. which direction

should I drive from here to get to there the quickest. I'm not amazed by

the outcome anymore... I must be getting used to it!

 

I hope that helps.

 

Love

Vivienne