Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Robert Sinaiko, MD wins

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Robert Sinaiko, MD wins

_http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW/is_265-266/ai_n15397001_

(http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW/is_265-266/ai_n15397001)

_Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients_

(http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW) , _August-Sept, 2005_

(http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW/is_265-266) by _Jule Klotter_

(http://findarticles.com/p/search?tb=art & qa=Jule+Klotter)

 

The California Medical Board dropped all action against Robert J. Sinaiko,

MD, on February 17, 2005. His medical license is clear and in good standing.

The Medical Board accused him of " departure from the prevailing standard of

practice. " Dr. Sinaiko, who is board-certified in allergy, was criticized for

using Enzyme Potentiated Desensitization and for treating patients for Candida

overgrowth. Dr. Sinaiko, in his own words, has " a huge passion for working

with children, especially children with ADHD and autism. " The Medical Board

disregarded briefs submitted by amici curiae and prestigious medical experts

who testified at Dr. Sinaiko's original hearing--including a brief filed by the

Center for Public Interest Law and one from Phil Lee, MD, a retired

Assistant Secretary of Health. Shortly after the original hearing, Governor

Gray

Davis appointed Lee as his primary health advisor, and Lee disbanded the

Medical

Board and appointed a new one. According to the Court of Appeal, the Medical

Board violated Dr. Sinaiko's due process rights when it ignored the amici

curiae briefs.

In his letter to consumer advocate Tim Bolen ( _www.quackpotwatch.org_

(http://www.quackpotwatch.org) ), Dr. Sinaiko wrote, " Recent data compiled by

the

Center for Public Interest Law show that we beat the odds. Only 5 out of 75

petitions for reconsideration are [sic] granted by the Medical Board. Our case

was one of them. For the past three years, at the appellate level, only 2

out of 19 prevailed against the board. " His case was one of the two.

Bolen, T. California " Sinaiko " Case: The " Quackbuster's " Breaking Point ...

_www.quackpotwatch.org_ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org) (accessed 5 April

2005)

COPYRIGHT 2005 The Townsend Letter Group

COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...