Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 Medical Board Brutality - The Plot Thickens... _http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/calmedbrd2.htm_ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/calmedbrd2.htm) Opinion by Consumer Advocate _Tim Bolen_ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/tim%20bolen.htm) Friday, August 26th, 2005 Last Friday, August 19th, 2005 I sent out a newsletter called " _Medical Board Brutality_ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/calmedbrd.htm) . " It was about the newest antics of the California Medical Board Staff - an organization, I believe, to be completely corrupt - and not worth saving. Like the story about Hercules and the Aegean stables, the best thing that could happen is for someone to re-route the Sacramento river right through 1426 Howe Avenue (the medical board offices) - and for the same reasons.... The responses were startling. In short, my disdain for the Administrative Law System, and the way it is abused against licensed health professionals, is SHARED worldwide. I want to thank all of those who responded with a letter to the Presiding Judge of the Appeals Court. If you haven't yet sent yours in, please do so. You can get the details about what to do by clicking _here_ (http://www.administrativelaw.net/) . In short, my earlier newsletter details an assault against a " lay representative " helping people through the Administrative law process. The lay representative had complained to an Administrative law Judge that the Medical Board, and the prosecutor in the case had " biased " the State's witness against his client - a violation of the agency's own rules of conduct - and the State retaliated against the lay representative, claiming he was " practicing law without a license. " The Medical Board went to a " friendly " Superior Court Judge and got an order seizing the lay representative's office, leaving his clients in the lurch. the lay representative filed an Appeal to the Fourth District Court of Appeals - and here we are. So, how is the plot thickening? Well, the situation is WORSE than I originally indicated. The corruption is far deeper, and far more extensive, than I thought. It extends deep into the bowels of the California Attorney General's office. Sit back, and read this... It turns out that the whole case against the lay representative centers around two letters, so-called " legal opinions " of employees of the Attorney General's office named Alfredo Terrazas, and Robert McKim Bell... And, the intent with this assault, in my opinion, is to preserve their continued misuse (cheating in prosecutions) of the regulatory system - to get more numbers of successful case outcomes - to make themselves look good to their superiors. So, who are these people? First I'll tell you who Alfredo Terrazas is. Those of you who have been long time readers of my newsletter will remember the series about the infamous _ " California Medical Board v. Sinaiko " _ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/breaking%20point.htm) _http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/breaking%20point.htm_ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/breaking%20point.htm) case - and the huge cost, and embarrassment, it caused the California Medical Board over the seven years it took to complete. It was the " Sinaiko " case that first brought the wrath of the California Legislature on the staff, in the form of an official " Enforcement Monitor. " The " star " of the show, on the Medical Board's side, during the " Sinaiko " case, the man that lost the biggest case in the medical board's history, was prosecutor Alfredo Terrazas. It was his " legal opinions " and his grasp of the law (or lack of it), that was so contemptuously shot down by the California Court of Appeals. Terrazas's case, and his concept of what constituted health care, and his concept of the the law surrounding health care, brought together the largest, angriest, and most diverse, group of opposition I've ever seen anywhere. And, it was deserved. The hallmark of the " Sinaiko " case was Terrazas's flagrant prosecutorial misconduct laid out in a fifty-one page document I'm giving you access to in a minute. But the keynote was Terrazas's continued use of a " fake " witness (Samantha Simons), with a _ " _ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/terr2.pdf) _fake " _ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/terr1.pdf) _ complaint._ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/terr1.pdf) Much like the situation the lay representative had complained about, Terrazas not only sought to _ " influence " the State's witnesses_ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/terr2.pdf) in the case, but he, against the orders of a Judge, slipped the " fake " document, by the " fake " witness, into the presentation to the appointed Medical Board members as " Exhibit #21. " In other words, there is a long history of abuse of the system, and misconduct on the part of the Medical Board staff and the AGs assigned to their cases. As you may remember, the support network for " Sinaiko " ended up including not just the North American Health Freedom Movement, and the Progress in Medicine Foundation, but the Center for Public Interest Law (the group that actually WROTE the California Medical Practices Act), the California Medical Association (CMA), The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), the Union of American Physicians & Surgeons (UAPD), and many others - just too many to name here. Unlikely bed-fellows - on most days. The " Sinaiko " case brought factors together, in California, which significantly changed the way medicine is regulated. For, the general feeling was that the whole situation surrounding the " Sinaiko " case was just plain wrong. The finger pointing was, for the most part, ALL at Alfredo Terrazas. The cause of all of the " Sinaiko " commotion was the decidedly " bigoted " and clearly " anti-due process " legal opinions of Alfredo Terrazas. Simply, Terrazas felt that it was improper for a defendant (in this case, Sinaiko) to be able to defend himself/herself. He convinced an Administrative Law Judge, named Ruth Astle (who slept through much of the hearings) to disallow any of Sinaiko's top-of-the-line " expert witnesses, " basically, because they DISAGREED with his witnesses. Terrazas tried to claim that " only medicine that was 'generally accepted in the mainstream' was legal. All else was 'health fraud. " The Appeals Court, in their decision, didn't hide their disdain for Terrazas's " legal opinions. " Neither do I. With Terrazas, it's not about justice, or disciplining bad doctors, its about " winning. " Terrazas bragged to Sinaiko's first attorney that " I never lose a case. I use the 'death of a thousand cuts' attack. I make as many accusations as possible so that even if you win on 999, I still win on one. And, I'm going to take your client's license to practice medicine away from him. " Shula Edelkind, the Executive Director of the _Progress in Medicine Foundation_ (http://www.treatmentchoice.org/) , the group that raised the money for the " Sinaiko " defense, also gathered information to help Sinaiko. One of the most interesting documents I've seen come out of the case is one called: _ " _ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/Terrazas%20Complaint.htm) Request for a Formal Investigation of: Mr. Alfredo Terrazas, State Bar # 78403, Deputy Atty Gen of CA, 2101 Webster Street, 12th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3049, (510) 622-2220, for misconduct in his prosecution of the case of Medical Board of California v. Robert Sinaiko, MD " In that Terrazas did the following: False Statement of Fact, Concealed Material Information, Misquoted Scientific Materials, Misquoted the Testimony, Produced Inappropriate “Expertsâ€, Misquoted and Misread the Medical Charts of Patients, Betrayed the Confidentiality of the Patients, Made Inappropriate Assumptions as to the Aim of Therapy, Cited as Authority a Decision that had been Overruled, Introduced into Evidence Materials Barred from Consideration, Colluded with Another to Deceive the Court, Used Slander, violated the ABA Code of Professional Responsibility, EC 7-13, Attempted to Show “Guilt by Association,†Took Advantage of Defense Naiveté . At the request of the Attorneys representing Sinaiko, the document was held back " until the case was finished. " Well, the " Sinaiko " case is finished... you can read the whole complaint by clicking here ..http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/Terrazas%20Complaint.htm Like me, you'll be shocked that someone of such low ethics, and moral character would be allowed to work as a prosecutor. You'll be even more shocked to find out that while the " Sinaiko " case was winding to conclusion, Terrazas was PROMOTED and now heads the Licensing Division - so be assured that his policies are now ALL of the prosecutors policies. Just think - now every licensed professional in the State can get the same treatment Sinaiko got... (sarcasm intended). So, who's Robert McKim Bell? Thought you'd never ask. Robert McKim Bell is the attorney for the California Attorney General's office that went to the Federation of States Medical Board (FSMB) meeting in Chicago in 1996. The purpose of that meeting, and the presentation called " Fraudulent Medical Practices " was to criminalize innovation in health care - and call it " health fraud. " As the panel moderator, James W. Wren MD said: " Our first session this morning is entitled: " Fraudulent Medical Practices: Watch and Be Wary. " This topic is particularly timely because of the increased attacks on medical practice acts around the country by a number of proponents and practitioners of alternative medicine. " Bell's role, on behalf of the _ " quackbusters, " _ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/WisconsinWar/who_are_these_so.htm) was to show FSMB members how to use the prosecutorial system to stop, or prosecute, innovation in health care. You can read his speech, at the convention, by clicking _here. _ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/WisconsinWar/planof96.htm) It's near the bottom of the page. You'll be shocked. Bell was at the podium with top _ " quackbuster " _ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/WisconsinWar/who_are_these_so.htm) John Renner. Bell said, in his introduction: " I'm flattered to be included in such a prestigious organization's program. I am an obscure lawyer from California. I think I came to the attention of a couple of your board members as a result of litigation conducted a couple of years ago for the State Medical Board of CA. involving a chelation physician which was of rather large magnitude. We had a successful outcome in that case, I've been asked today to talk from the perspective of a prosecutor about what it takes to investigate and successfully prove a case. " Summing Up... There are real credibility issues at the AG's office. Stay tuned... Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate This " Millions of Health Freedom Fighters - Newsletter " is about the battle between " Health and Medicine " on Planet Earth. Tim Bolen is an op/ed writer with extensive knowledge of the activities of a subversive organization calling itself the " quackbusters, " and that organization's attempts to suppress, and discredit, any, and all health modalities that compete with the allopathic (MD) paradigm for consumer health dollars. The focus of the newsletter is on the ongoing activities, battles, politics, and the victories won by members of the " Health Freedom Movement " against the " quackbusters " It details " who the quackbusters are, what they are, where they are operating, when they appear, and how they operate - and how easy it is to beat them... " For background information on the " Battle between Health and Medicine " go to: _http://www.savedrclark.net/by_whom2.htm_ (http://www.savedrclark.net/by_whom2.htm) . A copy of THIS newsletter, and older ones, are viewable at the website _http://www.quackpotwatch.org/default.htm_ (http://www.quackpotwatch.org/default.htm) . For EVEN MORE interesting and related articles go to _http://www.bolenreport.com_ (http://www.bolenreport.com/) . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.