Feds admit vaccine 'aggravated' autism

[Guest guest]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=57629

Posted: February 28, 2008

6:43 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

 

Feds admit vaccine 'aggravated' autism

 

Critics: Ruling major concession after years of government denials

 

 

The federal government continues to deny a link between vaccines and

autism, but the U.S. Court of Federal Claims has ruled in favor of a

child alleged to have regressed into autism as a result of

vaccinations.

 

Several of the vaccinations included the controversial mercury-based

preservative thimerosal, points out the National Autism Association,

which sees the ruling as confirmation of the claims of many parents.

 

" This case echoes the stories of thousands of children across the

country, " said NAA President Wendy Fournier. " With almost 5,000

similar cases pending in vaccine court, we are confident that this is

just the first of many that will confirm what we have believed for so

long – vaccines can and do cause children to regress into autism. "

 

Fournier called on the Centers for Disease Control " to acknowledge

that the current vaccine schedule is not safe for every child and as

with the administration of any medicine, individual risks and

susceptibilities must be considered for each patient. "

 

The government's unprecedented concession – filed Nov. 9 and sealed

to protect the plaintiff's identity – was obtained through

individuals unrelated to the case, said David Kirby, author

of " Evidence of Harm: Mercury in Vaccines and The Autism Epidemic, A

Medical Controversy. "

 

The concession was made by U.S. Assistant Attorney General Peter

Keisler and other Justice Department officials on behalf of the

Department of Health and Human Services, the defendant in all vaccine

court cases.

 

A CDC panel, meanwhile, voted unanimously Wednesday to recommend flu

shots for all school-age children. The move would compel private

insurers to cover the costs and require the CDC to make the vaccine

available to anyone who can't afford it.

 

The NAA criticized the CDC decision, noting thimerosal is still found

in flu shots recommended for children and pregnant women.

 

Thimerosal in vaccines is suspected of causing brain damage and

weakening the immune system, making some children susceptible later

to infection from measles, mumps and rubella shots.

 

Kirby, writing for the Huffington Post, reported the government's

written concession said the child had a pre-existing mitochondrial

disorder that was " aggravated " by her shots and ultimately resulted

in a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, or ASD.

 

" This statement is good news for the girl and her family, who will

now be compensated for the lifetime of care she will require, " Kirby

writes. " But its implications for the larger vaccine-autism debate,

and for public health policy in general, are not as certain. "

 

The government's concession, he says, seems to raise more questions

than it answers.

 

The Department of Health and Human Services said its Division of

Vaccine Injury Compensation, or DVIC, " has reviewed the scientific

information concerning the allegation that vaccines cause autism and

has found no credible evidence to support the claim. Accordingly, in

every case under the Vaccine Act, DVIC has maintained the position

that vaccines do not cause autism, and has never concluded in any

case that autism was caused by vaccination. "

 

Kirby said that for most affected families, the fine distinction

between claiming that vaccines did not " cause " autism but instead

aggravated a condition to " manifest " as autism is a fine distinction

that is not so important.

 

While it's too early to tell, he said, " this concession could

conceivably make it more difficult for some officials to continue

insisting there is 'absolutely no link' between vaccines and autism. "

 

It also puts the federal government's vaccine court defense strategy

somewhat into jeopardy, he said.

 

" DOJ lawyers and witnesses have argued that autism is genetic, with

no evidence to support an environmental component, " he pointed

out. " And, they insist, it's simply impossible to construct a chain

of events linking immunizations to the disorder. Government officials

may need to rethink their legal strategy, as well as their public

relations campaigns, given their own slightly contradictory

concession in this case. "

 

The bottom line, he said, is that the public will demand to know what

is going on inside the U.S. federal health establishment.

 

" The significance of this concession will unfortunately be fought

over in the usual, vitriolic way – and I fully expect to be slammed

for even raising these questions, " Kirby writes. " Despite that, the

language of this concession cannot be changed, or swept away. "

 

The key words contained in the concession, he says, are " aggravated "

and " manifested. "

 

" Without the aggravation of the vaccines, it is uncertain that the

manifestation would have occurred at all, " Kirby argues.

 

" When a kid with peanut allergy eats a peanut and dies, we don't

say 'his underlying metabolic condition was significantly aggravated

to the extent of manifesting as an anaphylactic shock with features

of death,' " he continues. " No, we say the peanut killed the poor boy.

Remove the peanut from the equation, and he would still be with us

today. "

 

Whatever the government's further explanation, says Kirby, " they

cannot change the fundamental facts of this extraordinary case: The

United State government is compensating at least one child for

vaccine injuries that resulted in a diagnosis of autism. And that is

big news, no matter how you want to say it. "