Guest guest Posted February 22, 2004 Report Share Posted February 22, 2004 first and foremost -- chris, please accept my apology regarding my typo and you name. i am a terrible typist and even worse early in the morning. i am truely sorry. butch, thanks for your response. i regret if i did not make myself clear on one point. that is, regarding the need for certain kinds of " scientific " study. i completely understand the reasons why this is not always possible i also understand the limitations and bias of much of the research that does exist. it has its place; but, it is not the be all and end all. this is an issue i must deal with professionally outside of the realm of essential oils. with regards to research, i believe that there more than one way to approach it. qualitative research is as valid and valuable as quantitative. clinical experience and case study is also very important. this is one reason why i appreciate chuck woodfield's (am i remembering his name correctly?) willingness to share his clinical experience and expertise. i hope that others are willing to do the same without fear of reprisal. thanks. sarah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.