Guest guest Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 At 02:06 AM 1/21/04, you wrote: >What makes me wonder is why all the hints that General Clark is less than >honest yet we never hear what the problem is with General Clark. amen! yes. hard information instead of inuendo would be nice here. Your source for superb Essential Oils, Aromatherapy Accessories, Information, Books and more! Visit us at: <http://www.naturesgift.com> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 At 02:10 PM 01/21/2004 -0600, Marge Clark wrote: >yes. hard information instead of inuendo would be nice here. For sure! And I disagree with Butch's assessment as to why we've only gotten innuendo so far. I think if they (whoever *they* are) want to torpedo someone's candidacy, and they have some real info/ammunition/evidence, they wouldn't wait until that person becomes *the* candidate. They'd spit it out right now and watch their target take the hit and go down. On the other hand, if they (whoever *they* are) want to torpedo someone's candidacy, and all they have is opinion and/or actions that are subject to an individual's interpretation, then they use innuendo and watch their target squirm as people start to question the candidate's integrity without having any real evidence on which to base an opinion. I may not know much about how the military works, but politicians are easy to figure out. Politics is a nasty business. -- Sandy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.