Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Placebo?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around by

researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real and

powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal itself. " Just

believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that we all have

the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and hepatitis. We

may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I wouldn't seek out

antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want all my

horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I see it as a

message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay attention " ,

" resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't view

sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger (the pain,

illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to reconnect with

our source instead of reinforcing our and societies disconnect?

 

The fact is that human beings have within them the power to heal and be

healed. How this power is activated involves many factors and is very

individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine being one

of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one determinate of

long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the case if the

drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in 1950 (Journal

of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that placebo was

powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to induce vomiting

into a drug that stopped nausea.

 

http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting article about the

power of placebo.

 

Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it should be

studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

 

Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

Oasis Acupuncture

<http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

Suite D-35

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Phone: (480) 991-3650

Fax: (480) 247-4472

 

 

Chinese Medicine

Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

daomsnow

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

Chinese Medicine

Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v Neutral (Even)

needling)

 

 

You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all medicines.

However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo is not

the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the belief.

The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis, try " just

believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the medicine thank

you.

 

 

Dr. Snow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive treatment. The

problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some effects. The

question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as well. That is what a

placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical effects as any drug study

will show you. In some studies it has been as high as 70%. The other thing is

that the effects of placebo usually do not last. It is therefore still a useful

tool, however not the endall

 

 

 

 

Oakland, CA 94609

 

 

-

Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

Placebo?

 

 

What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around by

researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real and

powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal itself. " Just

believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that we all have

the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and hepatitis. We

may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I wouldn't seek out

antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want all my

horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I see it as a

message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay attention " ,

" resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't view

sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger (the pain,

illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to reconnect with

our source instead of reinforcing our and societies disconnect?

 

The fact is that human beings have within them the power to heal and be

healed. How this power is activated involves many factors and is very

individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine being one

of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one determinate of

long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the case if the

drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in 1950 (Journal

of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that placebo was

powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to induce vomiting

into a drug that stopped nausea.

 

http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting article about the

power of placebo.

 

Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it should be

studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

 

Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

Oasis Acupuncture

<http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

Suite D-35

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Phone: (480) 991-3650

Fax: (480) 247-4472

 

Chinese Medicine

Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

daomsnow

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

Chinese Medicine

Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v Neutral (Even)

needling)

 

 

You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all medicines.

However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo is not

the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the belief.

The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis, try " just

believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the medicine thank

you.

 

 

Dr. Snow

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was that a monkey

or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points would always

yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner. You make your

own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is more to

acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its important,

but also believe there is something else at play - and that as the texts say

" the Yi moves the Qi. "

 

Point two, was that belief and intention are totally irrelevant. As you

correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up to 70% of any

clinical effect.

 

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

> no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive treatment. The

> problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some effects. The

> question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as well. That is

> what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical effects as

> any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as high as 70%.

> The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not last. It is

> therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

>

>

>

>

> Oakland, CA 94609

>

>

> -

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> Chinese Medicine

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> Placebo?

>

>

> What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around by

> researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real and

> powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal itself. " Just

> believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that we all have

> the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and hepatitis. We

> may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I wouldn't seek out

> antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want all my

> horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I see it as a

> message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay attention " ,

> " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't view

> sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger (the pain,

> illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to reconnect with

> our source instead of reinforcing our and societies disconnect?

>

> The fact is that human beings have within them the power to heal and be

> healed. How this power is activated involves many factors and is very

> individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine being one

> of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one determinate of

> long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the case if the

> drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in 1950 (Journal

> of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that placebo was

> powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to induce vomiting

> into a drug that stopped nausea.

>

> http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting article about the

> power of placebo.

>

> Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it should be

> studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

>

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> Oasis Acupuncture

> <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> Suite D-35

> Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> Phone: (480) 991-3650

> Fax: (480) 247-4472

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

> daomsnow

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> Chinese Medicine

> Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v Neutral (Even)

> needling)

>

>

> You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all medicines.

> However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo is not

> the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the belief.

> The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis, try " just

> believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the medicine thank

> you.

>

>

> Dr. Snow

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence of Yi Breath

and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion of the needles. The

final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres of influence) is the

outer manifestation of this confluence. The pulses change even prior to

insertion.

-

Dermot O'Connor

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was that a monkey

or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points would always

yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner. You make your

own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is more to

acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its important,

but also believe there is something else at play - and that as the texts say

" the Yi moves the Qi. "

 

Point two, was that belief and intention are totally irrelevant. As you

correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up to 70% of any

clinical effect.

 

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

> no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive treatment. The

> problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some effects. The

> question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as well. That is

> what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical effects as

> any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as high as 70%.

> The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not last. It is

> therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

>

>

>

>

> Oakland, CA 94609

>

>

> -

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> Chinese Medicine

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> Placebo?

>

>

> What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around by

> researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real and

> powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal itself. " Just

> believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that we all have

> the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and hepatitis. We

> may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I wouldn't seek out

> antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want all my

> horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I see it as a

> message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay attention " ,

> " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't view

> sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger (the pain,

> illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to reconnect with

> our source instead of reinforcing our and societies disconnect?

>

> The fact is that human beings have within them the power to heal and be

> healed. How this power is activated involves many factors and is very

> individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine being one

> of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one determinate of

> long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the case if the

> drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in 1950 (Journal

> of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that placebo was

> powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to induce vomiting

> into a drug that stopped nausea.

>

> http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting article about the

> power of placebo.

>

> Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it should be

> studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

>

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> Oasis Acupuncture

> <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> Suite D-35

> Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> Phone: (480) 991-3650

> Fax: (480) 247-4472

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

> daomsnow

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> Chinese Medicine

> Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v Neutral (Even)

> needling)

>

>

> You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all medicines.

> However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo is not

> the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the belief.

> The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis, try " just

> believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the medicine thank

> you.

>

>

> Dr. Snow

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively evaluate is

do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I just don't get the

resistance for it.

 

 

 

 

Oakland, CA 94609

 

 

-

Turiya Hill

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence of Yi

Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion of the

needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres of

influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The pulses change

even prior to insertion.

-

Dermot O'Connor

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was that a monkey

or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points would always

yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner. You make your

own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is more to

acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its important,

but also believe there is something else at play - and that as the texts say

" the Yi moves the Qi. "

 

Point two, was that belief and intention are totally irrelevant. As you

correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up to 70% of any

clinical effect.

 

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

> no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive treatment. The

> problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some effects. The

> question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as well. That is

> what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical effects as

> any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as high as 70%.

> The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not last. It is

> therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

>

>

>

>

> Oakland, CA 94609

>

>

> -

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> Chinese Medicine

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> Placebo?

>

>

> What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around by

> researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real and

> powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal itself. " Just

> believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that we all have

> the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and hepatitis. We

> may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I wouldn't seek out

> antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want all my

> horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I see it as a

> message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay attention " ,

> " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't view

> sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger (the pain,

> illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to reconnect with

> our source instead of reinforcing our and societies disconnect?

>

> The fact is that human beings have within them the power to heal and be

> healed. How this power is activated involves many factors and is very

> individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine being one

> of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one determinate of

> long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the case if the

> drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in 1950 (Journal

> of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that placebo was

> powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to induce vomiting

> into a drug that stopped nausea.

>

> http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting article about the

> power of placebo.

>

> Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it should be

> studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

>

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> Oasis Acupuncture

> <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> Suite D-35

> Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> Phone: (480) 991-3650

> Fax: (480) 247-4472

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

> daomsnow

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> Chinese Medicine

> Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v Neutral (Even)

> needling)

>

>

> You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all medicines.

> However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo is not

> the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the belief.

> The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis, try " just

> believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the medicine thank

> you.

>

>

> Dr. Snow

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific evaluation. That

was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is irrelavent

simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively evaluate

is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I just don't

get the resistance for it.

 

 

 

 

Oakland, CA 94609

 

 

-

Turiya Hill

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence of Yi

Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion of the

needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres of

influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The pulses

change even prior to insertion.

-

Dermot O'Connor

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was that a

monkey

or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points would always

yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner. You make

your

own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is more to

acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

important,

but also believe there is something else at play - and that as the texts

say

" the Yi moves the Qi. "

 

Point two, was that belief and intention are totally irrelevant. As you

correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up to 70% of

any

clinical effect.

 

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

> no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive treatment.

The

> problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some effects.

The

> question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as well. That

is

> what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical effects

as

> any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as high as

70%.

> The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not last. It

is

> therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

>

>

>

>

> Oakland, CA 94609

>

>

> -

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> Chinese Medicine

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> Placebo?

>

>

> What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around by

> researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real and

> powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal itself.

" Just

> believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that we all

have

> the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and hepatitis.

We

> may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I wouldn't seek

out

> antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want all my

> horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I see it as a

> message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

attention " ,

> " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't view

> sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger (the pain,

> illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to reconnect

with

> our source instead of reinforcing our and societies disconnect?

>

> The fact is that human beings have within them the power to heal and

be

> healed. How this power is activated involves many factors and is

very

> individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine being

one

> of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one determinate of

> long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the case if

the

> drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in 1950

(Journal

> of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that placebo was

> powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to induce

vomiting

> into a drug that stopped nausea.

>

> http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting article about

the

> power of placebo.

>

> Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it should be

> studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

>

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> Oasis Acupuncture

> <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> Suite D-35

> Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> Phone: (480) 991-3650

> Fax: (480) 247-4472

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

> daomsnow

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> Chinese Medicine

> Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v Neutral

(Even)

> needling)

>

>

> You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all medicines.

> However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo is not

> the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the belief.

> The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis, try " just

> believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the medicine thank

> you.

>

>

> Dr. Snow

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Christopher and all,

My understanding of the meaning of placebo is literally 'to please' I think

it could be stretched out to encompass,'to be approved of " I think this may

turn out to be one of the biggest needs of the mind.It takes many forms but

also in any therapeutic interaction,even at the dentist.

'I am not good enough as I am' may also turn out to be the most popular

thought in the last hundred years or so (or a lot lot longer)I think the

placebo effect has an intimate effect with this thought/feeling.

It is something science wants to eliminate from any study but it is very

difficult with our medicine.Maybe in the future placebo will be ' the

healing effect' as that is what it is in so many cases,maybe science will

look at ways to enhance this effect ,rather than eliminate it,after all,when

all said and done the observer and the observed cannot be separated,i cannot

ever " be outside " of anything that I am observing.

Ray Ford

 

 

_____

 

Chinese Medicine

Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:51 AM

Chinese Medicine

Placebo?

 

 

What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around by

researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real and

powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal itself. " Just

believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that we all have

the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and hepatitis. We

may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I wouldn't seek out

antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want all my

horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I see it as a

message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay attention " ,

" resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't view

sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger (the pain,

illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to reconnect with

our source instead of reinforcing our and societies disconnect?

 

The fact is that human beings have within them the power to heal and be

healed. How this power is activated involves many factors and is very

individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine being one

of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one determinate of

long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the case if the

drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in 1950 (Journal

of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that placebo was

powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to induce vomiting

into a drug that stopped nausea.

 

http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting article about the

power of placebo.

 

Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it should be

studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

 

Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

Oasis Acupuncture

<http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

Suite D-35

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Phone: (480) 991-3650

Fax: (480) 247-4472

 

 

Chinese Medicine

Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

daomsnow

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

Chinese Medicine

Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v Neutral (Even)

needling)

 

 

You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all medicines.

However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo is not

the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the belief.

The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis, try " just

believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the medicine thank

you.

 

 

Dr. Snow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

i agree

 

 

 

 

Oakland, CA 94609

 

 

-

Dermot O'Connor

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 5:16 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific evaluation. That

was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is irrelavent

simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively evaluate

is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I just don't

get the resistance for it.

 

 

Oakland, CA 94609

-

Turiya Hill

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence of Yi

Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion of the

needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres of

influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The pulses

change even prior to insertion.

-

Dermot O'Connor

Chinese Medicine

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was that a

monkey

or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points would always

yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner. You make

your

own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is more to

acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

important,

but also believe there is something else at play - and that as the texts

say

" the Yi moves the Qi. "

 

Point two, was that belief and intention are totally irrelevant. As you

correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up to 70% of

any

clinical effect.

 

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

> no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive treatment.

The

> problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some effects.

The

> question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as well. That

is

> what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical effects

as

> any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as high as

70%.

> The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not last. It

is

> therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

>

>

>

>

> Oakland, CA 94609

>

>

> -

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> Chinese Medicine

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> Placebo?

>

>

> What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around by

> researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real and

> powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal itself.

" Just

> believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that we all

have

> the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and hepatitis.

We

> may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I wouldn't seek

out

> antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want all my

> horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I see it as a

> message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

attention " ,

> " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't view

> sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger (the pain,

> illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to reconnect

with

> our source instead of reinforcing our and societies disconnect?

>

> The fact is that human beings have within them the power to heal and

be

> healed. How this power is activated involves many factors and is

very

> individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine being

one

> of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one determinate of

> long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the case if

the

> drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in 1950

(Journal

> of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that placebo was

> powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to induce

vomiting

> into a drug that stopped nausea.

>

> http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting article about

the

> power of placebo.

>

> Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it should be

> studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

>

> Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> Oasis Acupuncture

> <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> Suite D-35

> Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> Phone: (480) 991-3650

> Fax: (480) 247-4472

>

>

> Chinese Medicine

> Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

> daomsnow

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> Chinese Medicine

> Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v Neutral

(Even)

> needling)

>

>

> You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all medicines.

> However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo is not

> the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the belief.

> The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis, try " just

> believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the medicine thank

> you.

>

>

> Dr. Snow

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should work,

regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but accounting for

placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper point.

If not, we are not practicing medicine.

 

Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

>

> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

evaluation. That

> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

irrelavent

> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

>

>

> -

> " " <alonmarcus

> <Chinese Medicine >

> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively

evaluate

> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

just don't

> get the resistance for it.

>

>

>

>

> Oakland, CA 94609

>

>

> -

> Turiya Hill

> Chinese Medicine

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence

of Yi

> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion

of the

> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres

of

> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

pulses

> change even prior to insertion.

> -

> Dermot O'Connor

> Chinese Medicine

> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was

that a

> monkey

> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

would always

> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

You make

> your

> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is

more to

> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

> important,

> but also believe there is something else at play - and that as

the texts

> say

> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

>

> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

irrelevant. As you

> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up

to 70% of

> any

> clinical effect.

>

>

>

> -

> " " <alonmarcus

> <Chinese Medicine >

> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive

treatment.

> The

> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some

effects.

> The

> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

well. That

> is

> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical

effects

> as

> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as

high as

> 70%.

> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not

last. It

> is

> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Oakland, CA 94609

> >

> >

> > -

> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> > Chinese Medicine

> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> > Placebo?

> >

> >

> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around

by

> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real

and

> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

itself.

> " Just

> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that

we all

> have

> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

hepatitis.

> We

> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

wouldn't seek

> out

> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want

all my

> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

see it as a

> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

> attention " ,

> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't

view

> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

(the pain,

> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

reconnect

> with

> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

disconnect?

> >

> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power to

heal and

> be

> > healed. How this power is activated involves many factors

and is

> very

> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine

being

> one

> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

determinate of

> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the

case if

> the

> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in

1950

> (Journal

> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

placebo was

> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

induce

> vomiting

> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

> >

> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

article about

> the

> > power of placebo.

> >

> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

should be

> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

> >

> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> > Oasis Acupuncture

> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> > Suite D-35

> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

> >

> >

> > Chinese Medicine

> > Chinese Medicine On

Behalf Of

> > daomsnow

> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> > Chinese Medicine

> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

Neutral

> (Even)

> > needling)

> >

> >

> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

medicines.

> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo

is not

> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the

belief.

> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis,

try " just

> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

medicine thank

> > you.

> >

> >

> > Dr. Snow

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Don,

 

I got the impression that your students thought it was important but you

didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree that intention

and belief is very relavent and in fact is important. Sometimes needles

work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither work.

Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real Medicine.

Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many conditions. I

still disagree that its only down to accurate point location however, which

is what the monkey anecdote implies.

 

 

 

-

" daomsnow " <don83407

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

>I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should work,

> regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but accounting for

> placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper point.

> If not, we are not practicing medicine.

>

> Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

>

>

>

> Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

> O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

>>

>> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

> evaluation. That

>> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

> irrelavent

>> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

>>

>>

>> -

>> " " <alonmarcus

>> <Chinese Medicine >

>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

>> Re: Placebo?

>>

>>

>> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively

> evaluate

>> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

> just don't

>> get the resistance for it.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Oakland, CA 94609

>>

>>

>> -

>> Turiya Hill

>> Chinese Medicine

>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

>> Re: Placebo?

>>

>>

>> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence

> of Yi

>> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion

> of the

>> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres

> of

>> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

> pulses

>> change even prior to insertion.

>> -

>> Dermot O'Connor

>> Chinese Medicine

>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

>> Re: Placebo?

>>

>>

>> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was

> that a

>> monkey

>> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

> would always

>> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

> You make

>> your

>> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is

> more to

>> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

>> important,

>> but also believe there is something else at play - and that as

> the texts

>> say

>> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

>>

>> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

> irrelevant. As you

>> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up

> to 70% of

>> any

>> clinical effect.

>>

>>

>>

>> -

>> " " <alonmarcus

>> <Chinese Medicine >

>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

>> Re: Placebo?

>>

>>

>> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive

> treatment.

>> The

>> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some

> effects.

>> The

>> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

> well. That

>> is

>> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical

> effects

>> as

>> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as

> high as

>> 70%.

>> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not

> last. It

>> is

>> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > Oakland, CA 94609

>> >

>> >

>> > -

>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

>> > Chinese Medicine

>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

>> > Placebo?

>> >

>> >

>> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around

> by

>> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real

> and

>> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

> itself.

>> " Just

>> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that

> we all

>> have

>> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

> hepatitis.

>> We

>> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

> wouldn't seek

>> out

>> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want

> all my

>> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

> see it as a

>> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

>> attention " ,

>> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't

> view

>> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

> (the pain,

>> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

> reconnect

>> with

>> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

> disconnect?

>> >

>> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power to

> heal and

>> be

>> > healed. How this power is activated involves many factors

> and is

>> very

>> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine

> being

>> one

>> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

> determinate of

>> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the

> case if

>> the

>> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in

> 1950

>> (Journal

>> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

> placebo was

>> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

> induce

>> vomiting

>> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

>> >

>> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

> article about

>> the

>> > power of placebo.

>> >

>> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

> should be

>> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

>> >

>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

>> > Oasis Acupuncture

>> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

>> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

>> > Suite D-35

>> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

>> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

>> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

>> >

>> >

>> > Chinese Medicine

>> > Chinese Medicine On

> Behalf Of

>> > daomsnow

>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

>> > Chinese Medicine

>> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

> Neutral

>> (Even)

>> > needling)

>> >

>> >

>> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

> medicines.

>> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo

> is not

>> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the

> belief.

>> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis,

> try " just

>> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

> medicine thank

>> > you.

>> >

>> >

>> > Dr. Snow

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dermot,

 

I have to agree with you, I believe intention plays a massive part in

Medical intervention, I have to say comparing fish to humans doesn't really

float my boat, thats like compaing petrol and diesel, yes they are both used

for running vehicles, but your not going to put petrol into a diesel engin,

it just doesn't mix.

 

Intention, thoughts, feelings and emotions etc are all energy based, and if

you remember our old science books, energy cannot be created or destroyed

only changed from one form to another. I'm not aware of any method to

evaluate intention at the moment.

 

I do know that placebo has been tested in animals also.

 

Gordon

 

 

On 5/18/06, Dermot O'Connor <dermot wrote:

>

> Don,

>

> I got the impression that your students thought it was important but you

> didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree that

> intention

> and belief is very relavent and in fact is important. Sometimes

> needles

> work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither work.

> Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real Medicine.

>

> Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many conditions. I

>

> still disagree that its only down to accurate point location however,

> which

> is what the monkey anecdote implies.

>

>

>

>

> -

> " daomsnow " <don83407

> <Chinese Medicine >

> Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> >I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should work,

> > regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but accounting for

> > placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper point.

> > If not, we are not practicing medicine.

> >

> > Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

> >

> >

> >

> > Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

> > O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

> >>

> >> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

> > evaluation. That

> >> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

> > irrelavent

> >> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

> >>

> >>

> >> -

> >> " " <alonmarcus

> >> <Chinese Medicine >

> >> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

> >> Re: Placebo?

> >>

> >>

> >> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively

> > evaluate

> >> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

> > just don't

> >> get the resistance for it.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Oakland, CA 94609

> >>

> >>

> >> -

> >> Turiya Hill

> >> Chinese Medicine

> >> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

> >> Re: Placebo?

> >>

> >>

> >> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence

> > of Yi

> >> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion

> > of the

> >> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres

> > of

> >> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

> > pulses

> >> change even prior to insertion.

> >> -

> >> Dermot O'Connor

> >> Chinese Medicine

> >> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

> >> Re: Placebo?

> >>

> >>

> >> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was

> > that a

> >> monkey

> >> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

> > would always

> >> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

> > You make

> >> your

> >> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is

> > more to

> >> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

> >> important,

> >> but also believe there is something else at play - and that as

> > the texts

> >> say

> >> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

> >>

> >> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

> > irrelevant. As you

> >> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up

> > to 70% of

> >> any

> >> clinical effect.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> -

> >> " " <alonmarcus

> >> <Chinese Medicine >

> >> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

> >> Re: Placebo?

> >>

> >>

> >> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive

> > treatment.

> >> The

> >> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some

> > effects.

> >> The

> >> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

> > well. That

> >> is

> >> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical

> > effects

> >> as

> >> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as

> > high as

> >> 70%.

> >> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not

> > last. It

> >> is

> >> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > Oakland, CA 94609

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > -

> >> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> >> > Chinese Medicine

> >> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> >> > Placebo?

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around

> > by

> >> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real

> > and

> >> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

> > itself.

> >> " Just

> >> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that

> > we all

> >> have

> >> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

> > hepatitis.

> >> We

> >> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

> > wouldn't seek

> >> out

> >> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want

> > all my

> >> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

> > see it as a

> >> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

> >> attention " ,

> >> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't

> > view

> >> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

> > (the pain,

> >> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

> > reconnect

> >> with

> >> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

> > disconnect?

> >> >

> >> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power to

> > heal and

> >> be

> >> > healed. How this power is activated involves many factors

> > and is

> >> very

> >> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine

> > being

> >> one

> >> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

> > determinate of

> >> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the

> > case if

> >> the

> >> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in

> > 1950

> >> (Journal

> >> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

> > placebo was

> >> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

> > induce

> >> vomiting

> >> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

> >> >

> >> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

> > article about

> >> the

> >> > power of placebo.

> >> >

> >> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

> > should be

> >> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

> >> >

> >> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> >> > Oasis Acupuncture

> >> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

> > http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> >> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> >> > Suite D-35

> >> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> >> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

> >> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > Chinese Medicine

> >> > Chinese Medicine On

> > Behalf Of

> >> > daomsnow

> >> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> >> > Chinese Medicine

> >> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

> > Neutral

> >> (Even)

> >> > needling)

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

> > medicines.

> >> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo

> > is not

> >> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the

> > belief.

> >> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis,

> > try " just

> >> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

> > medicine thank

> >> > you.

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > Dr. Snow

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I do know that placebo has been tested in animals also

>>>>>

Since i am not sure how that can be done. Do you have a reference?

 

 

 

 

Oakland, CA 94609

 

 

-

Gordon Mullins

Chinese Medicine

Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:13 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

Dermot,

 

I have to agree with you, I believe intention plays a massive part in

Medical intervention, I have to say comparing fish to humans doesn't really

float my boat, thats like compaing petrol and diesel, yes they are both used

for running vehicles, but your not going to put petrol into a diesel engin,

it just doesn't mix.

 

Intention, thoughts, feelings and emotions etc are all energy based, and if

you remember our old science books, energy cannot be created or destroyed

only changed from one form to another. I'm not aware of any method to

evaluate intention at the moment.

 

I do know that placebo has been tested in animals also.

 

Gordon

 

 

On 5/18/06, Dermot O'Connor <dermot wrote:

>

> Don,

>

> I got the impression that your students thought it was important but you

> didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree that

> intention

> and belief is very relavent and in fact is important. Sometimes

> needles

> work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither work.

> Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real Medicine.

>

> Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many conditions. I

>

> still disagree that its only down to accurate point location however,

> which

> is what the monkey anecdote implies.

>

>

>

>

> -

> " daomsnow " <don83407

> <Chinese Medicine >

> Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> >I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should work,

> > regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but accounting for

> > placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper point.

> > If not, we are not practicing medicine.

> >

> > Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

> >

> >

> >

> > Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

> > O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

> >>

> >> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

> > evaluation. That

> >> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

> > irrelavent

> >> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

> >>

> >>

> >> -

> >> " " <alonmarcus

> >> <Chinese Medicine >

> >> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

> >> Re: Placebo?

> >>

> >>

> >> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively

> > evaluate

> >> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

> > just don't

> >> get the resistance for it.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Oakland, CA 94609

> >>

> >>

> >> -

> >> Turiya Hill

> >> Chinese Medicine

> >> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

> >> Re: Placebo?

> >>

> >>

> >> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence

> > of Yi

> >> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion

> > of the

> >> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres

> > of

> >> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

> > pulses

> >> change even prior to insertion.

> >> -

> >> Dermot O'Connor

> >> Chinese Medicine

> >> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

> >> Re: Placebo?

> >>

> >>

> >> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was

> > that a

> >> monkey

> >> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

> > would always

> >> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

> > You make

> >> your

> >> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is

> > more to

> >> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

> >> important,

> >> but also believe there is something else at play - and that as

> > the texts

> >> say

> >> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

> >>

> >> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

> > irrelevant. As you

> >> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up

> > to 70% of

> >> any

> >> clinical effect.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> -

> >> " " <alonmarcus

> >> <Chinese Medicine >

> >> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

> >> Re: Placebo?

> >>

> >>

> >> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive

> > treatment.

> >> The

> >> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some

> > effects.

> >> The

> >> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

> > well. That

> >> is

> >> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical

> > effects

> >> as

> >> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as

> > high as

> >> 70%.

> >> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not

> > last. It

> >> is

> >> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > Oakland, CA 94609

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > -

> >> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> >> > Chinese Medicine

> >> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> >> > Placebo?

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around

> > by

> >> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real

> > and

> >> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

> > itself.

> >> " Just

> >> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that

> > we all

> >> have

> >> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

> > hepatitis.

> >> We

> >> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

> > wouldn't seek

> >> out

> >> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want

> > all my

> >> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

> > see it as a

> >> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

> >> attention " ,

> >> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't

> > view

> >> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

> > (the pain,

> >> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

> > reconnect

> >> with

> >> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

> > disconnect?

> >> >

> >> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power to

> > heal and

> >> be

> >> > healed. How this power is activated involves many factors

> > and is

> >> very

> >> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine

> > being

> >> one

> >> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

> > determinate of

> >> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the

> > case if

> >> the

> >> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in

> > 1950

> >> (Journal

> >> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

> > placebo was

> >> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

> > induce

> >> vomiting

> >> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

> >> >

> >> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

> > article about

> >> the

> >> > power of placebo.

> >> >

> >> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

> > should be

> >> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

> >> >

> >> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> >> > Oasis Acupuncture

> >> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

> > http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> >> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> >> > Suite D-35

> >> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> >> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

> >> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > Chinese Medicine

> >> > Chinese Medicine On

> > Behalf Of

> >> > daomsnow

> >> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> >> > Chinese Medicine

> >> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

> > Neutral

> >> (Even)

> >> > needling)

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

> > medicines.

> >> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo

> > is not

> >> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the

> > belief.

> >> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis,

> > try " just

> >> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

> > medicine thank

> >> > you.

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > Dr. Snow

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Alon,

 

If you do a google search under - " placebo " and " animals " you will get over

a million returns. A few examples, just taking the top ones I have listed

below. I didn't see one with fish but I didn't look too hard - seems to

show mice, baboons and dogs a lot. I'm sure that as they are medical trials

it makes a lot more sense to test on species that are mammals as opposed to

other animal groups

 

Hopefully once and for all we can agree that belief and intention plays a

hugely important role in the success of all medicine. That's what science

tells us anyway. In a nutshell, I understood that Don was suggesting that

when a drug works it just works and has nothing to do with belief. As he

would say, you can't believe yourself well. However science doesn't support

this proposition and tells us that broadly speaking of the drugs approved

for the market 50% of their healing effect is attributable to the placebo

effect alone - people believing themselves well, expecting to be well and

having intention to be well. Of course that means that there is another 50%

which is not attributable to belief/intention but attributable to the

medicinal components. But nevertheless 50% is a pretty significant

percentage.

 

http://www.freshnews.com/cgi-bin/jsj_news/print.cgi?article_ID=18175

 

http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/62/5/1370

 

http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/content/full/101/10/4209

 

Kind regards

 

 

Dermot

 

 

 

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Friday, May 19, 2006 1:06 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

>I do know that placebo has been tested in animals also

>>>>>>

> Since i am not sure how that can be done. Do you have a reference?

>

>

>

>

> Oakland, CA 94609

>

>

> -

> Gordon Mullins

> Chinese Medicine

> Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:13 AM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> Dermot,

>

> I have to agree with you, I believe intention plays a massive part in

> Medical intervention, I have to say comparing fish to humans doesn't

> really

> float my boat, thats like compaing petrol and diesel, yes they are both

> used

> for running vehicles, but your not going to put petrol into a diesel

> engin,

> it just doesn't mix.

>

> Intention, thoughts, feelings and emotions etc are all energy based, and

> if

> you remember our old science books, energy cannot be created or destroyed

> only changed from one form to another. I'm not aware of any method to

> evaluate intention at the moment.

>

> I do know that placebo has been tested in animals also.

>

> Gordon

>

>

> On 5/18/06, Dermot O'Connor <dermot wrote:

> >

> > Don,

> >

> > I got the impression that your students thought it was important but

> you

> > didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree that

> > intention

> > and belief is very relavent and in fact is important. Sometimes

> > needles

> > work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither work.

> > Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real

> Medicine.

> >

> > Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many conditions.

> I

> >

> > still disagree that its only down to accurate point location however,

> > which

> > is what the monkey anecdote implies.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > " daomsnow " <don83407

> > <Chinese Medicine >

> > Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

> > Re: Placebo?

> >

> >

> > >I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should work,

> > > regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but accounting for

> > > placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper point.

> > > If not, we are not practicing medicine.

> > >

> > > Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

> > > O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

> > >>

> > >> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

> > > evaluation. That

> > >> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

> > > irrelavent

> > >> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> -

> > >> " " <alonmarcus

> > >> <Chinese Medicine >

> > >> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

> > >> Re: Placebo?

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively

> > > evaluate

> > >> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

> > > just don't

> > >> get the resistance for it.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> Oakland, CA 94609

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> -

> > >> Turiya Hill

> > >> Chinese Medicine

> > >> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

> > >> Re: Placebo?

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence

> > > of Yi

> > >> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion

> > > of the

> > >> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres

> > > of

> > >> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

> > > pulses

> > >> change even prior to insertion.

> > >> -

> > >> Dermot O'Connor

> > >> Chinese Medicine

> > >> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

> > >> Re: Placebo?

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was

> > > that a

> > >> monkey

> > >> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

> > > would always

> > >> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

> > > You make

> > >> your

> > >> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is

> > > more to

> > >> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

> > >> important,

> > >> but also believe there is something else at play - and that as

> > > the texts

> > >> say

> > >> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

> > >>

> > >> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

> > > irrelevant. As you

> > >> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up

> > > to 70% of

> > >> any

> > >> clinical effect.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> -

> > >> " " <alonmarcus

> > >> <Chinese Medicine >

> > >> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

> > >> Re: Placebo?

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive

> > > treatment.

> > >> The

> > >> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some

> > > effects.

> > >> The

> > >> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

> > > well. That

> > >> is

> > >> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical

> > > effects

> > >> as

> > >> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as

> > > high as

> > >> 70%.

> > >> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not

> > > last. It

> > >> is

> > >> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > Oakland, CA 94609

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > -

> > >> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> > >> > Chinese Medicine

> > >> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> > >> > Placebo?

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around

> > > by

> > >> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real

> > > and

> > >> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

> > > itself.

> > >> " Just

> > >> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that

> > > we all

> > >> have

> > >> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

> > > hepatitis.

> > >> We

> > >> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

> > > wouldn't seek

> > >> out

> > >> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want

> > > all my

> > >> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

> > > see it as a

> > >> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

> > >> attention " ,

> > >> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't

> > > view

> > >> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

> > > (the pain,

> > >> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

> > > reconnect

> > >> with

> > >> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

> > > disconnect?

> > >> >

> > >> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power to

> > > heal and

> > >> be

> > >> > healed. How this power is activated involves many factors

> > > and is

> > >> very

> > >> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine

> > > being

> > >> one

> > >> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

> > > determinate of

> > >> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the

> > > case if

> > >> the

> > >> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in

> > > 1950

> > >> (Journal

> > >> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

> > > placebo was

> > >> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

> > > induce

> > >> vomiting

> > >> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

> > >> >

> > >> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

> > > article about

> > >> the

> > >> > power of placebo.

> > >> >

> > >> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

> > > should be

> > >> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

> > >> >

> > >> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> > >> > Oasis Acupuncture

> > >> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

> > > http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> > >> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> > >> > Suite D-35

> > >> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> > >> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

> > >> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > Chinese Medicine

> > >> > Chinese Medicine On

> > > Behalf Of

> > >> > daomsnow

> > >> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> > >> > Chinese Medicine

> > >> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

> > > Neutral

> > >> (Even)

> > >> > needling)

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

> > > medicines.

> > >> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo

> > > is not

> > >> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the

> > > belief.

> > >> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis,

> > > try " just

> > >> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

> > > medicine thank

> > >> > you.

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > Dr. Snow

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Phil

Do they use the " placebo " in the same sense as in people? Or is it a kind of

comparison to natural history of disease?

 

 

 

 

Oakland, CA 94609

 

 

-

Dermot O'Connor

Chinese Medicine

Thursday, May 18, 2006 5:52 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

Alon,

 

If you do a google search under - " placebo " and " animals " you will get over

a million returns. A few examples, just taking the top ones I have listed

below. I didn't see one with fish but I didn't look too hard - seems to

show mice, baboons and dogs a lot. I'm sure that as they are medical trials

it makes a lot more sense to test on species that are mammals as opposed to

other animal groups

 

Hopefully once and for all we can agree that belief and intention plays a

hugely important role in the success of all medicine. That's what science

tells us anyway. In a nutshell, I understood that Don was suggesting that

when a drug works it just works and has nothing to do with belief. As he

would say, you can't believe yourself well. However science doesn't support

this proposition and tells us that broadly speaking of the drugs approved

for the market 50% of their healing effect is attributable to the placebo

effect alone - people believing themselves well, expecting to be well and

having intention to be well. Of course that means that there is another 50%

which is not attributable to belief/intention but attributable to the

medicinal components. But nevertheless 50% is a pretty significant

percentage.

 

http://www.freshnews.com/cgi-bin/jsj_news/print.cgi?article_ID=18175

 

http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/62/5/1370

 

http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/content/full/101/10/4209

 

Kind regards

 

 

Dermot

 

 

 

 

 

-

" " <alonmarcus

<Chinese Medicine >

Friday, May 19, 2006 1:06 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

>I do know that placebo has been tested in animals also

>>>>>>

> Since i am not sure how that can be done. Do you have a reference?

>

>

>

>

> Oakland, CA 94609

>

>

> -

> Gordon Mullins

> Chinese Medicine

> Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:13 AM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> Dermot,

>

> I have to agree with you, I believe intention plays a massive part in

> Medical intervention, I have to say comparing fish to humans doesn't

> really

> float my boat, thats like compaing petrol and diesel, yes they are both

> used

> for running vehicles, but your not going to put petrol into a diesel

> engin,

> it just doesn't mix.

>

> Intention, thoughts, feelings and emotions etc are all energy based, and

> if

> you remember our old science books, energy cannot be created or destroyed

> only changed from one form to another. I'm not aware of any method to

> evaluate intention at the moment.

>

> I do know that placebo has been tested in animals also.

>

> Gordon

>

>

> On 5/18/06, Dermot O'Connor <dermot wrote:

> >

> > Don,

> >

> > I got the impression that your students thought it was important but

> you

> > didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree that

> > intention

> > and belief is very relavent and in fact is important. Sometimes

> > needles

> > work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither work.

> > Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real

> Medicine.

> >

> > Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many conditions.

> I

> >

> > still disagree that its only down to accurate point location however,

> > which

> > is what the monkey anecdote implies.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > " daomsnow " <don83407

> > <Chinese Medicine >

> > Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

> > Re: Placebo?

> >

> >

> > >I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should work,

> > > regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but accounting for

> > > placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper point.

> > > If not, we are not practicing medicine.

> > >

> > > Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

> > > O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

> > >>

> > >> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

> > > evaluation. That

> > >> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

> > > irrelavent

> > >> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> -

> > >> " " <alonmarcus

> > >> <Chinese Medicine >

> > >> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

> > >> Re: Placebo?

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively

> > > evaluate

> > >> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

> > > just don't

> > >> get the resistance for it.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> Oakland, CA 94609

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> -

> > >> Turiya Hill

> > >> Chinese Medicine

> > >> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

> > >> Re: Placebo?

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence

> > > of Yi

> > >> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion

> > > of the

> > >> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres

> > > of

> > >> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

> > > pulses

> > >> change even prior to insertion.

> > >> -

> > >> Dermot O'Connor

> > >> Chinese Medicine

> > >> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

> > >> Re: Placebo?

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was

> > > that a

> > >> monkey

> > >> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

> > > would always

> > >> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

> > > You make

> > >> your

> > >> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is

> > > more to

> > >> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

> > >> important,

> > >> but also believe there is something else at play - and that as

> > > the texts

> > >> say

> > >> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

> > >>

> > >> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

> > > irrelevant. As you

> > >> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up

> > > to 70% of

> > >> any

> > >> clinical effect.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> -

> > >> " " <alonmarcus

> > >> <Chinese Medicine >

> > >> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

> > >> Re: Placebo?

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive

> > > treatment.

> > >> The

> > >> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some

> > > effects.

> > >> The

> > >> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

> > > well. That

> > >> is

> > >> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical

> > > effects

> > >> as

> > >> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as

> > > high as

> > >> 70%.

> > >> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not

> > > last. It

> > >> is

> > >> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > Oakland, CA 94609

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > -

> > >> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> > >> > Chinese Medicine

> > >> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> > >> > Placebo?

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around

> > > by

> > >> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real

> > > and

> > >> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

> > > itself.

> > >> " Just

> > >> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that

> > > we all

> > >> have

> > >> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

> > > hepatitis.

> > >> We

> > >> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

> > > wouldn't seek

> > >> out

> > >> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want

> > > all my

> > >> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

> > > see it as a

> > >> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

> > >> attention " ,

> > >> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't

> > > view

> > >> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

> > > (the pain,

> > >> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

> > > reconnect

> > >> with

> > >> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

> > > disconnect?

> > >> >

> > >> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power to

> > > heal and

> > >> be

> > >> > healed. How this power is activated involves many factors

> > > and is

> > >> very

> > >> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine

> > > being

> > >> one

> > >> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

> > > determinate of

> > >> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the

> > > case if

> > >> the

> > >> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in

> > > 1950

> > >> (Journal

> > >> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

> > > placebo was

> > >> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

> > > induce

> > >> vomiting

> > >> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

> > >> >

> > >> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

> > > article about

> > >> the

> > >> > power of placebo.

> > >> >

> > >> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

> > > should be

> > >> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

> > >> >

> > >> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> > >> > Oasis Acupuncture

> > >> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

> > > http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> > >> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> > >> > Suite D-35

> > >> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> > >> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

> > >> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > Chinese Medicine

> > >> > Chinese Medicine On

> > > Behalf Of

> > >> > daomsnow

> > >> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> > >> > Chinese Medicine

> > >> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

> > > Neutral

> > >> (Even)

> > >> > needling)

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

> > > medicines.

> > >> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo

> > > is not

> > >> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the

> > > belief.

> > >> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis,

> > > try " just

> > >> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

> > > medicine thank

> > >> > you.

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> > Dr. Snow

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

> > >> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

No, my only point was that we practice real medicine, not faith healing. This

seems to have touched on some nerves. I don't swing dead chickens over my head

and with the numerous new age practitioners within our medicine, that is how

many in Western medicine perceive us. From this discussion, it appears well

founded. Too bad.

 

Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

 

-

Dermot O'Connor

Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:49 AM

Chinese Medicine

Re: Placebo?

 

Don,

 

I got the impression that your students thought it was important but you

didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree that intention

and belief is very relavent and in fact is important. Sometimes needles

work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither work.

Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real Medicine

Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many conditions. I

still disagree that its only down to accurate point location however, which

is what the monkey anecdote implies.

 

 

 

-

" daomsnow " <don83407

<Chinese Medicine >

Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

>I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should work,

> regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but accounting for

> placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper point.

> If not, we are not practicing medicine.

>

> Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

>

>

>

> Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

> O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

>>

>> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

> evaluation. That

>> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

> irrelavent

>> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

>>

>>

>> -

>> " " <alonmarcus

>> <Chinese Medicine >

>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

>> Re: Placebo?

>>

>>

>> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively

> evaluate

>> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

> just don't

>> get the resistance for it.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Oakland, CA 94609

>>

>>

>> -

>> Turiya Hill

>> Chinese Medicine

>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

>> Re: Placebo?

>>

>>

>> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence

> of Yi

>> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion

> of the

>> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres

> of

>> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

> pulses

>> change even prior to insertion.

>> -

>> Dermot O'Connor

>> Chinese Medicine

>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

>> Re: Placebo?

>>

>>

>> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was

> that a

>> monkey

>> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

> would always

>> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

> You make

>> your

>> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is

> more to

>> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

>> important,

>> but also believe there is something else at play - and that as

> the texts

>> say

>> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

>>

>> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

> irrelevant. As you

>> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up

> to 70% of

>> any

>> clinical effect.

>>

>>

>>

>> -

>> " " <alonmarcus

>> <Chinese Medicine >

>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

>> Re: Placebo?

>>

>>

>> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive

> treatment.

>> The

>> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some

> effects.

>> The

>> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

> well. That

>> is

>> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical

> effects

>> as

>> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as

> high as

>> 70%.

>> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not

> last. It

>> is

>> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > Oakland, CA 94609

>> >

>> >

>> > -

>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

>> > Chinese Medicine

>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

>> > Placebo?

>> >

>> >

>> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around

> by

>> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real

> and

>> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

> itself.

>> " Just

>> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that

> we all

>> have

>> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

> hepatitis.

>> We

>> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

> wouldn't seek

>> out

>> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want

> all my

>> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

> see it as a

>> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

>> attention " ,

>> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't

> view

>> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

> (the pain,

>> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

> reconnect

>> with

>> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

> disconnect?

>> >

>> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power to

> heal and

>> be

>> > healed. How this power is activated involves many factors

> and is

>> very

>> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine

> being

>> one

>> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

> determinate of

>> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the

> case if

>> the

>> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in

> 1950

>> (Journal

>> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

> placebo was

>> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

> induce

>> vomiting

>> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

>> >

>> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

> article about

>> the

>> > power of placebo.

>> >

>> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

> should be

>> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

>> >

>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

>> > Oasis Acupuncture

>> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

>> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

>> > Suite D-35

>> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

>> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

>> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

>> >

>> >

>> > Chinese Medicine

>> > Chinese Medicine On

> Behalf Of

>> > daomsnow

>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

>> > Chinese Medicine

>> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

> Neutral

>> (Even)

>> > needling)

>> >

>> >

>> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

> medicines.

>> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo

> is not

>> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the

> belief.

>> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis,

> try " just

>> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

> medicine thank

>> > you.

>> >

>> >

>> > Dr. Snow

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

That's just silly Don, nobody suggested acupuncture was faith healing or

compared it to voodoo. If you can read over the discussion again you will

see we were making the point that belief and intention apply to ALL forms of

medicine - Western and Eastern Medicine alike. You were wrong to dismiss

the role of belief and intention and should listen more to your students.

 

 

 

-

" Donald Snow " <don83407

<Chinese Medicine >

Saturday, May 20, 2006 6:58 AM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

> No, my only point was that we practice real medicine, not faith healing.

> This seems to have touched on some nerves. I don't swing dead chickens

> over my head and with the numerous new age practitioners within our

> medicine, that is how many in Western medicine perceive us. From this

> discussion, it appears well founded. Too bad.

>

> Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

>

> -

> Dermot O'Connor

> Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:49 AM

> Chinese Medicine

> Re: Placebo?

>

> Don,

>

> I got the impression that your students thought it was important but you

> didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree that

> intention

> and belief is very relavent and in fact is important. Sometimes

> needles

> work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither work.

> Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real Medicine

> Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many conditions. I

> still disagree that its only down to accurate point location however,

> which

> is what the monkey anecdote implies.

>

>

>

> -

> " daomsnow " <don83407

> <Chinese Medicine >

> Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

>>I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should work,

>> regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but accounting for

>> placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper point.

>> If not, we are not practicing medicine.

>>

>> Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

>>

>>

>>

>> Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

>> O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

>>>

>>> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

>> evaluation. That

>>> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

>> irrelavent

>>> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

>>>

>>>

>>> -

>>> " " <alonmarcus

>>> <Chinese Medicine >

>>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

>>> Re: Placebo?

>>>

>>>

>>> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to objectively

>> evaluate

>>> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

>> just don't

>>> get the resistance for it.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Oakland, CA 94609

>>>

>>>

>>> -

>>> Turiya Hill

>>> Chinese Medicine

>>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

>>> Re: Placebo?

>>>

>>>

>>> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the confluence

>> of Yi

>>> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the insertion

>> of the

>>> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points ( spheres

>> of

>>> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

>> pulses

>>> change even prior to insertion.

>>> -

>>> Dermot O'Connor

>>> Chinese Medicine

>>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

>>> Re: Placebo?

>>>

>>>

>>> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one was

>> that a

>>> monkey

>>> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

>> would always

>>> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

>> You make

>>> your

>>> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there is

>> more to

>>> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that its

>>> important,

>>> but also believe there is something else at play - and that as

>> the texts

>>> say

>>> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

>>>

>>> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

>> irrelevant. As you

>>> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for up

>> to 70% of

>>> any

>>> clinical effect.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> -

>>> " " <alonmarcus

>>> <Chinese Medicine >

>>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

>>> Re: Placebo?

>>>

>>>

>>> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to noneactive

>> treatment.

>>> The

>>> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is some

>> effects.

>>> The

>>> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

>> well. That

>>> is

>>> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no clinical

>> effects

>>> as

>>> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been as

>> high as

>>> 70%.

>>> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do not

>> last. It

>>> is

>>> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Oakland, CA 94609

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > -

>>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

>>> > Chinese Medicine

>>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

>>> > Placebo?

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown around

>> by

>>> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very real

>> and

>>> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

>> itself.

>>> " Just

>>> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt that

>> we all

>>> have

>>> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

>> hepatitis.

>>> We

>>> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

>> wouldn't seek

>>> out

>>> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I want

>> all my

>>> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

>> see it as a

>>> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow down " , " pay

>>> attention " ,

>>> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us don't

>> view

>>> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

>> (the pain,

>>> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

>> reconnect

>>> with

>>> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

>> disconnect?

>>> >

>>> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power to

>> heal and

>>> be

>>> > healed. How this power is activated involves many factors

>> and is

>>> very

>>> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the medicine

>> being

>>> one

>>> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

>> determinate of

>>> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be the

>> case if

>>> the

>>> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done in

>> 1950

>>> (Journal

>>> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

>> placebo was

>>> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

>> induce

>>> vomiting

>>> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

>>> >

>>> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

>> article about

>>> the

>>> > power of placebo.

>>> >

>>> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

>> should be

>>> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in healing.

>>> >

>>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

>>> > Oasis Acupuncture

>>> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

>> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

>>> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

>>> > Suite D-35

>>> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

>>> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

>>> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Chinese Medicine

>>> > Chinese Medicine On

>> Behalf Of

>>> > daomsnow

>>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

>>> > Chinese Medicine

>>> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

>> Neutral

>>> (Even)

>>> > needling)

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

>> medicines.

>>> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when placebo

>> is not

>>> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or the

>> belief.

>>> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or Hepatitis,

>> try " just

>>> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

>> medicine thank

>>> > you.

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Dr. Snow

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Don appears to have touched on an interesting perception of our profession from

some laypeople and other professionals, the idea that we are faith-healers

(maybe there is a state where a person can include this as part of a religion

but I have not seen it). I have found that perception to be true in some

instances and very disturbing. The public can be very gullible (for example,

there are still people who believe that Iraq has WMD hiding somewhere even

though the myth has been dispelled long ago). While there is little doubt that

our history shows some very interesting care, we should strive to better show

unity behind a common message that is more about the channels and less about

ancient Chinese spiritual traditions. In this way, we can have a platform to

explain, treat and save face with other healthcare providers. I think that as

our profession continues to expand and we see more doctoral candidates, we will

gain more respect and not look so fu-fu. More hospitals are looking for

graduates as well. Those who remain with the rubber chicken will continue to

become less and less and so will their schools. I hate to say it but I will

gladly welcome the day when we see the last mom-and-pop program in this country

and the same goes for those unaccredited, abbreviated provider programs w/o any

supervised clinical training. Acupuncture is becoming more mainstream and with

that we must not allow for continual delusion of the training.

 

MB

 

 

:

dermot: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:09:35 +0100Re:

Placebo?That's just silly Don, nobody suggested acupuncture was faith

healing or compared it to voodoo. If you can read over the discussion again you

will see we were making the point that belief and intention apply to ALL forms

of medicine - Western and Eastern Medicine alike. You were wrong to dismiss the

role of belief and intention and should listen more to your students.

_______________

Join the next generation of Hotmail and you could win the adventure of a

lifetime

http://www.imagine-msn.com/minisites/sweepstakes/mail/register.aspx

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Again, you are preaching and have been preaching to the choir. You

think I missed your point as if you were the only one to know the

placebo effect. You weren't in my class and you have no idea the

students I am discussing. Nor do you know their thought or mine.

 

Acupuncture works with placebo. But antibiotics don't depend on it

and neither does AOM. I'm finished with this thread.

 

Dr. Snow

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

>

> That's just silly Don, nobody suggested acupuncture was faith

healing or

> compared it to voodoo. If you can read over the discussion again

you will

> see we were making the point that belief and intention apply to ALL

forms of

> medicine - Western and Eastern Medicine alike. You were wrong to

dismiss

> the role of belief and intention and should listen more to your

students.

>

>

>

> -

> " Donald Snow " <don83407

> <Chinese Medicine >

> Saturday, May 20, 2006 6:58 AM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> > No, my only point was that we practice real medicine, not faith

healing.

> > This seems to have touched on some nerves. I don't swing dead

chickens

> > over my head and with the numerous new age practitioners within

our

> > medicine, that is how many in Western medicine perceive us. From

this

> > discussion, it appears well founded. Too bad.

> >

> > Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

> >

> > -

> > Dermot O'Connor

> > Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:49 AM

> > Chinese Medicine

> > Re: Placebo?

> >

> > Don,

> >

> > I got the impression that your students thought it was important

but you

> > didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree

that

> > intention

> > and belief is very relavent and in fact is important.

Sometimes

> > needles

> > work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither

work.

> > Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real

Medicine

> > Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many

conditions. I

> > still disagree that its only down to accurate point location

however,

> > which

> > is what the monkey anecdote implies.

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > " daomsnow " <don83407

> > <Chinese Medicine >

> > Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

> > Re: Placebo?

> >

> >

> >>I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should

work,

> >> regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but

accounting for

> >> placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper

point.

> >> If not, we are not practicing medicine.

> >>

> >> Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

> >> O'Connor " <dermot@> wrote:

> >>>

> >>> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

> >> evaluation. That

> >>> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

> >> irrelavent

> >>> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> -

> >>> " " <alonmarcus@>

> >>> <Chinese Medicine >

> >>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

> >>> Re: Placebo?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to

objectively

> >> evaluate

> >>> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

> >> just don't

> >>> get the resistance for it.

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Oakland, CA 94609

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> -

> >>> Turiya Hill

> >>> Chinese Medicine

> >>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

> >>> Re: Placebo?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the

confluence

> >> of Yi

> >>> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the

insertion

> >> of the

> >>> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points (

spheres

> >> of

> >>> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

> >> pulses

> >>> change even prior to insertion.

> >>> -

> >>> Dermot O'Connor

> >>> Chinese Medicine

> >>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

> >>> Re: Placebo?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one

was

> >> that a

> >>> monkey

> >>> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

> >> would always

> >>> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

> >> You make

> >>> your

> >>> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there

is

> >> more to

> >>> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that

its

> >>> important,

> >>> but also believe there is something else at play - and that

as

> >> the texts

> >>> say

> >>> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

> >>>

> >>> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

> >> irrelevant. As you

> >>> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for

up

> >> to 70% of

> >>> any

> >>> clinical effect.

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> -

> >>> " " <alonmarcus@>

> >>> <Chinese Medicine >

> >>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

> >>> Re: Placebo?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to

noneactive

> >> treatment.

> >>> The

> >>> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is

some

> >> effects.

> >>> The

> >>> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

> >> well. That

> >>> is

> >>> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no

clinical

> >> effects

> >>> as

> >>> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been

as

> >> high as

> >>> 70%.

> >>> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do

not

> >> last. It

> >>> is

> >>> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > Oakland, CA 94609

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > -

> >>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> >>> > Chinese Medicine

> >>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> >>> > Placebo?

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown

around

> >> by

> >>> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very

real

> >> and

> >>> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

> >> itself.

> >>> " Just

> >>> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt

that

> >> we all

> >>> have

> >>> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

> >> hepatitis.

> >>> We

> >>> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

> >> wouldn't seek

> >>> out

> >>> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I

want

> >> all my

> >>> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

> >> see it as a

> >>> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow

down " , " pay

> >>> attention " ,

> >>> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us

don't

> >> view

> >>> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

> >> (the pain,

> >>> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

> >> reconnect

> >>> with

> >>> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

> >> disconnect?

> >>> >

> >>> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power

to

> >> heal and

> >>> be

> >>> > healed. How this power is activated involves many

factors

> >> and is

> >>> very

> >>> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the

medicine

> >> being

> >>> one

> >>> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

> >> determinate of

> >>> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be

the

> >> case if

> >>> the

> >>> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done

in

> >> 1950

> >>> (Journal

> >>> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

> >> placebo was

> >>> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

> >> induce

> >>> vomiting

> >>> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

> >>> >

> >>> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

> >> article about

> >>> the

> >>> > power of placebo.

> >>> >

> >>> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

> >> should be

> >>> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in

healing.

> >>> >

> >>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> >>> > Oasis Acupuncture

> >>> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

> >> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> >>> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> >>> > Suite D-35

> >>> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> >>> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

> >>> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > Chinese Medicine

> >>> > Chinese Medicine On

> >> Behalf Of

> >>> > daomsnow

> >>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> >>> > Chinese Medicine

> >>> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

> >> Neutral

> >>> (Even)

> >>> > needling)

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

> >> medicines.

> >>> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when

placebo

> >> is not

> >>> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or

the

> >> belief.

> >>> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or

Hepatitis,

> >> try " just

> >>> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

> >> medicine thank

> >>> > you.

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > Dr. Snow

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Promise?

 

-

daomsnow

Saturday, May 20, 2006 9:41 AM

Chinese Medicine

Re: Placebo?

 

 

Again, you are preaching and have been preaching to the choir. You

think I missed your point as if you were the only one to know the

placebo effect. You weren't in my class and you have no idea the

students I am discussing. Nor do you know their thought or mine.

 

Acupuncture works with placebo. But antibiotics don't depend on it

and neither does AOM. I'm finished with this thread.

 

Dr. Snow

 

 

 

Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

O'Connor " <dermot wrote:

>

> That's just silly Don, nobody suggested acupuncture was faith

healing or

> compared it to voodoo. If you can read over the discussion again

you will

> see we were making the point that belief and intention apply to ALL

forms of

> medicine - Western and Eastern Medicine alike. You were wrong to

dismiss

> the role of belief and intention and should listen more to your

students.

>

>

>

> -

> " Donald Snow " <don83407

> <Chinese Medicine >

> Saturday, May 20, 2006 6:58 AM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

> > No, my only point was that we practice real medicine, not faith

healing.

> > This seems to have touched on some nerves. I don't swing dead

chickens

> > over my head and with the numerous new age practitioners within

our

> > medicine, that is how many in Western medicine perceive us. From

this

> > discussion, it appears well founded. Too bad.

> >

> > Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

> >

> > -

> > Dermot O'Connor

> > Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:49 AM

> > Chinese Medicine

> > Re: Placebo?

> >

> > Don,

> >

> > I got the impression that your students thought it was important

but you

> > didn't at all agree with them? Well I think we can now agree

that

> > intention

> > and belief is very relavent and in fact is important.

Sometimes

> > needles

> > work, sometimes medication works.....and indeed sometimes neither

work.

> > Just because a treatment hasn't worked doesn't mean its not real

Medicine

> > Acupuncture has been proven scientifically to work for many

conditions. I

> > still disagree that its only down to accurate point location

however,

> > which

> > is what the monkey anecdote implies.

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > " daomsnow " <don83407

> > <Chinese Medicine >

> > Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:08 PM

> > Re: Placebo?

> >

> >

> >>I never said it was irrelevant, I said that acupuncture should

work,

> >> regardless. All medicine have the placebo effect, but

accounting for

> >> placebo, the needle alone should work if placed in the proper

point.

> >> If not, we are not practicing medicine.

> >>

> >> Dr. Don Snow, DAOM

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Chinese Medicine , " Dermot

> >> O'Connor " <dermot@> wrote:

> >>>

> >>> No resistance from here at all Alon, I welcome scientific

> >> evaluation. That

> >>> was never the point. In fact saying intention and belief is

> >> irrelavent

> >>> simply ignores a scientifically established fact.

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> -

> >>> " " <alonmarcus@>

> >>> <Chinese Medicine >

> >>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:05 AM

> >>> Re: Placebo?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> nothing wrong with that the only thing science wants to

objectively

> >> evaluate

> >>> is do you get better result than a none train needle sticker. I

> >> just don't

> >>> get the resistance for it.

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Oakland, CA 94609

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> -

> >>> Turiya Hill

> >>> Chinese Medicine

> >>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:54 PM

> >>> Re: Placebo?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Yes. Very well said Dermott. And in my experience the

confluence

> >> of Yi

> >>> Breath and Qi instigate the treatment even before the

insertion

> >> of the

> >>> needles. The final sequence and pattern of treated points (

spheres

> >> of

> >>> influence) is the outer manifestation of this confluence. The

> >> pulses

> >>> change even prior to insertion.

> >>> -

> >>> Dermot O'Connor

> >>> Chinese Medicine

> >>> Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:29 PM

> >>> Re: Placebo?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> No Alon, the points made initially were twofold, point one

was

> >> that a

> >>> monkey

> >>> or robot inserting needles into the same acupuncture points

> >> would always

> >>> yield the same results as an extremely skilled practitioner.

> >> You make

> >>> your

> >>> own mind up on that one, but I certainly believe that there

is

> >> more to

> >>> acupuncture than accurate point location. I do think that

its

> >>> important,

> >>> but also believe there is something else at play - and that

as

> >> the texts

> >>> say

> >>> " the Yi moves the Qi. "

> >>>

> >>> Point two, was that belief and intention are totally

> >> irrelevant. As you

> >>> correctly point out its not irrelevant and can account for

up

> >> to 70% of

> >>> any

> >>> clinical effect.

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> -

> >>> " " <alonmarcus@>

> >>> <Chinese Medicine >

> >>> Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:04 AM

> >>> Re: Placebo?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> > no. it is used to compare an active treatment to

noneactive

> >> treatment.

> >>> The

> >>> > problem is that any time one inserts a needle there is

some

> >> effects.

> >>> The

> >>> > question is do you need any training or a monkey can do as

> >> well. That

> >>> is

> >>> > what a placebo is. Placebo does not mean there is no

clinical

> >> effects

> >>> as

> >>> > any drug study will show you. In some studies it has been

as

> >> high as

> >>> 70%.

> >>> > The other thing is that the effects of placebo usually do

not

> >> last. It

> >>> is

> >>> > therefore still a useful tool, however not the endall

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > Oakland, CA 94609

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > -

> >>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac.

> >>> > Chinese Medicine

> >>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:50 PM

> >>> > Placebo?

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > What does placebo really mean? It is usually thrown

around

> >> by

> >>> > researchers as a way to dismiss or control for the very

real

> >> and

> >>> > powerful forces of the human bodies own ability to heal

> >> itself.

> >>> " Just

> >>> > believing " is not the same as placebo. I have no doubt

that

> >> we all

> >>> have

> >>> > the innate capacity to heal from bacterial infections and

> >> hepatitis.

> >>> We

> >>> > may just need a little reminding. That's not to say I

> >> wouldn't seek

> >>> out

> >>> > antibiotics for myself or my family, it is just that I

want

> >> all my

> >>> > horses running in the same direction. When I get sick, I

> >> see it as a

> >>> > message my body is communicating to me. " Slow

down " , " pay

> >>> attention " ,

> >>> > " resolve this issue " . The problem is that most of us

don't

> >> view

> >>> > sickness this way and just work at killing the messenger

> >> (the pain,

> >>> > illness etc.) Why not use illness as an opportunity to

> >> reconnect

> >>> with

> >>> > our source instead of reinforcing our and societies

> >> disconnect?

> >>> >

> >>> > The fact is that human beings have within them the power

to

> >> heal and

> >>> be

> >>> > healed. How this power is activated involves many

factors

> >> and is

> >>> very

> >>> > individualized. A profound trust and belief in the

medicine

> >> being

> >>> one

> >>> > of them (placebo). The will to live is the number one

> >> determinate of

> >>> > long term survival of cancer patients. How can this be

the

> >> case if

> >>> the

> >>> > drugs and radiation is what " cures " them? A study done

in

> >> 1950

> >>> (Journal

> >>> > of Clinical Investigation; 1950; 29; 100-109) showed that

> >> placebo was

> >>> > powerful enough to turn ipecac which is normally used to

> >> induce

> >>> vomiting

> >>> > into a drug that stopped nausea.

> >>> >

> >>> > http://www.wrf.org/news/news0017.htm is an interesting

> >> article about

> >>> the

> >>> > power of placebo.

> >>> >

> >>> > Instead of dismissing placebo as " not real " , I believe it

> >> should be

> >>> > studied to find out how to maximize it's benefits in

healing.

> >>> >

> >>> > Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

> >>> > Oasis Acupuncture

> >>> > <http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/>

> >> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

> >>> > 8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

> >>> > Suite D-35

> >>> > Scottsdale, AZ 85258

> >>> > Phone: (480) 991-3650

> >>> > Fax: (480) 247-4472

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > Chinese Medicine

> >>> > Chinese Medicine On

> >> Behalf Of

> >>> > daomsnow

> >>> > Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:31 AM

> >>> > Chinese Medicine

> >>> > Re: Needling ORDER and Method (BU v XIE v

> >> Neutral

> >>> (Even)

> >>> > needling)

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > You're absolutely right, placebo plays a big role in all

> >> medicines.

> >>> > However, it is not what makes the medicine work when

placebo

> >> is not

> >>> > the cure. It is the medicine. It is not the intent or

the

> >> belief.

> >>> > The next time you get a bacterial infection, or

Hepatitis,

> >> try " just

> >>> > believing " and see where it gets you. I'll take the

> >> medicine thank

> >>> > you.

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > Dr. Snow

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sorry Susie for not cropping the messages......

 

Yes, I also agree this thread has run its course, so this will be my final

word. True, I wasn't in your class and I'm just relying on what you have

told us - although that seems to change. Initially it seems like you had no

time for your students advocating the role of belief and intention and now

its common knowledge and you fully accept it. Of course I know that there

is more to acupuncture than placebo. The point is that there is also more

to acupuncture than simply point location and a needle being inserted by a

monkey is different from a needle being inserted by a trained

acupuncturist - even if the location is identical. There are simply other

factors at play and there is nothing hocus pocus or tree hugging about

saying that. These other factors also apply to Western Medicine.

 

By the way, I have first hand experience of the effect of the mind on the

body (and can quote you lots of scientific studies which establish just how

profound it is). In 1998 I was diagnosed with an aggressive form of MS and

the neurologist told me that it was most likely that I would lose mobility

in a matter of months. Almost as if I was following instructions I started

to decline rapidly. Thankfully I managed to turn my thinking (intention)

around and quite quickly I began to recover. Now 8 years later I remain

symptom free and still actively competitive in sports.

 

I'm also sorry that our exchange turned as caustic is it did and I aplogise

to you Don if I caused offence.

 

Kind regards

 

Dermot

 

LLAHN (Likes Letters After His Name)

 

 

 

-

" daomsnow " <don83407

<Chinese Medicine >

Saturday, May 20, 2006 2:25 PM

Re: Placebo?

 

 

 

Again, you are preaching and have been preaching to the choir. You

think I missed your point as if you were the only one to know the

placebo effect. You weren't in my class and you have no idea the

students I am discussing. Nor do you know their thought or mine.

 

Acupuncture works with placebo. But antibiotics don't depend on it

and neither does AOM. I'm finished with this thread.

 

Dr. Snow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I think Don has a good point the rest of you seem to be grumpy and

nit-picking, except the student of Jeff Yuen. I know the type of

students Don is talking about, they think they can put a needle into

any point, then " pray " or focus their intention to make the treatment

do whatever. With the point indications in mosty modern tcm texts

you might as well do that, because without understanding all the

systems fully, you'll never know if the point will work

as " indicated " , so people are guessing all the time in modern

acupuncture. The placebo model for testing therapies is outdated,

and its importance is over-rated. Are you acupuncturists arguing

using this " placebo technique " on yor patients? I spoke with the

head pharmacist at Macleans mental hospital in Boston about the

placebo model, now they are testing drugs against each other instead

of a sugar pill as per my idea. I think unless you are a Taoist

priest or a qi gong master to not rely on " intenton " for therapeutic

effect. Although it can't hurt to " pray " for someone's health and

they have done some studies on the power of prayer for healing in a

Western setting, and I beloieve they did use a placebo in those

studies as well.

 

Chinese Medicine , " Dermot O'Connor "

<dermot wrote:

>

> Sorry Susie for not cropping the messages......

>

> Yes, I also agree this thread has run its course, so this will be

my final

> word. True, I wasn't in your class and I'm just relying on what

you have

> told us - although that seems to change. Initially it seems like

you had no

> time for your students advocating the role of belief and intention

and now

> its common knowledge and you fully accept it. Of course I know

that there

> is more to acupuncture than placebo. The point is that there is

also more

> to acupuncture than simply point location and a needle being

inserted by a

> monkey is different from a needle being inserted by a trained

> acupuncturist - even if the location is identical. There are

simply other

> factors at play and there is nothing hocus pocus or tree hugging

about

> saying that. These other factors also apply to Western Medicine.

>

> By the way, I have first hand experience of the effect of the mind

on the

> body (and can quote you lots of scientific studies which establish

just how

> profound it is). In 1998 I was diagnosed with an aggressive form

of MS and

> the neurologist told me that it was most likely that I would lose

mobility

> in a matter of months. Almost as if I was following instructions I

started

> to decline rapidly. Thankfully I managed to turn my thinking

(intention)

> around and quite quickly I began to recover. Now 8 years later I

remain

> symptom free and still actively competitive in sports.

>

> I'm also sorry that our exchange turned as caustic is it did and I

aplogise

> to you Don if I caused offence.

>

> Kind regards

>

> Dermot

>

> LLAHN (Likes Letters After His Name)

>

>

>

> -

> " daomsnow " <don83407

> <Chinese Medicine >

> Saturday, May 20, 2006 2:25 PM

> Re: Placebo?

>

>

>

> Again, you are preaching and have been preaching to the choir. You

> think I missed your point as if you were the only one to know the

> placebo effect. You weren't in my class and you have no idea the

> students I am discussing. Nor do you know their thought or mine.

>

> Acupuncture works with placebo. But antibiotics don't depend on it

> and neither does AOM. I'm finished with this thread.

>

> Dr. Snow

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I feel there is a distinct difference between " placebo " as it is used in

this context, and " intention " . Intention is not simply " hoping the

patient gets better " but a highly cultivated state of being. Gandhi had

intention, Mother Theresa had intention. Intention shows itself in

powerful ways in the lives of those who are touched by it. It isn't

some mystical power, but a state of being that is highly focused and

congruent. I'm sure most of us have met with people who just have a very

powerful presence be in in martial arts, politics or medicine.

 

I also feel that acupuncture points work on a holographic model of the

body. If this is true, theoretically any point can affect any organ or

cause any result. However, different points and meridians of the body

concentrate different aspects of our physical, psychological and

spiritual being. For example, LI-4 is a more effective point for

treating pain, issues of the face and the large intestine organ system

than say UB-40. That is not to say that UB-40 can't be used for these

indications, but it isn't as powerful. The holographic pattern isn't as

dense at UB-40 as it is in LI-4 for those indications.

 

I agree that claiming to use " intention " without serious self

cultivation or understanding of the flow and nature of Qi in acupuncture

treatments is a dismissive approach to this medicine. When someone like

Jeffery Yuen talks about using intention in his treatments I pay

attention, when a 2nd year acupuncture student talks about it I suspect

they are reducing acupuncture down to " faith healing " .

 

The fact is that the needles do induce specific changes to the bodies

energy and the point location and prescription is important. Intention

or no intention I believe this is the case. However, I also believe

that a significant difference between a new practitioner and someone who

has be doing it for 30 years is the level of their cultivated intention

to more powerfully affect the treatment. Time alone isn't sufficient to

cultivate intent. Some people seem to be gifted with clarity and focus

beyond their years.

 

My 2 cents. :-)

 

Christopher Vedeler L.Ac., C.Ht.

Oasis Acupuncture

<http://www.oasisacupuncture.com/> http://www.oasisacupuncture.com

8233 N. Via Paseo del Norte

Suite D-35

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Phone: (480) 991-3650

Fax: (480) 247-4472

 

 

Chinese Medicine

Chinese Medicine On Behalf Of

jasonwcom

Saturday, May 20, 2006 12:32 PM

Chinese Medicine

Re: Placebo?

 

 

I think Don has a good point the rest of you seem to be grumpy and

nit-picking, except the student of Jeff Yuen. I know the type of

students Don is talking about, they think they can put a needle into

any point, then " pray " or focus their intention to make the treatment

do whatever. With the point indications in mosty modern tcm texts

you might as well do that, because without understanding all the

systems fully, you'll never know if the point will work

as " indicated " , so people are guessing all the time in modern

acupuncture. The placebo model for testing therapies is outdated,

and its importance is over-rated. Are you acupuncturists arguing

using this " placebo technique " on yor patients? I spoke with the

head pharmacist at Macleans mental hospital in Boston about the

placebo model, now they are testing drugs against each other instead

of a sugar pill as per my idea. I think unless you are a Taoist

priest or a qi gong master to not rely on " intenton " for therapeutic

effect. Although it can't hurt to " pray " for someone's health and

they have done some studies on the power of prayer for healing in a

Western setting, and I beloieve they did use a placebo in those

studies as well.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...