Guest guest Posted April 5, 2006 Report Share Posted April 5, 2006 Dear Group, I have been watching this thread with interest and would like to add a few thoughts. I have spent close to four years in China studying CM since 1998, and am currently a PhD student at Zhejiang University of CM in Hangzhou, so I have a lot of exposure to what is going on here. One of those years was spent with Chen Ke-Ji and his colleagues in Beijing at China Academy of CM, Xi Yuan Hospital, where some of the pioneering work on what is called Zhong-Xi Jie He, Chinese-Western Integrated Medicine, was done and continues to be done. In all fairness to Chen Ke-Ji and those involved in this stage of development of CM, I feel I should chime in. In no way do these people feel that integration is the only way to go forward with CM. They do feel it is an important and maybe even necessary direction to go, but they would never consider dismissing the foundations of CM in favor of a pure allopathic/ " modern " application of CM modalities. In the clinic, they use both, and they have to- they are primary care physicians and treat conditions of all levels of severity. To not use WM would be irresponsible and ridiculous for many of these patients. Prof. Chen is a cardiologist, so he routinely puts people on anti-hypertensives, etc., but then he gives them herbs. His formulas are a combination of classical ideas with some modern ideas thrown in, often things based on research he or his copious number of students have done themselves, such as the research Z'ev mentioned on Dan Shen (they have researched the hell out of Dan Shen). His results are excellent. To think for a moment that Prof Chen doesn't know or would dismiss classical knowledge, is unfair. He knows the classics well, (he routinely prescribes Zhi Gan Cao Tang :-) ) and as I mentioned in an earlier post, has done a lot of research on them. I am not suggesting that there are NO people here in favor of dismissing classical foundations for pure modernization. There may be, but I have never met one. I have met a lot of people who are in favor of modern research, and integration of CM and WM, but they are all quite aware that they are different paradigms and on the most fundamental level will have to remain that way. In other words, when it comes down to it, in the clinic, one can apply the logic of both methods to seeing patients, but they will never become one system of logic. There will still always be CM evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment strategy, and WM evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment strategy. Then treatments can be integrated according to ideas from both systems. I think this is a rational and intelligent approach. To think that CM doctors here know less about the classics than the average westerner practicing CM, and/or are abandoning them in favor of " modernization " is absurd. For example, my professor has every word of Shang Han Lun memorized, not to mention a fair amount of Nei Jing, Jin Gui, and various other classics, but he also knows WM really well, knows how to integrate the two in the clinic, and does modern research on clinical application of Shang Han formulas. His clinical work is extremely classical- his formulas are largely based on Shang Han Lun- and he is really effective using those. If I can ever attain his level of competence, I would be extremely happy, not to mention surprised. Find a Westerner that is of his caliber and I will quit and go study with her/him instead. Likewise, to think that the political climate here forces people to practice " Communist " CM is absurd. Granted, the undergraduate education in the CM schools here is standardized and slanted in a lot of ways towards WM. This is an acknowledged problem here. Still, they study more classical material than is taught in schools in the West. But once in practice, doctors here are free to practice as they like, as long as they practice responsibly (there are laws regulating practice of medicine here just as anywhere in the world). If one wants to practice straight WM, one can. If one wants to practice pure CM, one can. There is no one standing over your shoulder telling you where to place needles, or how to prescribe herbs. Someone was recently telling me about an old doctor who only needles " open " points on all patients. Not sure how " classical " that is, but it's certainly not an idea from the Party. The communists did not burn or ban classical CM texts. You are free to purchase a recent reprint of a Song dynasty copy of Shang Han Lun, etc. People are studying and applying the knowledge from these books in clinic all the time, and it is not going to die out in favor of " modernization " . I am not suggesting that the state of CM in China is in any way ideal- there are problems. For example, the University system cannot train CM doctors the way that a traditional apprenticeship did. There is less hands-on training, and so graduates are not good at pulse diagnosis and a lot of other skills. But if motivated, they can go work and study hard and find good teachers and learn these skills. Not everyone will be able to, but some will and the practices will persist. But everyone is aware of these problems and some are actively thinking of ways to solve them. Anyway, not to rant, but just thought I'd add a bit of my own experience and perspective. Best wishes, Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2006 Report Share Posted April 5, 2006 I agree with Greg: the classics are still widely studied in China, much more than in the West. I too met many doctors who based their formulas on the classics. Some of these doctors hardly modified anything as they thought the formulas were already so well-formulated. I see modern research as a necessity to determine the clinical value of specific treatments for specific diseases. But there are also journals that are solely devoted to studying the classics: e.g. KNOWLEDGE OF ANCIENT MEDICAL LITERATURE 2005 Vol.22 No.4 -- English contents (less than half of the article titles translated) Chinese Medical Cultures Harmony in Philosophy and Harmony in Traditional & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;ZHANG Wei-hang & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(4) Appreciation of Medical Records Appreciation of Dr He Gongdan's Medical Recipes & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;LIN Qian-liang & #12288; <Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(8) Medical Field in Literature Medical Stories in Feng Menglong's Two Books & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;GONG Shu-ming & #12288; <Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(10) Pleasures in Regimen History of Washing Hand & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;FU Wei-kang & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(12) Brief Introduction to Folkways and Health and Longevity Concepts in Folkways & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;WEN Chang-lu & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(14) Hygiene of Diet and Defecation in Ancient Times & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;SUN Wen-zhong & #12288; <Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(17) Cultural Exposition History of Aromatic Fumigation & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;JIN Zhi-jun & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(18) A Graceful Charm in Oriental Poetry Commemoration of Sixtieth Anniversary Anti-Japanese Triumph & #12288; & #12288; & #12288; ZHANG Can-jia & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(23) A Superior Complex About Two " Southern Poems " & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;ZHANG Jian-zhong & #12288; <Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(24) TCM Exploration in Japan Background and Contents on Japan-Korea Medical Exchange in Sang Han Bi Yu & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;LIANG Yong-xuan & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(26) Education of Jianghu Medical Museum & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;DING-QUAN Shou lang,WANG Tie-ce & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(29) Explanation of Meaning and Puzzles On the Annotation of Zhang Jiebin's Categorized Classic of Medicine & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;ZHANG Zhong-li & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(32) Brief Introduction to the " Jing " in Traditional Chinese Medical Theories & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;ZHU Min-zhuo & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(34) Study of Chinese Medical Literature On Postscripts of LIU Shu's TANG Ye Jing & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;LI Ding & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(37) On the Category of Traditional Chinese Medical Terms & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;MAO Xiao & #12288; <Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(39) Articles Collection of Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen Ji Zhu from Jin Kui Yao Lue & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;FAN Yi-pin & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(42) Clasics Drawing Library Preliminary Investigation of Incomplete Manuscripts of Hui Hui Yi Yao & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;WANG Xing-yi & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(44) Other Summary of National Eighth Chinese Medical Culture Synposium & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;WEN Shao & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(46) and another journal : & #20013; & #37291; & #25991; & #29563; & #38620; & #24535; JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINAL LITERATURE 2005 Vol.23 No.4 -- English CONTENTS ((less than half of the article titles translated)) General Comment of Literature Research about Treatise on Cold - induced Diseases and Synopsis of the Golden Chamber & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Zhang Canjia & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(1) Collection and Collation Records of Tong Jun collecting Materia Medica & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Ma Jixing & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(4) Textual Contrast and Research between Plain Questions and Fundamentals of Huangdi's Internal Classic & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Duan Yishan & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288; <PDF file> & #12288;(9) Research on Development Character of Visceral Syndrome Differentiation in Ming and Qing Dynasty & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Yang Xuemei & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(14) Discrimination and Question About Book Title and Author and Colophon of Some Plague Monographs in Qing Dynasty & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Li He & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288; <PDF file> & #12288;(18) Primary Research on Edition Spread of The Scholars' Care of Their Parents & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Xiao Guogang & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(22) Brain in T.C.M. Literature Comment on Internal Structure of Brain & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Jin Bing & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(28) From " Only Living One's Own Mental Life " to " Being a Good Doctor " & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Li Defeng & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(30) Knowledge on Tumor Naming & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Yan Hongfei & #12288; <Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(34) Relation between Habitus and Tumor Remedy & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Xu Liaoyu & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(40) Clinical Experience Using Theories of Internal Classic No. 2 & #12288; & #12288; & #12288; Wang Qingqi & #12288;<Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(45) Predominant Knowledge and Master's Style & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Zheng XueJun & #12288; <Abstract> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(48) Six Clinical Cases of Professor Zhu Ruiqun & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Chen Li & #12288;<Abstract> & #12288; <PDF file> & #12288;(50) The Clinical Experience of Shi Yinyu Combined Using Acupuncture and Remedying Osteoarthropathy & #12288; & #12288; & #12288;Shen Weidong & #12288; <Partly contents> & #12288;<PDF file> & #12288;(52) Most of the journals coming out of China have a mixture of articles: some are pharmacological research, some are clinical observations of treatment of Western medical diseases by Chinese medical methods, some articles are about one person's rich clinical experience, some are Chinese medical literature reviews and almost always there is also an article or two that comments on classical literature. I know Chinese doctors that roll their eyes if you mention electro-acupuncture or modern usage of certain herbs (like jiao gu lan for high cholesterol) but at least these modalities are supported by research, while classical medicine has not undergone that kind of objective testing. Due to its subjectiveness and macrocosmic views, finding out what the limits of Chinese medicine are is not an easy endeavor. but I feel that we owe it to ourselves and our patients to seek that out. Thanks to the forum, I'm learning every day! Tom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.