Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 Maybe i don't need to write this, but i feel compelled to respond to the assumptions and inferences written about me, my training, my teaching and my practice. I graduated acupuncture school in 1995 at the top of my class (i did not find the training particularly rigorous). My first job out of school was a 3-year stint at a busy rheumatologist's office (the MD never wore a tie, let alone a lab coat, by the way). During that time i traveled across the country virtually every month and made two trips to Japan to study Japanese meridian therapy. Eventually i was asked by the association with which i studied to teach in their American programs. I was offered a position as teacher with a full class load at the school where i earned my acupuncture certificate; i taught virtually the entire acupuncture program. When my students went to China to study in Guangzhou hospital, the faculty there were impressed with my students' grasp of TCM. I finished the masters' program at the school during the time i was teaching a full class load and maintaining a full-time practice and weekend teaching of Japanese acupuncture. The classes i took during that time were mostly on Chinese herbal medicine and biomedicine. I have had a number of physicians (MD, DO, DC) seek me out to either recruit me for their integrative medicine program, or to study Japanese meridian therapy with me. One of them, a nationally-known DO, did me the honor of calling me one of the best teachers he'd ever had. I'm on the editorial staff of an internationally-published OM journal, and have had positive responses to my translated writings from Japanese practitioners. I'm also privately undertaking functional translation of selected material from some classic Japanese acupuncture and Kampo texts. Over the last few years, due to family commitments, i have moved many times, three times cross-country. I suspended practice several years ago to take care of my son (my wife's job has full benefits and, yes, a higher income than i have been able to make). I have no " competitors " , in fact i have been regularly turning away potential patients because i do not feel i currently have enough time to devote to building and maintaining a good practice in which i can be fully present and responsive to the needs of my patients. I am currently teaching Chinese herbal medicine and am OM program director at an ACAOM-approved program. However, due to increased family responsibilities, i will be cutting back on my hours at the school. For ten years, i have maintained an informational website on Japanese meridian therapy (i will refrain from giving the URL). The site is non-commercial, except for a page with my upcoming lectures and classes. I teach Japanese meridian therapy infrequently and somewhat reluctantly, for the role of teacher confers upon me an authority that i do not feel i merit. However, i also have trouble saying no, and due to increased demand i will be teaching some classes in the unspecified future. The website contains my writings and some transcripts of lectures which are free of charge; i fully intend to add more content to the site as time permits. I pay for the website and do not charge for the information, i feel that it is my humble contribution to the profession. For many reasons, i have decided that this will be my last post on this e-group. I apologize if i misrepresented or misconstrued the words or actions of anyone on the group during the time i have been here (including you, Rachel, i humbly bow to you... today you are my teacher). I will keep my membership for a while in order to have access to the archives for whatever purposes may arise. I will respond to inquiries off-list. Thanks for your time, Most sincerely, Robert Hayden, L.Ac. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 Wow Robert, very impressive. When you edit, do you cut and paste words out of context to mislead potential readers? Or do you just do that here? Robert, your little diatribe is the most brilliant piece of passive- agressive manipulation that I have read or heard in YEARS....I almost feel sorry for you myself, sniff sniff. Where's my Kleenex? Never mind, I'll just wipe my nose on the sleeve of my official TCM dirty flannel shirt :-) You could have a brilliant career as a manipulative propagandist. Too bad TCM already has plenty of those. They are called TCM school administrators. NO, sir, I bow to YOU. You've taught ME the correct way to communicate in the world of TCM. Cut and paste, snip, snip....and above all, work the crowd for sympathy.... You are a rare individual indeed. Rachel Chinese Medicine , " kampo36 " <kampo36> wrote: > > Maybe i don't need to write this, but i feel compelled to respond to the assumptions and > inferences written about me, my training, my teaching and my practice. > > I graduated acupuncture school in 1995 at the top of my class (i did not find the training > particularly rigorous). My first job out of school was a 3-year stint at a busy > rheumatologist's office (the MD never wore a tie, let alone a lab coat, by the way). During > that time i traveled across the country virtually every month and made two trips to Japan > to study Japanese meridian therapy. Eventually i was asked by the association with which i > studied to teach in their American programs. > > I was offered a position as teacher with a full class load at the school where i earned my > acupuncture certificate; i taught virtually the entire acupuncture program. When my > students went to China to study in Guangzhou hospital, the faculty there were impressed > with my students' grasp of TCM. > > I finished the masters' program at the school during the time i was teaching a full class > load and maintaining a full-time practice and weekend teaching of Japanese acupuncture. > The classes i took during that time were mostly on Chinese herbal medicine and > biomedicine. > > I have had a number of physicians (MD, DO, DC) seek me out to either recruit me for their > integrative medicine program, or to study Japanese meridian therapy with me. One of > them, a nationally-known DO, did me the honor of calling me one of the best teachers > he'd ever had. > > I'm on the editorial staff of an internationally-published OM journal, and have had positive > responses to my translated writings from Japanese practitioners. I'm also privately > undertaking functional translation of selected material from some classic Japanese > acupuncture and Kampo texts. > > Over the last few years, due to family commitments, i have moved many times, three times > cross-country. I suspended practice several years ago to take care of my son (my wife's > job has full benefits and, yes, a higher income than i have been able to make). I have no > " competitors " , in fact i have been regularly turning away potential patients because i do > not feel i currently have enough time to devote to building and maintaining a good > practice in which i can be fully present and responsive to the needs of my patients. > > I am currently teaching Chinese herbal medicine and am OM program director at an > ACAOM-approved program. However, due to increased family responsibilities, i will be > cutting back on my hours at the school. > > For ten years, i have maintained an informational website on Japanese meridian therapy (i > will refrain from giving the URL). The site is non-commercial, except for a page with my > upcoming lectures and classes. I teach Japanese meridian therapy infrequently and > somewhat reluctantly, for the role of teacher confers upon me an authority that i do not > feel i merit. However, i also have trouble saying no, and due to increased demand i will be > teaching some classes in the unspecified future. > > The website contains my writings and some transcripts of lectures which are free of > charge; i fully intend to add more content to the site as time permits. I pay for the website > and do not charge for the information, i feel that it is my humble contribution to the > profession. > > For many reasons, i have decided that this will be my last post on this e-group. I > apologize if i misrepresented or misconstrued the words or actions of anyone on the > group during the time i have been here (including you, Rachel, i humbly bow to you... > today you are my teacher). I will keep my membership for a while in order to have access > to the archives for whatever purposes may arise. I will respond to inquiries off-list. > > Thanks for your time, > Most sincerely, > Robert Hayden, L.Ac. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 kampo36 wrote: > For many reasons, i have decided that this will be my last post on this e-group > there have been lengthy discussions on the reasons for the profession not quite making its mark out there in the real world, ranging from did we gouge out the gluteus in dissection to are we in white coat and tie other reasons have been, inadequate training, limitations in curriculum, questionable training in the business aspect of the profession i am suggesting one more reason, and that is that in some cases there may be an entire absence of the proverbial bedside manner some practitioners have come across as vitriolic, entirely intolerant of opinions which seem different from theirs at other times there is an underlying vein of frank rage, and absolutely no compunction at mauling the perceived weak by a barrage of invective if this intolerant attitude which borders on bullying is prevalent in as little as 2 % of the practitioners, word of mouth will carry in a negative sense, and do the fledgling profession no good for a practitioner of the stature of kampo36 to have to abdicate because of a rachel h peterman, M.S., J.D., gets to be as tragic and unfortunate as it will ever be if we a practitioners make the milieu ungraciously unreceptive for a man i consider one of the foremost living exponents of the Japanese Meridian Therapy, it is a sorry day, and bodes no well for the profession and i shudder to think that the same bullying, badgering and intolerance might be the lot of the patient, who is the quintessence of weak and vulnerable if indeed we have lost kampo36, it is rank tragedy dr holmes www.acu-free.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 ....But cutting and pasting the words of another in order to mislead readers is o.k. with you " dr " ? Is that what you learned in medical school, " dr " ? Robert's " last " email was the most passive-agressive, manipulative thing I've read in years, but his schtick worked on you. Perhaps on others, but not on me. *He* was allowed to be sarcastic, but not me? I gave him back a little bit of sarcasm, and he gets all weepy on us? Robert can dish it out, but he can't take it? I didn't cut and paste *his* words out of context, trying to manipulate the other readers. He was trying to lead others to think I was " calling him names " when I was simply giving examples of some unpleasant things that health care professionals actually say about us as TCM practitioners. But I didn't cut and paste *his* words out of context. Not once. Because it's unethical and underhanded. Does age or TCM experience afford him *that* privilege? Or are we only allowed to be sarcastic on this listserv if we are willing to accept some whimsical notion of TCM, and willing to ignore the realities associated with practice in the United States? If I told you that western medicine is the bogey man and TCM is a magical, mystical art that will transform the world, would I *then* have the " street cred " to be just as sarcastic on this listserv as the rest of you? The truth is, many of you are just as intractable and unwilling to see any other point of view as you accuse *me* of being. The difference is, *my* opinions are based on hundreds, maybe thousands of hours of research. The " magical world of TCM " faction only has their hopes and dreams to support *their* view. But they never let anything like facts and reality get in the way of *their* opinions.... Accept the fact, " dr " , that no one's attacking you or anyone else personally, some of us just want to discuss certain unpleasant realities affecting TCM today. Ignoring these realities might help you sleep better at night, but it won't do much to protect TCM as an independent practice in the United States. Too many people are so threatened by any discussion that doesn't comport with their own view of TCM as a high art form, sent down from heaven to magically cure everything...an art which requires its high priests to dance around in organically grown hemp, their dreadlocks and tatoos flashing in the morning light.... It's an art and a science. I'll give you that much. But too many people want to vilify the science while worshipping the " art " . That's not a formula for survival in the United States. Unless you *want* to work under the supervision of an M.D. Those of us who *aren't* retired or running continuing education courses for a living simply don't have the luxury of ignoring the *real* problems confronting TCM practice in the U.S. today. I think that deep down, you recognize that, " dr " . Send my love to your unusual knicknacks and curios who wanted to know about my degrees, " dr " ...that's SO sweet of them.... love, Rachel Chinese Medicine , holmes <dkaikobad@c...> wrote: > > kampo36 wrote: > > > For many reasons, i have decided that this will be my last post on this > e-group > > > > there have been lengthy discussions on the reasons for the profession > not quite making its mark out there in the real world, ranging from did > we gouge out the gluteus in dissection to are we in white coat and tie > > other reasons have been, inadequate training, limitations in curriculum, > questionable training in the business aspect of the profession > > i am suggesting one more reason, and that is that in some cases there > may be an entire absence of the proverbial bedside manner > > some practitioners have come across as vitriolic, entirely intolerant of > opinions which seem different from theirs > > at other times there is an underlying vein of frank rage, and absolutely > no compunction at mauling the perceived weak by a barrage of invective > > if this intolerant attitude which borders on bullying is prevalent in as > little as 2 % of the practitioners, word of mouth will carry in a > negative sense, and do the fledgling profession no good > > for a practitioner of the stature of kampo36 to have to abdicate because > of a rachel h peterman, M.S., J.D., gets to be as tragic and unfortunate > as it will ever be > > if we a practitioners make the milieu ungraciously unreceptive for a man > i consider one of the foremost living exponents of the Japanese Meridian > Therapy, it is a sorry day, and bodes no well for the profession > > and i shudder to think that the same bullying, badgering and intolerance > might be the lot of the patient, who is the quintessence of weak and > vulnerable > > if indeed we have lost kampo36, it is rank tragedy > > dr holmes > www.acu-free.com > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 Rachel, I know that your upset over people twisting your words to make a trap for you, but attacking people's dress code is not winning the argument. I've tried to edit your constant flaming attacks against people, but cannot get to all of them. You are not allowed to attack cultural identities such as you did in the passage below. It serves no purpose to attack people's characteristic identity (flaming) in order to win your argument. As a doctor of law and a TCM practitioner who really should know better. Please stop it. Try a different angle of argument. Warm regards, Attilio D'Alberto Doctor of (Beijing, China) B.Sc. (Hons) T.C.M. M.A.T.C.M. Editor Times 07786 198900 enquiries <http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/> www.chinesemedicinetimes.com Too many people are so threatened by any discussion that doesn't comport with their own view of TCM as a high art form, sent down from heaven to magically cure everything...an art which requires its high priests to dance around in organically grown hemp, their dreadlocks and tatoos flashing in the morning light.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2006 Report Share Posted January 22, 2006 Who are these people, Alon? I haven't met any. On Jan 22, 2006, at 1:28 PM, wrote: > Too many people are so threatened by any discussion that doesn't > comport with their own view of TCM as a high art form, sent down > from heaven to magically cure everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Zev We see very little discussion on any of the negatives related to our medicine and education. As you know i have been very vocal regarding this issue for many years. Almost without fail whenever i bring such subjects up i hear " well WM is that or this. " What i do not hear is any critical discussion of the evidence for our medicine or our education. I guess it is natural for an underdog profession to behaves is such defensive ways but change is way over due. Early in my teaching (early 90s) i used to put out theoretical scenarios of an acute MI asking students (LAcs) to start a questioning thread to come up with a dx. While these were unusual MI presentations out of at least 100 LAc non picked up an appropriate thread of questioning. It was clear none had any idea such a presentation could be related to an MI. When i then questioned the safety of their primary care practice and their professional standing i would hear all kind of stuff except acknowledgment that they could not even answer the question. At that time there was also a lot of discussion regarding granting Dr degrees to practitioners (this was part of AAOM), which i thought to be a mistake. But the kind of defensiveness and " deserving " attitude you could hear was mind blowing. Many were even extremely defensive regarding their OM training not willing to acknowledge its true state. You could see practitioners that new close to nothing about CM herbal practice claiming to be as educated as anyone and deserving of a Dr degree (although i must say that at that time the most vocal were from FL for some reason). There is simply too much defensiveness and not enough critical analysis in our profession. The schools have also done very little to change this, from significantly changing educational programs to requiring students to do clinical followups and critically measure clinical outcomes, to critically review our literature at school settings Oakland, CA 94609 - Chinese Medicine Sunday, January 22, 2006 3:35 PM Re: a final few words Who are these people, Alon? I haven't met any. On Jan 22, 2006, at 1:28 PM, wrote: > Too many people are so threatened by any discussion that doesn't > comport with their own view of TCM as a high art form, sent down > from heaven to magically cure everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Well said. There's nothing I could really disagree with here. We've got a lot of work to do, but as someone else pointed out, there is little funding for development in our profession other than professional dues and income from student tuitions at private, mostly for-profit educational institutions. I just wish you'd spell out your ideas in longer posts rather than dysphemisms. On Jan 22, 2006, at 4:20 PM, wrote: > Zev > We see very little discussion on any of the negatives related to > our medicine and education. As you know i have been very vocal > regarding this issue for many years. Almost without fail whenever i > bring such subjects up i hear " well WM is that or this. " What i do > not hear is any critical discussion of the evidence for our > medicine or our education. I guess it is natural for an underdog > profession to behaves is such defensive ways but change is way over > due. > Early in my teaching (early 90s) i used to put out theoretical > scenarios of an acute MI asking students (LAcs) to start a > questioning thread to come up with a dx. While these were unusual > MI presentations out of at least 100 LAc non picked up an > appropriate thread of questioning. It was clear none had any idea > such a presentation could be related to an MI. When i then > questioned the safety of their primary care practice and their > professional standing i would hear all kind of stuff except > acknowledgment that they could not even answer the question. At > that time there was also a lot of discussion regarding granting Dr > degrees to practitioners (this was part of AAOM), which i thought > to be a mistake. But the kind of defensiveness and " deserving " > attitude you could hear was mind blowing. Many were even extremely > defensive regarding their OM training not willing to acknowledge > its true state. You could see practitioners that new close to > nothing about CM herbal practice claiming to be a > There is simply too much defensiveness and not enough critical > analysis in our profession. The schools have also done very little > to change this, from significantly changing educational programs to > requiring students to do clinical followups and critically measure > clinical outcomes, to critically review our literature at school > settings > > > > > Oakland, CA 94609 > > > - > > Chinese Medicine > Sunday, January 22, 2006 3:35 PM > Re: a final few words > > > Who are these people, Alon? I haven't met any. > > > On Jan 22, 2006, at 1:28 PM, wrote: > >> Too many people are so threatened by any discussion that doesn't >> comport with their own view of TCM as a high art form, sent down >> from heaven to magically cure everything. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Zev I am just a guy with a few words i will try Oakland, CA 94609 - Chinese Medicine Sunday, January 22, 2006 4:39 PM Re: a final few words Well said. There's nothing I could really disagree with here. We've got a lot of work to do, but as someone else pointed out, there is little funding for development in our profession other than professional dues and income from student tuitions at private, mostly for-profit educational institutions. I just wish you'd spell out your ideas in longer posts rather than dysphemisms. On Jan 22, 2006, at 4:20 PM, wrote: > Zev > We see very little discussion on any of the negatives related to > our medicine and education. As you know i have been very vocal > regarding this issue for many years. Almost without fail whenever i > bring such subjects up i hear " well WM is that or this. " What i do > not hear is any critical discussion of the evidence for our > medicine or our education. I guess it is natural for an underdog > profession to behaves is such defensive ways but change is way over > due. > Early in my teaching (early 90s) i used to put out theoretical > scenarios of an acute MI asking students (LAcs) to start a > questioning thread to come up with a dx. While these were unusual > MI presentations out of at least 100 LAc non picked up an > appropriate thread of questioning. It was clear none had any idea > such a presentation could be related to an MI. When i then > questioned the safety of their primary care practice and their > professional standing i would hear all kind of stuff except > acknowledgment that they could not even answer the question. At > that time there was also a lot of discussion regarding granting Dr > degrees to practitioners (this was part of AAOM), which i thought > to be a mistake. But the kind of defensiveness and " deserving " > attitude you could hear was mind blowing. Many were even extremely > defensive regarding their OM training not willing to acknowledge > its true state. You could see practitioners that new close to > nothing about CM herbal practice claiming to be a > There is simply too much defensiveness and not enough critical > analysis in our profession. The schools have also done very little > to change this, from significantly changing educational programs to > requiring students to do clinical followups and critically measure > clinical outcomes, to critically review our literature at school > settings > > > > > Oakland, CA 94609 > > > - > > Chinese Medicine > Sunday, January 22, 2006 3:35 PM > Re: a final few words > > > Who are these people, Alon? I haven't met any. > > > On Jan 22, 2006, at 1:28 PM, wrote: > >> Too many people are so threatened by any discussion that doesn't >> comport with their own view of TCM as a high art form, sent down >> from heaven to magically cure everything. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 wrote: > people on the list will do well to hear much of what you say if we > are to have an independent profession. To many people feel we cant > loose ground we already attained. The resent changes in CA should > serve as a warning Hi Dr. Alon! Changes? I have heard that something was under consideration, but I was unaware that any change was actually made. What happened? Regards, Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Roseann, I wholeheartedly agree. It was painfully evident when SB 233 came to the political fore here in california, there was the very real and present danger of a loss of profession with the potential inability to bill insurance. Much of this was greeted plainly (painly if there was a word) with apathy, not because there is not energy in the profession, but because the organisations that are in place to defend and promote were sleeping at the proverbial wheel. Since this time there has been a shift and in the state org (CSOMA) the previous leader recognised her inability to constructively lead the profession, and another who has a track record of having an eye towards the future is now in that position. I agree with Lao Tzu that the best leaders aren't seen, but they must be heard. Where are our leaders nationally, internationally? We are a mish-mash of practitioners who are generally a well meaning, right brained lot that (generally) don't wish to engage in politics. Without this leadership we are simply prone to the wind that blows and the profession is then vulnerable should an attack seem viable to those who may feel threatened. We can have different ideas, but we must have a common Ideal, it is that simple. Regards, Tymothy Re: a final few words Alon and others have pointed out a lack of consensus in our profession about what kind of profession we want to have, or can have. From my point of view, what we really lack is LEADERSHIP. I don't think it's pssible to have a consensus on this issue, but if we had leaders WHO REALLY KNEW HOW TO LEAD, maybe we could get somewhere. People have said that anytime anyone raises these issues to the group everyone goes on the defensive. But I will say that my experience in this group and the CHA group (which is even worse) is that anytime anyone wants to raise these issues they do it through the method of attacking the integrity/intelligence/life choices of those with differing views. How can you build a consensus when the dialogue starts with such a polarizing, aggressive, negative tone? I have noticed this same negative tone with several different professional acupuncture organizations, too. Ugh, such a turn-off, so self-defeating. I have never, in my other walks of professional life, encountered a group of such strange and hostile energy that matches what I have encountered on this and the CHA group. But I really think it has to do with how we are looking at leadership. Isn't there something in Chinese philosophy that says, " the greatest leaders are those whose citizens don't know who they are? " I do appreciate the people who run these lists, I think that energy is serving us in a good way. ---RoseAnne " The greater danger for most of is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it. " Michelangelo -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 In a message dated 1/23/2006 12:52:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, alonmarcus writes: we may even loose our ability to order labwork. Need to back it up with training, how much training did the DOM's do last year, how much will they do this year. We are the new guys on the block, other practice acts may feel threatened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 > We have lost our ability to dx in CA, we may even loose our ability to order labwork. > > No, we haven't yet. The Govenor vetoed bill AB113 due to it's vagueness. I hope you guy's haven't chased Rachel away, we really need someone like her to use as a lobbiest in the Government, since many acupuncturists have thin skin, think a disagreement is a personal attack and run away at the first sign of a challenge. How woulds such a person last under the real attacks of politics? Don't be afraid of her hecause she's not you, embrace that which makes her different, someone like her is the only way this profession will have a fighting chance. Kelvin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Thank you! We do need strong warriors. >>> acupuncturebeverlyhills 01/23/06 12:30 PM >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 In a message dated 1/24/2006 12:53:15 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, mdeidson writes: AFL-CIO The below is from the web site, How does this work for a private practice? If our office has more than one, we are the employer so that would mean or office manager would be in the union demanding higher pay, better health care, more vacation, matching 401K. * _Why you need a union_ (http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/why/index.cfm) Union members earn more money, have better benefits and have a voice at work about the best way to get the job done. Get the details about this " union advantage, " plus a look at who belongs to unions. Joining A Union Fast Facts * Fifty-three percent of nonunion workers say they want a union in their workplace, according to a recent national poll. * Ninety-two percent of private-sector employers, when faced with employees who want to form a union, force employees to attend closed-door meetings to hear anti-union propaganda; 78 percent require supervisors to deliver anti-union messages in one-on-one meetings with workers they oversee. * Seventy-five percent hire outside consultants to run anti-union campaigns, often based on mass psychology and distorting the law. * More than half of private-sector employers tell employees they will shut down partially or totally if the employees succeed in forming a union; in manufacturing more than 70 percent of employers tell workers this. * In 25 percent of organizing campaigns, private-sector employers illegally fire workers because they want to form a union. * Even after workers successfully form a union, nearly half of the time, employers avoid negotiating a contract. * The union movement is supporting the Employee Free Choice Act, which would protect workers’ freedom to form unions by allowing them to choose a union through majority sign-up (card-check). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 KarateStan wrote: > In a message dated 1/24/2006 12:53:15 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > mdeidson writes: > > AFL-CIO The below is from the web site, How does this work for a > private practice? If our office has more than one, we are the > employer so that would mean or office manager would be in the union > demanding higher pay, better health care, more vacation, matching > 401K. Hi Dr. Stan! It is possible that they could modify their plan to accommodate our unique situation. I remember that as an owner-operator trucker I had an opportunity to join the Teamsters. Had I done it I could have gotten into their health plan and the like. I instead joined OOIDA and used their health plan and the like. OOIDA has a strong lobby. <http://www.ooida.com/> I offer MDs, chiros and the like professional courtesy, but they never take it. Most of us need a health plan. Regards, Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.