Guest guest Posted November 27, 2005 Report Share Posted November 27, 2005 Hi & All, Paraphrasing Todd: > It is a reminder that there is much we can't know without controlled > studies... a reminder that even longterm use of CHMs in combination > with WMs is not even remotely proven safe. When we consider drug/herb > interactions, we usually mean something obvious, like diarrhea or a > headache. But subtle things, like changes in cholesterol, typically are > silent killers and we don't know until it is too late. Despite the lack > of any hard data to question the use of combined herb/drug therapy, we > are in new territory and this could easily come back to bite us in the > butts. Many CHMs have antioxidant properties, thus we need to be very > careful when prescribing any herbs with any drugs. > > HT disease is the #1 killer in America ... Anything that herbalists do > that increases the risk of HT attack is a lawsuit waiting to happen ... > My guess is that if you get sued under such a scenario, your > malpractice carrier will drop you like a hot potato. This is one of > many reasons I have recently been advocating the use of CHMs for short > term use in acute conditions or to control symptoms. The mere fact that > the Chinese have used certain herbs longterm does not guarantee their > safety under these conditions nor do the claims of Chinese docs that > the whole issue is a red herring. Most Chinese docs know little or > nothing about pharmacology and their opinions on this topic of > drug/herb interaction is baseless. Todd IMO, Todd has raised a critical point, and I agree with his alarm-call. CHM and WM developed more or less independently of each other, follow different thinking processes and (until recently) were not used together, at least for prolonged periods. As Todd said, there are HUGE gaps in our knowledge of herb-drug interactions (positive or negative), especially over prolonged periods of time. We are in a real quandary because I suspect that MOST patients who present for CHM for chronic problems are ALREADY taking one or more WM drugs daily. I know of people who take/have taken 4-13 different WMs at the same time! CHM practitioners probably know as little about modern WM/western pharmacology as Allopathic doctors know about CHM/Chinese pharmacology. Should WE advise patients on WMs to wean off them before starting CHM? Many (most?) allopathic doctors take that line - they advise their patients NOT to use CHMs while they are on the WMs. has raised the spectre of law-suits if anything goes wrong in patients taking CHMs with WMs. Because WM is " in the saddle " , with support of Governments, Universities, public health kudos, etc., you can bet your bottom dollar that if such cases go to court, the odds are that the OMD will be hammered rather than the WMD. has given us all a wake-up call. So ... where do we go from here? Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc, c/o 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Chinese Proverb: " Man who says it can't be done, should not interrupt man doing it " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2005 Report Share Posted November 27, 2005 On 11/27/05, < wrote: As Todd said, there are HUGE gaps in our knowledge of herb-drug > interactions (positive or negative), especially over prolonged periods of > time. I like the " positive or negative " addition here. I currently have a toothache, an abscess at the root of a tooth for which I'm taking a penicillin type antibiotic. I'm also taking some Ge Gen to guide it to the stomach channel in my jaw. Of course one case isn't enough to assess the efficacy of this compared to not guiding the antibiotic action, however it is one example of using herbs and drugs together toward a beneficial outcome. I realize that this thread is about protecting our practices, but while we're all running away from the dangers of this issue, we can also look at the opportunities that it presents. Imagine a drug/herb combination that out performs the drug only. Again, clinical trials are required to generate the numbers to prove this theory. -- Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2005 Report Share Posted November 27, 2005 Of course one case isn't enough to assess the efficacy of this compared to not guiding the antibiotic action, however it is one example of using herbs and drugs together toward a beneficial outcome. >>>> Al You have to make the assumption that ge gen does not interfere with penicillin. While it probably does not this is an assumption. On the other side of the coin even with pharmaceuticals we have huge gaps in the knowledge of interactions Oakland, CA 94609 - Al Stone Sunday, November 27, 2005 7:56 AM Re: Re: CHM, antioxidants, WM medications & cholesterol On 11/27/05, < wrote: As Todd said, there are HUGE gaps in our knowledge of herb-drug > interactions (positive or negative), especially over prolonged periods of > time. I like the " positive or negative " addition here. I currently have a toothache, an abscess at the root of a tooth for which I'm taking a penicillin type antibiotic. I'm also taking some Ge Gen to guide it to the stomach channel in my jaw. Of course one case isn't enough to assess the efficacy of this compared to not guiding the antibiotic action, however it is one example of using herbs and drugs together toward a beneficial outcome. I realize that this thread is about protecting our practices, but while we're all running away from the dangers of this issue, we can also look at the opportunities that it presents. Imagine a drug/herb combination that out performs the drug only. Again, clinical trials are required to generate the numbers to prove this theory. -- Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2005 Report Share Posted November 27, 2005 Hi & All, Paraphrasing Todd: > It is a reminder that there is much we can't know without controlled > studies... a reminder that even longterm use of CHMs in combination > with WMs is not even remotely proven safe. When we consider drug/herb > interactions, we usually mean something obvious, like diarrhea or a > headache. But subtle things, like changes in cholesterol, typically are > silent killers and we don't know until it is too late. Despite the lack > of any hard data to question the use of combined herb/drug therapy, we > are in new territory and this could easily come back to bite us in the > butts. Many CHMs have antioxidant properties, thus we need to be very > careful when prescribing any herbs with any drugs. > > HT disease is the #1 killer in America ... Anything that herbalists do > that increases the risk of HT attack is a lawsuit waiting to happen ... > My guess is that if you get sued under such a scenario, your > malpractice carrier will drop you like a hot potato. This is one of > many reasons I have recently been advocating the use of CHMs for short > term use in acute conditions or to control symptoms. The mere fact that > the Chinese have used certain herbs longterm does not guarantee their > safety under these conditions nor do the claims of Chinese docs that > the whole issue is a red herring. Most Chinese docs know little or > nothing about pharmacology and their opinions on this topic of > drug/herb interaction is baseless. Todd IMO, Todd has raised a critical point, and I agree with his alarm-call. CHM and WM developed more or less independently of each other, follow different thinking processes and (until recently) were not used together, at least for prolonged periods. As Todd said, there are HUGE gaps in our knowledge of herb-drug interactions (positive or negative), especially over prolonged periods of time. We are in a real quandary because I suspect that MOST patients who present for CHM for chronic problems are ALREADY taking one or more WM drugs daily. I know of people who take/have taken 4-13 different WMs at the same time! CHM practitioners probably know as little about modern WM/western pharmacology as Allopathic doctors know about CHM/Chinese pharmacology. Should WE advise patients on WMs to wean off them before starting CHM? Many (most?) allopathic doctors take that line - they advise their patients NOT to use CHMs while they are on the WMs. has raised the spectre of law-suits if anything goes wrong in patients taking CHMs with WMs. Because WM is " in the saddle " , with support of Governments, Universities, public health kudos, etc., you can bet your bottom dollar that if such cases go to court, the odds are that the OMD will be hammered rather than the WMD. has given us all a wake-up call. So ... where do we go from here? Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc, c/o 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Chinese Proverb: " Man who says it can't be done, should not interrupt man doing it " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2005 Report Share Posted November 28, 2005 Al, Have you tried adding Salvia, Dan shen? It has a rep for enhancing microcirculation. Subhuti Dharmananda has an article on it at www.itmonline.org, if i'm not mistaken. ann I like the " positive or negative " addition here. I currently have a toothache, an abscess at the root of a tooth for which I'm taking a penicillin type antibiotic. I'm also taking some Ge Gen to guide it to the stomach channel in my jaw. Of course one case isn't enough to assess the efficacy of this compared to not guiding the antibiotic action, however it is one example of using herbs and drugs together toward a beneficial outcome. I realize that this thread is about protecting our practices, but while we're all running away from the dangers of this issue, we can also look at the opportunities that it presents. Imagine a drug/herb combination that out performs the drug only. Again, clinical trials are required to generate the numbers to prove this theory. -- Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional. ---------- Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.8/184 - Release 11/27/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 Matt, I work around a lot of MD's, and some DO's, and it is by far the minority that practice poor and/or insensitive medicine. The majority of them ARE in practice to help patients. When prescribing new rx's, they do compare (1) side effects and (2) costs for patients. I guess b/c I work around so many of " them, " I understand the adversarial tone even less than I used to - and I really never did. Lynn --- Matthew Sieradski <mattsieradski wrote: > Phil and Todd: > > The problem is also complicated by the fact > that most M.D.s don't even practice Western > Medicine well. The routinely overlook the fact > that their medicines are causing side-effects > (even the most highlighted ones), and then > continue to give drugs to combat those very > same side effects. In my clinical experience, > this is almost always how patients end up > taking a dozen or more different drugs. By the > time we get the case, it's enormously more > difficult to unravel than it would have been > had we seen them when they began having side > effects from the primary medication. > > -Matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Share Posted December 8, 2005 Lynn, My experience is certainly not a thorough one, but one based upon those patients seeking acupuncture and Chinese herbal treatment. I see quite a number of cases where MDs have made obvious mis-diagnoses or have, as I said, ignored side effects of drugs that they themselves prescribed. This is not just something I alone have noticed, but colleagues of mine have, as well. So perhaps I was overstating the case; replace " most M.D.s " with " many M.D.s " . I'm not sure how many. Maybe most, maybe not. Frankly, this is not a phenomena limited to the biomedical fields, as I have also seen many cases where acupuncturists have prescribed herbs where they were clearly contraindicated. I have no particular adversity towards biomedicine, but rather towards poor practice of medicine, regardless of the variety. Perhaps if Western medical doctors had enough time to think clearly through a case, instead of the 5 minutes that is common in today's practices, this would happen less frequently. As with acupuncturists, I think they shouldn't prescribe Chinese herbs unless they have seriously studied Chinese herbal medicine under competent instructors for several years. For the record, I did not mean to imply that I thought that most M.D.s were callous and uncaring towards their patients. Not at all. I simply believe that good intention must be paired with skillful means if the results are to be helpful. -Matt " J. Lynn Detamore " <lynndetamore wrote: Matt, I work around a lot of MD's, and some DO's, and it is by far the minority that practice poor and/or insensitive medicine. The majority of them ARE in practice to help patients. When prescribing new rx's, they do compare (1) side effects and (2) costs for patients. I guess b/c I work around so many of " them, " I understand the adversarial tone even less than I used to - and I really never did. Lynn --- Matthew Sieradski <mattsieradski wrote: > Phil and Todd: > > The problem is also complicated by the fact > that most M.D.s don't even practice Western > Medicine well. The routinely overlook the fact > that their medicines are causing side-effects > (even the most highlighted ones), and then > continue to give drugs to combat those very > same side effects. In my clinical experience, > this is almost always how patients end up > taking a dozen or more different drugs. By the > time we get the case, it's enormously more > difficult to unravel than it would have been > had we seen them when they began having side > effects from the primary medication. > > -Matt Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.