Guest guest Posted October 4, 2005 Report Share Posted October 4, 2005 Hi All, > GBP wrote: > > Perhaps we should reconsider DDT. Bart Paulding, LAc Pete wrote: > Hi Bart! Yes. I think some safeguards and a new protocol for safe > handling. Perhaps only for mosquitoes, deer ticks and the like, not > for farm crop pests. <http://www.junkscience.com/ddtfaq.htm> I favour biological control of insects rather than chemical control. IMO, DDT and its metabolite (DDE) are powerful toxins and should be avoided if at all possible. See: Sci Total Environ. 2005 May 12; [Epub ahead of print] DDT and human health. Beard J; Australian Rural Health Research Collaboration. University of Sydney and Southern Cross University, PO Box 3074, Lismore NSW 2480, Australia. 1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2'bis(p- chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) was the first widely used synthetic pesticide and is extremely persistent in both the environment and the human body. The introduction of DDT revolutionised agricultural production and has been credited with the elimination of malaria from the United States and Europe. However, DDT is also known to have had major environmental consequences and has been associated with dramatic declines in many animal populations. Although DDT use has generally been restricted since the early 1970s, exposure to the pesticide remains widespread. In developed countries, slow elimination from the body means a large proportion of the population still have detectable levels of DDT, or its metabolite DDE, in their serum or adipose tissue. In developing countries, the pesticide continues to be used for vector control and a significant proportion of breast-fed babies has daily intakes above recommended levels. This review considers the epidemiological evidence for possible adverse effects of human exposure to DDT. Much of this research is weakened by methodological flaws. However, recent methods in breast cancer research using nested studies in cohorts with stored biological samples have allowed a more rigorous assessment of a putative role for DDT in disease aetiology. While DDT does not appear to play a causative role in breast cancer development, there is suggestive evidence for a role in the aetiology of other conditions such as pancreatic cancer, neuropsychological dysfunction, and reproductive outcomes. Research into these and other conditions would benefit from the same rigorous approaches used in breast cancer research. Until further high quality evidence is available, it is still too early, even 60 years after the introduction of this once ubiquitous chemical, to pass judgement on the role of DDT in a number of common diseases. PMID: 15894351 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] Environ Mol Mutagen. 2005 Jul;46(1):43-52. Induction of cell proliferation, micronuclei and hyperdiploidy/polyploidy in the mammary cells of DDT- and DMBA-treated pubertal rats. Uppala PT, Roy SK, Tousson A, Barnes S, Uppala GR, Eastmond DA. Department of Environmental & Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA. puppala The environmental estrogen, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and its metabolites have been implicated in the development of breast cancer through mechanisms that remain to be elucidated. It has been hypothesized that exposure to DDT and its metabolites, during critical periods of development, can contribute to an elevated risk for breast cancer in adults. In the present study, we have investigated the effect of o,p'-DDT on mammary gland cell proliferation and chromosomal alterations, in a rat mammary cancer model (commonly used to study human cancer), to gain insights into its potential role in the development of breast cancer. Twenty-one-day-old female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were administered o,p'-DDT, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), genistein, DDT+DMBA, or DDT+DMBA+genistein, over a 14-day period. To determine changes in chromosome number and structure, we used the micronucleus assay as well as multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) region-specific DNA probes for rat chromosomes 4 and 19. Cell proliferation was evaluated using 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU). Significant increases in BrdU-incorporated cells were seen in the rats treated with DDT+DMBA. Although micronucleus frequencies were somewhat elevated in several of the treatment groups, significant increases were not seen in any of them. Significant increases in numerical chromosomal aberrations were detected in all of the DDT- and DMBA-treated groups. Genistein significantly reduced BrdU incorporation and polyploidy in the DDT+DMBA-treated rats. These initial studies indicate that DDT and DMBA can induce cellular and chromosomal alterations in the rat mammary gland, which is consistent with the hypothesis that these agents can induce early events in mammary carcinogenesis. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. PMID: 15880734 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Endocrine. 2005 Jun;27(1):45-50. DDE-induced changes in aromatase activity in endometrial stromal cells in culture. Holloway AC, Stys KA, Foster WG. Reproductive Biology Division, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Environmental toxicants are thought to play a role in several estrogen- dependent diseases including breast cancer and endometriosis. Toxicant-induced increased aromatase activity, an enzyme complex that catalyzes the final rate-limiting step in the conversion of androgens to estrogens, has been reported in assays using placental microsomes and cancer cells in vitro. These data suggest that environmental toxicants can increase aromatase activity and thus increase local tissue estrogen levels, which could have implications for estrogen- dependent functions in target tissues. The objective of this study was therefore to quantify the effect of the stable breakdown product of DDT, 2,2-bis(p- chlorophenyl)ethylene (p,p'-DDE), a toxicant broadly detected in human adipose tissue, serum and follicular fluid, on aromatase activity in the endometrium, an estrogen-sensitive target tissue. Specifically, the effect of increasing log concentrations of p,p'-DDE on aromatase activity was determined in cultures of endometrial stromal cells (ESC). Relative to controls p,p'-DDE treatment significantly increased aromatase activity in ESC (135%). Moreover, ESC cells treated with p,p'-DDE were immunopositive for aromatase, whereas no aromatase staining could be demonstrated in control cultures. Our data demonstrate that p,p'-DDE treatment can increase aromatase activity in ESC in culture. PMID: 16077170 [PubMed - in process] Brain Res Bull. 2005 Apr 15;65(3):241-7. Epub 2004 Dec 18. Activation of brain estrogen receptors in mice lactating from mothers exposed to DDT. Mussi P, Ciana P, Raviscioni M, Villa R, Regondi S, Agradi E, Maggi A, Di Lorenzo D. Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Center of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Milan, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milan, Italy. The insecticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) interferes with physiological endocrine processes modulating estrogens receptor activity. Most of the data describing the DDT mechanism of action have been collected in vitro or in reproductive tissues in vivo. Here we use a new transgenic mouse model to investigate the DDT effects on estrogens receptor activation in vivo in non-reproductive tissues. In particular, we demonstrate that DDT is able to activate estrogen receptors in the brain and the liver of adult mice after acute administration, and it is active in lactating mice when accumulated in the mother's milk. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the acute administration of DDT activates estrogen receptors with a different kinetics with respect to 17beta-estradiol. Experiments with a breast cancer cell line engineered to express luciferase under the transcriptional control of activated estrogen receptors reveal that the microsomal metabolization of DDT is required for its full activity on estrogen receptors. Taken together these data lead to hypothesize that the delayed DDT time course on estrogen receptor activation in vivo might be due to a necessary step of metabolism of the compound. PMID: 15811587 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Epidemiology. 2005 Mar;16(2):182-90. Exposure to organochlorine compounds and effects on ovarian function. Windham GC, Lee D, Mitchell P, Anderson M, Petreas M, Lasley B. Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Department of Health Services, Oakland, California 94612, USA. gwindham BACKGROUND: Some chemicals appear to have hormonally active properties in animals, but data in humans are sparse. Therefore, we examined ovarian function in relation to organochlorine compound levels. METHODS: During 1997- 1999, 50 Southeast Asian immigrant women of reproductive age collected urine samples daily. These samples were assayed for metabolites of estrogen and progesterone, and the women's menstrual cycle parameters were assessed. Organochlorine compounds (including DDT, its metabolite DDE, and 10 polychlorinated biphenyl [PCB] congeners) were measured in serum. RESULTS: All samples had detectable DDT and DDE, with mean levels higher than typical U.S. populations. Mean cycle length was approximately 4 days shorter at the highest quartile concentration of DDT or DDE compared with the lowest. After adjustment for lipid levels, age, parity, and tubal ligation, and exclusion of a particularly long cycle, the decrements were attenuated to less than 1 day, with wide confidence intervals (CIs). The adjusted mean luteal phase length was shorter by approximately 1.5 days at the highest quartile of DDT (95% CI = -2.6 to -0.30) or DDE (-2.6 to -0.20). With each doubling of the DDE level, cycle length decreased 1.1 day (- 2.4 to 0.23) and luteal phase length decreased 0.6 days (-1.1 to -0.2). Progesterone metabolite levels during the luteal phase were consistently decreased with higher DDE concentration. PCB levels were not generally associated with cycle length or hormone parameters after adjustment, and they did not alter the DDE associations when included in the same models. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a potential effect of DDE on ovarian function, which may influence other end points such as fertility, pregnancy, and reproductive cancers. PMID: 15703532 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Best regards, Tel: (H): +353-(0) or (M): +353-(0) Ireland. Tel: (W): +353-(0) or (M): +353-(0) " Man who says it can't be done should not interrupt man doing it " - Chinese Proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2005 Report Share Posted October 4, 2005 wrote: >>> Perhaps we should reconsider DDT. Bart Paulding, LAc > Pete wrote: > >> Hi Bart! Yes. I think some safeguards and a new protocol for safe >> handling. Perhaps only for mosquitoes, deer ticks and the like, not >> for farm crop pests. <http://www.junkscience.com/ddtfaq.htm> > > I favour biological control of insects rather than chemical control. > IMO, DDT and its metabolite (DDE) are powerful toxins and should be > avoided if at all possible. See: Hi Dr. Phil! Do biological controls reliably kill mosquitoes in sufficient numbers to stop the mosquito borne illnesses? If so, then by all means. Regards, Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.