Guest guest Posted July 19, 2005 Report Share Posted July 19, 2005 I have been having a continuing discussion with a fellow student about the concept of " qi is the commander of blood, blood is the mother of qi. " Especially as regards statements in, among others the Su Wen and Ling Shu concerning blood in the channels. Mr. Kendell in his book " dao of chinese medicine " would be quick to say that the meridian lines are not, in actual fact, a thing (in contrast to an artery, which can be palpated). In fact there are many scholars who would agree with this line of thought. The question is thus: if blood is in the channel, how can it be seen? In other words, if i was asked by a patient, " show me where the blood is moving in the meridian, " i most certainly could not do this. I could, of course, point to different theories and constructions, such as the electric potential of each RBC, but i could not propose a rationale to support this statement. In contrast, i could say that qi is in the arterial/venous system as the motivator and function of the flow, but i could not substantiate anything beyond that. I am curious of others thoughts on this from on the list, Regards, Tymothy " Everything can be resolved with willingness and love. Love is the ultimate healer and liberator, because only love is vast enough to embrace its opposite. " G. Hendricks -- http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2005 Report Share Posted July 19, 2005 I think you might want to review the published research of Dr Soh (S Korea) for a possible physiological structure that runs in and through various vessels, including blood vessels. I find the idea of qi controlling the blood makes a lot more sense when considered in light of this system, which seems to follow the jing luo pathways and connects to the organs as well. Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > " Tymothy " <jellyphish >Chinese Medicine >Chinese Medicine > blood in the channels >Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:17:14 -0700 > >I have been having a continuing discussion with a fellow student about >the concept of " qi is the commander of blood, blood is the mother of >qi. " Especially as regards statements in, among others the Su Wen and >Ling Shu concerning blood in the channels. Mr. Kendell in his book " dao >of chinese medicine " would be quick to say that the meridian lines are >not, in actual fact, a thing (in contrast to an artery, which can be >palpated). In fact there are many scholars who would agree with this >line of thought. The question is thus: if blood is in the channel, how >can it be seen? In other words, if i was asked by a patient, " show me >where the blood is moving in the meridian, " i most certainly could not >do this. I could, of course, point to different theories and >constructions, such as the electric potential of each RBC, but i could >not propose a rationale to support this statement. In contrast, i could >say that qi is in the arterial/venous system as the motivator and >function of the flow, but i could not substantiate anything beyond that. >I am curious of others thoughts on this from on the list, >Regards, Tymothy > > > " Everything can be resolved with willingness and love. Love is the >ultimate healer and liberator, because only love is vast enough to >embrace its opposite. " G. Hendricks > >-- >http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2005 Report Share Posted July 19, 2005 On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:17:14 -0700, " Tymothy " <jellyphish wrote: >>…. The question is thus: if blood is in the channel, how can it be seen? For instance, Luo vessel activity can be seen, visible as patches of spider-vein-like surface vessels, bluish or reddish, which come and go (as distinct from things like varicosities, which are larger, and more fixed). In particular, after appropriate bleeding/plum blossom, they will disappear, along with the associated Luo signs/symptoms. That is, when visible, they signal Luo " full " as a PF (pathological factor, usually EPF or external PF / xie) is attempting to penetrate from the WeiQi/sinew channel level into the YingQi/primary meridian (PM) levels. The Ying puts up a fight, trying to hold/block the PF, manifesting in the little vessels (and often some form of pain - the other of the two classical hallmarks of Luo pathology). Bleeding, together with other appropriate Luo Tx needling, enables release, dispersal of the PF back out where the Wei can throw it off the surface. To round-out this picture, Luo " empty " is taken as vacuity at the surface as the PF has drained, penetrated deeper into the PM/Ying level. In this case, bleeding is followed by moxa, i.e. opening the surface and warming below (moxa's far-infrared penetrating quality) to invigorate, empower the deeper Ying (qi & blood) to push out the PF from a deeper level. This vignette (an interpretation of Luo channel function and treatment) also serves to illustrate that the different channel systems represent (as metaphors) different aspects of physiological and pathological behavior (as well as treatment reactivity). They don't have a common currency at the level of bio-mechanical explanation. (I.e. they're not " things " , as Tymothy mentions in connection with Deke Kendell's and others' ideas.) In fact the different channel " systems " (better perhaps " phenomena " ) illustrate an essential comprehensiveness and flexibility in the CM way of regarding physiology/pathology/treatment. The WeiQi level of the sinew channels represents the active (movement) and reactive (autonomic response) interaction with the external environment. The YingQi level of the PM represents the internal, post-natal homeostatic energy model, powered by constantly renewed, day-in and day-out breath and food. (The Luo vessels represent an interface between these two layers.) The YuanQi and 8 extraordinary/curious channels represent constitutional givens and the processes influencing them (effects during development and mature life - not just genetics). (The divergent/distinct channels appear to deal with WeiQi - YuanQi interactions, and their spectrum of pathologies can be seen as taking up where the Luo model leaves off; the Luo progress from the Lungs through the horary sequence, and then into the Ren and Du, i.e. into the Yuan level.) Thinking about all this brings to mind Paul Unschuld's use of " subtle influences " to translate " qi " . I.e. the fact that judiciously chosen and manipulated points, on say the foot and arm can " influence " things going on at the head or trunk. Channel trajectories clearly relate to such readily observable phenomena. But these effects appear clinically in particular, specific ways. The text-book channel depictions -- arranging all the (regular) points into comprehensive distinct pathways and sequences - are then " theory " along the lines of pedagogical and mnemonic devices. The theory is less effectively predictive than experience, transmitted and/or personally accumulated. (This is partially inspired by Elisabeth Hsu's fascinating book " The Transmission of " , Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999; in particular Chapter 6 - Teaching from TCM texts.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.