Guest guest Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 http://www.berkshireeagle.com/editorials/ci_3276022 Don't pollute the organic market Editorial Sunday, December 04Art Ames was on his way to Colorado recently for a conference of co-op market managers and members when the U.S. Senate went into the back room to draw up rules compromising the integrity of organically labeled products. It would be a stretch to suggest that senators used the moment when Mr. Ames and his group, the National Cooperative Grocers Association, were away from their desks to pull a fast one, but when the organically conscious grocers heard about the impending congressional action to lessen organic standards an uproar ensued. Within days thousands of calls went out to senators. Senator Kennedy's office was shocked by the spontaneous grass-roots response to the small rule change that didn't even appear on the congressional docket, according to Mr. Ames, who also was impressed by how fast and furious members of the Berkshire Co-op Market that he manages were to shout their disapproval alongside co-op members nationwide. The grocers association won a short-lived victory in postponing Senate action on rules that have been hotly debated this past year, since a small farmer in Maine drew national attention for challenging USDA organic standards. Organic blueberry farmer Arthur Harvey sued the United States Department of Agriculture in federal court over allowing synthetics into organically labeled products, the court sided with the farmer and ordered the USDA to comply. Instead of instituting the most rigorous standards for organic food, the USDA and organic industry special interests, more concerned with profits than integrity, predictably set out to rewrite the laws on what is and what is not organic. The debate has caused a rift in the organic community. The Organic Trade Association is one of the leading voices in the industry, and actually wrote the rule change that loosens organic standards. The grocers association is on the leadership council of the trade association, but Mr. Ames has called for the co-op grocers to withdraw from the leadership circle out of protest for these new rules. Many within the organic community are losing faith in the Organic Trade Association because it has become more interested in profits than standards and has become corrupted by big business representatives who sit on its board. The organic brand is a growth market, raking in almost $15 billion in the last year and expected to grow 20 percent a year. Forty percent of Americans buy organic products, so it should be no surprise that the nation's largest corporations are looking to get involved in the market for healthy foods. Wal-Mart sells soy milk, which says plenty. After the co-op grocers' minor victory with the Senate, the Organic Trade Association, stubbornly refusing to renegotiate standards with other groups vested in the organic label as the Senate had recommended, handed its bill of goods to the House, which passed it stealthily within an agriculture spending bill last month. Regrettably, this bill was also passed by the Senate, which didn't want to hold up the entire agriculture bill over the organic issue, and became law upon the president's signature. The new laws regulating organic products make it easier for corporations to get in the game by basically allowing synthetically tainted products to be called organic, which is a case of government-sanctioned false advertising. Organic is basically a brand name and consumers are being misled. One new rule allows cows raised on conventional farms - fed with genetically-modified food and injected by hormones - to move to an organic farm where their milk can be called organic. The law also lessens the restrictions on conventional farmers who want to change to organic. Also, it allows synthetic ingredients to go into organic products under the claim that no organic alternative was available, which is often a phony argument. So now when a consumer looks for a purely organic product there will be less certainty, because the rules of organics, which should be as strict as kosher labeling, have been changed. Government is infamous for abusing terminology, altering definitions and deceptive labeling to trick the public and obscure the truth. The trickery is one of the greatest threats to an informed public and sound policy. The USDA seal of approval should stand for something, but now that is questionable. It should be simple - organic products are organic and synthetic ones are not. How did this truth get lost? Mr. Ames put it this way: " If someone buys certified organic, damn it, it should be certified organic. " But there is still hope and people like Mr. Ames and members of the Berkshire Co-op are still fighting for the purity of the organic trade, and further debate is certain in Washington. Lawmakers should fight for what's right in this case, truth in advertising of organic products. -- Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.12/192 - Release 12/5/2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.