Guest guest Posted June 19, 2005 Report Share Posted June 19, 2005 > Sorry to ramble here, but it strikes into the heart of a thousand conversations among friends over the years. Interesting article... I believe it was John Pirog who made similar comments. McDonald's comments point to much of what some would say excitement of using CM in the West and others might say corruption or co-optation. I asked my good friend, from Beijing TCM University, this very question about Window of the Sky points several years ago and I was surprised when he said, Look at all the names, of course, they are psychological points. Then perhaps we need to look at cultural concepts, perhaps stereotypes, perhaps not. Psychological health in Asia may mean best getting along with family first and (perhaps) secondly your (many) neighbors and community relationships. Your actions now have consequences for generations later for your family. One could conclude that most actions would tend to be more conservative and less individualistic. The Western individual is that, individual, and every one yearns, at least in modern culture to be taken mentally and culturally out of the group. American (popular) culture has been defined at its root as African culture where the individual attempts to move as far away from norms and still be able to pull back into the good graces of the community. Which is as far from Asian " face " as one can get. So the question, becomes not if " Window of the Sky " points exist but can they influence us in the way that proponents in the West claim. Can the Western patient (i.e. Shirley McClaine) expect to reach beyond the body, community and tradition of for their own purposes? And then we ask, are psychology and spirituality the same in CM? In America, at least, we are mandated the right to " pursue happiness " . Often this is meant that the most spiritual person is the one with the most obvious internal and external signs of spirituality. Of course, throughout Asia and the rest of the world, immigration, global communications and economies make much categorizations less the case for many. If any one is offended by such sweeping generalizations please respond (in kind!). Which brings me to a classic discussion from Trungpa, Chogyam, Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism; (Shambhala Publications, Inc.; Boston, Massachusetts; 1973) http://www.sacred-texts.com/bud/tib/cutting.htm It is important to see that the main point of any spiritual practice is to step out of the bureaucracy of ego. This means stepping out of ego's constant desire for a higher, more spiritual, more transcendental version of knowledge, religion, virtue, judgment, comfort or whatever it is that a particular ego is seeking. One must step out of spiritual materialism. If we do not step out of spiritual materialism, if we in fact practice it, then we may eventually find ourselves possessed of a huge collection of spiritual paths. We may feel these spiritual collections to be very precious. We have studied so much. We may have studied Western philosophy or Oriental philosophy, practiced yoga or perhaps studied under dozens of great masters. We have achieved and we have learned. We believe that we have accumulated a hoard of knowledge. And yet, having gone through all this, there is still something to give up. It is extremely mysterious! How could this happen? Impossible! But unfortunately it is so. Our vast collections of knowledge and experience are just part of ego's display, part of the grandiose quality of ego. We display them to the world and, in so doing, reassure ourselves that we exist, safe and secure, as " spiritual " people. But we have simply created a shop, an antique shop. We could be specializing in oriental antiques or medieval Christian antiques or antiques from some other civilization or time, but we are, nonetheless, running a shop. Before we filled our shop with so many things the room was beautiful: whitewashed walls and a very simple floor with a bright lamp burning in the ceiling. There was one object of art in the middle of the room and it was beautiful. Everyone who came appreciated its beauty, including ourselves. But we were not satisfied and we thought, " Since this one object makes my room so beautiful, if I get more antiques, my room will be even more beautiful. " So we began to collect, and the end result was chaos. We searched the world over for beautiful objects - India, Japan, many different countries. And each time we found an antique, because we were dealing with only one object at a time, we saw it as beautiful and thought it would be beautiful in our shop. But when we brought the object home and put it there, it became just another addition to our junky collection. The beauty of the object did not radiate out any more, because it was surrounded by so many other beautiful things. It did not mean anything anymore. Instead of a room full of beautiful antiques we created a junk shop! Proper shopping does not entail collecting a lot of information or beauty, but it involves fully appreciating each individual object. > ____________________ > __ > ____________________ > __ > > Message: 7 > Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:09:31 +0100 > " " < > Windows of the Sky Points > > Hi All, > > Will Morris [PulseDiagnosis List] alerted us to John McDonald's > " Curtains for the Windows of the Sky " , a refutation of widely held > belief > in great spiritual action of " Windows of the Sky Points " . Thanks, > Will! > > McDonald's conclusion is: " The APPEAL of a group of acupuncture > points with deep spiritual and psychological significance is beyond > dispute, and a widespread willingness to believe in such points on the > basis of the slenderest of evidence has already been demonstrated. > However this legitimate fascination with emotional, psychological and > spiritual issues need not cause the acupuncture profession to innovate > without any foundation. Designing the Emperor's new clothes has > become a veritable fashion industry. One of the great values of > acupuncture is the tremendous treasure of historical literature > which is > available to us all. When we access this literature, examine the > evidence and apply the usual tests of academic rigour, the > conclusion is > inescapable - the Emperor has no clothes! " > > For full-text of the article, see: > http://www.tcmcentral.com/articles/acu_window_sky.htm > > > Best regards, > > > Tel: (H): +353-(0) or (M): +353-(0) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.