Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The Baby or the Bath Water

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Here is a TCM dilemma which has been around since forever and has served

to entertain

practitioners.

 

If there is a glaring symptom complex large as a pink elephant, should

one treat that, or

seek out the Design of the illness, even when it is less obvious than

the falling of an

autumn leaf.

 

This post is meant to provoke thought, and less to criticize healers who

have successfully used

the symptomatic approach.

 

If there is migraine, should one, after having settled the attack, work

with LU which

may be at the back of things, or just deal with the episodes as they

occur again

and again?

 

If there are a series of symptoms, should one allay these one after the

other, like

a never ending domino, or get to the bottom of it, and say, fins an adrenal

exhaustion.

 

Should we work with pain in a simplistic manner to allay it or deal with

the more complex reasons this keeps happening?

 

Should we be needle wielders, or exquisite un ravellers of the warp and

woof of illness?

 

Should we be, in the end, the after the fact patcher uppers, or as the

ancient texts exhort,

" those who prevent illness before it happens " category of superior healers?

 

The choice is ours. The burden, the patient's.

 

Dr. Holmes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

dr holmes:

 

Should we be, in the end, the after the fact patcher

> uppers, or as the ancient texts exhort,

> " those who prevent illness before it happens "

> category of superior healers?

 

reading recent postings on the financial aspects of

tcm, this latter point seems pertinent.

 

why not turn around the western model of waiting for

illness to emerge, then taking expensive emergency

measures, to a model of disease prevention?

 

set up a new system of regular scheduled visits, at

low cost that patients could afford, to prevent

illness?

 

in the long run, this would prove far less expensive

to society, and lead to better overall health of a

population.

 

do we have the statistics and actuarial tables to

build such a model? are there any insurance companies

or health groups offering such plans?

 

regards, Jack

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dr. Holmes,

 

An important question to ask ourselves as " healers*. "

 

Being an inexperienced pratitioner myself I have hoovered from one

strategy to the other. However I have stopped treating only symptoms

since I found that it left me with a guilty empty feeling - a hole in my

stomach telling me something was wrong whenever I would treat only the

manifestations and not the root. Whereas I would feel warm in my stomach

and feel confident whenever I would try and diagnose and treat the root

primarily. So now when a patient comes with ie a tennis elbow I will

always spend ample time with him/her and make a full diagnosis along

with a treatment for the root problem... this actually tends to be more

efficient in the long run.

 

IMO we should make effort to " unemploy " ourselves..... in coorporation

with the patients we should then aim to keep them healthy and help them

maximize their human potentials.

 

Since we have the knowledge and the tools to help people we should do so

- I feel it to be my duty as a human being and as a practitioner of

medicin not to hold back, but help as many as possible as well as possible.

 

This is my humble opinion......

 

Best regards,

Thomas Soerensen

L.Ac., TuiNa Massage Therapist

Hwa Rang Do lic. Instructor

 

 

* I am not done arguing with myself whether one can be a healer or one

only can activate a healing process - quick one or slow?! I tend to

believe the latter more......

 

dkakobad wrote:

 

> Here is a TCM dilemma which has been around since forever and has served

> to entertain

> practitioners.

>

> If there is a glaring symptom complex large as a pink elephant, should

> one treat that, or

> seek out the Design of the illness, even when it is less obvious than

> the falling of an

> autumn leaf.

>

> This post is meant to provoke thought, and less to criticize healers who

> have successfully used

> the symptomatic approach.

>

> If there is migraine, should one, after having settled the attack, work

> with LU which

> may be at the back of things, or just deal with the episodes as they

> occur again

> and again?

>

> If there are a series of symptoms, should one allay these one after the

> other, like

> a never ending domino, or get to the bottom of it, and say, fins an

> adrenal

> exhaustion.

>

> Should we work with pain in a simplistic manner to allay it or deal with

> the more complex reasons this keeps happening?

>

> Should we be needle wielders, or exquisite un ravellers of the warp and

> woof of illness?

>

> Should we be, in the end, the after the fact patcher uppers, or as the

> ancient texts exhort,

> " those who prevent illness before it happens " category of superior

> healers?

>

> The choice is ours. The burden, the patient's.

>

> Dr. Holmes

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Anytime you want, I am in your corner.

Thanks.

 

Thomas Bøgedal Sørensen wrote:

 

> Dr. Holmes,

>

> An important question to ask ourselves as " healers*. "

>

> Being an inexperienced pratitioner myself I have hoovered from one

> strategy to the other. However I have stopped treating only symptoms

> since I found that it left me with a guilty empty feeling - a hole in my

> stomach telling me something was wrong whenever I would treat only the

> manifestations and not the root. Whereas I would feel warm in my stomach

> and feel confident whenever I would try and diagnose and treat the root

> primarily. So now when a patient comes with ie a tennis elbow I will

> always spend ample time with him/her and make a full diagnosis along

> with a treatment for the root problem... this actually tends to be more

> efficient in the long run.

>

> IMO we should make effort to " unemploy " ourselves..... in coorporation

> with the patients we should then aim to keep them healthy and help them

> maximize their human potentials.

>

> Since we have the knowledge and the tools to help people we should do so

> - I feel it to be my duty as a human being and as a practitioner of

> medicin not to hold back, but help as many as possible as well as

> possible.

>

> This is my humble opinion......

>

> Best regards,

> Thomas Soerensen

> L.Ac., TuiNa Massage Therapist

> Hwa Rang Do lic. Instructor

>

>

> * I am not done arguing with myself whether one can be a healer or one

> only can activate a healing process - quick one or slow?! I tend to

> believe the latter more......

>

> dkakobad wrote:

>

> > Here is a TCM dilemma which has been around since forever and has served

> > to entertain

> > practitioners.

> >

> > If there is a glaring symptom complex large as a pink elephant, should

> > one treat that, or

> > seek out the Design of the illness, even when it is less obvious than

> > the falling of an

> > autumn leaf.

> >

> > This post is meant to provoke thought, and less to criticize healers who

> > have successfully used

> > the symptomatic approach.

> >

> > If there is migraine, should one, after having settled the attack, work

> > with LU which

> > may be at the back of things, or just deal with the episodes as they

> > occur again

> > and again?

> >

> > If there are a series of symptoms, should one allay these one after the

> > other, like

> > a never ending domino, or get to the bottom of it, and say, fins an

> > adrenal

> > exhaustion.

> >

> > Should we work with pain in a simplistic manner to allay it or deal with

> > the more complex reasons this keeps happening?

> >

> > Should we be needle wielders, or exquisite un ravellers of the warp and

> > woof of illness?

> >

> > Should we be, in the end, the after the fact patcher uppers, or as the

> > ancient texts exhort,

> > " those who prevent illness before it happens " category of superior

> > healers?

> >

> > The choice is ours. The burden, the patient's.

> >

> > Dr. Holmes

> >

> >

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...