Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 Hi Everybody! I don't recall who started this thread, and I can't find it in 1300+ saved messages however I try, but after hours and hours of searching I gave up and asked for help. This paper is interesting in it's own right, although it most likely is not the one the paraphrase came from. The similar language is on page 6 under the heading " Background " Regards, Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 At 08:18 PM 2/7/05 -0500, you wrote: > >Hi Everybody! > >I don't recall who started this thread, and I can't find it in 1300+ >saved messages however I try, but after hours and hours of searching I >gave up and asked for help. > >This paper is interesting in it's own right, although it most likely is >not the one the paraphrase came from. The similar language is on page 6 >under the heading " Background " > >Regards, > >Pete What thread? What paper? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 Pete Theisen wrote: > Hi Everybody! > > I don't recall who started this thread, and I can't find it in 1300+ > saved messages however I try, but after hours and hours of searching I > gave up and asked for help. > > This paper is interesting in it's own right, although it most likely is > not the one the paraphrase came from. The similar language is on page 6 > under the heading " Background " > > Regards, > > Pete > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 wrote: <snip> > > What thread? > > What paper? Hi Chris! It all got blown away in the forwarding. Evidently this stupid Mozilla email client forwards messages as HTML even though I have selected text only. Maybe I can change it in the settings, meanwhile, the thread contained this paragraph: " The US GAO (govt accounting office) had issued a report in the 80's in which it stated that only about 10-15% of the currently used western medical treatments had any scientific validity. " This is the reply I got from GAO: " Here is a link to the closest matching GAO document I can locate. http://archive.gao.gov/d31t10/145906.pdf Thank you for contacting GAO Research Services. Tim Johnson Reference Analyst >>>>>> Pete Theisen <petet 2/6/2005 2:12:25 AM >>> Hi GAO webmaster! I have been searching your site for three hours for the report I was told about in the following paragraph: The US GAO (govt accounting office) had issued a report in the 80's in which it stated that only about 10-15% of the currently used western medical treatments had any scientific validity. Of course, the person has no title of the report, and that is not a quote but a paraphrase. You have so MUCH material I am sure that you must have the report I am looking for - however, I can't find it. It doesn't help that the pdf files take 15 or more minutes each to load. I have been loading only the ones that look from the summaries that they *might* be the one. I have tried a number of keyword combinations with and without quotes but no luck. I wonder, do you have a direct link to this particular report? Regards, Pete " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 My mistake, wrong agency. Sorry you spent all that time. The quote comes from a report issued by the Office of Technology Assessment of the US Congress. The report is named " Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical Technologies. " Sept 1978. Hope this helps. Later Mike W. Bowser, L Ac >Pete Theisen <petet >Chinese Medicine >Chinese Medicine >Re: [Fwd: Re: Scientific validity of medical treatments] >Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:29:25 -0500 > > wrote: ><snip> > > > > What thread? > > > > What paper? > >Hi Chris! > >It all got blown away in the forwarding. Evidently this stupid Mozilla >email client forwards messages as HTML even though I have selected text >only. Maybe I can change it in the settings, meanwhile, the thread >contained this paragraph: > > " The US GAO (govt accounting office) had issued a report in the 80's in >which it stated that only about 10-15% of the currently used >western medical treatments had any scientific validity. " > >This is the reply I got from GAO: > > " Here is a link to the closest matching GAO document I can locate. > >http://archive.gao.gov/d31t10/145906.pdf > >Thank you for contacting GAO Research Services. > >Tim Johnson >Reference Analyst > > > >>>>>> Pete Theisen <petet 2/6/2005 2:12:25 AM >>> > >Hi GAO webmaster! > >I have been searching your site for three hours for the report I was >told about in the following paragraph: > >The US GAO (govt accounting office) had issued a report in the 80's in >which it stated that only about 10-15% of the currently used >western medical treatments had any scientific validity. > >Of course, the person has no title of the report, and that is not a >quote but a paraphrase. > >You have so MUCH material I am sure that you must have the report I am >looking for - however, I can't find it. It doesn't help that the pdf >files take 15 or more minutes each to load. I have been loading only >the >ones that look from the summaries that they *might* be the one. > >I have tried a number of keyword combinations with and without quotes >but no luck. I wonder, do you have a direct link to this particular >report? > >Regards, > >Pete > > " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 mike Bowser wrote: > My mistake, wrong agency. Sorry you spent all that time. The quote comes > from a report issued by the Office of Technology Assessment of the US > Congress. The report is named " Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical > Technologies. " Sept 1978. Hope this helps. Later Hi Mike! Thanks, the original email must have gone astray, that's why I didn't know it was you who authored the paragraph. Thanks again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2005 Report Share Posted February 9, 2005 mike Bowser wrote: > My mistake, wrong agency. Sorry you spent all that time. The quote comes > from a report issued by the Office of Technology Assessment of the US > Congress. The report is named " Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical > Technologies. " Sept 1978. Hope this helps. Later > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac Hi Mike! There it is, page 18, about the middle of the page. Thanks again. Regards, Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2005 Report Share Posted February 9, 2005 mike Bowser wrote: > My mistake, wrong agency. Sorry you spent all that time. The quote comes > from a report issued by the Office of Technology Assessment of the US > Congress. The report is named " Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical > Technologies. " Sept 1978. Hope this helps. Later > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac Hi Mike! Well, it is their page 7, the viewer counts the cover and all the index pages as pages. Regards, Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.