Guest guest Posted January 5, 2005 Report Share Posted January 5, 2005 Hi All, Recent research in NZ has shown that properly sealed mattresses may reduce SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome; cot deaths) to near zero! The NZ data add support to BA Richardson's hypothesis that toxic gases emitted from unsealed mattresses are primary causes of SIDS. Infants sleeping face-down on unsealed mattresses have the maximum possibility to inhale such toxic gases. Consider passing these to friends with babies or young children. Love to you all, And may God and Mary protect our children, Phil Sprott TJ (2004) Cot Death--Cause and Prevention. Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine, 14 (3), 221-232. DOI: 10.1080/13590840400016836 Taylor & Francis Health Sciences. Abstract: There is a general perception that the cause of cot death remains unknown. This is not so. The cause of cot death (often erroneously termed Sudden Infant Death Syndrome or SIDS) has been elucidated as being due to extremely toxic 'nerve' gases generated by fungal activity on chemicals frequently present in cot mattresses and in certain other bedding commonly used in baby bedding. However, this explanation, often referred to in Britain as 'the Richardson Hypothesis', has aroused considerable controversy, especially among individuals and organizations closely associated with cot death. Interventions based on this explanation have been widely advocated in two countries: first in Britain (1989 and 1994) and far more intensively in New Zealand through a nationwide public information programme from late 1994 continouously to the present. Both interventions were followed by significant reductions in cot death, especially the 10-year 'mattress- wrapping' programme in New Zealand. Mattress-wrapping (a logical intervention based on the toxic gas explanation) is an obvious corollary to that explanation. If this intervention method is successful in preventing cot death, that outcome provides very strong proof of the validity of the explanation. And this has been the outcome--during the 10-year intervention period in NZ there has never been a report of a cot death when the baby has been sleeping on a mattress wrapped in accordance with the simple protocol based on the explanation, and the NZ cot death rate has fallen markedly. Given the close examination of all cot deaths in New Zealand (about 650 from 1995 to the present) ZERO reported deaths on wrapped mattresses effectively means that there have been no such deaths. The apparently total success of the intervention, and the reduction in cot deaths, provide a standard of proof of the toxic gas explanation which nullifies the opposition of those who would deny it. The success of mattress-wrapping for the prevention of cot death is such that it behoves all people and organizations who provide advice to parents about cot death prevention to inform parents of the NZ experience using this technique. © Taylor & Francis Ltd Kapuste H (2004) Learning to Communicate with a SIDS Establishment that Denies the Cause of Sudden Infant Deaths. Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine 14(3), 233-245. DOI: 10.1080/13590840400017875 Taylor & Francis Health Sciences. Abstract: A high incidence, and most of the features, of 'cot deaths' were described 50 years ago. While avoidance of prone sleeping led to a significant reduction of SIDS incidence it remained the most frequent post-perinatal death. The consensus of the establishment is that the cause(s) is/are not understood. The toxic gas theory by Richardson, however, renders this consensus incorrect. While it (1) was based on definite experimental evidence, (2) could explain practically all of the features associated with SIDS, and (3) was the basis for the first significant decline of SIDS incidence in England and Wales, the establishment did not accept the evidence, in particular after two Expert Groups established by the British Department of Health concluded in their Final Report of May 1998, that the toxic gas theory was unsubstantiated. Richardson's Comments, however, submitted in June 1998 which refuted these conclusions have been suppressed. The impact of this neglect has been tremendous. T. J. Sprott in New Zealand meanwhile has provided conclusive evidence that children protected by polythene covers of their mattresses will not die from SIDS. At present the SIDS establishment are launching an improved definition and diagnosis of SIDS to provide a better framework for investigations and put an end to " the literature that is beset by contradictions and unsubstantiated conclusions " . Looking forward now to how long it may take until an effective means of SIDS prevention will be accepted, a look into Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions may help to begin effective professional communication that can bring about the necessary change to save babies' lives. To improve the tedious expert- expert interaction in professional journals one may use the modern means of communication, coordinate reader-reader and reader-author interaction by email to gain control of the biased establishment. Experience shows that individual efforts cannot overcome their powerful defence. In conclusion, it will take a coordinated activity of motivated readers who are well established in their local communities using the means of modern communication to promote effective national and international SIDS prevention. © Taylor & Francis Ltd Richardson BA (1994) Sudden infant death syndrome: a possible primary cause. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1994 Jul-Sep;34(3):199-204.Erratum in: J Forensic Sci Soc 1994 Oct-Dec;34(4):284. Penarth Research International Limited, St Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel Islands. The hypothesis that poisoning by phosphines, arsines and stibines might be the primary cause of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) was investigated. Most mattress materials contain phosphorus or antimony compounds as fire retardant additives. Mattress materials in areas affected by the warmth and perspiration of the sleeping infant were found to be naturally infected by the fungus Scopulariopsis brevicaulis which is thought to be capable of generating phosphines, arsines and stibines from materials containing phosphorus, arsenic or antimony compounds. These gases may cause anticholinesterase poisoning and cardiac failure in infants, but contributory factors include the prone sleeping position and overwrapping. In England and Wales, the progressive increase in SIDS between 1951 and 1988 seems to be related to increasing use of phosphorus and antimony compounds as fire retardents in cot mattresses. PMID: 7523575 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.