Guest guest Posted November 5, 2004 Report Share Posted November 5, 2004 Hi All, See these Phil Spence, D. Warren; Kayumov, Leonid; Chen, Adam; Lowe, Alan; Jain, Umesh; Katzman, Martin A.; Shen, Jianhua; Perelman, Boris; Shapiro, Colin M. AP Increases Nocturnal Melatonin Secretion and Reduces Insomnia and Anxiety: A Preliminary Report. Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 16 (1) 2004, 19-28. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; lkayumov The response to AP of 18 anxious adult subjects who complained of insomnia was assessed in an open prepost clinical trial study. Five weeks of AP treatment was associated with a significant (p=0.002) nocturnal increase in endogenous melatonin secretion (as measured in urine) and significant improvements in polysomnographic measures of sleep onset latency (p=0.003), arousal index (p=0.001), total sleep time (p=0.001), and sleep efficiency (p=0.002). Significant reductions in state (p=0.049) and trait (p=0.004) anxiety scores were also found. These objective findings are consistent with clinical reports of AP's relaxant effects AP treatment may be of value for some categories of anxious patients with insomnia. (PsycINFO Database Record © 2004 APA, all rights reserved) White Peter; Lewith George; Hopwood Val; Prescott Phil The placebo needle, is it a valid and convincing placebo for use in AP trials? A randomised, single-blind, cross-over pilot trial. Pain 106 (3) 2003, 401-409. Complementary Medicine Research Unit, Mail Point OPH, Royal South Hants Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Complementary Medicine Research Unit, Mail Point OPH, Royal South Hants Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Complementary Medicine Research Unit, Mail Point OPH, Royal South Hants Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Department of Mathematics, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom pjw1 The issue of what constitutes an effective and realistic AP placebo control has been a continuing problem for AP research. In order to provide an effective placebo, the control procedure must be convincing, visible and should mimic, in all respects, apart from a physiological effect , the real active treatment The 'Streitberger' needle might fulfil these criteria and this paper reports on a validation study. This was a single-blind, randomised, cross-over pilot study. Patients were drawn from the orthopaedic hip and knee, joint replacement waiting list. Intervention consisted of either 2 weeks of treatment with real AP followed by 2 weeks on placebo, or vice versa. The prime outcome was a needle sensation questionnaire and there was a range of secondary outcomes. Thirty-seven patients were randomised and completed treatment No significant differences between groups or needle types were found for any of the sensations measured. No major differences in outcome between real and placebo needling could be found. The fact that nearly 40% of subjects did NOT find that the two interventions were similar, however, raises some concerns with regard to the wholesale adoption of this instrument as a standard AP placebo. (PsycINFO Database Record © 2004 APA, all rights reserved) Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc, c/o 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Chinese Proverb: " Man who says it can't be done, should not interrupt man doing it " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.