Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Parents May be Jailed over Vaccinations

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Parents May be Jailed over Vaccinations

By Maria Cheng

12 March, 2008

LONDON - As doctors struggle to eradicate polio worldwide, one of

their biggest problems is persuading parents to vaccinate their children.

In Belgium, authorities are resorting to an extreme measure: prison

sentences.

Two sets of parents in Belgium were recently handed five month prison

terms for failing to vaccinate their children against polio. Each parent

was also fined 4,100 euros ($8,000).

“It’s a pretty extraordinary case,” said Dr. Ross Upshur, director of the

Joint Centre for Bioethics at the University of Toronto.

“The Belgians have a right to take some action against the parents, given

the seriousness of polio, but the question is, is a prison sentence

disproportionate?”

The parents can still avoid prison ­ their sentences were delayed to give

them a chance to vaccinate their children. But if that deadline also

passes without their children receiving the injections, the parents could

be put behind bars.

Because of privacy laws, Belgian officials would not talk specifically

about the case, such as why the parents refused the vaccine or how much

longer they have to vaccinate their children.

The polio vaccine is the only one required by Belgian law. Exceptions are

granted only if parents can prove their children might have a bad

physical reaction to the vaccine.

“Polio is a very serious disease and has caused great suffering in the

past,” said Dr. Victor Lusayu, head of Belgium’s international vaccine

centre. “The discovery of the vaccine has eliminated polio from Europe

and it is simply the law in Belgium that you have to be vaccinated. … At

the end of the day, the law must be respected.”

Some ethicists back the hardline Belgian stance.

“Nobody has the right to unfettered liberty, and people do not have a

right to endanger their kids,” said John Harris, a professor of bioethics

at the University of Manchester.

“The parents in this case do not have any rights they can appeal to. They

have obligations they are not fulfilling.”

Aside from Belgium, only France makes polio vaccinations mandatory by

law. In the United States, children must be vaccinated against many

diseases including polio, but most states allow children to opt out if

their parents have religious or “philosophical” objections.

In the U.S. state of Maryland, prosecutors and school officials in one

county threatened truancy charges against parents who failed to vaccinate

their children. The measure sharply reduced the number of unvaccinated

children although nobody has been charged.

The only other case of mandatory polio vaccines is during the Muslim

yearly Hajj pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia. Pilgrims from polio-endemic

countries ­ Afghanistan, India, Nigeria and Pakistan ­ must prove they

have been vaccinated. Saudi officials even give them an extra dose upon

arrival at the airport.

Since the polio virus can live in the human body for weeks, it jumps

borders easily. That makes health officials even in developed countries

nervous, since the threat of an outbreak remains as long as the virus is

circulating anywhere.

Polio is a highly infectious disease spread through water that mainly

strikes children under five. Initial symptoms include fever, headaches,

vomiting, stiffness in the neck and fatigue. The polio virus invades the

body’s nervous system and can lead to irreversible paralysis within

hours. In extreme cases, children can die when their breathing muscles

are immobilized.

Incidence has dropped by 99 percent since the World Health Organization

and partners began their eradication effort in 1988. But the virus is

still entrenched in Afghanistan, India, Nigeria and Pakistan, and

occasionally pops up elsewhere.

For developed countries, imported polio cases could cause chaos in the

health system, warned Dr. Steve Cochi, an immunization expert at the

United States’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

He said that unlike other medical problems, in which rejecting treatment

only affects the individual, refusing a vaccine for a transmissible

disease like polio puts others at risk as well.

“Most of the time, polio outbreaks do spill into the general population,”

Cochi said.

Ethicists argue that people who refuse vaccinations are taking advantage

of everyone else who has been vaccinated. Once the majority of a

population is vaccinated, there are few susceptible people the disease

can infect, thus lowering the odds of an outbreak.

People who refuse to be vaccinated are “free riders,” Harris said. “They

can only afford to refuse the vaccine because they are surrounded by

people who have fulfilled their obligations to the community.”

Health officials doubt that Belgium’s strategy will be useful to

countries still battling polio.

“It is up to individual countries to decide their own policies, but we do

not feel that imprisonment would help,” said Dr. David Heymann, WHO’s top

polio official.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...