Guest guest Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8765575472072390793 & q=the+men+who+killed\ +kennedy+part+9 & total=35 & start=0 & num=10 & so=0 & type=search & plindex=0 Please, Bea watch the video and wake up to the truth. -------------- Original message ---------------------- Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen > Unfortunately the speed at which things are unravelling and the depths of the > lies and the many many years it would take to get at any truth which is not > likely anyway---they still don't know who killed Kennedy after 50years---and we > don't have 50 years---leave us no alternative but to take our best guess. Your > guess is a sgood as mine---to me it's not an unlikely scenario at all...we all > know its coming sometime... > > Unfortunately the speed at which things are unravelling and the depths of the lies and the many many years it would take to get at any truth which is not likely anyway---they still don't know who killed Kennedy after 50years---and we don't have 50 years---leave us no alternative but to take our best guess. Your guess is a sgood as mine---to me it's not an unlikely scenario at all...we all know its coming sometime...Lynn Ward <lynnward (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: At 06:18 PM 3/16/2008, you wrote:I know I shouldn't get upset at things like this, but I just can't help it......There are so many things wrong with this post it would hard to know where to begin. However, the most important is the majority of assumptions, statements and supposed "leaks" spoken about in this email are absolutely not verifiable. Anywhere. By anyone. Check yourself. The only thing anyone will find is opinions and innuendos. Nothing factual. Other than they had a closed door session. and, that they debated surveillance legislation. More than that is conjecture at this point. I was a reporter, and I know what an "un-named source" or "leak" can mean. Sometimes, it means you don't have anyone that said anything - and are just trying to bolster a story. A number of reporters have been caught doing just that. Their stories and their "sources" were fictitious. A lot of the stuff said in this email isn't even logical. For one, why would the U.S. merge with Mexico for cheap labor? When they come pouring over the border and their labor is already cheap? And, if the economy collapses, as this email suggests, we won't have a need for cheap labor - it'll be all around us because people will be out work. People will be desperate. People work pretty cheap when they're in that situation. Just do a bit of checking on what went on in the Depression in the 1930's.Emails such as these are irresponsible and do nothing more than pander to people's fears. While there may be a grain of truth here and there, it is largely bunk, and should be treated as such. Not to mention - if, by some stretch of the imagination some, or several of the things spoken about below were in the cards, what could the average working person, the working poor, or those who receive benefits because they can't work, do anyway? If you don't have enough money to live properly, live hand to mouth every month, or get the medical care you need, how do you suppose one could plan for such an event? Real quick, A cursory examination of one of the sites given as reference for the article below, the Huffington Post, shows that opinion rather than fact is the basis for a number of their articles. For example, the recent article, Admiral Fallon: A resignation in Protest, written by Jon Soltz, has a tiny bit of fact - and even that is not totally correct. The bulk of the article is his opinion - unless of course, he is a telepath and has read Adm. Fallon's mind. In case you're curious, the fact that Fallon left his position as CENTCOM's commander is true. However, an Admiral doesn't resign, especially not a four star Admirial - he retires. which he did after 40 years of service. They are two entirely different things - especially when it comes to someone in the military. Which Solz would know, if he knew anything about the military at all. Or, if he were even trying to give an objective presentation of the facts. Lynn Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:31:55 -0700"Freedom Pool" <freedompool >freedompool (AT) hotmail (DOT) comSubject: 6th closed door session of Congress in 176 yearsLast week's session (Th 3/13/08) was only the 6th time in the last 176 years that Congress has closed its doors to the public. Word has begun leaking that not only did members discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated reason for the closed door session, they also discussed: the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008;the imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009;the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse;advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move against the government;the detention of those rounded-up at "REX 84" camps constructed throughout the USA (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84);the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses;the location of "safe facilities" for members of Congress and their families to reside during expected massive civil unrest;the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada (for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool);the issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO - for all three nations as the proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon. Members of Congress were forbidden to reveal what was discussed. See House Holds Closed Session to Discuss Surveillance Bill: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/14/house-holds-closed-sessio_n_91490.html ; House Approves New Eavesdropping Rules: http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2008Mar14/0,4675,TerroristSurveillance,00.html ; International Experts Foresee Collapse of U.S. Economy: http://www.intelligencer.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=918803 ************************************************************************************ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 I've watched that whole series--there was no absolute conclusion--there were many different scenarios. The only thing I know is it wasnt Oswald....Soul_bro2 wrote: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8765575472072390793 & q=the+men+who+killed+kennedy+part+9 & total=35 & start=0 & num=10 & so=0 & type=search & plindex=0Please, Bea watch the video and wake up to the truth. -------------- Original message ----------------------Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen >> Unfortunately the speed at which things are unravelling and the depths of the > lies and the many many years it would take to get at any truth which is not > likely anyway---they still don't know who killed Kennedy after 50years---and we > don't have 50 years---leave us no alternative but to take our best guess. Your > guess is a sgood as mine---to me it's not an unlikely scenario at all...we all > know its coming sometime...> > Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen Subject: Re: Fwd: 6th closed door session of Congress in 176 yearsMon, 17 Mar 2008 01:43:04 +0000 Unfortunately the speed at which things are unravelling and the depths of the lies and the many many years it would take to get at any truth which is not likely anyway---they still don't know who killed Kennedy after 50years---and we don't have 50 years---leave us no alternative but to take our best guess. Your guess is a sgood as mine---to me it's not an unlikely scenario at all...we all know its coming sometime...Lynn Ward <lynnward (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: At 06:18 PM 3/16/2008, you wrote:I know I shouldn't get upset at things like this, but I just can't help it......There are so many things wrong with this post it would hard to know where to begin. However, the most important is the majority of assumptions, statements and supposed "leaks" spoken about in this email are absolutely not verifiable. Anywhere. By anyone. Check yourself. The only thing anyone will find is opinions and innuendos. Nothing factual. Other than they had a closed door session. and, that they debated surveillance legislation. More than that is conjecture at this point. I was a reporter, and I know what an "un-named source" or "leak" can mean. Sometimes, it means you don't have anyone that said anything - and are just trying to bolster a story. A number of reporters have been caught doing just that. Their stories and their "sources" were fictitious. A lot of the stuff said in this email isn't even logical. For one, why would the U.S. merge with Mexico for cheap labor? When they come pouring over the border and their labor is already cheap? And, if the economy collapses, as this email suggests, we won't have a need for cheap labor - it'll be all around us because people will be out work. People will be desperate. People work pretty cheap when they're in that situation. Just do a bit of checking on what went on in the Depression in the 1930's.Emails such as these are irresponsible and do nothing more than pander to people's fears. While there may be a grain of truth here and there, it is largely bunk, and should be treated as such. Not to mention - if, by some stretch of the imagination some, or several of the things spoken about below were in the cards, what could the average working person, the working poor, or those who receive benefits because they can't work, do anyway? If you don't have enough money to live properly, live hand to mouth every month, or get the medical care you need, how do you suppose one could plan for such an event? Real quick, A cursory examination of one of the sites given as reference for the article below, the Huffington Post, shows that opinion rather than fact is the basis for a number of their articles. For example, the recent article, Admiral Fallon: A resignation in Protest, written by Jon Soltz, has a tiny bit of fact - and even that is not totally correct. The bulk of the article is his opinion - unless of course, he is a telepath and has read Adm. Fallon's mind. In case you're curious, the fact that Fallon left his position as CENTCOM's commander is true. However, an Admiral doesn't resign, especially not a four star Admirial - he retires. which he did after 40 years of service. They are two entirely different things - especially when it comes to someone in the military. Which Solz would know, if he knew anything about the military at all. Or, if he were even trying to give an objective presentation of the facts. Lynn Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:31:55 -0700"Freedom Pool" <freedompool >freedompool (AT) hotmail (DOT) comSubject: 6th closed door session of Congress in 176 yearsLast week's session (Th 3/13/08) was only the 6th time in the last 176 years that Congress has closed its doors to the public. Word has begun leaking that not only did members discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated reason for the closed door session, they also discussed: the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008;the imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009;the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse;advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move against the government;the detention of those rounded-up at "REX 84" camps constructed throughout the USA (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84);the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses;the location of "safe facilities" for members of Congress and their families to reside during expected massive civil unrest;the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada (for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool);the issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO - for all three nations as the proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon. Members of Congress were forbidden to reveal what was discussed. See House Holds Closed Session to Discuss Surveillance Bill: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/14/house-holds-closed-sessio_n_91490.html ; House Approves New Eavesdropping Rules: http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2008Mar14/0,4675,TerroristSurveillance,00.html ; International Experts Foresee Collapse of U.S. Economy: http://www.intelligencer.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=918803 ************************************************************************************ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 Did you watch the chapter 9? It was added some years later. Read The Elite Serial Killers by Robert Gaylon Ross Sr. -------------- Original message ---------------------- Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen > I've watched that whole series--there was no absolute conclusion--there were > many different scenarios. The only thing I know is it wasnt Oswald.... > > Soul_bro2 wrote: > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8765575472072390793 & q=the+men+who+killed > +kennedy+part+9 & total=35 & start=0 & num=10 & so=0 & type=search & plindex=0 > > Please, Bea watch the video and wake up to the truth. > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen > > Unfortunately the speed at which things are unravelling and the depths of the > > lies and the many many years it would take to get at any truth which is not > > likely anyway---they still don't know who killed Kennedy after 50years---and > we > > don't have 50 years---leave us no alternative but to take our best guess. Your > > guess is a sgood as mine---to me it's not an unlikely scenario at all...we all > > know its coming sometime... > > > > > > > > Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen > > Re: Fwd: 6th closed door session of Congress in > 176 years > Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:43:04 +0000 > > Unfortunately the speed at which things are unravelling and the depths of > the lies and the many many years it would take to get at any truth which is not > likely anyway---they still don't know who killed Kennedy after 50years---and we > don't have 50 years---leave us no alternative but to take our best guess. Your > guess is a sgood as mine---to me it's not an unlikely scenario at all...we all > know its coming sometime... > > Lynn Ward <lynnward wrote: At 06:18 PM 3/16/2008, you > wrote: > > I know I shouldn't get upset at things like this, but I just can't help it...... > > There are so many things wrong with this post it would hard to know where to > begin. However, the most important is the majority of assumptions, statements > and supposed " leaks " spoken about in this email are absolutely not verifiable. > Anywhere. By anyone. Check yourself. The only thing anyone will find is opinions > and innuendos. Nothing factual. Other than they had a closed door session. and, > that they debated surveillance legislation. More than that is conjecture at this > point. > > I was a reporter, and I know what an " un-named source " or " leak " can mean. > Sometimes, it means you don't have anyone that said anything - and are just > trying to bolster a story. A number of reporters have been caught doing just > that. Their stories and their " sources " were fictitious. A lot of the stuff said > in this email isn't even logical. For one, why would the U.S. merge with Mexico > for cheap labor? When they come pouring over the border and their labor is > already cheap? And, if the economy collapses, as this email suggests, we won't > have a need for cheap labor - it'll be all around us because people will be out > work. People will be desperate. People work pretty cheap when they're in that > situation. Just do a bit of checking on what went on in the Depression in the > 1930's. > > Emails such as these are irresponsible and do nothing more than pander to > people's fears. While there may be a grain of truth here and there, it is > largely bunk, and should be treated as such. Not to mention - if, by some > stretch of the imagination some, or several of the things spoken about below > were in the cards, what could the average working person, the working poor, or > those who receive benefits because they can't work, do anyway? If you don't have > enough money to live properly, live hand to mouth every month, or get the > medical care you need, how do you suppose one could plan for such an event? > > Real quick, A cursory examination of one of the sites given as reference for the > article below, the Huffington Post, shows that opinion rather than fact is the > basis for a number of their articles. For example, the recent article, Admiral > Fallon: A resignation in Protest, written by Jon Soltz, has a tiny bit of fact - > and even that is not totally correct. The bulk of the article is his opinion - > unless of course, he is a telepath and has read Adm. Fallon's mind. In case > you're curious, the fact that Fallon left his position as CENTCOM's commander is > true. However, an Admiral doesn't resign, especially not a four star Admirial - > he retires. which he did after 40 years of service. They are two entirely > different things - especially when it comes to someone in the military. Which > Solz would know, if he knew anything about the military at all. Or, if he were > even trying to give an objective presentation of the facts. > > Lynn > > > Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:31:55 -0700 > " Freedom Pool " <freedompool > freedompool > 6th closed door session of Congress in 176 years > > > Last week's session (Th 3/13/08) was only the 6th time in the last 176 years > that Congress has closed its doors to the public. > > Word has begun leaking that not only did members discuss new surveillance > provisions as was the publicly stated reason for the closed door session, they > also discussed: > > the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008; > the imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009; > the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse; > advance round-ups of " insurgent U.S. citizens " likely to move against the > government; > the detention of those rounded-up at " REX 84 " camps constructed throughout the > USA (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84); > the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses; > the location of " safe facilities " for members of Congress and their families to > reside during expected massive civil unrest; > the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada (for its > natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool); > the issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO - for all three nations as the > proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon. > > Members of Congress were forbidden to reveal what was discussed. > > See House Holds Closed Session to Discuss Surveillance Bill: > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/14/house-holds-closed-sessio_n_91490.html > ; House Approves New Eavesdropping Rules: > http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2008Mar14/0,4675,TerroristSurveill > ance,00.html ; International Experts Foresee Collapse of U.S. Economy: > http://www.intelligencer.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=918803 > > ******************************************************************************** > **** > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. > > > > > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. I've watched that whole series--there was no absolute conclusion--there were many different scenarios. The only thing I know is it wasnt Oswald....Soul_bro2 (AT) comcast (DOT) net wrote: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8765575472072390793 & q=the+men+who+killed+kennedy+part+9 & total=35 & start=0 & num=10 & so=0 & type=search & plindex=0Please, Bea watch the video and wake up to the truth. -------------- Original message ----------------------Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen >> Unfortunately the speed at which things are unravelling and the depths of the > lies and the many many years it would take to get at any truth which is not > likely anyway---they still don't know who killed Kennedy after 50years---and we > don't have 50 years---leave us no alternative but to take our best guess. Your > guess is a sgood as mine---to me it's not an unlikely scenario at all...we all > know its coming sometime...> > Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen > Subject: Re: Fwd: 6th closed door session of Congress in 176 yearsMon, 17 Mar 2008 01:43:04 +0000 Unfortunately the speed at which things are unravelling and the depths of the lies and the many many years it would take to get at any truth which is not likely anyway---they still don't know who killed Kennedy after 50years---and we don't have 50 years---leave us no alternative but to take our best guess. Your guess is a sgood as mine---to me it's not an unlikely scenario at all...we all know its coming sometime...Lynn Ward <lynnward (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: At 06:18 PM 3/16/2008, you wrote:I know I shouldn't get upset at things like this, but I just can't help it......There are so many things wrong with this post it would hard to know where to begin. However, the most important is the majority of assumptions, statements and supposed "leaks" spoken about in this email are absolutely not verifiable. Anywhere. By anyone. Check yourself. The only thing anyone will find is opinions and innuendos. Nothing factual. Other than they had a closed door session. and, that they debated surveillance legislation. More than that is conjecture at this point. I was a reporter, and I know what an "un-named source" or "leak" can mean. Sometimes, it means you don't have anyone that said anything - and are just trying to bolster a story. A number of reporters have been caught doing just that. Their stories and their "sources" were fictitious. A lot of the stuff said in this email isn't even logical. For one, why would the U.S. merge with Mexico for cheap labor? When they come pouring over the border and their labor is already cheap? And, if the economy collapses, as this email suggests, we won't have a need for cheap labor - it'll be all around us because people will be out work. People will be desperate. People work pretty cheap when they're in that situation. Just do a bit of checking on what went on in the Depression in the 1930's.Emails such as these are irresponsible and do nothing more than pander to people's fears. While there may be a grain of truth here and there, it is largely bunk, and should be treated as such. Not to mention - if, by some stretch of the imagination some, or several of the things spoken about below were in the cards, what could the average working person, the working poor, or those who receive benefits because they can't work, do anyway? If you don't have enough money to live properly, live hand to mouth every month, or get the medical care you need, how do you suppose one could plan for such an event? Real quick, A cursory examination of one of the sites given as reference for the article below, the Huffington Post, shows that opinion rather than fact is the basis for a number of their articles. For example, the recent article, Admiral Fallon: A resignation in Protest, written by Jon Soltz, has a tiny bit of fact - and even that is not totally correct. The bulk of the article is his opinion - unless of course, he is a telepath and has read Adm. Fallon's mind. In case you're curious, the fact that Fallon left his position as CENTCOM's commander is true. However, an Admiral doesn't resign, especially not a four star Admirial - he retires. which he did after 40 years of service. They are two entirely different things - especially when it comes to someone in the military. Which Solz would know, if he knew anything about the military at all. Or, if he were even trying to give an objective presentation of the facts. Lynn Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:31:55 -0700"Freedom Pool" <freedompool >freedompool (AT) hotmail (DOT) comSubject: 6th closed door session of Congress in 176 yearsLast week's session (Th 3/13/08) was only the 6th time in the last 176 years that Congress has closed its doors to the public. Word has begun leaking that not only did members discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated reason for the closed door session, they also discussed: the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008;the imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009;the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse;advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move against the government;the detention of those rounded-up at "REX 84" camps constructed throughout the USA (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84);the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses;the location of "safe facilities" for members of Congress and their families to reside during expected massive civil unrest;the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada (for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool);the issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO - for all three nations as the proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon. Members of Congress were forbidden to reveal what was discussed. See House Holds Closed Session to Discuss Surveillance Bill: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/14/house-holds-closed-sessio_n_91490.html ; House Approves New Eavesdropping Rules: http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2008Mar14/0,4675,TerroristSurveillance,00.html ; International Experts Foresee Collapse of U.S. Economy: http://www.intelligencer.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=918803 ************************************************************************************ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 THE BANKSTERS MURDERED JFK........CHECK OUT EXECUTIVE ORDER # IIOII I BELIEVE, IT MOVED 68 BILLION $ US FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND INTO THE U.S. TREASURY,[ THIS WAS 68 BILLION IN 1962 DOLLARS] AND HE WAS SITTING ON ABOUT A HALF BILLION OF " NEW " MONEY, OUTSIDE THE FEDS. CONTROL.HE WAS JUST ABOUT TO PUT SILVER CERTIFICATES BACK INTO CIRCULATION.....HE WAS ABOUT TO END THE FEDS CONTROL OF THE MONEY SUPPLY THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON, AND THE " CLOSED DOOR " CONGRESS DID NOTHING.......CONGRESS IS A HUGE PART OF THE PROBLEM, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE BIG PHARAMA FOLKS BOASTS IN A PRESS RELEASE LAST YEAR, THEY [THE DRUG INDUSTRY] SPENT $$ 2.4 BILLION ON THE LAST CONGRESSIONAL RACE.........HOW MUCH DID YOU GIVE TO THE PERSON WHO SWORE AND OATH BEFORE GOD TO DEFEND AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES?? NOW JUST WHO DO YOU THINK THEY ARE BEHOLDEN TO! LETS NOT EVEN TALK ABOUT THE DEFENCE GANG AND THE MULTI-BILLIONS THAT GO THERE......OR MAYBE WE STOP GIVING ISRAEL 15 MILLION AMERICAN DOLLARS A DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST A THOUGHT ! KRAIG Kraig Carroll Environmental Damage Repair --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.