Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 At 04:03 AM 3/15/2008, you wrote: Your argument is misplaced if you are referring to the recent discussion re urban legends.....Additionally, it appears to often depend on which side of the fence one sits on, as to whether one considers certain information bogus. I would no longer take something Bolen says at face value, than I would something from the FDA. They both have an agenda. In either case, it behooves one to do independent research. It's convenient to take someone's word because you think they espouse your POV - it bolsters one's argument. But, their information may not be accurate or factual.....Just because something agrees what you or I may believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's true - and the converse, because something or someone says something we don't happen to believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's not true. http://www.bolenreport.net/feature_articles/feature_article064.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 you wrote LYNN Just because something agrees what you or I may believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's true - and the converse, because something or someone says something we don't happen to believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's not true. AND I MOSTLY AGREE WITH YOU BUT I have been (for example) anti the chholesterol theory of heart disease for many many years...... once upon a time there were a few professional people who thought this way .... their thoughts 'meshed' with mine..... but we were all considered anti establishment................ I am pleased to say that now .... several yearslater thre are hundred of well respected medics, professor and the likes standing up and shouting out against the cholesterol hypothesis BUT mainstream medicine still says we are wrong...... the numbers are growing daily...... on the side of anti establishemnt and pharma fraud...... sometime you just gotta stand up for what you believe in AGAINST the establisment........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote: No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet. In fact, that makes my point exactly - just because people say something is, or isn't true doesn't make it so. Remember, popular opinion once said the earth was flat (in fact did you see the video I posted a link to? Apparently fundamentalist Muslems believe not only is the earth flat, but that the sun rotates around the earth..they believe that because the Koran says it is so..the video is in Farci, but is translated at the bottom....) The only thing I have an issue with, is someone believing something pretty much solely because someone tells them it is so. I think all of us have a tendency to want to believe what fits into our particular POV. I may not always be successful, but try very hard to look at all sides of an issue before I make up my mind. Often, even when I think I know, I check things out. I think this may be a personality trait - I'm not sure. It was this very thing that used to get me into a lot of trouble in school when I was young. Asked too many questions. Usually I asked them because I really wanted to know - although I'll admit, not always. *grin* I can't tell you how delighted I was, when I went to college, where they liked the fact that you asked questions. Even then, though, professors usually weren't always thrilled if you held a different POV than they, even if you could substantiate it. Generally, I've always thought, since I learned anything about them (which is more years than I care to count..*smile*), that it is foolhardy not to use what God gave us - the herbs and minerals and good foods and so on. That all the preservatives and additives and fake stuff isn't good for us. Really, it's only logical when one actually thinks about it. As it is with many man-made things most use to make their lives easier. I've found, that even when I read something from someone I generally trust, sometimes there are things which don't seem logical or make sense to me. To me, Truth is usually logical - even if you have a ways to get to the logical part. But, not always, of course. There are some Truths which are not logical.....But, on the whole, the more I learn, the less illogical Truth seems. On many levels. That's all I've been trying to say.... Lynn you wrote LYNN Just because something agrees what you or I may believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's true - and the converse, because something or someone says something we don't happen to believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's not true. AND I MOSTLY AGREE WITH YOU BUT I have been (for example) anti the chholesterol theory of heart disease for many many years...... once upon a time there were a few professional people who thought this way .... their thoughts 'meshed' with mine..... but we were all considered anti establishment................ I am pleased to say that now .... several yearslater thre are hundred of well respected medics, professor and the likes standing up and shouting out against the cholesterol hypothesis BUT mainstream medicine still says we are wrong...... the numbers are growing daily...... on the side of anti establishemnt and pharma fraud...... sometime you just gotta stand up for what you believe in AGAINST the establisment........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 Well, do not believe what you are told by the moon landing.Den 15/03/2008 kl. 23.51 skrev Lynn Ward:At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote:No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet.In fact, that makes my point exactly - just because people say something is, or isn't true doesn't make it so. Remember, popular opinion once said the earth was flat (in fact did you see the video I posted a link to? Apparently fundamentalist Muslems believe not only is the earth flat, but that the sun rotates around the earth..they believe that because the Koran says it is so..the video is in Farci, but is translated at the bottom....)The only thing I have an issue with, is someone believing something pretty much solely because someone tells them it is so. I think all of us have a tendency to want to believe what fits into our particular POV. I may not always be successful, but try very hard to look at all sides of an issue before I make up my mind. Often, even when I think I know, I check things out. I think this may be a personality trait - I'm not sure. It was this very thing that used to get me into a lot of trouble in school when I was young. Asked too many questions. Usually I asked them because I really wanted to know - although I'll admit, not always. *grin* I can't tell you how delighted I was, when I went to college, where they liked the fact that you asked questions. Even then, though, professors usually weren't always thrilled if you held a different POV than they, even if you could substantiate it.Generally, I've always thought, since I learned anything about them (which is more years than I care to count..*smile*), that it is foolhardy not to use what God gave us - the herbs and minerals and good foods and so on. That all the preservatives and additives and fake stuff isn't good for us. Really, it's only logical when one actually thinks about it. As it is with many man-made things most use to make their lives easier.I've found, that even when I read something from someone I generally trust, sometimes there are things which don't seem logical or make sense to me. To me, Truth is usually logical - even if you have a ways to get to the logical part. But, not always, of course. There are some Truths which are not logical.....But, on the whole, the more I learn, the less illogical Truth seems. On many levels.That's all I've been trying to say....Lynnyou wrote LYNNJust because something agrees what you or I may believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's true - and the converse, because something or someone says something we don't happen to believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's not true. AND I MOSTLY AGREE WITH YOU BUT I have been (for example) anti the chholesterol theory of heart disease for many many years...... once upon a time there were a few professional people who thought this way .... their thoughts 'meshed' with mine..... but we were all considered anti establishment................ I am pleased to say that now .... several yearslater thre are hundred of well respected medics, professor and the likes standing up and shouting out against the cholesterol hypothesis BUT mainstream medicine still says we are wrong...... the numbers are growing daily...... on the side of anti establishemnt and pharma fraud...... sometime you just gotta stand up for what you believe in AGAINST the establisment........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2008 Report Share Posted March 16, 2008 When facts fall dead Truth come to life - this is a saying which I like - we are all brainwashed to a certain extent - or we all have our blindspots - due to upbringing and conditioning - but it is difficult to see them all - growth and awakening is a painful business often. Despite the "evils" of our society we have to fit in as best we can and at the same time do the best we can for everyone, as well as care for ourselves and those we have contact with, family, friends, etc as far as they will let us - but sometimes fighting their blind acceptance of medication, vaccines, town water, religious demands, is very hard work! For example when someone who is fed aspartame everyday and sits like a vegetable displaying all the symptoms of aspartame poisoning and having all the community services rallying around them, is it right to try to alert authorities to this possibility? There are so many examples of blind acceptance in my work, acceptance that has damaged people sometimes beyond repair - do I speak or do I just do my job - repair work - knowing that the problem will continue unchecked? I guess it is a matter of some people wanting to hear the truth and others not. Like you I have managed to stop some people taking statins and with others I haven't bothered to say anything. Best, Jane Lynn Ward Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:51 AM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote:No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet.In fact, that makes my point exactly - just because people say something is, or isn't true doesn't make it so. Remember, popular opinion once said the earth was flat (in fact did you see the video I posted a link to? Apparently fundamentalist Muslems believe not only is the earth flat, but that the sun rotates around the earth..they believe that because the Koran says it is so..the video is in Farci, but is translated at the bottom....)The only thing I have an issue with, is someone believing something pretty much solely because someone tells them it is so. I think all of us have a tendency to want to believe what fits into our particular POV. I may not always be successful, but try very hard to look at all sides of an issue before I make up my mind. Often, even when I think I know, I check things out. I think this may be a personality trait - I'm not sure. It was this very thing that used to get me into a lot of trouble in school when I was young. Asked too many questions. Usually I asked them because I really wanted to know - although I'll admit, not always. *grin* I can't tell you how delighted I was, when I went to college, where they liked the fact that you asked questions. Even then, though, professors usually weren't always thrilled if you held a different POV than they, even if you could substantiate it.Generally, I've always thought, since I learned anything about them (which is more years than I care to count..*smile*), that it is foolhardy not to use what God gave us - the herbs and minerals and good foods and so on. That all the preservatives and additives and fake stuff isn't good for us. Really, it's only logical when one actually thinks about it. As it is with many man-made things most use to make their lives easier.I've found, that even when I read something from someone I generally trust, sometimes there are things which don't seem logical or make sense to me. To me, Truth is usually logical - even if you have a ways to get to the logical part. But, not always, of course. There are some Truths which are not logical.....But, on the whole, the more I learn, the less illogical Truth seems. On many levels.That's all I've been trying to say....Lynn you wrote LYNNJust because something agrees what you or I may believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's true - and the converse, because something or someone says something we don't happen to believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's not true. AND I MOSTLY AGREE WITH YOU BUT I have been (for example) anti the chholesterol theory of heart disease for many many years...... once upon a time there were a few professional people who thought this way .... their thoughts 'meshed' with mine..... but we were all considered anti establishment................ I am pleased to say that now .... several yearslater thre are hundred of well respected medics, professor and the likes standing up and shouting out against the cholesterol hypothesis BUT mainstream medicine still says we are wrong...... the numbers are growing daily...... on the side of anti establishemnt and pharma fraud...... sometime you just gotta stand up for what you believe in AGAINST the establisment........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2008 Report Share Posted March 16, 2008 At 07:22 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote: I guess I would have to try and fix what I could one person at a time. I'm not a political activist - have always found it far too frustrating. But, one at a time - or a couple at a time - I've had some success with that. As far as the aspartame person - I guess I would gather as much info as I could, then try to talk to his/her relatives. Give as much factual data as possible. Then, I think I'd have to end with something like this, " if what I'm saying is true, then you will lose nothing by trying it. It certainly won't hurt whoever not to take something with aspartame in it. If I'm wrong, and it makes no difference, at least you'll know you tried. You've lost nothing but a little time and effort. " Of course, if it means risking losing your job - well, I think one has to measure how many you could help, versus the one you may not be able to. It's a very difficult personal decision. It sounds to me as though you've helped a number of people. It's sad, but we can't help everyone, for a variety of reasons. As far as the authorities go - again, if it comes down to whether or not you'll lose your job, I guess you have to gage the importance of that particular case versus your job and the others you may be able to help. I recall you writing something about this is a previous post, but don't remember the particulars. Ultimatley, it comes down to how strongly you feel and how much good you think you may be able to do if you stay versus if you don't. We can't save everyone, no matter how hard we try. When I worked in a mental hospital as a psychiatric tech, I finally had to leave, because ultimately, I was impotent. The people with the big degrees were in power, even though I, and people like me, actually had more patient contact, and knew more about the patients individually. Some of their stupid decisions wound up costing several people their lives. I knew it would, but they wouldn't listen because they felt they knew better because of their degrees. At some point, I just couldn't take it anymore, and had to leave. It was a shame, because I liked what I was doing, and I was good at what I did, and was able to help a number of people. But, later, I was able to help some other people - and children. Not on a mass basis, but mostly one-on-one. I've actually been able to help quite a few people - but not nearly as many as I would like. I wish I could change the system. I wish more than anything I could change the way a lot of things are done. But, I can't. I'll lend my voice, energy and experience to those who will, though. To those who have the stamina and the stomach for politics. I've learned how to control myself a lot more than I did when I was younger, but still have no tolerance for double-talkers or for those who are less than honest. Knowingly so. I can tell you're frustrated - as are many on the people in this group. That happens when you know there is a better way and you have a hard time getting someone to listen to you. Especially someones with some power or position (which, I suppose, equates to power). Believe me - I understand. More than you will know. Lynn When facts fall dead Truth come to life - this is a saying which I like - we are all brainwashed to a certain extent - or we all have our blindspots - due to upbringing and conditioning - but it is difficult to see them all - growth and awakening is a painful business often. Despite the " evils " of our society we have to fit in as best we can and at the same time do the best we can for everyone, as well as care for ourselves and those we have contact with, family, friends, etc as far as they will let us - but sometimes fighting their blind acceptance of medication, vaccines, town water, religious demands, is very hard work! For example when someone who is fed aspartame everyday and sits like a vegetable displaying all the symptoms of aspartame poisoning and having all the community services rallying around them, is it right to try to alert authorities to this possibility? There are so many examples of blind acceptance in my work, acceptance that has damaged people sometimes beyond repair - do I speak or do I just do my job - repair work - knowing that the problem will continue unchecked? I guess it is a matter of some people wanting to hear the truth and others not. Like you I have managed to stop some people taking statins and with others I haven't bothered to say anything. No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet. In fact, that makes my point exactly - just because people say something is, or isn't true doesn't make it so. Remember, popular opinion once said the earth was flat (in fact did you see the video I posted a link to? Apparently fundamentalist Muslems believe not only is the earth flat, but that the sun rotates around the earth..they believe that because the Koran says it is so..the video is in Farci, but is translated at the bottom....) The only thing I have an issue with, is someone believing something pretty much solely because someone tells them it is so. I think all of us have a tendency to want to believe what fits into our particular POV. I may not always be successful, but try very hard to look at all sides of an issue before I make up my mind. Often, even when I think I know, I check things out. I think this may be a personality trait - I'm not sure. It was this very thing that used to get me into a lot of trouble in school when I was young. Asked too many questions. Usually I asked them because I really wanted to know - although I'll admit, not always. *grin* I can't tell you how delighted I was, when I went to college, where they liked the fact that you asked questions. Even then, though, professors usually weren't always thrilled if you held a different POV than they, even if you could substantiate it. Generally, I've always thought, since I learned anything about them (which is more years than I care to count..*smile*), that it is foolhardy not to use what God gave us - the herbs and minerals and good foods and so on. That all the preservatives and additives and fake stuff isn't good for us. Really, it's only logical when one actually thinks about it. As it is with many man-made things most use to make their lives easier. I've found, that even when I read something from someone I generally trust, sometimes there are things which don't seem logical or make sense to me. To me, Truth is usually logical - even if you have a ways to get to the logical part. But, not always, of course. There are some Truths which are not logical.....But, on the whole, the more I learn, the less illogical Truth seems. On many levels. That's all I've been trying to say.... Lynn you wrote LYNN Just because something agrees what you or I may believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's true - and the converse, because something or someone says something we don't happen to believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's not true. AND I MOSTLY AGREE WITH YOU BUT I have been (for example) anti the chholesterol theory of heart disease for many many years...... once upon a time there were a few professional people who thought this way .... their thoughts 'meshed' with mine..... but we were all considered anti establishment................ I am pleased to say that now .... several yearslater thre are hundred of well respected medics, professor and the likes standing up and shouting out against the cholesterol hypothesis BUT mainstream medicine still says we are wrong...... the numbers are growing daily...... on the side of anti establishemnt and pharma fraud...... sometime you just gotta stand up for what you believe in AGAINST the establisment........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 Good for you Lynn, Years ago, I had the same problem. I was taking one medication, a second medication to relieve the side effects of the first and still another medication to get rid of the side effects of the second. Three medications all because of one problem. All prescribed by the same doc. I took the meds for a while then while doing research figured out the best thing to do was stop all of them. Cold turkey, I stopped (my doc was highly upset). One of the meds (he told me), I was going to need to take for the rest of my life. Well I guess my life will be shorter, then! Just what is with the numbers for cholesterol anyway? What is good? What is bad? Do "they" really know? Do you trust what "they" say when they change everything and anything whenever they want? I see you have your eyes open! Kenneth T <snipped> - Lynn Ward Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:51 PM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote:No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet.Lynn you wrote LYNNJust because something agrees what you or I may believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's true - and the converse, because something or someone says something we don't happen to believe, doesn't necessarily mean it's not true. AND I MOSTLY AGREE WITH YOU BUT I have been (for example) anti the chholesterol theory of heart disease for many many years...... once upon a time there were a few professional people who thought this way .... their thoughts 'meshed' with mine..... but we were all considered anti establishment................ I am pleased to say that now .... several yearslater thre are hundred of well respected medics, professor and the likes standing up and shouting out against the cholesterol hypothesis BUT mainstream medicine still says we are wrong...... the numbers are growing daily...... on the side of anti establishemnt and pharma fraud...... sometime you just gotta stand up for what you believe in AGAINST the establisment........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 Hey Kenn, I was told that we did not land on the moon! (Although the schools I attended told me different) Should I believe the school system (after-all it is a "SYSTEM") or believe what I have learned since school? Kenneth T - Kenn Johnsen Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:57 PM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... Well, do not believe what you are told by the moon landing. Den 15/03/2008 kl. 23.51 skrev Lynn Ward: At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote:No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 Well, do not believe anything the state tells you.......I can not think of any story, I have been told by the state......which have not turned out to be a lie.Den 20/03/2008 kl. 10.26 skrev Kenneth:Hey Kenn,I was told that we did not land on the moon!(Although the schools I attended told me different) Should I believe the school system (after-all it is a "SYSTEM") or believe what I have learned since school?:)Kenneth T -Kenn Johnsen Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:57 PMRe: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters...Well, do not believe what you are told by the moon landing.Den 15/03/2008 kl. 23.51 skrev Lynn Ward:At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote:No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 At 05:22 AM 3/20/2008, you wrote: Thanks! I try....I'm a big proponent of quality versus quantity. Whether it's being on drugs or off drugs, if the quality of your life sucks - it's time to change something. If you feel woosy or bad all the time because something you're taking is supposed to make you live longer, I'd rather live shorter and better. To me, the converse also applies. If not taking something makes you feel bad and if taking something makes you feel better, then I'd do it (assuming, of course, whatever it is, doesn't make you feel even worse in the long run). I'm reminded of my mom - she got lung cancer in her late 60's - they operated and took the lung out. For anyone who might not know, they have to go through bone to get to the lung. She never really recovered from that surgery. Prior to that she had been a vital woman. After the surgery, it was almost as she had become instantly old. Just about everything changed. She told me several years later, had she known what that surgery had entailed. and how she would feel, she never would have done it. She would have preferred living a shorter time, rather than the longer time the way she wound up. Lynn Good for you Lynn, Years ago, I had the same problem. I was taking one medication, a second medication to relieve the side effects of the first and still another medication to get rid of the side effects of the second. Three medications all because of one problem. All prescribed by the same doc. I took the meds for a while then while doing research figured out the best thing to do was stop all of them. Cold turkey, I stopped (my doc was highly upset). One of the meds (he told me), I was going to need to take for the rest of my life. Well I guess my life will be shorter, then! Just what is with the numbers for cholesterol anyway? What is good? What is bad? Do " they " really know? Do you trust what " they " say when they change everything and anything whenever they want? I see you have your eyes open! Kenneth T <snipped> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 From all I know I would say the US DID land on the moon - but made a simulated documentary for the people in case the live action didn't come through - just child's stuff thats all - and I always believed this because of reports from totally different view points and non governmental sources at that ....... Jane - Kenn Johnsen Friday, March 21, 2008 2:01 AM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... Well, do not believe anything the state tells you.......I can not think of any story, I have been told by the state......which have not turned out to be a lie. Den 20/03/2008 kl. 10.26 skrev Kenneth: Hey Kenn, I was told that we did not land on the moon! (Although the schools I attended told me different) Should I believe the school system (after-all it is a "SYSTEM") or believe what I have learned since school? Kenneth T - Kenn Johnsen Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:57 PM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... Well, do not believe what you are told by the moon landing. Den 15/03/2008 kl. 23.51 skrev Lynn Ward: At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote:No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 Well, I do not think it is child's stuff going to the moon. Who are those people there have told you that they did it. This German Brown ( what was his name ) said in the fifties that to go to the moon they would need a spaceship 1,000 feet long and thousands of tons.......just one decade later they were on the moon...........? of course I can not say anything for sure, because what do I know, but that goes both ways. I just wonder......how did they survive the radiation - the solar wind in the space, the space is a hostile place. Those people up in the space station, can not survive one solar out burst......and that is inside the Van Allen Belt........they have to crawl in to a special cage. No it is a hoax.Den 20/03/2008 kl. 22.57 skrev Jane MacRoss:From all I know I would say the US DID land on the moon - but made a simulated documentary for the people in case the live action didn't come through - just child's stuff thats all - and I always believed this because of reports from totally different view points and non governmental sources at that ....... Jane-Kenn Johnsen Friday, March 21, 2008 2:01 AMRe: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters...Well, do not believe anything the state tells you.......I can not think of any story, I have been told by the state......which have not turned out to be a lie.Den 20/03/2008 kl. 10.26 skrev Kenneth:Hey Kenn,I was told that we did not land on the moon!(Although the schools I attended told me different) Should I believe the school system (after-all it is a "SYSTEM") or believe what I have learned since school?:)Kenneth T -Kenn Johnsen Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:57 PMRe: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters...Well, do not believe what you are told by the moon landing.Den 15/03/2008 kl. 23.51 skrev Lynn Ward:At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote:No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 I wasn't saying going to the moon was child's stuff - good gracious - I am saying that to make a movie because "they" imagine this is what the public expects is childish - as if it would prove anything - as it is it is what let the whole venture down in the end ....... deception usually does. Best, Jane - Kenn Johnsen Friday, March 21, 2008 10:23 AM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... Well, I do not think it is child's stuff going to the moon. Who are those people there have told you that they did it. This German Brown ( what was his name ) said in the fifties that to go to the moon they would need a spaceship 1,000 feet long and thousands of tons.......just one decade later they were on the moon...........? of course I can not say anything for sure, because what do I know, but that goes both ways. I just wonder......how did they survive the radiation - the solar wind in the space, the space is a hostile place. Those people up in the space station, can not survive one solar out burst......and that is inside the Van Allen Belt........they have to crawl in to a special cage. No it is a hoax. Den 20/03/2008 kl. 22.57 skrev Jane MacRoss: From all I know I would say the US DID land on the moon - but made a simulated documentary for the people in case the live action didn't come through - just child's stuff thats all - and I always believed this because of reports from totally different view points and non governmental sources at that ....... Jane - Kenn Johnsen Friday, March 21, 2008 2:01 AM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... Well, do not believe anything the state tells you.......I can not think of any story, I have been told by the state......which have not turned out to be a lie. Den 20/03/2008 kl. 10.26 skrev Kenneth: Hey Kenn, I was told that we did not land on the moon! (Although the schools I attended told me different) Should I believe the school system (after-all it is a "SYSTEM") or believe what I have learned since school? Kenneth T - Kenn Johnsen Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:57 PM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... Well, do not believe what you are told by the moon landing. Den 15/03/2008 kl. 23.51 skrev Lynn Ward: At 04:50 PM 3/15/2008, you wrote:No question...Just because one is anti-establishment, or anti whatever the common thought is, doesn't make one wrong. the Cholesterol issue is a really good example of that. And, it's true. For a long time, people felt what folks said about Statins and Cholesterol was hooey. Turns out, it wasn't so silly after all...*grin* Fact is, it is thanks to the information in this group that I wound up having my DH stop the statin he was taking. He was having side-effects, which I thought were caused by the drug. But, the doc said no. I didn't agree. And, thanks to the info and links folks like yourself provided, I substantiated my thoughts and told him to stop taking them. He's felt better. Now we'll see if we're effective in lowering his extremely high cholesterol through diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 At 05:57 PM 3/20/2008, you wrote: Jane, You constantly surprise me...*smile* Was just talking to DH about this post and he brought something interesting up. Actually 2 things. He said if the moon landing had been faked, Neil Armstrong wouldn't have flubbed his lines the way he did....they would have simply retaped it. You probably know this, but Armstrong said " one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind. " The line that was written for him that he was supposed to say, was " One small step for A man, and one giant leap for mankind. " To this day, he claims he said " A " . Something else he said that makes sense - he said, in the military, they make numerous practice runs before the action. Like with a beach landing - they practiced it many, many times, before the actual event, when the media or a member from congress might be there. Makes sense to me. Some food for thought anyway..... Lynn From all I know I would say the US DID land on the moon - but made a simulated documentary for the people in case the live action didn't come through - just child's stuff thats all - and I always believed this because of reports from totally different view points and non governmental sources at that ....... Jane - Kenn Johnsen To: Friday, March 21, 2008 2:01 AM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... Well, do not believe anything the state tells you.......I can not think of any story, I have been told by the state......which have not turned out to be a lie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 lol - and what he said was far more ........... man and a man - his was much better .............. The astronauts had to wait a number of years before they could divulge what they experienced - didn't they - was that time up already? Jane - Lynn Ward Friday, March 21, 2008 11:10 AM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... At 05:57 PM 3/20/2008, you wrote:Jane,You constantly surprise me...*smile* Was just talking to DH about this post and he brought something interesting up. Actually 2 things. He said if the moon landing had been faked, Neil Armstrong wouldn't have flubbed his lines the way he did....they would have simply retaped it. You probably know this, but Armstrong said "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." The line that was written for him that he was supposed to say, was "One small step for A man, and one giant leap for mankind." To this day, he claims he said "A". Something else he said that makes sense - he said, in the military, they make numerous practice runs before the action. Like with a beach landing - they practiced it many, many times, before the actual event, when the media or a member from congress might be there. Makes sense to me. Some food for thought anyway.....Lynn From all I know I would say the US DID land on the moon - but made a simulated documentary for the people in case the live action didn't come through - just child's stuff thats all - and I always believed this because of reports from totally different view points and non governmental sources at that ....... Jane - Kenn Johnsen Friday, March 21, 2008 2:01 AM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... Well, do not believe anything the state tells you.......I can not think of any story, I have been told by the state......which have not turned out to be a lie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 At 08:18 PM 3/20/2008, you wrote: they still can't talk about it - DH says probably forever, unless something happens and they get the go ahead. 50 years after WWII, my father still couldn't talk about some things because they were still classified.... Lynn lol - and what he said was far more ............ man and a man - his was much better .............. The astronauts had to wait a number of years before they could divulge what they experienced - didn't they - was that time up already? Jane - Lynn Ward To: Friday, March 21, 2008 11:10 AM Re: Gerson Documentary HumiliatesQuackbusters... At 05:57 PM 3/20/2008, you wrote: Jane, You constantly surprise me...*smile* Was just talking to DH about this post and he brought something interesting up. Actually 2 things. He said if the moon landing had been faked, Neil Armstrong wouldn't have flubbed his lines the way he did....they would have simply retaped it. You probably know this, but Armstrong said " one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind. " The line that was written for him that he was supposed to say, was " One small step for A man, and one giant leap for mankind. " To this day, he claims he said " A " . Something else he said that makes sense - he said, in the military, they make numerous practice runs before the action. Like with a beach landing - they practiced it many, many times, before the actual event, when the media or a member from congress might be there. Makes sense to me. Some food for thought anyway..... Lynn From all I know I would say the US DID land on the moon - but made a simulated documentary for the people in case the live action didn't come through - just child's stuff thats all - and I always believed this because of reports from totally different view points and non governmental sources at that ....... Jane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.