] NYT Scoffs at 400+ 'Skeptical' Scientists, Elevates 44 Green Southern Baptists

March 14, 2008

NYT Scoffs at 400+ 'Skeptical' Scientists, Elevates 44 Green

Southern

Baptists

By

Amy Menefee |

March 11, 2008 - 11:42 ET

Remember when

more than 400 scientists were revealed as " skeptical " about

global warming hype? The New York Times's Andrew Revkin

blogged about it, saying the " perennial tug of war " was

actually " a distraction from fundamentals that are clearly

established. "

Of course,

44 Southern Baptists who buy into the green agenda received a

respectful print story in the March 10 Times, widely quoting the church

leaders saying things like: " when we destroy God's creation, it's

similar to ripping pages from the Bible. "

Actually, the man behind that statement, Jonathan Merritt, isn't really a

church leader, according to the article - he's a 25-year-old seminary

student. But he's " the spokesman for the Southern Baptist

Environment and Climate Initiative. " He used to be " an enemy of

the environment, " until he had the " epiphany " quoted

above.

Such double-standard reporting on sides of the climate debate is standard

for the networks, as the Business & Media Institute's new report

shows. In

" Global Warming Censored, " BMI reveals how actors,

musicians and just plain men on the street are used as voices in support

of global warming hysteria.

400+ scientists or 44 Southern Baptists? Take your pick.

March 15, 2008

It's probably my lack of sleep which makes me giggly (we are having an

ongoing heatwave here, day 13 today with another 3 or 4 more

days to come, sleep is a bit of luxury at the moment) but I'm chuckling

at this report.

That changes in the climate right across the world are experienced is

beyond a doubt but I have not bought into the Global Warming stuff

for one minute. Even call it a hoax and a grand example of how

gullible the general population is.

As a rule, unless assertions come from scientists, they can't be

taken seriously.

Now, the reverse is happening..... and receive a 'respectful' position in

a 'reputable' mainstream media outlet (newspaper, television, doesn't

matter which as long as it has approval of the CFR).

The threat to minimalise/ridicule the seriousness of the climate changes

which has the potential to deliver many many dollars into their coffers

(you have heard of the desire to introduce the 'carbon tax',

worldwide!!) can't be tolerated, and what better source to quote than one

coming from a religious source. A source which is being used by the

elite in many other ways.

Google for it: Preachers trained to 'quell dissent in times

of martial law'.

Oh man, these elites are evil.

Wonder what theory they will use (and manipulate) if and when the

climate is going to change in the next 2-5 or 10 years . or even 20

years and we are all freezing our butts off. Would Al Gore return

his Nobel Prize???

Just of few of my thoughts after seeing this message.

Hanneke

At 08:57 AM 15/03/2008, you wrote:

NYT Scoffs at 400+

'Skeptical' Scientists, Elevates 44 Green Southern