Guest guest Posted January 24, 2008 Report Share Posted January 24, 2008 HI, I am new to this group, thanks for having me. I would like some feedback on the product Salba. Has anyone hear ever used it. I am getting ready to buy some and I am wondering if it is indeed better then flax seed. Thanks Suzeann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2008 Report Share Posted January 25, 2008 Suzeann Hello from Australia Salba OR CHIA (same thing almost) I /we use at home. Now Slaba is the EXPENSIVE product becuase it has been selectively 'bred' so that the seeds are all white.... whilst CHIA is a mix of dark and light seeds........ but cost MUCH LESS. Follow the $$$$$$$$ I take and use CHIA SEEDS for a couple of reasons.... one being that they 'assist' me with the movement of waste products through my digestive system.... maybe a natural laxative would describe it. I am also GLUTEN FREE so I find CHIA SEEDS work wonderfully in g/f baking. Add to that their natural healthy minerals and vitamis and I am happy with the product. I find flax seeds just come out of my system, the way the go in - they don't digest! Chia does. Please note I have NO financial attachment to either of these 'seeds'.... I just find chia beneficial. Cheer's from Clare HI, I am new to this group, thanks for having me. I would like some feedback on the product Salba. Has anyone hear ever used it. I am getting ready to buy some and I am wondering if it is indeed better then flax seed. Thanks SuzeannVersion: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.9/1238 - Release 22/01/2008 8:12 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Hi Folk, From a botanists point of view I believe, upon brief inquiry into the facts, chia and salba are the same, although it is possible that there is a " variation " but not a subspecies that produces salba. The comments below are from a " manufacturer " and to my knowledge there is no such thing as a " distinct registered variety " except by manufacturers of plant products, sort of like Monsanta registering a soybean it created. Therefore, although it is possible that there are some differences, the possibility that those differences are as significant as the " manufacturer " states are unlikely. *Salvia hispanica* has a long and rich history of use amung native peoples and is a great source of many nutrients. I am not familiar with the cultivation and as I mentioned, it is possible they have bred a variety that yields higher amounts of nutrition. BUT, salba is, as far as I can tell, the same as chia....which is not the same as the " chia pet. " BTW: I highly recommend this seed as a nutritional supplement...good stuff! >Many people think Salba is a " patented " form of a seed called chia (the seed from the infamous " Chia Pet " ) . The truth is that Salba represents 2 distinct registered varieties >of *Salvia hispanica L* - a member of the mint family. These varieties are called *Sahi Alba 911* and *Sahi Alba 912*, hence *Salba*. In fact, the botanical name of the " Chia Pet " >seed is actually *Salvia columbarae*. According to USDA nutritional data, chia has between 30-35% less omega-3s (the main nutritional benefit of both seeds) than Salba. The >5% variance can be attributed to different chia crops that can yield vastly different nutrient density. Thomas Beijing, China Author of " Western Herbs According to Traditional : A Practitioners Guide " Check out my blog: www.sourcepointherbs.blogspot.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Thomas, I did more research, and it seems that chia researcher and author, Wayne Coates, PhD, agrees with you. It seems that Salba is simply white chia, and from the attached interview with Coates, there is little difference between black and white chia--other than the cost, as you say. Thank you. http://chia-us.com/Documents/An%20interview%20with%20Dr%20Wayne%20Coates.pdf --- On Thu, 5/21/09, wrote: re: salba Thursday, May 21, 2009, 4:09 PM Hi Folk, From a botanists point of view I believe, upon brief inquiry into the facts, chia and salba are the same, although it is possible that there is a " variation " but not a subspecies that produces salba. The comments below are from a " manufacturer " and to my knowledge there is no such thing as a " distinct registered variety " except by manufacturers of plant products, sort of like Monsanta registering a soybean it created. Therefore, although it is possible that there are some differences, the possibility that those differences are as significant as the " manufacturer " states are unlikely. *Salvia hispanica* has a long and rich history of use amung native peoples and is a great source of many nutrients. I am not familiar with the cultivation and as I mentioned, it is possible they have bred a variety that yields higher amounts of nutrition. BUT, salba is, as far as I can tell, the same as chia....which is not the same as the " chia pet. " BTW: I highly recommend this seed as a nutritional supplement.. .good stuff! >Many people think Salba is a " patented " form of a seed called chia (the seed from the infamous " Chia Pet " ) . The truth is that Salba represents 2 distinct registered varieties >of *Salvia hispanica L* - a member of the mint family. These varieties are called *Sahi Alba 911* and *Sahi Alba 912*, hence *Salba*. In fact, the botanical name of the " Chia Pet " >seed is actually *Salvia columbarae*. According to USDA nutritional data, chia has between 30-35% less omega-3s (the main nutritional benefit of both seeds) than Salba. The >5% variance can be attributed to different chia crops that can yield vastly different nutrient density. Thomas Beijing, China Author of " Western Herbs According to Traditional : A Practitioners Guide " Check out my blog: www.sourcepointherb s.blogspot. com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Sorry Yehuda, it was a flub. I hit reply instead of fw. ann On May 24, 2009, at 3:30 PM, yehuda frischman wrote: > > > Hi Ann, > > Nothing came through. Can you send again? > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/24/09, <snakeoil.works wrote: > > A. Brameier <snakeoil.works > Re: re: salba > > Sunday, May 24, 2009, 12:07 PM > > don't really know how this happened, but sorry, mis-fw. delete. > > On May 24, 2009, at 2:59 PM, A. Brameier wrote: > > > > > > > I know --- here's more. > > a > > > > On May 24, 2009, at 4:45 AM, yehuda frischman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas, > > > > > > I did more research, and it seems that chia researcher and author, > > > Wayne Coates, PhD, agrees with you. It seems that Salba is simply > > > white chia, and from the attached interview with Coates, there is > > > little difference between black and white chia--other than the > cost, > > > as you say. Thank you. > > > > > > http://chia- us.com/Documents /An%20interview% 20with%20Dr% > 20Wayne%20Coates .pdf > > > > > > > > > www.traditionaljewi shmedicine. net > > > www.traditionaljewi shmedicine. blogspot. com > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, <tag.plantgeek@ gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > <tag.plantgeek@ gmail.com> > > > re: salba > > > > > > Thursday, May 21, 2009, 4:09 PM > > > > > > Hi Folk, > > > > > > From a botanists point of view I believe, upon brief inquiry into > > > the facts, > > > chia and salba are the same, although it is possible that there > is a > > > " variation " but not a subspecies that produces salba. The comments > > > below are > > > from a " manufacturer " and to my knowledge there is no such thing > > as a > > > " distinct registered variety " except by manufacturers of plant > > > products, > > > sort of like Monsanta registering a soybean it created. Therefore, > > > although > > > it is possible that there are some differences, the possibility > that > > > those > > > differences are as significant as the " manufacturer " states are > > > unlikely. *Salvia > > > hispanica* has a long and rich history of use amung native peoples > > > and is a > > > great source of many nutrients. I am not familiar with the > > > cultivation and > > > as I mentioned, it is possible they have bred a variety that > yields > > > higher > > > amounts of nutrition. BUT, salba is, as far as I can tell, the > > same as > > > chia....which is not the same as the " chia pet. " > > > > > > BTW: I highly recommend this seed as a nutritional > > > supplement.. .good stuff! > > > > > > >Many people think Salba is a " patented " form of a seed called > chia > > > (the > > > seed from the infamous " Chia Pet " ) . The truth is that Salba > > > represents 2 > > > distinct registered varieties >of *Salvia hispanica L* - a > member of > > > the > > > mint family. These varieties are called *Sahi Alba 911* and *Sahi > > > Alba 912*, > > > hence *Salba*. In fact, the botanical name of the " Chia Pet " >seed > > is > > > actually *Salvia columbarae*. According to USDA nutritional data, > > > chia has > > > between 30-35% less omega-3s (the main nutritional benefit of both > > > seeds) > > > than Salba. The >5% variance can be attributed to different chia > > > crops that > > > can yield vastly different nutrient density. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > Beijing, China > > > Author of " Western Herbs According to Traditional Chinese > > Medicine: A > > > Practitioners Guide " > > > Check out my blog: www.sourcepointherb s.blogspot. com > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.