Guest guest Posted December 16, 2007 Report Share Posted December 16, 2007 Part III: The Innovation Conundrum Blaming the Messenger Part three of the four part series if you are interested: http://www.gooznews.com/archives/000904.html Blaming the Messenger Contrary to popular belief, the regulatory environment for new drug development has grown less stringent over the past two decades, not more so. A succession of changes in food and drug laws plus new rules propagated by the FDA itself, which began when an alarmed HIV/AIDS patient community began clamoring for new drugs to treat that deadly disease, substantially liberalized the rules under which new drug development takes place. The Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 sharply reduced the amount of time that FDA reviewers may take to evaluate new drugs once all the data from confirmatory clinical trials have been submitted to the agency. Regulations put in place the same year allowed new drug applicants to measure surrogate markers, not clinical Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.