: Please, Please Help Me Find Some Dirt On Ron Paul,,,,,,,,,Please,,,,,,,,,,

[Guest guest]

This guy is going to be our next president! I'm for sure voting for

him, how about you all? Check his views on health - everything I

agree with. He doesn't want to take away our healthy options, he

wants people to have access to alternative methods, unlike all the

option candidates.

 

GO RON!

 

Carol

http://www.bluegreensolutions.com

 

, The Havens <thehavens

wrote:

 

> >from my Good Friend Major Bob Worn (USAF-Ret)

> >

> >

> >----------

> >>

> >>Folks, I really need your help. We've got to find some dirt on Ron

Paul

> >>and find it fast.

[Guest guest]

Yep, got to figure this letter is meant as tongue in cheek. But as a

supporter of Ron, I must ask for clarification of a conflict in one of

his policies vs. actions..ok, " dirt " , maybe, maybe not..here it comes:

 

Sometime back in 2002, Ron delivered a speech entitled " Is America A

Police State " (http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr062702.htm)

and the following is merely one statement from a bunch:

 

" Over 80,000 federal bureaucrats now carry guns to make us toe the

line and to enforce the thousands of laws and tens of thousands of

regulations that no one can possibly understand. We don't see the

guns, but we all know they're there, and we all know we can't fight

" City Hall, " especially if it's " Uncle Sam. " "

 

In conflict with this statement condemning the Police State, is his

bill HR 3304.

" For example, the American Federation of Police -- with well over

100,000 members -- recently praised Ron Paul for introducing a bill

that would help cops obtain topnotch body armor that would withstand

rounds fired from most firearms. Rep. Paul's bill -- HR 3304 -- would

amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide for a tax credit to law

enforcement officers who purchase their own body armor. "

http://ronpaul.meetup.com/185/boards/view/viewthread?thread=3813052

 

So, with the militarization of the civilian police, which we all know

has happened in the past few years, we now have a bill which will

allow them to purchase bigger and better body armor and get a tax

credit for it (anybody remember when Congress tried to pass a similar

bill to make it illegal for civilians to own body armor?). These same

police can now carry guns on airplanes on their vacations, business

trips, whatever, but you and I as law abiding citizens cannot. Federal

law, civilian police...Now what would have been this police response

had Ron put this bill forward to give a tax credit to all tax payers

instead of this select group? And remember this is a tax credit, not a

deduction. The money comes off the taxes due at one hundred percent of

cost.

 

This is the same bunch of guys and gals that are now breaking in their

tazers on the old, the very young and infirm regularly these days. The

harassment quotient has gone up exponentially since 911, and the

passage of the Pat Acts. We hear talk of martial law almost every day

now, and Ron mentions it in that same speech already cited. These are

the same guys and gals that are going to be involved in whatever

martial law plans are implemented. Why then would Ron want to make it

so much more difficult for us, the law abiding citizen, to resist this

usurpation of our greatest right of all, our Freedom? I hold this man

to a much higher standard than to merely state its " vote buying " or he

is " naive " as to who will implement the Police State. So, dirt maybe,

maybe not...and he's my candidate too...I'd just like this one

explained a bit. And I have asked before to no avail.

 

 

 

-

[Guest guest]

I don't even SEE a candidate that has our interests. We have to start voting four our city elections and stop letting the weirdos through to get too close to even be on the presidential elections.

Sincerely Barb M.

 

----

 

 

onthemend1

12/15/2007 10:23:31 AM

 

Re: : Please, Please Help Me Find Some Dirt On Ron Paul,,,,,,,,,Please,,,,,,,,,,

 

 

Yep, got to figure this letter is meant as tongue in cheek. But as asupporter of Ron, I must ask for clarification of a conflict in one ofhis policies vs. actions..ok, "dirt", maybe, maybe not..here it comes:Sometime back in 2002, Ron delivered a speech entitled "Is America APolice State" (http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr062702.htm)and the following is merely one statement from a bunch:"Over 80,000 federal bureaucrats now carry guns to make us toe theline and to enforce the thousands of laws and tens of thousands ofregulations that no one can possibly understand. We don't see theguns, but we all know they're there, and we all know we can't fight"City Hall," especially if it's "Uncle Sam.""In conflict with this statement condemning the Police State, is hisbill HR 3304. "For example, the American Federation of Police -- with well over100,000 members -- recently praised Ron Paul for introducing a billthat would help cops obtain topnotch body armor that would withstandrounds fired from most firearms. Rep. Paul's bill -- HR 3304 -- wouldamend the Internal Revenue Code to provide for a tax credit to lawenforcement officers who purchase their own body armor."http://ronpaul.meetup.com/185/boards/view/viewthread?thread=3813052So, with the militarization of the civilian police, which we all knowhas happened in the past few years, we now have a bill which willallow them to purchase bigger and better body armor and get a taxcredit for it (anybody remember when Congress tried to pass a similarbill to make it illegal for civilians to own body armor?). These samepolice can now carry guns on airplanes on their vacations, businesstrips, whatever, but you and I as law abiding citizens cannot. Federallaw, civilian police...Now what would have been this police responsehad Ron put this bill forward to give a tax credit to all tax payersinstead of this select group? And remember this is a tax credit, not adeduction. The money comes off the taxes due at one hundred percent ofcost. This is the same bunch of guys and gals that are now breaking in theirtazers on the old, the very young and infirm regularly these days. Theharassment quotient has gone up exponentially since 911, and thepassage of the Pat Acts. We hear talk of martial law almost every daynow, and Ron mentions it in that same speech already cited. These arethe same guys and gals that are going to be involved in whatevermartial law plans are implemented. Why then would Ron want to make itso much more difficult for us, the law abiding citizen, to resist thisusurpation of our greatest right of all, our Freedom? I hold this manto a much higher standard than to merely state its "vote buying" or heis "naive" as to who will implement the Police State. So, dirt maybe,maybe not...and he's my candidate too...I'd just like this oneexplained a bit. And I have asked before to no avail.-