ADA Caves In - FDA Under Fire For Protecting Mercury Fillings

[Guest guest]

" Gone is the old ADA braggadocio about the Food & Drug Administration finding

mercury fillings to be safe. Gone is the time-worn assurance to its members

that the good old ADA will take care of any problems those

“anti-amalgamistsâ€

are stirring up. Instead, the ADA meekly advises its members that warnings are

likely, and a ban is conceivable. "

 

This all too transparent shell game is continually used to disregard solid

toxicology science.

 

Here among many is a perfect example, another is Fluoride, that is the raison

d'être for the existence of most regulatory bodies

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/05/11/use_abuse_of_regulations_to_pro\

tect_pharma_monopoly.htm

. They are primarily created as industry shields under the pretense of

protecting the constituents. Essentially these pseudo bodies are next to useless

other than providing token lip service while they are essentially created and

needed to protect the industry... The industry love's bureaucracy while

providing lip service against it, essentially conning the masses to clamour for

more

and more government - A perfect scam!

 

Listen to Attorney Charlie Brown's

http://toxicteeth.org/ourTeam_People.cfm?n=charles half hour interview with Dr.

Stan Monteith

http://www.radioliberty.com/doc.htm who took on this rogue agency is here.

 

Chris Gupta

http://tinyurl.com/35msby

 

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2007/08/01/ada_caves_in_fda_under_fire_for\

_protecting_mercury_fillings.htm

-----------------

 

-------

ADA warns members: Trouble ahead for mercury fillings

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:27:40 -0500

FACT <moderator

 

 

Read the fine print, the ADA sees that the FDA is no longer able to pretend

amalgam fillings are safe. The end is in sight for mercury fillings!!

 

Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H) President, Gordon Research Institute

www.gordonresearch.com

 

Terry J. Lee D.D.S. Ph. 480-545-8237 tjleedds

 

ADA warns members: Trouble ahead for mercury fillings.

 

The American Dental Association sends out an ADA Update to its members only,

but of course we have several Fifth Columnists who wheel it on to us.

 

Gone is the old ADA braggadocio about the Food & Drug Administration finding

mercury fillings to be safe. Gone is the time-worn assurance to its members

that the good old ADA will take care of any problems those

“anti-amalgamistsâ€

are stirring up. Instead, the ADA meekly advises its members that warnings are

likely, and a ban is conceivable.

 

Below is their entire message on this issue. Note the quotations ? again,

folks, this is straight from the American Dental Association:

 

We don’t know the direction the FDA will take,†FDA could issue “a

mandatory

brochure or even limited warnings,†FDA could even issue “a ban,†though

“

we don’t expect the latter.â€

 

Charlie Brown 7/8/07

Note our new address & ph # Charles G. Brown, National Counsel Consumers for

Dental Choice 316 F St., N.E., Suite 210, Washington, DC 20002 Ph.

202.544-6333; fax 544-6331 charlie, www.toxicteeth.org

 

Paragraph from ADA Update, July 1, 2007 The FDA has been contemplating

regulatory action for several years to reclassify dental amalgam as either a

class 2

or 3 material. (Components of encapsulated amalgam currently are classified

separately.) The ADA has supported classifying dental amalgam as a Class 2

device in the past. We expect the FDA will issue an advanced notice of proposed

rulemaking (ANPR) this summer, seeking input from interested parties. An ANPR is

the beginning of the regulatory process. After consideration of input

generated by the ANPR, the FDA will likely issue a notice of proposed

rulemaking,

setting forth a specific proposal for public comment. Only after that would a

new

regulation be issued. At this point, we don’t know the direction the FDA will

take. The agency could simply reclassify amalgam as a Class 2 material,

adding special controls to its use, such as a mandatory brochure or even limited

warnings, or classify it as a Class 3 material, which could result in a ban. We

don’t expect the latter. We’re closely monitoring these developments and of

course will offer appropriate advocacy comments and develop strategies for

addressing the ANPR. We’ll also keep you updated as this process plays out.â€

 

Access the FACT website here.

http://promed.gordonresearch.com/factforum/welcome.html

 

 

 

To / :  chrisgupta

List information is at: http://tinyurl.com/2xohw

ARCHIVES: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/archives.htm

Share The Wealth: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/

Communication Agents: http://www.communicationagents.com/

Council Member: Friends of Freedom - http://www.friendsoffreedom.org