Guest guest Posted March 23, 2007 Report Share Posted March 23, 2007 IDAHO STATE LEGISLATURE FIRST TO OPPOSE NORTH AMERICAN UNION WE MUST HAMMER ALL STATE LEGISLATURES! NO NORTH AMERICAN UNION---- RESIST THE NEW WORLD ORDER---- NO NAFTA SUPERHIGHWAY!!!NO CODEX!! From the desk of John Hammell, HISTORY MADE TODAY IN BATTLE TO STOP CODEX- IDAHO BECOMES FIRST STATE TO OPPOSE N.AMERICAN UNION With the FDA totally ignoring myFreedom of Information Act request, and Congress totally ignoring ourpetition calling for oversight on the FDA's Trilateral CooperationCharter http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/373269232#body , its time to shift gears and send amessage to Bush, Congress, and the media via anew direction: through the State Legislatures as IDAHO has just done today(!!) Idaho's legislature is the firstto pass a resolution which opposes the Security and Prosperity Partnershipof North America, the North American Union, and the NAFTA Superhighway.(Lets get states to add in language opposing the FDA's Trilateral Cooperation Charter, we can do this!!) 14 States have introduced legislationin either their House or Senate that calls for removing the USA from further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of NorthAmerica and opposes the North American Union, but history was made today when IDAHO became the FIRST STATE to pass such legislation, we must now work very hard to get all others to follow! By passing this legislation at theState level, Idahoans have told Bush, and their US Senators andCongressmen that they prefer to continue living in America, that they oppose the Executive Branch signing treaties without any congressional oversight, that they oppose the Executive Branch (including the FDA)harmonizing our nations laws with Canada's and Mexico's behind closed doors where we can't see whats going on. They're sending a strong message that the second amendment, and all other Constitutional rights are still in effect in Idaho, and that they REFUSE to become the slaves of a bunch of multinational corporate collectivists who oppose individual rights. They've opposed the FDA's Trilateral Cooperation Charter with Canada/Mexico via this action, and so have opposed CODEX restrictions on their vitamins. We'd better follow their lead, or we're going down- HARD. Its time to awaken our friends, family and neighbors to whats going on right under our noses! No one can afford to be complacent anymore, its time toGET BUSY! WE MUST NOW PASS SIMILAR LEGISLATION IN ALL OTHER STATES- EASY INSTRUCTIONS HERE: 13 other states that have introduced such legislation in either their House, their Senate or both, and we must approach State legislators in additional states to urge introduction of the legislation there. See this site for the 13 other states that have similar legislation pending http://www.stopthenau.org/Current_Activities.htm If your state isn't one of them, google your state legislatures, write down the names and contact info for your state senators and representatives- get in touch with them and educate them on this issue! Tell them you want your state to pass legislation similar to Idaho's in order to inform Bush and your Senators and Congressman in Washington DC that you want the US to get OUT of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and that you OPPOSE the North American Union they'reforcing us into. Tell them you specifically want language added to oppose the FDA's Trilateral Cooperation Charter with Canada and Mexico because its an illegal attempt by the FDA to make an end run around the Dietary Supplement Health & Education Act of 1994. Tell them you want them to help you push for Congressional oversight in DC on this. Direct your state legislators here to see Model Legislation that they should introduce: http://www.jbs.org/campaigns/nau/ModelResolution.pdf (but have them ADD language to specifically oppose FDA's Trilateral Cooperation Charter with Canada and Mexico and to educate them on that,direct them to the IAHF petition here: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/373269232#body DETAILS ON WHAT HAPPENED IN IDAHO-LANGUAGE OF THEIR RESOLUTION Today the Idaho Senate passed,by a vote of 24 to 7, HJM005,a resolution “ Stating findings of the Legislature and urging Congress to use all efforts, energies and diligence to withdraw the United Statesfrom any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or any other bilateral or multilateral activity that seeks to advance, authorize, fund or in any way promote the creation ofany structure to create any form of North American Union.†(See resolution language below) Since the Idaho Househad already adopted HJM005 by voice vote on March 12, today’s Senate vote means that Idaho is the first state to pass an anti-NAU/SPP resolution in both houses. HJM005..............................................by REVENUE AND TAXATION SECURITY AND PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH AMERICA - Stating findings of the Legislature and urging Congress to use all efforts, energies and diligence to withdraw the United States from any further participationin the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or any other bilateral or multilateral activity that seeks to advance, authorize,fund or in any way promote the creation of any structure to create any form of North American Union. LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OFIDAHO ]]]] Fifty-ninthLegislature First Regular Session - 2007 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 5 BY REVENUE AND TAXATION COMMITTEE 1 A JOINT MEMORIAL 2 TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OFTHE UNITED STATES IN CONGRESS 3 ASSEMBLED, AND TO THE CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION REPRESENTING THE STATE OF 4 IDAHO IN THE CONGRESSOF THE UNITED STATES. 5 We, your Memorialists,the House of Representatives and the Senate of the 6 State of Idaho assembled in the First RegularSession of the Fifty-ninth Idaho 7 Legislature, do hereby respectfully representthat: 8 WHEREAS, the U.S.Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce and 9 the U.S. Department of Homeland Securityparticipated in the formation of the 10 Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America(SPP) on March 23, 2005, 11 representing a trilateral agreement between Canada, Mexico and the United 12 States designed, among other things, to facilitatecommon regulatory schemes 13 between these countries; and 14 WHEREAS, reports issuedby the SPP indicate that it has implemented regu- 15 latory changes among the three countries thatcircumvent United States trade, 16 transportation, homeland security and border securityfunctions and that it is 17 the intention of SPP to continue toward a NorthAmerican Union in the future; 18 and 19 WHEREAS, the actions taken bythe SPP to coordinate border security by 20 eliminating obstacles to migration betweenMexico and the United States actu- 21 ally makes the United States-Mexico border lesssecure and more vulnerable to 22 possible terrorist activities, and Mexico is the primary source country of 23 illegal immigrants, illegal drug entry and illegalhuman smuggling into the 24 United States; and 25 WHEREAS, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the United States 26 trade deficits with Mexico and Canada havesignificantly increased since the 27 implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the 28 volume of imports from Mexico has soared since NAFTA, straining security 29 checks at the U.S. border; and 30 WHEREAS, the economic and physical security of the UnitedStates is 31 impaired by the potential loss of control of itsborders attendant to the full 32 operation of NAFTA and the SPP; and 33 WHEREAS, the regulatory andborder security changes implemented and pro- 34 posed by the SPP violate and threaten United Statessovereignty; and 35 WHEREAS, the NAFTA Superhighway System from the west coast ofMexico 36 through the United States and into Canada hasbeen suggested as part of a 37 North American Union to facilitate trade between theSPP countries; and 38 WHEREAS, the stabilityand economic viability of the U.S. ports along the 39 western coast will be seriously compromised by huge cargos off-loaded at 40 cheaper labor cost from foreign traders intothe ports of Mazatlan and Lazaro 41 Cardenas; and 42 WHEREAS, the state of Texashas already approved and begun planning of the 43 Trans-Texas Corridor, a major multi-modaltransportation project beginning at 44 the United States-Mexico border,which would serve as an initial section of 2 1 the NAFTA Superhighway System; and 2 WHEREAS, plans of Asian trading powers to divert cargo from U.S. ports 3 such as Los Angeles to ports in Mexico will only put pressure on border 4 inspectors, interfering with their already overwhelming job of intercepting 5 the flow of drugs and illegals flowing into this country; and 6 WHEREAS, future unrestricted foreign trucking into the United States can 7 pose a safety hazard due to inadequate maintenance and inspection, and the 8 Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) lack of background checks for 9 violations in Mexico, lack of drug and alcohol testing, lack of enforcement of 10 size and weight requirements and lack of national security procedures, which 11 threaten the American people and undermine the very charge given to our 12 homeland security agency to defend our borders against these threats; and 13 WHEREAS, the Eisenhower National Highway System was designed for the 14 national security of the United States formovement of the military, purposes 15 of commerce from state to state, not from foreign countries, and this highway 16 system should not be compromised by treaties or agreements with other coun- 17 tries that would supplant the control and managementof our nation's highways 18 by our U.S. Department of Transportation and the various states; and 19 WHEREAS, we strongly object to any treaty or agreement, which threatens to 20 violate national security, private property, United States commerce, constitu- 21 tional rights and American sovereignty and emphasize our commitment to the 22 Pacific Northwest Economic Region (PNWER) and other cooperative working 23 nations in mutual beneficial goals; and 24 WHEREAS, this trilateralpartnership to develop a North American Union has 25 never been presented to Congress as an agreement or treaty, and has had virtu- 26 ally no congressional oversight; and 27 WHEREAS, recent reports on internet news, Friday, January 26, 2007, 28 WorldNetDaily, stating that Congressman Poe(R-Texas) asked about the U.S. 29 Department of Transportation's work with the trade group North American Super- 30 Corridor Coalition, Inc. (NASCO) and the department's plans to build the 31 Trans-Texas Corridor, Congressman Poe was told that the NAFTA agreement super- 32 highway corridor plans exist to move goods from Mexico through the United 33 States to Canada; and 34 WHEREAS, American citizens and state and local governments throughout the 35 United States would be negatively impacted by the SPP process. 36 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of the First Regular Session 37 of the Fifty-ninth Idaho Legislature, the House of Representatives and the 38 Senate concurring therein, that we emphatically urge and petition the Congress 39 of the United States and particularly the congressional delegation represent- 40 ing the state of Idaho to use all efforts, energies and diligence to withdraw 41 the United States from any further participation in the Security and Prosper- 42 ity Partnership of North America or any otherbilateral or multilateral activ- 43 ity that seeks to advance, authorize, fund or in anyway promote the creation 44 of any structure to create any form of North American Union. 45 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that House Concurrent Resolution 40 of the First 46 Session of the 110th Congress addresses the concern herein expressed by the 47 state of Idaho. 48 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we are asking our congressional delegation, 49 our U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters and President 50 Bush to reject appropriated federal fuel tax dollars for such SPP or NAFTA 51 when there is such a need for fuel tax dollars to be dedicated to the needs of 52 the states in the U.S. in order to maintain our highway system. 53 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chief Clerk of the House of Representa- 54 tives be, and she is hereby authorized and directed to forward a copy of this 55 Memorial to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Repre- 3 1 sentatives of Congress, and the congressional delegation representing the 2 State of Idaho in the Congress of the United States. Statement of Purpose / Fiscal Impact STATEMENT OF PURPOSE RS17145 The purpose of this legislation is to send the message tothe Congressof the United States, and particularly thecongressional delegation representing the State of Idaho that theFirst Regular Session of theFifty-ninth Idaho Legislature, the Senate and the House of Representatives concurring therein, that the Congress of the United States, and particularly the congressional delegation representing the State of Idaho,are hereby urged and petitioned to use all of their efforts to withdraw the United States from any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and anyother bilateral or multilateral activity which seeks to advance, authorize, fund or in any way promote the creation of any structure to accomplish any form of North American Union. FISCAL NOTE None CONTACT:Name: Representative JoAn Wood Phone: 208-332-1000 Representative Cliff Bayer Representative MarvHagedorn Senator Shirley McKague Senator Monte Pierce Senator Mel Richardson For Health Freedom, John C. Hammell, PresidentInternational Advocates for Health Freedom 556 Boundary Bay Road Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA http://www.iahf.com jham 800-333-2553 N.America 360-945-0352 World Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.