Guest guest Posted March 10, 2007 Report Share Posted March 10, 2007 As many of you have read, the Journal of the American medical Association recently published an article describing a meta-study which ostensibly shows that supplementing with antioxidants is a bad thing. The Council for Responsible Nutrition (CNR) has posted an informative rebuttal here: http://www.crnusa.org/PR07_JAMA_antioxidant_metaanalysis_022707.html Suffice to say JAMA sould know better than publish such tendentious articles. Why is bad science so widely reported and good science so underreported? Randy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.