Guest guest Posted February 3, 2007 Report Share Posted February 3, 2007 What sort of testing was done do you suppose? Could vaccine have that AIDS characteristic--that is being ethno-specific? Who were test subjects? NOW we're getting to the real nitty-gritty of population control with government forced chemicals on ALL potential mothers. Has Merck management developed a 'Chutzpah' pill for use by their head criminals; I'd have thought on the heels of VIOXX murders, they'd have elected to go for a little lower profile. $360 per jabbing. Could any government subsidy be in the cards? These guys are RELENTLESS--- Wonder if Rumsfeld or Krongard or any FDA officials are heavily invested in their stock? Is a bear Catholic? Are you mad yet? See below, Alan Cantwell's connenction between george Merck HEPATITIS B VACCINE + AIDS. ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION (AHRP) Promoting Openness, Full Disclosure, and Accountability http://www.ahrp.org and http://ahrp.blogspot.com FYI The Associated Press reports that Merck--the company responsible for the tens of thousands of preventable heart attacks and deaths due to its failure to disclose the cardiac risk of its now outlawed drug, Vioxx--is now bankrolling efforts to pass state laws REQUIRING girls as young as 11 to be vaccinated with its new vaccine, Gardasil, for the possible prevention of cervical cancer in the future!! What is worse than appalling is that Merck has not only hired lobbyists to push for legislation that tramples on parental rights and responsibilities, the company has also funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country. It is estimated that Merck could generate at least $1 billion in sales per year--at $360 for the three-shot regimen. Billions more IF Gardasil were made mandatory across the country. If we've learned nothing else these last few years, it is that the worst adverse effects of a new medicine--drug or vaccine--are not evident when first marketed. So aside from issues of parental rights colliding with industry-friendly government policies, the vaccine has not proven itself safe and effective in the marketplace. Does anyone remember hormone replacement and its broken promise? Unlesss Merck and the government sign written guarantees that they will assume all responsiblity for any and all adverse effects that may occur after being exposed to the vaccine, Gardasil, it is downright reckless and irresponsible to adopt any MANDATORYpolicy. Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav 212-595-8974 veracare http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=180060 & format=text Associated Press Merck lobbies states to require cervical-cancer vaccine for schoolgirls Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - AUSTIN, Texas - Merck & Co. is helping bankroll efforts to pass state laws requiring girls as young as 11 or 12 to receive the drugmaker's new vaccine against the sexually transmitted cervical-cancer virus. Some conservatives and parents'-rights groups say such a requirement would encourage premarital sex and interfere with the way they raise their children, and they say Merck's push for such laws is underhanded. But the company said its lobbying efforts have been above-board. With at least 18 states debating whether to require Merck's Gardasil vaccine for schoolgirls, Merck has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country. A top official from Merck's vaccine division sits on Women in Government's business council, and many of the bills around the country have been introduced by members of Women in Government. " Cervical cancer is of particular interest to our members because it represents the first opportunity that we have to actually eliminate a cancer, " Women in Government President Susan Crosby said. Gardasil, approved by the federal government in June, protects girls and women against strains of the human papillomavirus, or HPV, that are responsible for most cases of cervical cancer. A government advisory panel has recommended that all girls get the shots at 11 and 12, before they are likely to be sexually active. But no state has yet to add Gardasil to the list of vaccinations youngsters must have under law to be enrolled in school. Merck spokeswoman Janet Skidmore would not say how much the company is spending on lobbyists or how much it has donated to Women in Government. Crosby also declined to specify how much the drug company gave. But Skidmore said: " We disclosed the fact that we provide funding to this organization. We're not in any way trying to obscure that. " The New Jersey-based drug company could generate billions in sales if Gardasil _ at $360 for the three-shot regimen _ were made mandatory across the country. Most insurance companies now cover the vaccine, which has been shown to have no serious side effects. Cathie Adams, president of the conservative watchdog group Texas Eagle Forum, said the relationship between Merck and Women in Government is too cozy. " What it does is benefit the pharmaceutical companies, and I don't want pharmaceutical companies taking precedence over the authorities of parents, " she said. Adams said Merck's method of lobbying quietly through groups like Women in Government in addition to meeting directly with legislators are common in state government but still should raise eyebrows. " It's corrupt as far as I'm concerned, " she said. A mandatory vaccine against a sexually transmitted disease could be a tough sell in the Lone Star State and other conservative strongholds, where schools preach abstinence and parents' rights are sacrosanct. But Merck has doubled its spending on lobbyists in Texas this year, to between $150,000 and $250,000, as lawmakers consider the vaccine bill for girls entering the sixth grade. Also, the drugmaker has hired one of the state's most powerful lobbyists, Mike Toomey, who once served as Republican Gov. Rick Perry's chief of staff and can influence conservatives who see him as one of their own. " What we support are approaches that achieve high immunization rates, " said Skidmore, the Merck spokeswoman. " We're talking about cervical cancer here, the second-leading cancer among women worldwide. " The legislation already has the enthusiastic support of the conservative governor. " I look at this no different than vaccinating our children for polio, " Perry said. " If there are diseases in our society that are going to cost us large amounts of money, it just makes good economic sense, not to mention the health and well being of these individuals to have those vaccines available. " Proposals for mandates have popped up from California to Connecticut since the first piece of legislation was introduced in September in Michigan. Michigan's bill was narrowly defeated last month. Lawmakers said the requirement would intrude on families' privacy, even though, as in most states' proposals, parents could opt out. Even with such opt-out provisions, mandates take away parents' rights to make medical decisions for their children, said Linda Klepacki of the Colorado-based evangelical organization Focus on the Family. The group contends the vaccine should be available for parents who want it, but not forced on those who don't. But Texas Rep. Jessica Farrar said her proposal is aimed at protecting children whose parents are less informed about or less interested in preventive care. " Not everybody has equal sets of parents, " said Farrar, a Houston Democrat who had precancerous cells removed from her cervix several years ago. " I think this is a public health issue and to not want to eradicate cervical cancer is irresponsible. " Drug-industry analyst Steve Brozak of W.B.B. Securities has projected Gardasil sales of at least $1 billion per year _ and billions more if states start requiring the vaccine. " I could not think of a bigger boost, " he said. C Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. Alan Cantwell <alancantwell wrote: Alan Cantwell <alancantwell Re: All 11- and 12-year-old girls would get MANDATORY shots against cervical cancer.? Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:59:12 -0700 Bob Dunbar <robertaldermandunbar Remember it was Merck (long history of biowarfare connections between George Merck, the founder -- headed b/w research under Roosevelt in WW2) -- Merck made the experimental hepatitis B vaccine injected into gays THAT IMMEDIATELY PRECEEDED THE OUTBREAK OF 'GAY PLAGUE' = AIDS IN NYC Gay men. Results 1 - 10 of about 2,130,000 English pages for HEPATITIS B VACCINE + AIDS. (0.09 seconds) Hepatitis B vaccine experiment Hepatitis B vaccine experiment & AIDS Hepatitis vaccination. " There is no question that HIV was introduced into the US male homosexual population via the ... www.whale.to/v/hepb1.html - 5k - Cached - Similar pages On Jul 4, 2006, at 4:41 AM, Bob Dunbar wrote: >Mandated to those unfortunate enough enough to still be in public school system) What sort of testing was done do you suppose? Could vaccine have that AIDS characteristic==that is being ethno-specific? Who were test subjects? NOW we're getting to the real nitty-gritty of population control with government forced chemicals on ALL potential mothers. Has Merck management developed a 'Chutzpah' pill for use by their head criminals; I'd have thought on the heels of VIOXX murders, they'd have elected to go for a little lower profile. $360 per jabbing. Could any government subsidy be in the cards? These guys are RELENTLESS--- Wonder if Rumsfeld or Krongard or any FDA officials are heavily invested in their stock? Is a bear Catholic? Are you mad yet? UncBob Panel Wants Vaccine to Be Routine All 11- and 12-year-old girls would get shots against cervical cancer. Some conservatives oppose a mandate; states will have to decide. By Denise Gellene, Times Staff Writer June 30, 2006 Federal health experts recommended Thursday that all 11- to 12-year-old girls routinely get a newly approved cervical cancer vaccine, paving the way for private insurers and the federal government to pay for shots that could save thousands of lives in the U.S. each year. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices also said females ages 9 to 26 could receive the vaccine on the advice of their doctors. " This is a huge breakthrough for women's health, " Dr. Anne Schuchat, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said after the unanimous vote by the expert committee. The focus now moves to individual states, which must decide whether to mandate the vaccine for school attendance. Women's health experts argue that requiring the vaccine is the most effective way to combat the disease. " Unless you force people to get it, penetration is low, " said Cosette Wheeler of the University of New Mexico, who conducted clinical trials of the vaccine. But some educators and conservative groups say decisions about the vaccine should be left to parents. " We think this is a matter of parental rights and parental control, " said Peter Sprigg of the conservative Family Research Council. " Parents have the rights to make these decisions for their kids. " Called Gardasil, the vaccine blocks four types of the human papillomavirus, or HPV, two of which are believed to be responsible for 70% of the 15,000 cervical cancer cases diagnosed in the U.S. each year. Worldwide, 400,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer each year, and half die. The four types of HPV blocked by Gardasil cause 90% of genital warts. The vaccine is most effective when administered to girls before they become sexually active. According to the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 26% of girls have had intercourse by age 15. Health experts said the vaccine could go a long way toward reducing the 4,000 cervical cancer deaths that occur in the U.S. each year. Manufactured by Merck & Co., the vaccine is among the most expensive ever produced. A full three-shot series costs $360. Although private insurers and the federal Vaccines for Children program will cover the vast majority of females, Claire Hannan, director of the Assn. of Immunization Managers, said thousands still fall between the cracks. They include those whose insurance plans don't cover vaccines or have high deductibles. The federal program also does not cover people older than 18. To provide the vaccine to everyone who should get it, the states would have to pay for those who could not afford it. Dr. Leah Devlin, state health director for North Carolina and president of the Assn. of State and Territorial Health Officers, said most states did not have the money. She said the cost of providing Gardasil to all 11- and 12-year-old girls would nearly double her state's vaccine budget, which already had trouble paying for required vaccines. The federal committee's recommendation will become policy if it is accepted by the CDC, which normally follows the recommendations of its advisory panel. The CDC's approval is expected in a matter of weeks. Two national health insurers, Aetna and WellPoint, the parent of Blue Cross of California, said they would follow the committee's recommendations and begin reimbursing for the vaccine immediately. Cost isn't the only obstacle to widespread adoption of the vaccine. In California, for example, legislation is required to mandate a shot. Conservative groups have opposed requiring the vaccine, saying it might send young girls an implicit message condoning sex before marriage. Some school officials also objected, noting that only three vaccines — those against polio, diphtheria and measles — were required in all 50 states. " This is not a communicable disease that would keep kids out of school like mumps or rubella, " said Gerald Tirozzi, executive director of the National Assn. of Secondary School Principals, whose members include middle school and high school administrators. " To make this a condition to enter school — I think parents would become very upset, and many would see this as a signal to their daughters that they can become sexually active, " Tirozzi said. " I think there would be a lot of push-back. " http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-sci-vaccine30jun30,1,3106960.s\ tory?ctrack=1 & cset=true Click to join Avian2005 http://health.Avian2005/ ( " mandated " to those unfortunate enough to still be in public school > system) > > What sort of testing was done do you suppose? Could vaccine have > that AIDS characteristic==that is being ethno-specific? Who were test > subjects? NOW we're getting to the real nitty-gritty of population > control with government forced chemicals on ALL potential mothers. > Has Merck management developed a 'Chutzpah' pill for use by > their head criminals; I'd have thought on the heels of VIOXX murders, > they'd have elected to go for a little lower profile. $360 per > jabbing. Could any government subsidy be in the cards? These guys are > RELENTLESS--- Wonder if Rumsfeld or Krongard or any FDA officials are > heavily invested in their stock? Is a bear Catholic? Are you mad > yet? UncBob Alan Cantwell M.D. alancantwell http://www.ariesrisingpress.com FOUR WOMEN AGAINST CANCER: Bacteria, Cancer and the Origin of Life Re: All 11- and 12-year-old girls would get MANDATORY shots against cervical cancer.? Gardasil: FDA Promotes Merck Cancer Vaccine by CONSPIRACY PLANET Despite the bad publicity regarding Merck's deadly Vioxx painkiller which allegedly causes heart attacks, claimed in 13,000 lawsuits against Merck, the FDA has approved Merck's Gardasil vaccine, which allegedly prevents cervical cancer, adding it to a list of recommended shots for girls ages 11 and 12. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has also advised the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)that girls as young as 9 years old be vaccinated. Gardasil was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)as a counter-measure against Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) which causes cervical cancer and genital warts. Like previous FDA frauds, the intent is to eventually make the vaccine mandatory reaping the greatest revenue for Merck from government mandated regulations. The FDA's rationale is that Gardasil is most effective for young girls before they become sexually active.That expands the market even more. The question remains --how much did Merck pay the FDA officials who approved the vaccine? Or were they just promised an executive position once they leave the stately halls of government? And what compensation did Merck give to the Committee members who made the " recommendation " ? Gardasil is not cheap -- $360 for a series of three shots. More Other Top Stories Gardasil: FDA Promotes Merck Cancer Vaccine by CONSPIRACY PLANET The Vaccine Magic Conspiracy: The Grand Finale by DR. LEONARD G. HOROWITZ Vaccine Fraud: Thimerosal - ADD -Autism Connection by EVELYN PRINGLE GOP Congress Wants to Mandate Toxic Vaccines by EVELYN PRINGLE BioWarfare Via Vaccinations: Hasta La Vista, Baby by ORLINGRABBE.COM Pentagon: Killing Soldiers with Anthrax Vaccine by JEFF DONALDSON (LAS VEGAS SUN) It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Toolbar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.