Guest guest Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 There is No Autism Epidemic By David Kirby, author of Evidence of Harm on the Huffington Post Blog site. http://tinyurl.com/yhf8ya It's been nearly two years since the release of my book, " Evidence of Harm, Mercury in Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic - A Medical Controversy, " and I continue to be vilified by critics who insist that mercury does not cause autism, that autism is a stable genetic condition, and that it cannot be an " epidemic. " I am going to declare a New Year's truce, and announce that my critics are 100 percent correct. This year, I hope we can ALL agree on one thing: There is no autism epidemic. Among my most spirited and articulate detractors is a group of adults with autism who belong to a movement that refers to itself as the " neurodiversity " community. These adults argue passionately that autism is neither a disease nor a disorder, but rather a natural and special variation of the chance genetic imprint left upon human behavior. Most of them, I believe, have what science calls " Asperger's Syndrome, " or very high functioning autism. From their eloquent and well reasoned point of view, autism has no " cause, " and it certainly requires no " cure. " To suggest otherwise is to brand these adults with the stigma of disease and disability, which is patently absurd given their educational and intellectual achievements. It's like saying that left-handers or gays are deviant and need treatment - something that reasonable people stopped doing years ago. So maybe autism really is just an odd genetic peculiarity that yields atypical people whose own set of talents and gifts can lead to perfectly happy and fulfilled lives, with little or no dependence on others for their survival. If that's the case, then autism has always been with us at some steady, but largely overlooked rate. Growing awareness and better diagnostics have certainly helped us identify and count more people with the condition, who might have been mislabeled as " quirky " or " nerdy " a decade ago. But if that's autism, then the kids that I have met suffer from some other condition entirely. When I talk about " curing " autism, I am not talking about curing the " neurodiverse. " I am talking about kids who begin talking and then, suddenly, never say another word. I'm talking about kids who may never learn to read, write, tie their shoes or fall in love. I'm talking about kids who sometimes wail in torture at three in the morning because something inside them hurts like a burning coal, but they can't say what or where it is. I'm talking about kids who can barely keep food in their inflamed, distressed guts, and when they do, it winds up in rivers of diarrhea or swirls of feces spread on a favorite carpet or pet (no one said this kind of " autism " was pretty). I'm talking about kids who escape from their home in a blaze of alarms, only to be found hours later, freezing, alone and wandering the Interstate. I'm talking about kids who have bitten their mother so hard and so often, they are on a first name basis at the emergency room. I'm talking about kids who spin like fireworks until they fall and crack their heads, kids who will play with a pencil but not with their sister, kids who stare at nothing and scream at everything and don't even realize it when their dad comes home from work. These are the kids I want to see cured. And I don't believe they have " autism. " Scientists tell us that 1-in-104 American boys are currently diagnosed with some form of autism spectrum disorder. But the mildest, " high functioning " forms of autism have seemingly little in common with the most severe or even moderate cases. My hunch (and yes, that is all it is) is that most of these kids do not have " autism " at all, and it's probably time we started calling it something else. American kids are in huge trouble. One in six has a learning disability. Asthma, diabetes, allergies and arthritis are ravaging their bodies in growing numbers. And little of this is due to " better diagnostics " or " greater awareness. " It can only be attributed to radical changes in our environment over the last 10-20 years. There is something, or more likely some things in our modern air, water, food and drugs that are making genetically susceptible children sick, and we need to find out what they are. Mercury remains a logical candidate for contributing to " autism spectrum disorders, " either alone or in combination with other environmental insults. Mercury exposure can kill brain cells. It can cause loss of speech and eye contact, digestive and immune dysfunction, social withdrawal and anxiety, and repetitive and self-injurious behaviors. So maybe we should leave the autistics in peace and focus on these environmentally toxic kids and what it is that ails them. Maybe what these kids have is not autism, but something like, say, " Environmentally-acquired Neuroimmune Disorder, " which we could call E.N.D. (Great slogan: " Let's End E.N.D.). Maybe that would explain why a recent CDC-funded study of the San Francisco Bay Area showed that kids with " autism " were 50% more likely to be born in neighborhoods with high levels of airborne toxins, especially mercury. If a second study underway in Baltimore yields similar data, it will be that much harder to defend the " better diagnosis " argument, (other studies have shown an association between autism rates and proximity to coal-fired power plants). So maybe what we have here is just a semantic failure to communicate. Columbus thought he had met " Indians, " and we only recently began to use the term " Native American. " Columbus was not in the Indies, mercury doesn't cause autism, and there is no autism epidemic. EVIDENCE OF HARM DISCUSSION LIST HEATS UP AS MERCURY LINK TO AUTISM QUESTION SPREADS >> PAPERBACK BOOK NOW OUT - CHECK AMAZON.COM An Evidence of Harm email discussion list has been created in response to the growing interest in the book and the issues it chronicles. Now over 1,470 rs. Here is how to (no cost): EOHarm- " The doctor of the future will give no medicine, but will interest his patients in the care of the human frame, in diet and in the cause and prevention of disease. " - Thomas Edison Don't be flakey. Get Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2007 Report Share Posted January 16, 2007 I cannot say I do not belive Autism is not caused from vaccines. My 12 year old boy was perfectly normal up to the point he got his 6-month shots. He stopped smiling, saying ma ma and da da. He stopped playing with his toys on the floor. He stopped getting into a kneeling postion. I choose not to vaccinate my 2nd son he is now 20 months old and he is totally different than my first. He is actually way ahead of his development. Yes, we all have opinions, but deep in my heart I know my older son's 6-month shots did something to him. He is now labled PDD. Rose Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2007 Report Share Posted January 17, 2007 I recently nursed a 12 yo child with " gangliosidosis " when I met his father and sister I asked if the child was OK before his infant vaccination shots & was told yes he was OK but " they said it was not the vaccinations - it was gangliosidosis " which showed the child was born apparently OK - but has been nursed UNCONSCIOUS by his doting parents ever since - funny that the government pays for everything tho - don't you think? Jane >My 12 year old boy was perfectly normal up to the point he got his 6-month >shots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2007 Report Share Posted January 17, 2007 Saying that there is no autism epidemic when 1000% more kids were diagnosed with autism in California in the past 10 years is like saying there is no global warming, it's just a climate change. Many people choose to stick their heads in the sand and repeat 'status quo' rhetoric of the corpoations that are making billions off the misery of these children and their families. How could hand flapping, non-verbal, poopsmearing children with no eye contact, and severe gut problems have been missed all these years. The correct term for these children is vaccine poisoned kids. This is the real crust of the matter, if we say there this no autism epidemic, it's better diagnosing, then we don't have to hold pharmaceutical companies responsible for mass mercury and viral poisoning of our kids. Just my .0002cents worth of opinion! Nagla > > I cannot say I do not belive Autism is not caused from vaccines. My 12 year old boy was perfectly normal up to the point he got his 6- month shots. He stopped smiling, saying ma ma and da da. He stopped playing with his toys on the floor. He stopped getting into a kneeling postion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 When I started reading the essayby Kirby, I thought the essay was written by a madman. But as I continued to read, I realized he was being sarcastic. Kirby has a strong position which elicits strong responses in people. Some people who are classified as high functioning autistic (Asperger's) have no desire to be " cured " . I am certainly in agreement. I am probably Asperger's (never been diagnosed) and have zero desire for my mental quirkiness to be medicated away. Kirby then goes on to explain his initial statements in the ending paragraphs. > So maybe we should leave the autistics in peace and focus on these > environmentally toxic kids and what it is that ails them. > Maybe what these kids have is not autism, but something like, say, > " Environmentally-acquired Neuroimmune Disorder, " which we could call E. > N.D. (Great slogan: " Let's End E.N.D.). > Maybe that would explain why a recent CDC-funded study of the San > Francisco Bay Area showed that kids with " autism " were 50% more likely > to be born in neighborhoods with high levels of airborne toxins, > especially mercury. If a second study underway in Baltimore yields > similar data, it will be that much harder to defend the " better > diagnosis " argument, (other studies have shown an association between > autism rates and proximity to coal-fired power plants). > So maybe what we have here is just a semantic failure to communicate. > Columbus thought he had met " Indians, " and we only recently began to > use the term " Native American. " > Columbus was not in the Indies, mercury doesn't cause autism, and there > is no autism epidemic. I concur with Kirby on all points. Envionmental toxins are poisoning us and our kids. The toxification must be ended. I would also like all drug company researchers and officials who hide research findings on the dangers of the drugs they push be tried for first degree murder and international war crimes. Alobar On 1/17/07, asccnagla <nagla_alvin wrote: > Saying that there is no autism epidemic when 1000% more kids were > diagnosed with autism in California in the past 10 years is like > saying there is no global warming, it's just a climate change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 One of the reasons I posted this was that - THIS is Exactly what happened to the baby that my niece babysat. This child had a history of adverse reactions to vaccines and had lots of problems with his colon..... With holistic treatment, had just gotten several of those previous complications cleared, and then they got a second dose of vaccines and within a week died exactly like this. But, Does 2 + 2 = 4? No, it must be someone's brief whiff of cigarette smoke? IF people who smoked for years - died like this... they might have a leg to stand on, but not when that is not a factor. They refuse to see the evidence of the many instances of this occurring with vaccine injections. Gloucestershire Echo WHY DID OUR BABY DIE? Be the first reader to comment on this story http://www.gloucestershireecho.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=139331 & command=displ\ ayContent & sourceNode=139314 & contentPK=16402143 & moduleName=InternalSearch & formnam\ e=filtersearch10:30 - 15 January 2007 A Heartbroken couple want to know why their baby died.An inquest foundDan Curtis and Carrie Hick's two-month-old daughter Charlotte died of cotdeath.A pathologist said the only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 Alobar, David Kirby has a great book out called 'Evidence of Harm'. It is all about mercury poisoning in children with autism. He has made an eloquent case for vaccines causing this mercury poisoning in his book. He is one of my heroes for speaking out. Nagla , Alobar <Alobar wrote: > > When I started reading the essayby Kirby, I thought the essay was > written by a madman. But as I continued to read, I realized he was > being sarcastic. Kirby has a strong position which elicits strong > responses in people. Some people who are classified as high > functioning autistic (Asperger's) have no desire to be " cured " . I am > certainly in agreement. I am probably Asperger's (never been > diagnosed) and have zero desire for my mental quirkiness to be > medicated away. Kirby then goes on to explain his initial statements > in the ending paragraphs. > > > So maybe we should leave the autistics in peace and focus on these > > environmentally toxic kids and what it is that ails them. > > > Maybe what these kids have is not autism, but something like, say, > > " Environmentally-acquired Neuroimmune Disorder, " which we could call E. > > N.D. (Great slogan: " Let's End E.N.D.). > > > Maybe that would explain why a recent CDC-funded study of the San > > Francisco Bay Area showed that kids with " autism " were 50% more likely > > to be born in neighborhoods with high levels of airborne toxins, > > especially mercury. If a second study underway in Baltimore yields > > similar data, it will be that much harder to defend the " better > > diagnosis " argument, (other studies have shown an association between > > autism rates and proximity to coal-fired power plants). > > > So maybe what we have here is just a semantic failure to communicate. > > Columbus thought he had met " Indians, " and we only recently began to > > use the term " Native American. " > > > Columbus was not in the Indies, mercury doesn't cause autism, and there > > is no autism epidemic. > > I concur with Kirby on all points. Envionmental toxins are poisoning > us and our kids. The toxification must be ended. I would also like > all drug company researchers and officials who hide research findings > on the dangers of the drugs they push be tried for first degree murder > and international war crimes. > > Alobar > > On 1/17/07, asccnagla <nagla_alvin wrote: > > Saying that there is no autism epidemic when 1000% more kids were > > diagnosed with autism in California in the past 10 years is like > > saying there is no global warming, it's just a climate change. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 My son had bad reactions to his vaccines, he developed a very high fever, big red lump on his leg at the vaccine site, and febrile seizures, later on he developed other kind of seizures, by the time he had his MMR vaccine, he developed chronic diahrea, lost all his language and started behaving oddly, lost interest in people, wouldn't answer to his name any more and so on, then he was diagnosed with autism. His autism was a physical as well as neurological illness, his gut hurt, he had loose stools, seizures. We're not talking just quircky, we're talking really sick kids. If quirickness was the only manifestation of autism, then yes, sure it's just a difference in people's characters, not a big problem. It's much more than that, it's very sick kids that need treatment. Nagla , " Ruby " <ruby wrote: > > One of the reasons I posted this was that - THIS is Exactly what happened to > the baby that my niece babysat. This child had a history of adverse > reactions to vaccines and had lots of problems with his colon..... With > holistic treatment, had just gotten several of those previous complications > cleared, and then they got a second dose of vaccines and within a week died > exactly like this. > > But, Does 2 + 2 = 4? No, it must be someone's brief whiff of cigarette > smoke? > IF people who smoked for years - died like this... they might have a leg to > stand on, but not when that is not a factor. They refuse to see the evidence > of the many instances of this occurring with vaccine injections. > > Gloucestershire Echo > > WHY DID OUR BABY DIE? > Be the first reader to comment on this story > http://www.gloucestershireecho.co.uk/displayNode.jsp? nodeId=139331 & command=displayContent & sourceNode=139314 & contentPK=16402 143 & moduleName=InternalSearch & formname=filtersearch10:30 - 15 January 2007 A Heartbroken couple want to know why their baby died.An inquest foundDan Curtis and Carrie Hick's two-month-old daughter Charlotte died of cotdeath.A pathologist said the only > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.