Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Thoughts on Toxicity and the Power Steer

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Thoughts on Toxicity and the Power Steer

JoAnn Guest

Nov 17, 2006 19:08 PST

--

Thoughts on Toxicity and the Power Steer

Paul Goettlich 14apr02

Power Steer

MICHAEL POLLAN

http://www.mindfully.org/Food/Meat-Eating-PWG14apr02.htm

 

Michael Pollan's NY Times article " The Power Steer " is about raising

steer. It's main theme is the over-use of antibiotics. (follow link

in

box) It does indeed make eating beef seem quite nasty. The use of

antibiotics for nonmedical uses in the USA is the status quo. But

that's

not the only toxic threat from eating beef or drinking cow's milk.

 

Organic beef is an alternative, and I know a farmer in MI that has

an

organic beef farm. I have been on his farm many times and used to

buy

from him when I lived in the Midwest. After learning more about how

they

raise the animals on inhumane mega-farms and feedlots, my taste for

it

has tapered off. The only time I eat it now is that rare occasion

when I

am faced with travel food . . . aka road-kill, as I call it.

 

According to Dr. Arnold Schecter at the University of Texas School

of

Public Health at Houston, Americans are getting 22 times the maximum

dioxin exposure suggested by the U.S. EPA.

 

And nursing infants are getting 35 to 65 times the recommended

dosage,

as if any dioxin at all can be recommended. The main causes are meat

and

dairy products. Beef is a major source of dioxin in the diets of

humans.

(see table 2 below)

 

Because steer and cows live a relatively long life, in comparison

to,

say, chickens, they accumulate a substantial amount of dioxin in

their

fat.

 

Dioxin is lipophilic, meaning it seeks fat. It accumulates faster

than

it is ridded from the animal's body. The same is true for humans.

 

Because humans are at the top of the food chain, we get the full

benefit, if one can use that term, of dioxin through

bioaccumulation.

The embryo and suckling infant receive an even larger dose because

of

the accumulation of a lifetime of dioxin by the mother and father.

 

Dioxin gets into the beef by way of grass and/or livestock feeds.

Looking at feeds, a lot of contamination occurs through a variety of

sources, both intentional and accidental. It falls on the grass from

the

sky after chlorine-containing products are burned in incinerators,

back-yard ash burning in barrels, accidental fires, and chemical

processes such as the production of PVC plastic. Dioxin is the

by-product of burning chlorine in the presence of oxygen with a

catalyst. The process is known as oxychlorination.

 

A chief source of dioxin in the air and water is the production and

disposal of PVC (polyvinyl chloride) plastic. Note the chloride in

PVC.

Other chloride-containing products include the typical paper used by

most people--paper used for writing, copying, wiping your bum,

bleaching

clothes, swimming pools. The list is quite large. It could also be

created when bleached clothes are dried using heat, as is typically

done

in the US because energy is still extremely cheap.

 

Dr. Hillary Carpenter, a toxicologist with the Minnesota Department

of

Health is studying recently discovered dioxin in livestock feed

ingredients from Quali Tech, a Minnesota company. When I spoke to

him in

March, he told me that the source was kelp. We already know that

dioxin

exists in low levels in the ocean, and that it accumulates on

various

surfaces. Dr. Carpenter has only begun to study the problem. In an

AP

interview , Carpenter incorrectly stated that " [t]he dioxin levels

found

in the feed supplements made at Chaska-based were so low, especially

after they were diluted in feed, that they wouldn't pose a health

hazard

to people. Comments such as his are a good reason why the public is

clueless with regards to dioxin. But this is a typical comment by a

toxicologist. I once had lunch with a group of prominent

toxicologists

in Chicago at an EPA workshop on dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD). I was

appalled

at the datedness of their knowledge.

 

As a side note, if clothes are dried naturally on a wooden rack, the

use

of dryer softener sheets is also avoided. The chemicals that impart

the

anti-static quality in the dryer sheets is highly toxic. The scents

used

in them are also toxic. When combined with the scents of the typical

detergent, the effect for some can be the cause of severe physical

reactions. I am one of those people who reacts strongly to scents.

Any

and almost all scents cause an allergic reaction that can last a

day. My

breathing becomes heavy because my larynx becomes constricted.

 

Back to chlorine for a moment. Chlorine production in the US is also

quite large, and it requires a substantial amount of energy. It is

made

by send an electrical charge through brine, aka salt water, sodium

chloride plus H2O. Take a look at the 1953 Life magazine

article " The

Reign of Chemistry " in Life 5jan53. In it there is a photo of

chlorine

production by Monsanto, noted as the WORLD'S LARGEST single chlorine

plant is operated by Monsanto for US at Muscle Shoals, AL.

Electrodes

extract chlorine from brine. It is a highly toxic and energy

intensive

industry.

 

Most of the chlorine goes into making PVC. In 1998, the world

production

capacity of PVC equaled 27,000,000 tons. It is impossible to make

PVC

without creating dioxin. The industry has known this for decades, as

well as the fact that it is a potent carcinogen and endocrine

disruptor,

meaning it mimics the hormones of our bodies.

 

In fact, it mimics ever hormone in the human body, and it is active

in

the single-digit parts/per/trillion range. One ppt can be

represented by

one drop of water in 660 rail tank cars, or a train six miles long!

I

know one researcher, mentioned in Our Stolen Future, that has told

me

that it is active down to 1/10 ppt. The 6-mile train just grew to 60

miles with one drop in it. He has not published this yet, but the

interesting thing about his study is that this level of 1/10 ppt is

not

the threshold (the lowest level at which it is hormonally active).

 

Think of all the PVC in our lives. The 27 million tons of it

produced

each year makes lots of stuff. Building materials such as roofing,

flooring, windows, piping, wall coverings, electrical wiring,

swimming

pool liners, and lots of the furniture that goes inside those

buildings

as well; Children's toys and clothing; Hospitals use a significant

amount of PVC as IV bags, tubing, sheeting, kidney dialysis machine

parts and tubing, disposable eating utensils, plates, cups, and on

and

on, ad infinitum.

 

PVC is NOT recycled. Less than .002% is recycled. The industry

definition of recycling includes incineration, so this figure is

next to

meaningless. Waste PVC products are incinerated, landfilled, and/or

shipped off to less developed nations such as India. This exporting

of

our toxic waste is called environmental discrimination, and it is an

exceedingly common practice.

 

But how are we to know about this when the media white-washes and

censors the news, and our children's classrooms receive materials

fro

such industries claiming the miracles of plastic? While in a

dentist's

waiting room, I read an advertisement in a popular magazine claiming

that plastic is " The Sixth Basic Food Group, " and " Plastics. One

part of

your diet you may never break. " I wrote a page in honour of that

advertisement.

 

Most of what we learned in school was either mis- or disinformation.

The

misinformation comes from teachers who, through no fault of their

own,

are either ill informed or disinformed. Then there are the

teachers " on

a mission. " It may be for the Messiah or it may be for Monsanto. But

all

of this adds up to an ignorant public. When I write, many times I

get to

the end of an article on a new subject and I am floored by what has

appeared in words. It goes against most of what I learned and

assumed

until about eleven years ago, when I began questioning.

 

Search mindfully.org for dioxin

 

Question everything at every opportunity,

no matter who or where the audience is.

 

 

---

-----------

 

 

Table 1 - Inventory of Sources of Dioxin in the United States

 

Reference Year 1995 Central estimate

(gm TEQ/year)

 

Air:

Municipal waste incineration 1,100

Secondary copper smelting 541

Medical waste incineration 477

Forest 208

brush and straw fires

Cement kilns 153

hazardous waste burning

Coal combustion 72.8

Wood combustion 62.8

residential

Wood combustion 29.1

industrial

Vehicle fuel combustion 33.5

diesel

Cement kilns 17.8

non-hazardous waste burning

Secondary aluminum smelting 17

Oil combustion 9.3

industrial/utility

Sewage sludge incineration 6

Hazardous waste incineration 5.7

Vehicle fuel combustion - 6.3

unleaded

Kraft recovery boilers 2.3

Secondary lead smelters 1.63

Cigarette combustion 0.81

Boilers/industrial furnaces 0.38

Crematoria 0.24

Total 2,745

 

Products:

Pentachlorophenol 25,000

treated wood

Bleached chemical wood pulp 24.1

and paper mills

Dioxazine dyes and pigments 0.36

2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid 18.4

Non-incinerated municipal sludge 7

Total 25,050

 

Land:

Non-incinerated municipal sludge 207

Bleached chemical wood pulp 1.4

and paper mills

Total 208

 

Water:

Bleached chemical wood pulp 19.5

and paper mills

 

Source: USEPA (1998) The Inventory off Sources of Dioxin in the

United

States, USEPA,

Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/P-98/002Aa,

External Review Draft, April.

Table 2 - Dioxin Levels in U.S. Foods

 

Total

TEQ(pg/gram food)

Food Type (ppt)

Ground beef 1.5

Soft blue cheese 0.7

Beef rib steak 0.65

Lamb sirloin 0.4

Heavy cream 0.4

Soft cream cheese 0.3

American cheese sticks 0.3

Pork chops 0.3

Bologna 0.12

Cottage cheese 0.04

Beef rib/sirloin tip 0.04

Chicken drumstick 0.03

Haddock 0.03

Cooked ham 0.03

Perch 0.023

Cod 0.023

 

Source: Schecter, A., et al. (1994) " Congener-specific levels of

dioxins

and dibenzofurans in

U.S. food and estimated daily dioxin toxic equivalent

intake. "

Environmental Health Perspectives 102: 962-966.

http://www.mindfully.org/Food/Meat-Eating-PWG14apr02.htm

----------------------

JoAnn Guest

mrsjo-

www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Diets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...