Guest guest Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Hi all, When I was in practice in the late 70's thru 90's, I was a member of this group, and contributed a bit. It is published without any drug advertising of any kind, and as a result, is supported by membership. The articles in this publication were always interesting and showed how to solve many mental and physical problems without drugs. Big Pharma has worked hard over many years to keep this free information that competes with their drugs " off the market " . Here's how that has worked up to now, but with the web, secrets are harder to keep. The following is reprinted by permission from the Orthomolecular Medical Society. It shows clearly that " conventional MD's " , and those with closed or " bribed minds " are doing the " dirty work? of Big Pharma again. How does this work to keep non drug therapies from the public? Read on. --- * ** How to Fool All of the People All of the Time: US Taxpayers Fund Library Censorship *This article may be reprinted free of charge provided 1) that there is clear attribution to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, and 2) that both the OMNS free subscription link http://orthomolecular.org/.html <http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=48 & e=MTM4ODU= & l=-http--or\ thomolecular.org/.html> and also the OMNS archive link http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml <http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=48 & e=MTM4ODU= & l=-http--or\ thomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml> are included. ------ *FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE* *Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, January 21, 2010* How to Fool All of the People All of the Time: US Taxpayers Fund Library Censorship *(OMNS, Jan 21, 2010) At a recent emergency meeting of the World Headquarters Of Pharmaceutical Politicians, Educators, and Reporters (WHOPPER):* * " Ladies and gentlemen, we have a slight problem.* The public is beginning to complain about how the US National Library of Medicine censors nutritional research. This is embarrassing, as the last thing we want is for taxpayers to question how their tax money is spent. It is none of their damn business. But it is definitely a matter of business, big business, for WHOPPER. " Up until now, when people write to complain about journal censorship ( custserv <custserv ) , we've managed to get away with NLM sending out this form letter reply: /'The National Library of Medicine (NLM) uses a 15-person advisory committee of health professionals and librarians to recommend titles to be indexed. This committee uses guidelines, available to the public on our website, such as scientific merit, importance of the content to the scientific community, and editorial processes to assist it in making recommendations. Additional information about journal selection is available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/jsel.html <http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=48 & e=MTM4ODU= & l=-http--ww\ w.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/jsel.html> '/ " The beauty of this is that we do not have to follow the published guidelines. We control the National Library of Medicine so skillfully that we got Medline to index publications that are not medical journals at all. We are enormously proud to say that Medline indexes /Time/ magazine, /Newsweek/, /US News and World Report/, and /Consumer Reports/. But not the peer-reviewed /Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine/, continuously published for more than 40 years, nor the peer-reviewed journal /Fluoride/, also published for decades. " Yes, there are about 2,000 indexed articles on Medline/PubMed just from /Time/ magazine. Here: see for yourself what a great job we've done. Go to Medline ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed <http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=48 & e=MTM4ODU= & l=-http--ww\ w.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed> ) and do your own two-second search for " time magazine " . Then try /Newsweek/: over 1,900 Medline responses. /US News and World Report/: over 2,000 articles indexed by Medline. Medline also indexes several hundred articles from /Consumer Reports/. Check and see. It is quickest if you search Medline/PubMed by putting quotes around the magazine's name. " Medline even indexes two dozen articles from /Reader's Digest/. (search for " read dig. " ) " Isn't this terrific? " While it is embarrassingly obvious that these are not medical journals, there is nothing the public can do about it. Medline indexes what its Literature Selection Technical Review Committee tells it to. The committee's members are all appointed; none are elected. They meet behind closed doors. No public input is accepted. (1) No taxpayer can communicate with them or attend hearings, because there aren't any hearings. " Quite a system, isn't it? But hey, even Al Capone knew that a picked jury guarantees the verdict. We have a good little racket going here, and we are not about to change it for 150 million silly vitamin-pill-popping voters. They will read what we decide they should read. " Some WHOPPER members are concerned that, after this story broke on the internet, a few nutritional crackpots are writing to their Congressperson and Senators and demanding action. We understand that questions being asked include, 'Why is there journal censorship in a public library? Why the secrecy? Why is an unelected 'advisory' committee making decisions, in private, about what the public has access to on the National Library of Medicine's tax-funded Medline service? Should a select small group, an elite, control a public library in the Land of the Free?' " Now to reassure you: if you are worried about pressure from the House and the Senate, relax. The people have better things to do with their time than to really push their elected representatives for action on something as small potatoes as the First Amendment. It is true that American patriot Samuel Adams said, 'When arbitrary rulers are put over them, when government is secret, the people become alarmed.' " But don't worry. He's dead. " *References:* (1) Correspondence received from Medline: " If the (journal review) meeting were open to the public, word could circulate about a committee recommendation before a final determination was made . . . While names of review committee members are public information, NLM never discloses names of primary and secondary reviewers for specific journals. Observers could obtain that information and it could affect the openness of discussion and might result in contact with specific reviewers after the meeting. It is NLM's policy to prevent unnecessary contact with specific reviewers. " For free access to over 600 full-text papers from the /Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine/: http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/ <http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=48 & e=MTM4ODU= & l=-http--or\ thomolecular.org/library/jom/> For free access to /Fluoride's/ online journal archive: http://www.fluorideresearch.org/backissues.pdf <http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=48 & e=MTM4ODU= & l=-http--ww\ w.fluorideresearch.org/backissues.pdf> *Nutritional Medicine is Orthomolecular Medicine* Orthomolecular medicine uses safe, effective nutritional therapy to fight illness. For more information: http://www.orthomolecular.org <http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=48 & e=MTM4ODU= & l=-http--ww\ w.orthomolecular.org> The peer-reviewed Orthomolecular Medicine News Service is a non-profit and non-commercial informational resource. -- Phil Bate PhD http://drbate.com - Free Alternate Health Advice Neuroliminal Training (NT) solves allergy stress causing mental problems ADD to Autism, Insomnia to depression & more Without dangerous/addictive drugs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.