Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 YES--to the tune of 000% WE ARE LIVING IN THE MIDDLE OF A LIE. THE CDC IS FABRICATING AND SPINNING ITS OWN DATA TO CONVINCE US THAT THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE (ABOUT 36,000) ARE DYING FROM THE FLU EVERY YEAR IN THE US. WHEN ITS OWN POSTED DATA (UNDER ALL THE LIES) SHOWS THAT FLU IS ABOUT AS DEADLY AS ACCIDENTS INVOLVING TOASTERS FALLING ON PEOPLE FROM APARTMENT WINDOWS. http://www.whale.to/a/rapp.html <http://www.whale.to/a/rapp.html> CDC, Media Hype The Flu - Facts Show Different Picture <http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/11/06/cdc_media_hype_the_flu_\ facts_show_different_picture.htm> Vaccine maker Chiron had their license suspended and a year's worth of flu vaccines produced in a British factory was not approved for sale in the US - contamination problems. The media treated us to stories of seniors standing in line for hours to " get the flu shot " . What they did not say was that the flu is nowhere near as dangerous as they told us previously. Who has not... [read more <http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/11/06/cdc_media_hype_the_flu_\ facts_show_different_picture.htm> ] November 06, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/04/29/investigators_challenge_ cdc_flu_statistics_as_season_ draws_to_close.htm <http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/04/29/investigators_challenge\ _ cdc_flu_statistics_as_season_ draws_to_close.htm> " Trends in Pneumonia and Influenza/Morbidity and Mortality. " This report comes from " Research and Scientific Affairs/Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. " At the bottom of the document, the source is listed as: National Center for Health Statistics, Report of Final Mortality Statistics, 1979-2001. Get ready for some surprises, especially since the CDC keeps trumpeting flu-death annual numbers as 36,000. Like clockwork. Year in and year out. 36,000 people in the US die from the flu every year. Killer disease. Watch out. Get your flu shot. Every autumn. Don't wait. You might fall over dead in the street. I've found the preliminary data for 2002. It's at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_13.pdf <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_13.pdf> . It's in THIS document that Keller's instructions make sense. Sure enough, on page 16, Influenza (J10-J11) is listed as 753 [deaths], and Pneumonia (J12-J18) accounts for the other 65,231 cases. Here are the total flu deaths from the report. From 1979 to 1995, the stats were released every two years. 1979: 604 1981: 3,006 1983: 1,431 1985: 2,054 1987: 632 1989: 1,593 1991: 1,137 1993: 1,044 1995: 606 1996: 745 1997: 720 1998: 1,724 1999: 1,665 2000: 1765 2001: 257 Don't believe me? Here is the page <http://www.lungusa.org/atf/cf/%7B7A8D42C2-FCCA-4604-8ADE-7F5D5E762256%7\ D/PI1.PDF> [as of October, 2004]: UPDATE: October 11, 2004, 12:30PM, Pacific Time: Here is another source, Martin Maloney, who has tracked the CDC page address cited by Keller. He offers his succinct confirmatory finding: Perhaps this is what you are looking for. Near the bottom of page 31 of that PDF document, you will find, under the heading: Table 10. Number of deaths from 113 selected causes by age: United States, 2001 - Con. //snip// Influenza and pneumonia (J10-J18) ........... 62,034 Influenza (J10-J11) ................................. 257 Pneumonia (J12-J18) ............................... 61,777 These researchers, mind you, were looking at the CDC's own data on the CDC sites. Avian2005 , Carol Ann <saffireskyes wrote: FRIDAY, Dec. 9 (HealthDay News) -- A Harvard grad student is charging that the U.S. government is hyping the threat of the annual (non-avian) strains of influenza. Specifically, Peter Doshi says, the estimate of 36,000 flu-related deaths a year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is unsupported by the available data. And, he suspects, the numbers may be inflated to help drug companies sell more flu vaccine. It's a familiar charge -- a quick scan of the Internet turns up several Web sites claiming much the same thing -- and like many others who make the claim, Doshi is not a medical expert. He's a student in Harvard's department of East Asian studies. But he presents his charges with one notable difference: They appear in the form of an article published in this week's issue of the prestigious British Medical Journal. In his one-page article, Doshi lauded the BMJ's " system of open discussion and open debate through their on-line bulletin board ... a very democratic form of scientific discourse. " His criticism centers on a 2003 paper in the Journal of the American Medical Association in which CDC experts increased their estimate of flu-related deaths from 20,000 a year to 36,000 a year. The reasons the agency used to justify that rise are dubious at best, Doshi said. For one thing, the National Center for Health Statistics lists only a few hundred deaths a year as directly caused by influenza, Doshi said. And the major explanation for the increased estimate -- the aging of the American population that puts more people in the highly vulnerable over-65 group -- doesn't hold water, he maintained. " The 65-plus population grew just 12 percent between 1990 and 2000, " Doshi wrote. How can the CDC justify an estimate of 36,000 U.S. deaths a year now when there were just 34,000 deaths recorded in the 1968-1969 " Hong Kong flu " epidemic? he asked. But William W. Thompson, the CDC epidemiologist who was the lead author of the 2003 paper, said Doshi is missing the big picture. The increase in older Americans has been substantial over the longer run -- up by 48 percent between 1976 and 1999, he said. The number of Americans in the most-vulnerable 85-and-older age group has doubled during that time, Thompson said. That increase in the older population explains why more Americans die in an ordinary flu year nowadays than in the Hong Kong pandemic, he said. Most of them don't die directly of the flu, Thompson stressed. Instead, the immediate cause of death is often listed as pneumonia. " Influenza is rarely reported on the death certificate, even though influenza is responsible for many deaths, " Thompson said. " Pneumonia and influenza are grouped together because many pneumonias result from influenza. Influenza is listed as a secondary cause of death. " That is not how Doshi sees it. Instead, his article talks of a " public relations approach " linked to drug company profits. " CDC is already working in the manufacturers' interest by conducting campaigns to increase vaccinations, " he wrote. " I don't understand that argument, " Thompson said. " We have used this method for the past 40 years, and we continue to use these estimates. We don't need drug manufacturers' approval or anything like it. " Thompson said the CDC's annual advice remains the same: " I think that people who are at high risk for flu- associated complications should get vaccinated. " Of the British Medical Journal, he said, " It surprises me that they would publish something like that without giving us a chance to reply. " Will there be a reply? " We're considering it, " Thompson said. More information Regards, Carol Ann~ 2000-08 Ends the Reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/11/06/cdc_media_hype_the_flu_facts_sho\ w_different_picture.htm This is the correct URL. Thursday, November 2, 2006, 6:41:17 PM, you wrote: YES--to the tune of 000% WE ARE LIVING IN THE MIDDLE OF A LIE. THE CDC IS FABRICATING AND SPINNING ITS OWN DATA TO CONVINCE US THAT THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE (ABOUT 36,000) ARE DYING FROM THE FLU EVERY YEAR IN THE US. WHEN ITS OWN POSTED DATA (UNDER ALL THE LIES) SHOWS THAT FLU IS ABOUT AS DEADLY AS ACCIDENTS INVOLVING TOASTERS FALLING ON PEOPLE FROM APARTMENT WINDOWS. http://www.whale.to/a/rapp.html <http://www.whale.to/a/rapp.html> CDC, Media Hype The Flu - Facts Show Different Picture <http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/11/06/cdc_media_hype_the_flu_\ facts_show_different_picture.htm> Vaccine maker Chiron had their license suspended and a year's worth of flu vaccines produced in a British factory was not approved for sale in the US - contamination problems. The media treated us to stories of seniors standing in line for hours to " get the flu shot " . What they did not say was that the flu is nowhere near as dangerous as they told us previously. Who has not... [read more <http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/11/06/cdc_media_hype_the_flu_\ facts_show_different_picture.htm> ] November 06, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/04/29/investigators_challenge_ cdc_flu_statistics_as_season_ draws_to_close.htm <http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/04/29/investigators_challenge\ _ cdc_flu_statistics_as_season_ draws_to_close.htm> " Trends in Pneumonia and Influenza/Morbidity and Mortality. " This report comes from " Research and Scientific Affairs/Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. " At the bottom of the document, the source is listed as: National Center for Health Statistics, Report of Final Mortality Statistics, 1979-2001. Get ready for some surprises, especially since the CDC keeps trumpeting flu-death annual numbers as 36,000. Like clockwork. Year in and year out. 36,000 people in the US die from the flu every year. Killer disease. Watch out. Get your flu shot. Every autumn. Don't wait. You might fall over dead in the street. I've found the preliminary data for 2002. It's at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_13.pdf <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_13.pdf> . It's in THIS document that Keller's instructions make sense. Sure enough, on page 16, Influenza (J10-J11) is listed as 753 [deaths], and Pneumonia (J12-J18) accounts for the other 65,231 cases. Here are the total flu deaths from the report. From 1979 to 1995, the stats were released every two years. 1979: 604 1981: 3,006 1983: 1,431 1985: 2,054 1987: 632 1989: 1,593 1991: 1,137 1993: 1,044 1995: 606 1996: 745 1997: 720 1998: 1,724 1999: 1,665 2000: 1765 2001: 257 Don't believe me? Here is the page <http://www.lungusa.org/atf/cf/%7B7A8D42C2-FCCA-4604-8ADE-7F5D5E762256%7\ D/PI1.PDF> [as of October, 2004]: UPDATE: October 11, 2004, 12:30PM, Pacific Time: Here is another source, Martin Maloney, who has tracked the CDC page address cited by Keller. He offers his succinct confirmatory finding: Perhaps this is what you are looking for. Near the bottom of page 31 of that PDF document, you will find, under the heading: Table 10. Number of deaths from 113 selected causes by age: United States, 2001 - Con. //snip// Influenza and pneumonia (J10-J18) ........... 62,034 Influenza (J10-J11) ................................. 257 Pneumonia (J12-J18) ............................... 61,777 These researchers, mind you, were looking at the CDC's own data on the CDC sites. Avian2005 , Carol Ann <saffireskyes wrote: FRIDAY, Dec. 9 (HealthDay News) -- A Harvard grad student is charging that the U.S. government is hyping the threat of the annual (non-avian) strains of influenza. Specifically, Peter Doshi says, the estimate of 36,000 flu-related deaths a year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is unsupported by the available data. And, he suspects, the numbers may be inflated to help drug companies sell more flu vaccine. It's a familiar charge -- a quick scan of the Internet turns up several Web sites claiming much the same thing -- and like many others who make the claim, Doshi is not a medical expert. He's a student in Harvard's department of East Asian studies. But he presents his charges with one notable difference: They appear in the form of an article published in this week's issue of the prestigious British Medical Journal. In his one-page article, Doshi lauded the BMJ's " system of open discussion and open debate through their on-line bulletin board ... a very democratic form of scientific discourse. " His criticism centers on a 2003 paper in the Journal of the American Medical Association in which CDC experts increased their estimate of flu-related deaths from 20,000 a year to 36,000 a year. The reasons the agency used to justify that rise are dubious at best, Doshi said. For one thing, the National Center for Health Statistics lists only a few hundred deaths a year as directly caused by influenza, Doshi said. And the major explanation for the increased estimate -- the aging of the American population that puts more people in the highly vulnerable over-65 group -- doesn't hold water, he maintained. " The 65-plus population grew just 12 percent between 1990 and 2000, " Doshi wrote. How can the CDC justify an estimate of 36,000 U.S. deaths a year now when there were just 34,000 deaths recorded in the 1968-1969 " Hong Kong flu " epidemic? he asked. But William W. Thompson, the CDC epidemiologist who was the lead author of the 2003 paper, said Doshi is missing the big picture. The increase in older Americans has been substantial over the longer run -- up by 48 percent between 1976 and 1999, he said. The number of Americans in the most-vulnerable 85-and-older age group has doubled during that time, Thompson said. That increase in the older population explains why more Americans die in an ordinary flu year nowadays than in the Hong Kong pandemic, he said. Most of them don't die directly of the flu, Thompson stressed. Instead, the immediate cause of death is often listed as pneumonia. " Influenza is rarely reported on the death certificate, even though influenza is responsible for many deaths, " Thompson said. " Pneumonia and influenza are grouped together because many pneumonias result from influenza. Influenza is listed as a secondary cause of death. " That is not how Doshi sees it. Instead, his article talks of a " public relations approach " linked to drug company profits. " CDC is already working in the manufacturers' interest by conducting campaigns to increase vaccinations, " he wrote. " I don't understand that argument, " Thompson said. " We have used this method for the past 40 years, and we continue to use these estimates. We don't need drug manufacturers' approval or anything like it. " Thompson said the CDC's annual advice remains the same: " I think that people who are at high risk for flu- associated complications should get vaccinated. " Of the British Medical Journal, he said, " It surprises me that they would publish something like that without giving us a chance to reply. " Will there be a reply? " We're considering it, " Thompson said. More information Regards, Carol Ann~ 2000-08 Ends the Reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.