Guest guest Posted October 1, 2006 Report Share Posted October 1, 2006 This ties in very well to the allegations that some high ranking officials knew about the 9-11 attacks, but wanted them to succeed to further their right wing agenda. Alobar On 10/1/06, Ward Reilly <wardpeace wrote: > Two Months Before 9/11, an Urgent Warning to Rice > The Washington Post > > Sunday 01 October 2006 > > Editor's Note: How much effort the Bush administration made in going > after Osama bin Laden before the attacks of September 11, 2001, became an > issue last week after former president Bill Clinton accused President Bush's > " neocons " and other Republicans of ignoring bin Laden until the attacks. > Rice responded in an interview that, " what we did in the eight months was at > least as aggressive as what the Clinton administration did in the preceding > years. " -The Washington Post > > On July 10, 2001, two months before the attacks on the World Trade > Center and the Pentagon, then-CIA Director George J. Tenet met with his > counterterrorism chief, J. Cofer Black, at CIA headquarters to review the > latest on Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda terrorist organization. Black > laid out the case, consisting of communications intercepts and other > top-secret intelligence showing the increasing likelihood that al-Qaeda > would soon attack the United States. It was a mass of fragments and dots > that nonetheless made a compelling case, so compelling to Tenet that he > decided he and Black should go to the White House immediately. > > Tenet called Condoleezza Rice, then national security adviser, from the > car and said he needed to see her right away. There was no practical way she > could refuse such a request from the CIA director. > > For months, Tenet had been pressing Rice to set a clear counterterrorism > policy, including specific presidential orders called " findings " that would > give the CIA stronger authority to conduct covert action against bin Laden. > Perhaps a dramatic appearance - Black called it an " out of cycle " session, > beyond Tenet's regular weekly meeting with Rice - would get her attention. > > Tenet had been losing sleep over the recent intelligence he'd seen. > There was no conclusive, smoking-gun intelligence, but there was such a huge > volume of data that an intelligence officer's instinct strongly suggested > that something was coming. He and Black hoped to convey the depth of their > anxiety and get Rice to kick-start the government into immediate action. > > He did not know when, where or how, but Tenet felt there was too much > noise in the intelligence systems. Two weeks earlier, he had told Richard A. > Clarke, the National Security Council's counterterrorism director: " It's my > sixth sense, but I feel it coming. This is going to be the big one. " > > But Tenet had been having difficulty getting traction on an immediate > bin Laden action plan, in part because Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld > had questioned all the National Security Agency intercepts and other > intelligence. Could all this be a grand deception? Rumsfeld had asked. > Perhaps it was a plan to measure U.S. reactions and defenses. > > Tenet had the NSA review all the intercepts, and the agency concluded > they were of genuine al-Qaeda communications. On June 30, a top-secret > senior executive intelligence brief contained an article headlined " Bin > Laden Threats Are Real. " > > Tenet hoped his abrupt request for an immediate meeting would shake > Rice. He and Black, a veteran covert operator, had two main points when they > met with her. First, al-Qaeda was going to attack American interests, > possibly in the United States itself. Black emphasized that this amounted to > a strategic warning, meaning the problem was so serious that it required an > overall plan and strategy. Second, this was a major foreign policy problem > that needed to be addressed immediately. They needed to take action that > moment - covert, military, whatever - to thwart bin Laden. > > The United States had human and technical sources, and all the > intelligence was consistent, the two men told Rice. Black acknowledged that > some of it was uncertain " voodoo " but said it was often this voodoo that was > the best indicator. > > Tenet and Black felt they were not getting through to Rice. She was > polite, but they felt the brush-off. President Bush had said he didn't want > to swat at flies. > > As they all knew, a coherent plan for covert action against bin Laden > was in the pipeline, but it would take some time. In recent closed-door > meetings the entire National Security Council apparatus had been considering > action against bin Laden, including using a new secret weapon: the Predator > unmanned aerial vehicle, or drone, that could fire Hellfire missiles to kill > him or his lieutenants. It looked like a possible solution, but there was a > raging debate between the CIA and the Pentagon about who would pay for it > and who would have authority to shoot. > > Besides, Rice seemed focused on other administration priorities, > especially the ballistic missile defense system that Bush had campaigned on. > She was in a different place. > > Tenet left the meeting feeling frustrated. Though Rice had given them a > fair hearing, no immediate action meant great risk. Black felt the decision > to just keep planning was a sustained policy failure. Rice and the Bush team > had been in hibernation too long. " Adults should not have a system like > this, " he said later. > > The July 10 meeting between Tenet, Black and Rice went unmentioned in > the various reports of investigations into the Sept. 11 attacks, but it > stood out in the minds of Tenet and Black as the starkest warning they had > given the White House on bin Laden and al-Qaeda. Though the investigators > had access to all the paperwork on the meeting, Black felt there were things > the commissions wanted to know about and things they didn't want to know > about. > > Philip D. Zelikow, the aggressive executive director of the Sept. 11 > commission and a University of Virginia professor who had co-authored a book > with Rice on Germany, knew something about the July 10 meeting, but it was > not clear to him what immediate action really would have meant. In 2005 Rice > hired Zelikow as a top aide at the State Department. > > Afterward, Tenet looked back on the meeting with Rice as a tremendous > lost opportunity to prevent or disrupt the Sept. 11 attacks. Rice could have > gotten through to Bush on the threat, but she just didn't get it in time, > Tenet thought. He felt that he had done his job and had been very direct > about the threat, but that Rice had not moved quickly. He felt she was not > organized and did not push people, as he tried to do at the CIA. > > Black later said, " The only thing we didn't do was pull the trigger to > the gun we were holding to her head. " > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.